Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(1): 15-30, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23788228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excluding disinfectants, pyrethrins and pyrethroids are the pesticides used most commonly in and around homes. Respiratory effects and paresthesia are among the concerns about pyrethrin/pyrethroid exposures. METHODS: Acute pesticide-related illness/injury cases were identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation from 2000-2008. Characteristics and incidence rates were determined for acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness/injury cases. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine odds of respiratory and dermal symptoms in persons with illness/injury following pyrethrin/pyrethroid exposure compared to persons with illness/injury following exposure to other pesticides. RESULTS: A total of 4,974 cases of acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness were identified. Incidence rates increased over time, reaching 8 cases/million population in 2008. The majority of cases were low severity (85%) and 34% were work-related. Respiratory effects were the most common symptoms reported (48%). Risk of acute respiratory effects were significantly elevated among persons exposed only to pyrethrins (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49-2.16), only to pyrethroids (aOR 1.99 95% CI: 1.77-2.24), to a mixture of pyrethroids (aOR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.99-2.81) or to a mixture containing both pyrethrins and pyrethroids (aOR 2.99; 95% CI: 2.33-3.84) compared to those with illness arising from exposure to other pesticides. The most common factors contributing to pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness included exposure from spills/splashes, improper storage, and failure to evacuate during pesticide application. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness/injury is relatively low but is increasing. As such, additional measures to prevent them are needed.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Insecticides/toxicity , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pyrethrins/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Insecticides/poisoning , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Poisoning/epidemiology , Pyrethrins/poisoning , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
J Agromedicine ; 18(2): 151-73, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23540306

ABSTRACT

On December 10, 2009, a fumigation stack containing aluminum phosphide became soaked with rain water and caught fire at a pistachio processing plant in Kern County, California. Untrained plant personnel responding to the fire had exposure to pyrolysis by-products, particulates, and extinguisher ingredients. Ten workers taken for medical evaluation had respiratory and nonspecific systemic symptoms consistent with exposure to phosphine gas. Six of the 10 workers had respiratory distress, indicated by chest pain, shortness of breath, elevated respiratory rate, or decreased oxygen saturation. Recommendations are made for the management of similar illnesses and prevention of similar exposures.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , Food-Processing Industry , Phosphines/poisoning , Phosphines/toxicity , Poisoning/etiology , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , California , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Eye/drug effects , Fires , Fumigation , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Phosphines/administration & dosage , Phosphines/chemistry , Pistacia , Poisoning/prevention & control , Skin/drug effects , Young Adult
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 55(7): 571-83, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22495938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Farmworkers have a high risk for acute pesticide-related illness and injury, and the rate among female farmworkers is approximately twice as high as that among males. Surveillance data were used to identify reasons for this gender difference. METHODS: We identified acute pesticide-related illness and injury cases among farmworkers from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR)-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Gender-specific associations with acute pesticide-related illness and injury were assessed using chi-square tests. National Agricultural Workers Survey data were also examined. RESULTS: The over-representation of females among farmworker illness and injury cases was confined to females who did not handle pesticides (non-handlers). Female non-handler farmworkers who were affected were more likely to be working on fruit and nut crops, to be exposed to off-target pesticide drift, and to be exposed to fungicides and fumigants compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an increased risk for acute pesticide-related illness and injury among female farmworkers, the absolute number of farmworkers with acute pesticide-related illness and injury is far higher among males than females. Furthermore, farmworkers have little or no control over many of the identified contributing factors that led to illness and injury. Stringent enforcement of existing regulations and enhanced regulatory efforts to protect against off-target drift exposures may have the highest impact in reducing acute pesticide-related illness and injury among farmworkers.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Pesticides/toxicity , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Risk , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Statistics as Topic , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Environ Health Perspect ; 119(8): 1162-9, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642048

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and off-target pesticide drift exposes workers and the public to harmful chemicals. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the incidence of acute illnesses from pesticide drift from outdoor agricultural applications and characterized drift exposure and illnesses. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Drift included off-target movement of pesticide spray, volatiles, and contaminated dust. Acute illness cases were characterized by demographics, pesticide and application variables, health effects, and contributing factors. RESULTS: From 1998 through 2006, we identified 2,945 cases associated with agricultural pesticide drift from 11 states. Our findings indicate that 47% were exposed at work, 92% experienced low-severity illness, and 14% were children (< 15 years). The annual incidence ranged from 1.39 to 5.32 per million persons over the 9-year period. The overall incidence (in million person-years) was 114.3 for agricultural workers, 0.79 for other workers, 1.56 for nonoccupational cases, and 42.2 for residents in five agriculture-intensive counties in California. Soil applications with fumigants were responsible for the largest percentage (45%) of cases. Aerial applications accounted for 24% of cases. Common factors contributing to drift cases included weather conditions, improper seal of the fumigation site, and applicator carelessness near nontarget areas. CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural workers and residents in agricultural regions had the highest rate of pesticide poisoning from drift exposure, and soil fumigations were a major hazard, causing large drift incidents. Our findings highlight areas where interventions to reduce off-target drift could be focused.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Pesticides/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
5.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 48(7): 737-44, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20849331

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fipronil is a broad-spectrum phenylpyrazole insecticide widely used to control residential pests and is also commonly used for flea and tick treatment on pets. It is a relatively new insecticide and few human toxicity data exist on fipronil. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the magnitude and characteristics of acute illnesses associated with fipronil exposure. METHODS: Illness cases associated with exposure to fipronil-containing products from 2001 to 2007 were identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR)-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. RESULTS: A total of 103 cases were identified in 11 states. Annual case counts increased from 5 in 2001 to 30 in 2007. Of the cases, 55% were female, the median age was 37 years, and 11% were <15 years old. The majority (76%) had exposure in a private residence, 37% involved the use of pet-care products, and 26% had work-related exposures. Most cases (89%) had mild, temporary health effects. Neurological symptoms (50%) such as headache, dizziness, and paresthesia were the most common, followed by ocular (44%), gastrointestinal (28%), respiratory (27%), and dermal (21%) symptoms/signs. Exposures usually occurred from inadvertent spray/splash/spill of products or inadequate ventilation of the treated area before re-entry. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that exposure to fipronil can pose a risk for mild, temporary health effects in various body systems. Precautionary actions should be reinforced to prevent fipronil exposure to product users.


Subject(s)
Insecticides/poisoning , Pyrazoles/poisoning , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Protective Devices , Time Factors , United States
6.
J Agromedicine ; 15(1): 24-37, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20390729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate illnesses resulting from community exposure to chloropicrin on October 5, 2005, in the agricultural community of Salinas, California. METHODS: A cross-sectional interview survey was conducted of 142 households downwind from the application site in neighborhoods that were sources of emergency calls. A total of 439 residents of the 142 households in affected neighborhoods and 1 emergency responder were interviewed. The authors assessed exposure to chloropicrin resulting from the application using a public domain air pollution dispersion model, the Industrial Source Complex 3 (ISC3). RESULTS: A total of 440 subjects were represented in the interviews, including 324 (73.6%) who reported symptoms possibly or probably related to chloropicrin exposure. Ocular symptoms were present in 302 (93.2%) of the symptomatic cases. Nonocular (usually systemic or respiratory) symptoms occurred in 170 cases (52.5%), but occurred significantly more frequently in residents who lived within 0.46 miles of the application site. Air-modeling showed a plume of chloropicrin in the affected neighborhoods, with estimated 1-h TWA (time-weighted average) air concentrations between 0.15 and 0.025 ppm. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular, respiratory, and systemic symptoms on the evening of October 5, 2005, corresponded to a plume of chloropicrin, with estimated concentrations as high as 0.15 ppm, in the community of Salinas, California. Cases occurred between 0.36 and 2.89 miles from the application site. Use of irritant agricultural fumigants near residential neighborhoods can produce a risk of illness for distances more than 2 miles from the site of application. Air modeling is useful for evaluating the relationship between possible exposures and community symptoms.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/toxicity , Agriculture , Air Pollutants/toxicity , California , Chemical Warfare Agents/toxicity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Fumigation , Humans , Irritants , Pesticides , Respiratory System , Risk Assessment
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 51(12): 883-98, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18666136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 75% of pesticide usage in the United States occurs in agriculture. As such, agricultural workers are at greater risk of pesticide exposure than non-agricultural workers. However, the magnitude, characteristics and trend of acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers are unknown. METHODS: We identified acute pesticide poisoning cases in agricultural workers between the ages of 15 and 64 years that occurred from 1998 to 2005. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the SENSOR-Pesticides program provided the cases. Acute occupational pesticide poisoning incidence rates (IR) for those employed in agriculture were calculated, as were incidence rate ratios (IRR) among agricultural workers relative to non-agricultural workers. RESULTS: Of the 3,271 cases included in the analysis, 2,334 (71%) were employed as farmworkers. The remaining cases were employed as processing/packing plant workers (12%), farmers (3%), and other miscellaneous agricultural workers (19%). The majority of cases had low severity illness (N = 2,848, 87%), while 402 (12%) were of medium severity and 20 (0.6%) were of high severity. One case was fatal. Rates of illness among various agricultural worker categories were highly variable but all, except farmers, showed risk for agricultural workers greater than risk for non-agricultural workers by an order of magnitude or more. Also, the rate among female agricultural workers was almost twofold higher compared to males. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that acute pesticide poisoning in the agricultural industry continues to be an important problem. These findings reinforce the need for heightened efforts to better protect farmworkers from pesticide exposure.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/chemically induced , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides/poisoning , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pest Control , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Public Health Rep ; 122(2): 232-44, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17357366

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to describe the national magnitude and characteristics of acute pesticide poisoning among workers and customers in retail establishments. METHODS: Analyses included retail employees 15-64 years of age and customers with acute pesticide poisoning identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides (SENSOR-Pesticides) and California Department of Pesticide Regulation from 1998 to 2004. Pesticide poisoning incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 325 cases of acute pesticide poisoning were identified. Of these cases, 287 (88%) were retail employees and 38 (12%) were customers. Overall, retail employees had a significantly lower acute pesticide poisoning incidence rate compared with non-agricultural, non-retail employees (IRR=0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.47, 0.59). However, significantly elevated pesticide poisoning incidence rates were observed for four retail occupations (janitors, stock handlers/baggers, bakery/deli clerks, and shipping/receiving handlers). In addition, workers employed in two retail industry sectors (farm supply stores and hardware stores) had significantly elevated acute pesticide poisoning incidence rates. Incidence rates among the retail employees demonstrated a quadratic trend, monotonically decreasing from 1998 to 2000 and monotonically increasing from 2000 to 2003. The rates appear to have leveled off in 2003 and 2004. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive measures to decrease acute pesticide poisoning incidence in the retail sector include adoption of unbreakable and tear-resistant container requirements, increased utilization of integrated pest management strategies, and advisement to store managers, employees, and customers about poisoning prevention.


Subject(s)
Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Organophosphate Poisoning , Pesticides/poisoning , Product Packaging/standards , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Food Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Organophosphates/supply & distribution , Pesticides/supply & distribution , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Agromedicine ; 11(2): 67-79, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17135144

ABSTRACT

The California Pesticide Illness Surveillance Program (PISP) is a major resource for pesticide illness epidemiology. This work attempts to improve characterization of pesticide illness in California, evaluate case ascertainment of the PISP and identify PISP's limitations and biases for studying the incidence and epidemiology of pesticide-related illness. Abstractors collected standardized information from 1994-1996 PISP files, poison control logs, hospital records, and death certificates. Linkage produced a merged file of all records that documented consideration of pesticide exposure as a cause of ill health. We identified 23 deaths and estimated 1,310 hospitalizations attributable to pesticide exposure, corresponding to 0.024 fatalities and 1.38 hospitalizations (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.74) per 100,000 California population person-years. Most intoxications followed domestic exposures and were not reported to the surveillance program, which identified primarily occupational exposures. Excluding groups of five or more, we estimated 16% ascertainment (CI = 0.05-0.27) for non-agricultural occupational cases. Agricultural connections increased the probability of ascertainment to about 50%, cultural and economic barriers notwithstanding. Surveillance records existed for all identified episodes in which five or more people were exposed. California pesticide surveillance data appear complete for mass exposures, and adequate to characterize agricultural and occupational exposures. Work is needed to explore domestic exposures and occurrences beyond the reach of the health care system.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/chemically induced , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pesticides/poisoning , Poisoning/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , California , Child , Child, Preschool , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Poison Control Centers , Suicide/statistics & numerical data
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 49(5): 383-93, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16570258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emergency responders are among the first to arrive at a pesticide-related release event. Magnitude, severity, and risk factor information on acute pesticide poisoning among those workers is needed. METHODS: Survey data collected from the SENSOR-Pesticides, CDPR and HSEES programs between 1993 and 2002 from 21 states were reviewed. Acute occupational pesticide-related illness incidence rates for each category of emergency responder were calculated, as were incidence rate ratios (IRR) among emergency responders compared to all other workers employed in non-agricultural industries. RESULTS: A total of 291 cases were identified. Firefighters accounted for 111 cases (38%), law enforcement officers for 104 cases (36%), emergency medical technicians for 34 cases (12%), and 42 cases (14%) were unspecified emergency responders. Among the 200 cases with information on activity responsible for exposure, most were exposed while performing activities related to a pesticide release event (84%) and not involving patient care, while the remainder involved exposure to pesticide-contaminated patients. A majority of cases were exposed to insecticides (51%). Most had low severity illnesses (90%). The incidence rate was highest for firefighters (39.1/million) and law enforcement officers (26.6/million). The IRRs were also elevated for these professions (firefighters, IRR = 2.67; law enforcement officers, IRR = 1.69). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest the need for greater efforts to prevent acute occupational pesticide-related illness among emergency responders.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Technicians , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides/poisoning , Police , Adolescent , Adult , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
11.
JAMA ; 294(4): 455-65, 2005 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16046652

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Pesticides continue to be used on school property, and some schools are at risk of pesticide drift exposure from neighboring farms, which leads to pesticide exposure among students and school employees. However, information on the magnitude of illnesses and risk factors associated with these pesticide exposures is not available. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of and associated risk factors for pesticide-related illnesses at schools. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of surveillance data from 1998 to 2002 of 2593 persons with acute pesticide-related illnesses associated with exposure at schools. Nationwide information on pesticide-related illnesses is routinely collected by 3 national pesticide surveillance systems: the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks pesticides program, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, and the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rates and severity of acute pesticide-related illnesses. RESULTS: Incidence rates for 1998-2002 were 7.4 cases per million children and 27.3 cases per million school employee full-time equivalents. The incidence rates among children increased significantly from 1998 to 2002. Illness of high severity was found in 3 cases (0.1%), moderate severity in 275 cases (11%), and low severity in 2315 cases (89%). Most illnesses were associated with insecticides (n = 895, 35%), disinfectants (n = 830, 32%), repellents (n = 335, 13%), or herbicides (n = 279, 11%). Among 406 cases with detailed information on the source of pesticide exposure, 281 (69%) were associated with pesticides used at schools and 125 (31%) were associated with pesticide drift exposure from farmland. CONCLUSIONS: Pesticide exposure at schools produces acute illnesses among school employees and students. To prevent pesticide-related illnesses at schools, implementation of integrated pest management programs in schools, practices to reduce pesticide drift, and adoption of pesticide spray buffer zones around schools are recommended.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Pesticides/toxicity , Schools , Acute Disease , Adult , Child , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Poisoning/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Schools/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Agromedicine ; 10(4): 27-42, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16702121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the health effects of methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) and other byproducts resulting from the soil-incorporated (shank) application of 25,000 pounds of metam-sodium on July 8, 2002, near the community of Arvin, California. METHODS: Residents in a four-block area were interviewed regarding eye and upper respiratory irritation, non-specific systemic symptoms, and lower respiratory complaints. The distribution of cases was compared to results of Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) air dispersion modeling for the metam-sodium byproduct, methyl isothiocyanate (MITC). The 1-hour 200 ppb no-observed-effect- level (NOEL) and 800 ppb lowest-observed-effect level (LOEL) from a previous human eye irritation study were used to interpret the results of the air modeling estimates. Peak concentrations were compared to the 4-minute NOEL of 600 ppb and the LOEL of 1.9 ppm. RESULTS: Two-hundred-fifty-two cases of irritant, non-specific systemic, and respiratory symptoms were associated with the metam-sodium application. These included 178 community residents or visitors and 74 employees of a carrot packing operation located in the affected neighborhood of Arvin. The most severe reported illness occurred in a community visitor with a history of pre-existing pulmonary disease, who was hospitalized for a week with respiratory distress. ISC3 Modeling indicated 1-hour MITC concentrations in the affected community ranged from 0.8-1.0 ppm, in the range of the LOEL, with peak concentrations between 2.4 and 3.2 ppm. CONCLUSION: Estimated MITC concentrations during the episode exceeded both the 4-minute NOEL and 1-hourNOELby approximately four fold. The high concentrations of MITC present in the affected neighborhood may have been partially attributable to failure to immediately complete a required post-application water-treatment on 15 of the 100 treated acres. However, because of the limited area involved, the violation was unlikely to have accounted for the entire incident. Similar episodes may occur when metam-sodium fumigants are used adjacent to other rural communities.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Herbicides/toxicity , Isothiocyanates/toxicity , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/chemically induced , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , California/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Occupational Exposure , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced
13.
Environ Health Perspect ; 111(13): 1654-9, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14527846

ABSTRACT

Working youths face many safety and health risks. Among these risks are those posed by disinfectant exposures. In this study we describe acute occupational disinfectant-related illness among youth. Data on U.S. children younger than 18 years with acute occupational disinfectant-related illnesses between 1993 and 1998 were collected from the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System and from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. We analyzed data from persons with exposures who met the case definition for acute occupational disinfectant-related illness. The case definition required onset of new adverse health effects that were both temporally related to a disinfectant exposure and consistent with the known toxicology of the disinfectant. We calculated incidence rates of acute occupational disinfectant-related illness among youths 15-17 years old and incidence rate ratios to compare these rates with those of adults 25-44 years old. We found 307 children with disinfectant-related illnesses. The average annual incidence rate was 16.8/billion hours worked with a relative risk compared with adults of 4.14 (95% confidence interval, 3.66-4.68). Most illnesses were of mild severity (78%). There were no fatalities. Hypochlorites (e.g., bleach) were responsible for 45% of the illnesses. Among the 206 cases where the responsible disinfectant's U.S. Environmental Protection Agency toxicity category was known, 80% were in category I (highest toxicity level). These findings suggest the need for greater efforts to prevent adolescent acute occupational disinfectant-related illness. This may require strengthening regulations and enforcement as well as increased educational efforts directed at employers, youths, parents, school officials, and physicians. Better mechanisms for reporting and tracking chemical illnesses among working adolescents are also needed.


Subject(s)
Chlorine Compounds/toxicity , Disinfectants/toxicity , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Population Surveillance , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Employment , Female , Humans , Hypochlorous Acid/toxicity , Incidence , Male , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Oxidants/toxicity
14.
Am J Public Health ; 93(4): 605-10, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12660205

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe acute occupational pesticide-related illnesses among youths and to provide prevention recommendations. METHODS: Survey data from 8 states and from poison control center data were analyzed. Illness incidence rates and incidence rate ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 531 youths were identified with acute occupational pesticide-related illnesses. Insecticides were responsible for most of these illnesses (68%), most of which were of minor severity (79%). The average annual incidence rate among youths aged 15 to 17 years was 20.4 per billion hours worked, and the incidence rate ratio among youths vs adults was 1.71 (95% confidence interval = 1.53, 1.91). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest the need for greater efforts to prevent acute occupational pesticide-related illnesses among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pesticides/poisoning , Population Surveillance , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/chemically induced , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Fungicides, Industrial/poisoning , Humans , Incidence , Insecticides/poisoning , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/classification , Occupations/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Pesticides/classification , Public Health Informatics , Pyrethrins/poisoning , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...