Decreased condom breakage and slippage rates after counseling men at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Jamaica.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate condom failure (breakage and slippage) rates before and those during a trial that provided instructions on correct condom use. METHOD: Our analysis was based on 314 men who presented with urethral discharge at Jamaica's largest sexually transmitted infection clinic and were enrolled into our 6-month trial. RESULTS: Participants reported breaking 18.5% (95% confidence interval=12.8-24.1%) of their condoms during the 7 days prior to the screening visit and having 3.5% (95% confidence interval=1.2-5.7%) of their condoms slip off completely. After the condom counseling provided during the screening visit, breakage rates decreased (p<.05) and remained below 10% throughout the trial. During in-depth interviews, the men who reported frequent condom failures cited (1) improper storage/exposure to heat, (2) improper handling while putting on condoms and (3) use of lubricants/improper lubricants as the possible reasons for their high failure rates. CONCLUSION: Although the rates of reported condom breakage and slippage decreased significantly after counseling, we need to improve the quality of condom counseling to further reduce failure rates.

Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: A randomized controlled trial to inform a World Health Organization family planning handbook.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare 3 different approaches for increasing clients' understanding of contraceptive effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN: We randomized 900 reproductive-age women in India and Jamaica to 1 of 3 charts presenting pregnancy risk. RESULTS: The most important reason for choosing a contraceptive was how well it prevents pregnancy (54%) followed by few side effects (17%). At baseline, knowledge about contraceptive effectiveness was poor. About half knew oral contraceptive pills are more effective than condoms (46%) and intrauterine devices are more effective than injectables (50%). All 3 charts improved knowledge significantly (P < .01) for these 2 questions. No chart improved knowledge better than any other (P > .05). The chart ranking contraceptive methods on a continuum was judged slightly easier to understand than the other 2 charts. CONCLUSION: Only with accurate understanding of pregnancy risk can clients make informed choices. Our results have already informed a global handbook for family planning providers to use the chart ranking contraceptive methods on a continuum.