Differential diagnosis of breast mucinous carcinoma with an oval shape from fibroadenoma based on ultrasonographic features.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of breast mucinous carcinomas (MCs) are oval and have the possibility of being misdiagnosed as fibroadenomas (FAs). We aimed to identify the key features that can help differentiate breast MC with an oval shape from FA on ultrasonography (US). METHODS: Seventy-six MCs from 71 consecutive patients and 50 FAs with an oval shape from 50 consecutive patients were included in our study. All lesions pathologically diagnosed. According to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), first, the ultrasonographic features of the MCs and FAs were recorded and a final category was assessed. Then, the differences in ultrasonographic characteristics between category 4 A (low-risk group) and category 4B-5 (medium-high- risk group) MCs were identified. Finally, other ultrasonographic features of MC and FA both with an oval shape were compared to determine the key factors for differential diagnosis. The Mann-Whitney test, χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare data between groups. RESULTS: MCs with an oval shape (81.2%) and a circumscribed margin (25%) on US were more commonly assessed in the low-risk group (BI-RADS 4 A) than in the medium-high-risk group (BI-RADS 4B-5) (20%, p < 0.001 and 0%, p = 0.001, respectively). Compared with those with FA, patients with MC were older, and tended to have masses with non-hypoechoic patterns, not circumscribed margins, and a posterior echo enhancement on US (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: The oval shape was the main reason for the underestimation of MCs. On US, an oval mass found in the breast of women of older age with non-hypoechoic patterns, not circumscribed margins, and a posterior echo enhancement was associated with an increased risk of being an MC, and should be subjected to active biopsy.

Deep learning combining mammography and ultrasound images to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US 4A lesions in women with dense breasts: a diagnostic study.

OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to assess the performance of a deep learning (DL) model, based on a combination of ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images, for predicting malignancy in breast lesions categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) US 4A in diagnostic patients with dense breasts. METHODS: A total of 992 patients were randomly allocated into the training cohort and the test cohort at a proportion of 4:1. Another, 218 patients were enrolled to form a prospective validation cohort. The DL model was developed by incorporating both US and MG images. The predictive performance of the combined DL model for malignancy was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The combined DL model was then compared to a clinical nomogram model and to the DL model trained using US image only and to that trained MG image only. RESULTS: The combined DL model showed satisfactory diagnostic performance for predicting malignancy in breast lesions, with an AUC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.874-1.000) in the test cohort, and an AUC of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.817-0.995) in the validation cohort, which was significantly higher than the clinical nomogram model, and the DL model for US or MG alone ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study developed an objective DL model combining both US and MG imaging features, which was proven to be more accurate for predicting malignancy in the BI-RADS US 4A breast lesions of patients with dense breasts. This model may then be used to more accurately guide clinicians' choices about whether performing biopsies in breast cancer diagnosis.

Predicting the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features and the use of nomograms: a prospective single-center observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish two preoperative nomograms to evaluate the risk for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in early breast cancer patients based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 593 consecutive female participants who were diagnosed with cT1-3N0-1M0 breast cancer between March 2018 and May 2019 at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. The participants were randomly classified into training and validation sets in a 4:1 ratio for the development and validation of the nomograms, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of ALN status. We developed Nomogram A and Nomogram B to predict ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence) and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 528 participants were evaluated in the final analyses. Multivariable analysis revealed that the number of suspicious lymph nodes, long axis, short-to-long axis ratio, cortical thickness, tumor location, and histological grade were independent predictors of ALN status. The AUCs of nomogram A in the training and validation groups were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. The AUCs of nomogram B in the training and validation groups were 0.87 and 0.87, respectively. Both nomograms were well-calibrated. CONCLUSION: We developed two preoperative nomograms that can be used to predict ALN metastasis (presence vs. absence) and the number of metastatic ALNs (≤ 2 vs. > 2) in early breast cancer patients. Both nomograms are useful tools that will help clinicians predict the risk of ALN metastasis and facilitate therapy decision-making about axillary surgery. KEY POINTS: • We developed two preoperative nomograms to predict axillary lymph node status based on ultrasonographic-clinicopathologic features. • Nomogram A was used to predict axillary lymph node metastasis (presence vs. absence). The AUCs in the training and validation groups were 0.83 and 0.78, respectively. Nomogram B was used to estimate the number of metastatic lymph nodes ( ≤ 2 vs. > 2). The AUCs in the training and validation group were 0.87 and 0.87, respectively. • Our nomograms may help clinicians weigh the risks and benefits of axillary surgery more appropriately.

A new nomogram for predicting the malignant diagnosis of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonography category 4A lesions in women with dense breast tissue in the diagnostic setting.

BACKGROUND: Biopsy has been recommended for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions. However, the malignancy rate of category 4A lesions is very low (2-10%). Therefore, most biopsies of category 4A lesions are benign, and the results will generally cause additional health care costs and patient anxiety. METHODS: A prediction model was developed based on an analysis of 418 BI-RADS ultrasonography (US) category 4A patients at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to identify significant variables for inclusion in the final nomogram. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. An independent cohort of 97 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University was used for external validation. RESULTS: The independent risk factors from the multivariate analysis for the training cohort were family history of breast cancer (OR =4.588, P=0.004), US features [margin (OR =2.916, P=0.019), shape (irregular vs. oval, OR =2.474, P=0.044; round vs. oval, OR =1.935, P=0.276), parallel orientation vs. not parallel (OR =2.204, P=0.040)], low suspicious lymph nodes (OR =7.664, P=0.019), and suspicious calcifications on mammography (MG) (OR =6.736, P=0.001). The C-index was good in the training [0.813, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.733 to 0.893] and validation cohorts (0.765, 95% CI, 0.584 to 0.946). The calibration curves showed optimal agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observations for the probability of malignancy. Also, the cutoff score was set to 100 for discriminating high and low risk. The model performed well in discerning different risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a well-discriminated and calibrated nomogram to predict the malignancy of BI-RADS US category 4A lesions in dense breast tissue, which may help clinicians identify patients at lower or higher risk.

Specimen number based diagnostic yields of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in core biopsy in breast cancer: clinical implications from a prospective exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is widely applied in the pathological diagnosis of suspicious axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in breast cancer. However, the number of specimens removed during biopsy is currently based on the preference of the individual radiologist. This study aims to analyze the specimen number based diagnostic yields of US guided CNB of suspicious ALNs in breast cancer. METHODS: Core biopsy specimens of suspicious lymph nodes were prospectively obtained from breast cancer patients treated at our hospital between November, 2018, and July, 2019. Four specimens were obtained from each patient and labeled 1-4 in the order they were removed. Each specimen underwent pathological evaluation to determine whether metastasis had occurred. The diagnostic yields of the specimens were calculated and differences in diagnostic accuracy according to the number of specimens were evaluated by McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, and 139 (83.2%) cases were identified as metastasis by CNB. The diagnostic yields were: 74.2% (specimen 1), 87.8% (specimens 1-2), 91.2% (specimens 1-3), and 94.6% (specimens 1-4). The increases in diagnostic yield from specimen 1 to 1-2 and from specimens 1-2 to 1-4 were significant; however, no significant differences were detected between specimens 1-3 and the first two, or between specimens 1-4 and the first three in this sample size. The lower diagnostic abilities for the first two specimens were associated with shorter long- and short-axis lengths of lymph nodes on US. CONCLUSIONS: Although the second specimen contributed significant diagnostic yield of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in core biopsy in breast cancer, a minimum number cannot be determined by this study. Additional specimens may improve diagnostic yield particularly in patients with small nodes.

Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Versus Surgical Resection in Patients With Breast Desmoid Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that desmoid tumors can be managed more conservatively rather than undergoing wide surgical resection (SR). Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (UGVAB) is a minimally invasive technique. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcome in patients with breast desmoid tumor (BDT) who received UGVAB alone versus SR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pathology database was searched for patients diagnosed with BDT ≤ 3 cm from 2007 to 2019. All patients underwent breast ultrasound examination and were then performed UGVAB alone or local SR. The Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test was used as a univariate analysis to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) rates between UGVAB and SR groups. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included. The median follow-up was 41 mo (range, 5-110 mo). The incidence of tumor recurrence was 23.1% (9/39). The 3-y cumulative RFS was 83.1% and 95.8% in the UGVAB and SR group, respectively, which was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.131, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis also revealed that treatment strategy (UGVAB versus SR) was not associated with an increased risk of relapse events (P = 0.274). CONCLUSIONS: Small desmoid tumors (≤3 cm) after UGVAB alone did not have a significantly compromised RFS compared with those who underwent SR. UGVAB may be an alternative and relatively conservative method for the diagnosis and local control of BDT with a smaller size. A prospective, randomized study with large sample size is needed to confirm this observation.

Does establishing a preoperative nomogram including ultrasonographic findings help predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients with microcalcifications?

BACKGROUND: Mammography (MG) is highly sensitive for detecting microcalcifications, but has low specificity. This study investigates whether establishing a preoperative nomogram including ultrasonographic findings can help predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients with mammographic microcalcification. METHODS: Between May 2012 and January 2017, 475 patients with suspicious microcalcifications detected on MG underwent ultrasonography (US). The χ2 test was used to screen risk factors among the variables. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of malignant microcalcifications. A mammographic nomogram (M nomogram) and mammographic-ultrasonographic nomogram (M-U nomogram) were established based on multivariate logistic regression models. The discriminatory ability and clinical utility of both nomograms were compared by the receiver operating characteristics curve and decision curve analysis. The calibration ability was evaluated using a calibration curve. RESULTS: Among the cases, 68.2% (324/475) were pathologically diagnosed as breast cancer and 31.8% (151/475) were benign lesions. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, clinical manifestation, morphology and distribution of microcalcifications on MG and lesions associated with microcalcifications on US were confirmed as independent predictors of malignant microcalcifications. In terms of discrimination ability, the C-index of the M-U nomogram was significantly higher than that of the M nomogram (0.917 vs 0.897, p = 0.006). The bias-corrected curve was close to the ideal line in the calibration curve. Decision curve analysis suggested that the M-U nomogram was superior to M nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: Combining mammographic parameters with ultrasonographic findings in a nomogram provided better performance than an M nomogram alone, especially for dense breasts, which suggests the value of ultrasonographic finding for individualized prediction of malignancy in patients with microcalcifications.

Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

Purpose: To assess whether radiologist needs to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonography (US) assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting. Patients and methods: Image data on 1,070 patients with 1,070 category 3-5 breast lesions with a pathological diagnosis scanned between January and June 2016 were included. Both real-time and static image assessments were acquired for each lesion. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of each category in the two groups were calculated according to the ACR BI-RADS manual and compared. Kappas were determined for agreement on two assessment approaches. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value for real-time US were 98.9%, 58.2%, 44.8% and 99.4%, and for static images were 98.9%, 57.1%, 44.1% and 99.3%, respectively. The performance of the two groups was not significantly different (areas under ROCs: 0.786 vs 0.780, P=0.566) if the final assessment was only dichotomized as negative (category 3) and positive (categories 4 and 5). All PPVs of each category for each assessment were within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013 except subcategory 4B (reference range: >10% and ≤50%) of static image evaluation, which was also significantly higher than that of real-time assessment (54.8% vs 40.7%, P=0.037). The overall agreement of the two approaches was moderate (κ=0.43-0.56 according to different detailed assessment). Conclusion: Both static image and real-time assessment had similar diagnostic performance if only the treatment recommendations were considered, that is, follow-up or biopsy. However, as for subcategory 4B lesions without obviously benign or malignant US features, real-time scanning by the interpreter is recommended to obtain a more accurate BI-RADS assessment after assessing static images.

Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) of the Ultrasound section of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS US) atlas categories 4 and 5 in different age groups and to determine whether patient age influences the PPV3 of each category in the diagnosis of breast lesions. METHODS: We identified 2,433 ACR BI-RADS US categories 4 and 5 lesions with a known pathological diagnosis in 2,433 women. The patients were classified into three age groups (<35, 35-50, and >50 years). The age-related PPV3 of each category in the three age groups were calculated based on the pathological diagnoses and compared using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: The overall PPV3 of each category was within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013. PPV3 gradually increased with increasing age in patients with category 4 lesions. PPV3 in the oldest group with subcategories 4A and 4B lesions were close to or exceeded the reference values. CONCLUSIONS: PPV3 and age were significantly associated in patients with category 4 lesions according to the newest edition of ACR BI-RADS US in the diagnostic setting. Closer attention should be given to older patients when assigning a final assessment category. KEY POINTS: • In patients with category 4 lesions , the likelihood of malignancy is associated with age. • In patients with category 5 lesions, the association is not definite. • Closer attention should be given to older patients in applying the ACR BI-RADS US.