Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 244
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804702

ABSTRACT

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines were quickly and successfully developed and deployed, saving millions of lives globally. While first generation vaccines are safe and effective in preventing disease caused by SARSCoV-2, next-generation vaccines have the potential to improve efficacy and safety. Vaccines delivered by a mucosal route may elicit greater protective immunity at respiratory surfaces thereby reducing transmission. Inclusion of viral antigens in addition to the spike protein may enhance protection against emerging variants of concern. Next-generation vaccine platforms with a new mechanism of action may necessitate efficacy trials to fulfill regulatory requirements. The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) will be supporting Phase 2b clinical trials of candidate next-generation vaccines. The primary endpoint will be improved efficacy in terms of symptomatic disease relative to a currently approved COVID-19 vaccine. In this paper, we discuss the planned endpoints and potential challenges to this complex program.

2.
Pediatrics ; 152(5)2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37682622
5.
Eur J Pediatr ; 181(2): 841-845, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34365543

ABSTRACT

Guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for children with CLD in their second year of life if they continue to need treatment within 6 months before the RSV season. The utilization patterns of treatment (chronic corticosteroid therapy, diuretic therapy, or supplemental oxygen) are not well understood. We examined variations in CLD treatment for ten consecutive 20-day segments preceding RSV season onset. Among infants and children with CLD (n = 19,026), 35.2% received one or more medical treatments for CLD any time within 200 days before entering the second RSV season: 8.6%, 3.2%, and 29.7% received supplemental oxygen, diuretics, and corticosteroids, respectively. Utilization decreased as infants' age increased with corticosteroids surpassing oxygen and diuretics. To avoid the capture of intermittent use of corticosteroids for acute infections, we found requiring a minimum of 45 days cumulative exposure was reasonable to determine chronic use. What is Known: • Guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for children with CLD in their second year of life if they continue to need treatment within 6 months before the RSV season. • The utilization patterns of treatment (chronic corticosteroid therapy, diuretic therapy, or supplemental oxygen) are not well understood. A definition of chronic corticosteroid therapy in this setting is not available. What is New: • Among infants and children with CLD of prematurity, 35.2% received one or more medical treatments for CLD any time within 200 days before entering the second RSV season: 8.6%, 3.2%, and 29.7% received oxygen, diuretics, and corticosteroids, respectively. Utilization decreased as infants' age increased with corticosteroids surpassing oxygen and diuretics. • A minimum of 45 days cumulative corticosteroid use within the past 90 days would accurately capture chronic use to fulfill criteria for immunoprophylaxis while limiting the inclusion of intermittent use of corticosteroids for acute infections.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Pediatrics , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Lung Diseases/drug therapy , Palivizumab/therapeutic use , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Seasons , United States
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(5): 2060-2067.e2, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33607339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Massachusetts began newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using measurement of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) from dried blood spots. OBJECTIVE: We describe developments and outcomes from the first 10 years of this program (February 1, 2009, to January 31, 2019). METHODS: TREC values, diagnostic, and outcome data from all patients screened for SCID were evaluated. RESULTS: NBS of 720,038 infants prompted immunologic evaluation of 237 (0.03%). Of 237, 9 were diagnosed with SCID/leaky SCID (4% of referrals vs 0.001% general population). Another 7 were diagnosed with other combined immunodeficiencies, and 3 with athymia. SCID/leaky SCID incidence was approximately 1 in 80,000, whereas approximately 1 in 51,000 had severe T-cell lymphopenia for which definitive treatment was indicated. All patients with SCID/leaky SCID underwent hematopoietic cell transplant or gene therapy with 100% survival. One patient with athymia underwent successful thymus transplant. No known cases of SCID were missed. Compared with outcomes from the 10 years before SCID NBS, survival trended higher (9 of 9 vs 4 of 7), likely due to a lower rate of infection before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support a single NBS testing-and-referral algorithm for all gestational ages. Despite lower median TREC values in premature infants, the majority for all ages are well above the TREC cutoff and the algorithm, which selects urgent (undetectable TREC) and repeatedly abnormal TREC values, minimizes referral. We also found that low naïve T-cell percentage is associated with a higher risk of SCID/CID, demonstrating the utility of memory/naïve T-cell phenotyping as part of follow-up flow cytometry.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/diagnosis , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/epidemiology , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/genetics
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(2): 185-189, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501959

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based guidance for the most effective strategies for the diagnosis and management of babesiosis. The diagnosis and treatment of co-infection with babesiosis and Lyme disease will be addressed in a separate Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline [1]. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytic anaplasmosis can be found in the recent rickettsial disease guideline developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2]. The target audience for the babesiosis guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition, such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatricians, hematologists, and transfusion medicine specialists.


Subject(s)
Babesiosis , Communicable Diseases , Lyme Disease , Animals , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/therapy , Humans , Societies , United States
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(2): 309-310, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33501966

ABSTRACT

The Vaccine Compensation System evaluates true and false associations between vaccination and adverse events. The data from the system enable the calculation of the risk of serious adverse events per million doses given of each vaccine.


Subject(s)
Vaccines , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Humans , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effects
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(1): 1-8, 2021 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483734

ABSTRACT

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Lyme Disease , Neurology , Rheumatology , Animals , Humans , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , North America , United States
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(1): e1-e48, 2021 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417672

ABSTRACT

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Lyme Disease , Neurology , Rheumatology , Animals , Humans , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , North America , United States
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(2): e49-e64, 2021 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252652

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this guideline is to provide evidence-based guidance for the most effective strategies for the diagnosis and management of babesiosis. The diagnosis and treatment of co-infection with babesiosis and Lyme disease will be addressed in a separate Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guideline [1]. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytic anaplasmosis can be found in the recent rickettsial disease guideline developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2]. The target audience for the babesiosis guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition, such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, pediatricians, hematologists, and transfusion medicine specialists.


Subject(s)
Babesiosis , Communicable Diseases , Lyme Disease , Animals , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/therapy , Humans , Societies , United States
14.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 10(3): 317-325, 2021 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32978942

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines assume children with chronic lung disease (CLD) who require medical support within 6 months before the second respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season remains at high risk of severe RSV disease. We determined the number of days since the last treatment (DSL) when the risk of RSV hospitalization among children with CLD becomes equivalent to the risk for those not qualified for immunoprophylaxis. METHODS: The study cohort was assembled using Medicaid billing records from 1999 to 2010 linked to Florida and Texas birth certificate records. We developed DSL-trend discrete time logistic regression models within a survival analysis framework, adjusting for use of immunoprophylaxis, to compare the hospitalization risk of CLD infants at 4 age points to that of term infants at 1 month of age with siblings. RESULTS: The study cohort included 858 830 healthy term and 5562 preterm infants with CLD. Among 1-month-old term infants, the RSV hospitalization risk averaged across all covariate strata was 14.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.5-16.1) per 1000 patient season-months. Risk for preterm CLD children reached the threshold derived from term infants when DSL was 76 (95% CI, 22-198.5), 52 (95% CI, 6.5-123), 35 (95% CI, 0-93.5), and 12 (95% CI, 0-61.5) at the respective ages of 12, 15, 17.2, and 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 180-day threshold used to define CLD severity at season start can be shortened to 120 days, 90 days, and 60 days for children with CLD at age 15, 17.2, and 21 months, respectively.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Calibration , Child , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Lung , Palivizumab/therapeutic use , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
16.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 73(1): 12-20, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33251716
17.
Neurology ; 96(6): 262-273, 2021 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257476

ABSTRACT

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The scope of this guideline includes prevention of Lyme disease, and the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease presenting as erythema migrans, Lyme disease complicated by neurologic, cardiac, and rheumatologic manifestations, Eurasian manifestations of Lyme disease, and Lyme disease complicated by coinfection with other tick-borne pathogens. This guideline does not include comprehensive recommendations for babesiosis and tick-borne rickettsial infections, which are published in separate guidelines. The target audience for this guideline includes primary care physicians and specialists caring for this condition such as infectious diseases specialists, emergency physicians, internists, pediatricians, family physicians, neurologists, rheumatologists, cardiologists and dermatologists in North America.


Subject(s)
Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Humans , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , United States
19.
Pediatrics ; 146(2)2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32719087

ABSTRACT

Despite the established safety and efficacy of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine after almost 50 years of widespread use, the United States is encountering higher levels of measles and mumps disease than has occurred for years. Return of disease threatens the health of those who remain unimmunized by choice as well as those who are immunized appropriately but experience loss of vaccine-induced immunity. The solution to continued threats of illness caused by these untreatable but readily preventable diseases is compliance with recommendations for administration of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Here we examine trends in the epidemiology of measles, mumps, and rubella in recent years and consider the consequences of loss of protective immunity within our country.


Subject(s)
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Vaccination , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...