[Dissection of brachiocephalic arteries as a complication of open neurosurgery: case report and literature review]. / Dissektsiya brakhiotsefal'nykh arterii kak oslozhnenie otkrytoi neirokhirurgicheskoi operatsii: sluchai iz praktiki i obzor literatury.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal styloid processes cause dissection of supra-aortic arteries in some cases. In total, about 33 cases have been described in the world and national literature. However, there were no dissections associated with neurosurgery. At the same time, anomalies of styloid process may be an unidentified cause of many spontaneous dissections of brachiocephalic arteries. OBJECTIVE: To analyze modern data on dissection of brachiocephalic arteries associated with anomalies of styloid process and describe dissection in a 44-year-old patient with deviated styloid processes after posterior cranial fossa surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searching for literature data was performed using the keywords "dissection of the cervicocerebral arteries", "dissection of the brachiocephalic arteries", "stylocarotid syndrome" and "Eagle syndrome" in the PubMed and Medscape databases. We also describe a patient hospitalized for microsurgical resection of cystic-solid hemangioblastoma of medulla oblongata who developed postoperative dissection of both internal carotid and vertebral arteries. RESULTS: We found 1777 papers between 01/01/1900 and 01/18/2021. In most cases, ICA dissection was not a result of stylocarotid syndrome. There were 121 full-text Russian- or English-language articles. We selected 46 most relevant publications. Analyzing these papers, we found that small distance between the tops of styloid processes and internal carotid arteries can be a risk factor of dissection of brachiocephalic arteries in addition to styloid process elongation. Our patient was diagnosed with just such an anomaly. CONCLUSION: Anomalies of styloid processes can cause dangerous vascular complications. Therefore, the length and abnormal deviation of styloid process should be considered when planning intraoperative position of a patient associated with prolonged neck flexion.

[The orbitozygomatic approach. History, technique, and modifications]. / Orbitozigomaticheskii dostup. Istoriia, tekhnika, modifikatsii.

The orbitozygomatic approach (OZA) has been used in neurosurgical practice since the 1980s. Many approach modifications have been proposed; anatomical and clinical developments have been conducted in many clinics. However, there is no algorithm for choosing an approach option, depending on the type and topographo-anatomical features of pathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched for publications in the PubMed and Medscape databases using the keywords 'orbitozygomatic'. RESULTS: A total of 447 publications matching the search terms were found. In most of them, the approach was either not actually orbitozygomatic or was mentioned in the description of a clinical case. One hundred and nineteen full text Russian or English papers were available for detailed analysis. Of these, we selected 72 most relevant publications. DISCUSSION: There were no studies demonstrating disadvantages of the OZA compared to traditional craniotomies. Orbitozygomatic approaches are widely used in routine neurosurgical practice. Existing approaches are not without disadvantages. The publications are based on small material. The recommendations on choosing the optimal OZA option are based on the authors' opinion, i.e. they satisfy the minimum level of evidence. There are no studies comparing the efficacy of OZA options in different types and topographo-anatomical variants of neurosurgical pathology of the anterior and middle skull base. CONCLUSION: The reasonability of using the orbitozygomatic approach in neurosurgical practice is obvious. There are a large number of orbitozygomatic approaches and their modifications. The modern literature lacks an algorithm for choosing the optimal OZA option for specific types and topographo-anatomical variants of the pathological process.