IMRT or 3D-CRT in glioblastoma? A dosimetric criterion for patient selection.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is increasingly employed in glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. The present work aimed to assess which clinical-dosimetric scenario could benefit the most from IMRT application, with respect to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). The number of organs at risk (OARs) overlapping the planning target volume (PTV) was the parameter describing the clinical-dosimetric pattern. Based on the results, a dosimetric decision criterion to select the most appropriate treatment technique is provided. Seventeen previously irradiated patients were retrieved and re-planned with both 3D-CRT and IMRT. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/30fx. The cases were divided into 4 groups (4 patients in each group). Each group represents the scenario where 0, 1, 2 or 3 OARs overlapped the target volume, respectively. Furthermore, in one case, 4 OARs overlapped the PTV. The techniques were compared also in terms of irradiated healthy brain tissue. The results were evaluated by paired t-test. IMRT always provided better target coverage (V95%) than 3D-CRT, regardless the clinical-dosimetric scenario: difference ranged from 0.82% (p = 0.4) for scenario 0 to 7.8% (p = 0.02) for scenario 3, passing through 2.54% (p = 0.18) and 5.93% (p = 0.08) for scenario 1 and 2, respectively. IMRT and 3D-CRT achieved comparable results in terms of dose homogeneity and conformity. Concerning the irradiation of serial-kind OARs, both techniques provided nearly identical results. A statistically significant dose reduction to the healthy brain in favor of IMRT was scored. IMRT seems a superior technique compared to 3D-CRT when there are multiple overlaps between OAR and PTV. In this scenario, IMRT allows for a better target coverage while maintaining equivalent OARs sparing and reducing healthy brain irradiation. The results from our patients dataset suggests that the overlap of three OARs can be used as a dosimetric criterion to select which patients should receive IMRT treatment.

Clinical target volume delineation in glioblastomas: pre-operative versus post-operative/pre-radiotherapy MRI.

OBJECTIVES: Delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) is still controversial in glioblastomas. In order to assess the differences in volume and shape of the radiotherapy target, the use of pre-operative vs post-operative/pre-radiotherapy T(1) and T(2) weighted MRI was compared. METHODS: 4 CTVs were delineated in 24 patients pre-operatively and post-operatively using T(1) contrast-enhanced (T1(PRE)CTV and T1(POST)CTV) and T(2) weighted images (T2(PRE)CTV and T2(POST)CTV). Pre-operative MRI examinations were performed the day before surgery, whereas post-operative examinations were acquired 1 month after surgery and before chemoradiation. A concordance index (CI) was defined as the ratio between the overlapping and composite volumes. RESULTS: The volumes of T1(PRE)CTV and T1(POST)CTV were not statistically different (248 ± 88 vs 254 ± 101), although volume differences >100 cm(3) were observed in 6 out of 24 patients. A marked increase due to tumour progression was shown in three patients. Three patients showed a decrease because of a reduced mass effect. A significant reduction occurred between pre-operative and post-operative T(2) volumes (139 ± 68 vs 78 ± 59). Lack of concordance was observed between T1(PRE)CTV and T1(POST)CTV (CI = 0.67 ± 0.09), T2(PRE)CTV and T2(POST)CTV (CI = 0.39 ± 0.20) and comparing the portion of the T1(PRE)CTV and T1(POST)CTV not covered by that defined on T2(PRE)CTV images (CI = 0.45 ± 0.16 and 0.44 ± 0.17, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using T(2) MRI, huge variations can be observed in peritumoural oedema, which are probably due to steroid treatment. Using T(1) MRI, brain shifts after surgery and possible progressive enhancing lesions produce substantial differences in CTVs. Our data support the use of post-operative/pre-radiotherapy T(1) weighted MRI for planning purposes.

A method for the quantitative evaluation of SAR distribution in deep regional hyperthermia.

The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) distribution pattern visualization by a matrix of E-field light-emitting sensors has demonstrated to be a useful tool to evaluate the characteristics of the applicators used in deep regional hyperthermia and to perform a quality assurance programme. A method to quantify the SAR from photographs of the sensor array--the so-called 'Power Stepping Technique'--has already been proposed. This paper presents a new approach to the quantitative determination of the SAR profiles in a liquid phantom exposed to electromagnetic fields from the Sigma-60 applicator (BSD-2000 system for deep regional hyperthermia). The method is based on the construction of a 'calibration curve' modelling the light-output of an E-field sensor as a function of the supplied voltage and on the use of a reference light source to 'normalize' the light-output readings from the photos of the sensor array, in order to minimize the errors introduced by the non-uniformity of the photographic process. Once the calibration curve is obtained, it is possible, with only one photo, to obtain the quantitative SAR distribution in the operating conditions. For this reason, this method is suitable for equipment characterization and also for the control of the repeatability of power deposition in time.