ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Foodborne illness is an important contributor to morbidity and health system costs in Canada. Using number of critical hazards as a proxy for food safety, we sought to better understand how to improve food safety in restaurants. We compared the current standard of annual inspections to twice-yearly inspections among restaurants "at risk" for food safety infractions. These were restaurants that had three or more elevated-risk inspection ratings in the preceding 36 months. METHODS: We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial between November 2012 and October 2014. The intervention was twice-yearly routine restaurant inspection compared to standard once-yearly routine inspection. Included were all restaurants within Saskatoon Health Region that were assessed as "at risk", with 73 restaurants in the intervention arm and 78 in the control arm. Independent sample t-tests were conducted between groups to compare: i) average number of critical hazards per inspection; and ii) proportion of inspections resulting in a rating indicating an elevated hazard. RESULTS: Over time we noted statistically significant improvements across both study arms, in number of both critical food safety hazards (decreased by 61%) and elevated-risk inspection ratings (decreased by 45%) (p < 0.0001). We observed no significant differences between the two groups pre- or post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Results suggest increasing the number of annual routine inspections in high-risk restaurants was not associated with a significant difference in measures of compliance with food safety regulations. Findings of this study do not provide evidence supporting increased frequency of restaurant inspection from annually to twice annually.
Subject(s)
Food Inspection/statistics & numerical data , Food Safety , Restaurants/standards , Canada , Food Inspection/legislation & jurisprudence , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Restaurants/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this study we assessed the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes and the quality of care during the period 1988-2000 in an Italian population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two population-based surveys, using similar methods and centralized measurements, were conducted in 1988 and 2000 in a representative Italian area to identify people with known diabetes. The adjusted prevalence (reference, 2001 Italian population) was computed. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates of diabetes in the population of Casale Monferrato were 2.13% (2.05-2.22) in 1988 and 3.07% (2.97-3.17) in 2000. In comparison with diabetic persons recruited in 1988 and independently of age and sex, persons recruited in 2000 had a lower likelihood of having HbA1c > or = 7.0% (OR=0.48; 0.42-0.56), diastolic blood pressure > or = 80 mmHg (OR=0.61; 0.49-0.75), LDL cholesterol > or = 2.59 mmol/l (OR=0.77; 0.63-0.93) and AER > or = 20 microg/min (OR=0.53; 0.45-0.61; they had a higher likelihood of having BMI > or = 25 kg/m(2) (OR=1.49; 1.2-1.74). However, 45.4% of patients still had HbA1c > or = 7.0%, 80% blood pressure > or = 130/80 mmHg and 79% LDL-cholesterol values > or =2.59 mmol/l. CONCLUSION: More than two-thirds of Italians with diabetes are now aged 65 years and more. The quality of control of glycemia, lipids and blood pressure improved and the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy decreased over time, although complete adherence to international guidelines has not yet been achieved.