ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to compare the different stereotactic treatment plans and dose calculation algorithms for small targets with film dosimetry in anthropomorphic phantom. Treatment plans were prepared for multiple targets with single setup isocenter. Plans for three different irradiation techniques were generated using conformal arc with four non-coplanar arcs, RapidArc with two coplanar full arcs and RapidArc with four non-coplanar arcs in the Varian Eclipse v13.7.16 TPS. Conformal arc and RapidArc plans were calculated using AAA, Acuros XBDm and XBDw algorithms. Conformity index, gradient index and dose maximum were calculated for all PTVs. All measurements were made on the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. Comparison between computed and measured dose distributions was performed with gamma evaluation criteria of 3%, 3 mm; 3%, 1 mm and 2%, 2 mm. According to our results, the Eclipse AAA and AXB algorithms provide accurate dose distributions for homogeneous cranial irradiation.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Algorithms , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Particle Accelerators , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
Introduction The purpose of the study was to compare the results of gamma value based film analysis according to the used type of self-developer film and software product. Material and methods The films were irradiated with different treatment techniques such as 3D conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy with static and rotational delivery. Stereotactic plans with conformal and intensity modulated arc techniques, using coplanar and non-coplanar beam setup were also evaluated. The data of irradiated film were compared with the planned planar dose distribution exported from the treatment planning system. Three film analysis software programs were evaluated: PTW Mephysto (PTW), FilmQA Pro (FQP) and radiohromic.com(RC). Both EBT2 and EBT3 types of films were examined. The comparisons of dose distributions were performed with gamma analysis using 10% cut-off level. Results The results of the gamma analysis for larger fields were between 78.3% and 98.3%, 75.7% and 100%, 80.2% and 98.8% with PTW, FQP and RC, respectively. The results of evaluation in case of stereotactic measurements were 76.8%-99.2% for PTW, 95.7%-100% for FQP and 91.2%-99.9% for RC. Conclusions All the three software programs are suitable for calibrating and evaluating films, performing gamma analysis, and can be used for patient specific quality assurance measurements. There is no direct connection between gamma passing rate and absolute accuracy or software quality, it is just a feature of the software. The interpretation of own results has to be defined on an institutional level according to given workflow and preliminary results.
Subject(s)
Film Dosimetry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Software , Calibration , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Gamma Rays , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate normal tissue sparing through dosimetric parameters of normal tissue volumes using different irradiation techniques for conventional (CFRT) and simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) schedules. BACKGROUND: Several dose-escalation studies for localized prostate cancer (PCa) have shown advanced biochemical relapse-free (bRFS) rates and also better local control for higher total doses using either CFRT or SIB schedules. Besides the most important organs-at-risk, absorbed dose reduction of other surrounding normal tissues are also preferable. In order to analyse the normal tissue sparing, dosimetric parameters of different normal tissue volumes were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans for 15 high risk prostate cancer patients were created using RapidArc (RA), Sliding Window (SW) IMRT and 4-field box (3D-CRT) technique. In order to evaluate normal tissue sparing, the volume of pelvic region was divided into six normal tissue cylinders with 1 cm wall thickness, located in each other. RESULTS: All plans met the criteria of target coverage (V95%>95%). All techniques provided the same results for OARs except 3D-CRT for rectum and bilateral femoral heads. The values of V5, V10 and V15 increased in cases which included RapidArc technique and decreased for V20 and V30. CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetric parameters for the cylindrical normal tissue volumes show that using RapidArc technique gives equal or slightly better normal tissue sparing and SIB provided the same normal tissue sparing as CFRT planned with RapidArc.
ABSTRACT
Recently the prevalence of oligometastatic patients is increasing. A common site of distant spread is the liver. The standard of care is curative surgical resection, however, the resecability rate is only 10-20%. Alternatively, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may be used. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABRT) makes it possible to deliver curative radiation dose without radiation injury to the healthy liver tissue. We delivered SABRT to three patients with inoperable hepatic metastases. The primary tumors were rectal (2) and lung (1). The dose was 3x20 Gy every other day. We observed one grade 1 side effect. All the metastases showed complete remission and no local recurrence or late side effect occurred during the one year of follow-up. One patient is tumor-free, one has stable disease, in one patient two new hepatic metastases appeared and receives chemo-biological therapy. SABRT of liver metastases is safe and highly effective. It can be expected that in the near future it will become one of the standard treatments of hepatic tumors.
