Spring-Assisted Surgery of Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis.

Craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with extensive cranial vault reconstructions (CVRs). Although less invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy, have been successful, they also present difficulties. An alternative method is distraction osteogenesis using either manually controlled devices or specially designed springs. In this study, the authors provide the first comparison of spring-assisted surgery (SAS) with CVR for the treatment of unilambdoid synostosis (ULS). Fourteen consecutive patients (8 CVR and 6 SAS) treated for ULS at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2005 and 2018 were included. Skull shape and deviations were evaluated using previously defined measurement points on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans preoperatively, at spring removal, and at 3 years of age. Posterior and middle cranial fossa (PCF and MCF, respectively), skull-base cant, facial twist, and mastoid bulge (MB) were measured, and clinical data were obtained from chart reviews. The results indicated that at the 3-year follow-up, PCF, MCF, and MB improved in both groups, with no significant difference in outcome observed between methods. In the SAS group, duration of operation [61±27 min (mean±SD)] and perioperative bleeding (3.5±2.8 mL/kg body weight) were both significantly lower relative to the CVR group (P<0.05). These findings showed that both SAS and CVR resulted in similar improvements in treating ULS, although neither produced complete normalization of skull shape. The results suggest that early diagnosis and operation allow less extensive SAS to be performed without adversely affecting the results.

Improved Facial and Skull-Base Symmetry following Osteotomy and Distraction of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) results in a surgically demanding deformation, as the deformity is asymmetric in the calvaria but also presents with facial scoliosis and orbital dystopia. Traditional cranioplasties correct the forehead but have little effect on the face and orbits. In this article, the authors describe a consecutive series of patients operated on for UCS with osteotomy of the fused suture combined with distraction osteogenesis. METHODS: Fourteen patients (mean age, 8.0 months; range, 4.3 to 16.6 months) were included in this study. The authors measured and compared the orbital dystopia angle, anterior cranial fossa deviation, and anterior cranial fossa cant between preoperative computed tomography results and those at distractor removal. RESULTS: Blood loss was 6.1 mL/kg (range, 2.0 to 15.2 mL/kg), and length of stay was 4.4 days (range, 3.0 to 6.0 days). The authors observed significant improvements in the median orbital dystopia angle from 9.8 degrees (95% CI, 7.0 to 12.6 degrees) to 1.1 degrees (95% CI, -1.5 to 3.7 degrees) ( P < 0.001), anterior cranial fossa deviation from 12.9 degrees (95% CI, 9.2 to 16.6 degrees) to 4.7 degrees (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.9 degrees) ( P < 0.001), and anterior cranial fossa cant from 2.5 degrees (95% CI, 1.5 to 3.5 degrees) to 1.7 degrees (95% CI, 0.0 to 3.4 degrees) ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Osteotomy combined with a distractor for UCS straightened the face and relieved orbital dystopia by affecting the nose angle relative to the orbits, correcting the deviation of the cranial base in the anterior fossa, and lowering the orbit on the affected side. Furthermore, this technique demonstrated a favorable morbidity profile with low perioperative bleeding and a short inpatient period, suggesting its potential to improve the surgical treatment of UCS. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Correction of Unicoronal Synostosis With Springs: Two Patients With Improved Facial Symmetry.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical correction of unicoronal synostosis (UCS) entails extensive cranioplasties which do not address facial scoliosis. This paper presents the first results with springs that motivated the shift from extensive cranioplasties to dynamic techniques for surgical correction of UCS. METHODS: Two cases of UCS were operated with a linear osteotomy combined with springs. The deviation in facial symmetry (orbital dystopia angle) and skull base angles were measured on pre and postoperative computed tomography scans until 3 years of age. RESULTS: The facial scoliosis was corrected. At spring removal, the orbital dystopia angle had gone from a 9.2 to 13.2-degree deviation preoperatively to a 0.5 to 0.9-degree overcorrection compared with the ideal 0-degree deviation. Also, the skull base deviation improved. CONCLUSION: Linear osteotomy combined with springs corrects the facial scoliosis in UCS. These cases indicate that dynamic methods may be beneficial for improving the results of surgical correction of UCS.