Towards high-quality peri-operative care: a global perspective.

Article 25 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrines the right to health and well-being for every individual. However, universal access to high-quality healthcare remains the purview of a handful of wealthy nations. This is no more apparent than in peri-operative care, where an estimated five billion individuals lack access to safe, affordable and timely surgical care. Delivery of surgery and anaesthesia in low-resource environments presents unique challenges that, when unaddressed, result in limited access to low-quality care. Current peri-operative research and clinical guidance often fail to acknowledge these system-level deficits and therefore have limited applicability in low-resource settings. In this manuscript, the authors priority-set the need for equitable access to high-quality peri-operative care and analyse the system-level contributors to excess peri-operative mortality rates, a key marker of quality of care. To provide examples of how research and investment may close the equity gap, a modified Delphi method was adopted to curate and appraise interventions which may, with subsequent research and evaluation, begin to address the barriers to high-quality peri-operative care in low- and middle-income countries.

Declaración de Helsinki sobre la seguridad de los pacientes en Anestesiología / No disponible

No disponible

Shaping the future of Scandinavian anaesthesiology: a position paper by the SSAI.

Traditionally, Scandinavian anaesthesiologists have had a very broad scope of practice, involving intensive care, pain and emergency medicine. European changes in the different medical fields and the constant reorganising of health care may alter this. Therefore, the Board of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) decided to produce a Position Paper on the future of the speciality in Scandinavia. The training in the various Scandinavian countries is very similar and provides a stable foundation for the speciality. The Scandinavian practice in anaesthesia and intensive care is based on a team model where the anaesthesiologists work together with highly educated nurses and should remain like this. However, SSAI thinks that the role of the anaesthesiologists as perioperative physicians is not fully developed. There is an obvious need and desire for further training of specialists. The SSAI advanced educational programmes for specialists should be expanded and include formal assessment leading to a particular medical competency as defined by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). In this way, Scandinavian anaesthesiologists will remain leaders in perioperative, intensive care, pain and critical emergency medicine.

The future role of the Scandinavian anaesthesiologist: a web-based survey.

BACKGROUND: The Board of the Scandinavian Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) decided in 2008 to undertake a survey among members of the SSAI aiming at exploring some key points of training, professional activities and definitions of the specialty. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was used to capture core data on workforce demographics and working patterns together with opinions on definitions for practice/practitioners in the four areas of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine and pain medicine. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred and four responses were lodged, representing close to half of the total SSAI membership. The majority of participants reported in excess of 10 years of professional experience in general anaesthesia and intensive care medicine as well as emergency and pain medicine. While no support for separate or secondary specialities in the four areas was reported, a majority of respondents favoured sub-specialisation or recognition of particular medical competencies, notably so for intensive care medicine. Seventy-five percent or more of the respondents supported a common framework of employment within all four areas irrespective of further specialisation. CONCLUSIONS: The future of Scandinavian anaesthesiology is likely to involve further specialisation towards particular medical competencies. With such diversification of the workforce, the majority of the respondents still acknowledge the importance of belonging to one organisational body.

Anaesthesia workforce in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European anaesthesia workforce is facing increased demand and expansion of the labour market, which may likely exceed supply. This survey assesses the numbers and practice patterns of anaesthesiologists and studies migration and shortage of the anaesthesia workforce in Europe. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all national European anaesthesia societies. Countries were grouped according to their relationship with the European Union. RESULTS: The number of anaesthesiologists per 100,000 population varies between 2.7 (Turkey) and 20.7 (Estonia). There seems to be no clear evidence for feminization of the anaesthesia workforce. Anaesthesia physician training lasts between 3 yr (Armenia, Belarus, Uzbekistan) and 7 yr (Ireland, UK), and seems to positively correlate with the number of trainees. Throughout Europe, anaesthesiologists typically work in public practice, and are involved in the entire care chain of surgical patients (anaesthesia, intensive care, chronic pain and pre-hospital emergency medicine). The differences between European salaries for anaesthesiologists are up to 50-fold. Most Western European countries are recipients of migrating anaesthesiologists who often originate from the new member states of the European Union. However, it seems that expectations about anaesthesia workforce shortages are not confined to Eastern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Each European country has its own unique workforce constellation and practice pattern. Westward migration of anaesthesiologists from those countries with access to the European Union labour market may be explained by substantial salary differences. There is a European-wide lack of systematic, comparable data about the anaesthesia workforce, which makes it difficult to accurately assess the supply of anaesthesiologists.

Guidelines for safety and quality in anaesthesia practice in the European Union.

Anaesthesia is a medical specialty that is particularly concerned with the safety of the patient who is undergoing a surgical procedure. This is a prerequisite in order to provide quality of care, which is based on good clinical practice, on a sound organization, on an agreement on best practice and on adequate communication with other healthcare workers involved. Providing a safe environment for those working in healthcare is at least as important as other factors serving that objective. A working party on Safety and Quality in Anaesthesiological Practice in the Section and Board of Anaesthesiology of the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS/UEMS) has prepared guidelines that were amended and approved recently.

Charter on continuing medical education/continuing professional development approved by the UEMS Specialist Section and European Board of Anaesthesiology.

The mission of the Section and Board of Anaesthesiology of the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS/UEMS) is to harmonize training and medical practice in all European countries to continuously improve the quality of care. The need for continuous medical education in the field of anaesthesiology has long been recognized. However, specialty-based competencies are not the only requirements for successful medical practice. The need to acquire medical, managerial, ethical, social and personal communication skills on top of specialty-based competencies has developed into the principle of continuous professional development, which embraces both objectives. The Section and Board of Anaesthesiology of the EUMS/UEMS has approved a proposal of its Standing Committee on Continuous Medical Education/Continuous Professional Development to adopt the following charter on the subject.

Guidelines for the practice of anesthesia in Norway.

Since the first version saw the light of day in 1991 the Guidelines have occupied a central position in the Norwegian practice of anesthesia. This document comprises part of the quality management documents held in the departments of anesthesia in Norwegian hospitals. If departments of anesthesia are unable to adhere to certain specific points in the Guidelines, it is recommended that this should be documented in writing. It has been stated by central governmental bodies and patients' insurance organizations that the Guidelines will be an important factor in medico legal cases, although it is not an obligatory legal document for hospital owners. It is our objective that the document will form the foundation for quality assurance work in the departments of anesthesia in Norway. The purpose of this document is to ensure a satisfactory standard for the practice of anesthesia in Norway. 'The Guidelines for the Practice of Anesthesia in Norway' (the Guidelines) is a series of recommended guidelines. The practice of anesthesia in this context includes general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, controlled sedation, postoperative monitoring, and other observations where anesthesia personnel are required. The Guidelines apply to all doctors, nurses, and other personnel undertaking the delegated practice of anesthesia. Deviations from the Guidelines should be explained and documented in every case. The Guidelines should be adhered to in medical emergencies as far as possible. The Guidelines must not be allowed to prevent the execution of immediate and lifesaving measures. The Guidelines should be revised at regular intervals so that it is up-to-date with current legislation and medical and technological developments and practice.

Routine preoperative gastric emptying is seldom indicated. A study of 85,594 anaesthetics with special focus on aspiration pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during anaesthesia, to determine the short- and long-term morbidity, and to evaluate present routines for preoperative gastric emptying. During the study period, preoperative gastric emptying was done only when intestinal obstruction was suspected. METHODS: We routinely record prospectively all problems during and after anaesthesia by means of a database. All data for the 5 years from 1989 to 1993, a total of 85594 anaesthetic procedures, were analyzed. The hospital charts were also reviewed for those patients where aspiration to the lungs had occurred. RESULTS: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents was detected in 25 cases; all occurred in patients receiving general anaesthesia. The incidence was 4.1 times higher in emergency procedures than in electives. There were no aspirations in 30199 patients receiving regional anaesthesia. The complication occurred in all phases of anaesthesia, but clinical morbidity was low in most cases. Three cases showed serious morbidity immediately after the event, but recovered. Two cases showed serious long-term morbidity, but also recovered completely. No patients died. No cases, except possibly one, might have been prevented by stricter routines for preoperative gastric emptying. CONCLUSION: We found a low incidence of pulmonary aspiration. When it occurs, it carries a low risk for serious morbidity. Emergency cases for general anaesthesia are most at risk. Regional anaesthesia is considered safe. There is no evidence that preoperative gastric emptying should be routinely done in emergency cases, except in patients with suspected ileus/ subileus.