Correlation of LINE-1 Hypomethylation With Size and Pathologic Extent of Dysplasia in Colorectal Tubular Adenomas.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional adenomas (tubular adenoma [TA] or tubulovillous adenoma) and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are neoplastic precancerous lesions frequently detected in patients undergoing average risk screening colonoscopy and polyp surveillance. Metachronous risk stratification of adenomas is currently limited to histologic features and size of polyps. We report long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) methylation levels in SSL in comparison to TA and the impact of TA size and presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on LINE-1 methylation. METHODS: LINE-1 methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing of bisulfite-converted DNA. We compared LINE-1 methylation between TA and SSL, among varying sizes of TA, and between TA with HGD and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). RESULTS: LINE-1 methylation declined with increasing polyp size in TA when comparing those <5 mm (72.31 ± 6.11), 5 to <10 mm (67.50 ± 7.00), and ≥10 mm (66.75 ± 11.89). There were lower LINE-1 methylation levels in TA with LGD (n = 119) compared with SSLs (n = 29) (69.11 ± 8.62 vs 81.41 ± 2.43, P < 0.001). TA containing HGD (n = 26) had lower LINE-1 methylation levels than those with LGD (n = 119) (59.86 ± 7.93 vs 69.11 ± 8.62, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: HGD and increasing size of TA/tubulovillous adenoma were associated with lower LINE-1 methylation. This supports a hypothesis that LINE-1 hypomethylation in TAs indicates advancement along the CRC tumorigenesis pathway. Lower LINE-1 methylation and greater variance of global DNA methylation was seen in TA compared with SSL. LINE-1 methylation in adenomas correlates with polyp size and degree of dysplasia and deserves further study as a predictor of metachronous colorectal cancer risk.

Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 to Detect Recurrence of Stage II/Stage III Colorectal Cancer (CRC).

BACKGROUND: Most recurrences of early-stage colorectal cancer detected with current surveillance measures are widespread and incurable. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may facilitate earlier diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer and improve cancer-related outcomes. METHODS: Plasma from patients undergoing standard surveillance after definitive treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer was assayed with COLVERA and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at a single time point. Results were correlated with radiographic imaging. Assay performance, including sensitivity and specificity for recurrence, were compared. Impact of potentially confounding variables was also explored. RESULTS: 322 patients were included in the final analysis, and 27 recurrences were documented over a median follow-up period of 15 months. Sensitivity for recurrence was 63% [confidence interval (CI), 42.4-80.6] and 48% (CI, 28.7-68.1) for COLVERA and CEA (≥5 ng/mL), respectively (P = 0.046), while specificity was 91.5% (CI, 87.7-94.4) and 96.3% (CI, 93.4-98.1), respectively (P = 0.016). Smoking and age were independent predictors of CEA but not COLVERA positivity. CONCLUSIONS: COLVERA was more sensitive but less specific than CEA in detecting recurrent colorectal cancer. Short median follow-up may have been responsible for apparent false positives in COLVERA. Studies with serial sampling and longer follow-up are needed to assess whether earlier detection of colorectal cancer recurrence translates into clinical benefit. IMPACT: This prospective study showed that COLVERA (a two-gene ctDNA assay) was more sensitive for detection of recurrence in a cohort of patients undergoing surveillance after definitive therapy for stages II and III colorectal cancer.

AGA White Paper: Roadmap for the Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

The American Gastroenterological Association's Center for Gastrointestinal Innovation and Technology convened a consensus conference in December 2018, entitled, "Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance: Role of Emerging Technology and Innovation to Improve Outcomes." The goal of the conference, which attracted more than 60 experts in screening and related disciplines, including the authors, was to envision a future in which colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance are optimized, and to identify barriers to achieving that future. This White Paper originates from that meeting and delineates the priorities and steps needed to improve CRC outcomes, with the goal of minimizing CRC morbidity and mortality. A one-size-fits-all approach to CRC screening has not and is unlikely to result in increased screening uptake or desired outcomes owing to barriers stemming from behavioral, cultural, and socioeconomic causes, especially when combined with inefficiencies in deployment of screening technologies. Overcoming these barriers will require the following: efficient utilization of multiple screening modalities to achieve increased uptake; continued development of noninvasive screening tests, with iterative reassessments of how best to integrate new technologies; and improved personal risk assessment to better risk-stratify patients for appropriate screening testing paradigms.

Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: A target goal for screening adenoma detection rate (S-ADR) of ≥ 25% has been set to define high-quality colonoscopy performance. However, there is no current accepted target goal for ADR in colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance. This makes quality assessment challenging when physicians perform cancer surveillance colonoscopy but minimal screening procedures. METHODS: In this cohort study, consecutive colonoscopies performed at either Rush University Medical Center or Rush Oak Park Hospital by a gastroenterologist or colorectal surgeon in average risk screening population and CRC surveillance population were reviewed retrospectively from 2006 to 2012 and prospectively from 2013 to 2016. ADR in first surveillance colonoscopy following surgical resection of CRC (CRC-ADR) was reported in high-quality detectors (HQD) or low-quality detectors (LQD) based on achievement of 25% ADR in consecutive screening colonoscopy in average risk patients. Pearson's correlation was used to describe the association between individual S-ADR and CRC-ADR for colonoscopists. RESULTS: There was a very strong positive correlation (r = 0.88, p = 0.002) between ADR in average risk screening and first time CRC surveillance. For HQD as defined by S-ADR ≥ 25% (n = 10 colonoscopists), the CRC-ADR was 37.7% (78/207, SD 8%) which was very similar to their respective S-ADR of 33.4% (816/2440, p = 0.22). For LQD (n = 5 colonoscopists), the CRC-ADR was 20.2% (40/198) which was similar to their respective S-ADR of 20.1% (119/591, p = 0.99). The CRC-ADR was significantly higher for HQD than for LQD (37.7 vs. 20.2%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The major finding of this study is a defined CRC-ADR for HQD based on the ability to achieve S-ADR ≥ 25%. S-ADR strongly correlates with CRC-ADR. CRC-ADR is quite similar to the colonoscopists' respective S-ADR for both HQD and LQD. For colonoscopists who perform limited screening colonoscopies but do perform CRC surveillance colonoscopies, ADR metrics similar to S-ADR to assess quality in colonoscopy could be considered.

The Effects of Bowel Preparation on Microbiota-Related Metrics Differ in Health and in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and for the Mucosal and Luminal Microbiota Compartments.

OBJECTIVES: Bowel preparations (BPs) taken before colonoscopy may introduce a confounding effect on the results of gastrointestinal microbiota studies. This study aimed to determine the effect of bowel preparation on the mucosa-associated and luminal colonic microbiota in healthy subjects (HC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS: Biopsy samples (n=36) and fecal samples (n=30) were collected from 10 HC and 8 IBD subjects pre- and post-BP. 16S rRNA gene was pyrosequenced using 454 Titanium protocols. We compared the differences between the pre- and post-BP samples (i.e., comparisons-across-bowel-prep); we examined the effect of BP on the expected separation of the mucosal vs. the luminal compartments (i.e., comparisons-across-compartments). Last, we compared the baseline differences between the HC vs. IBD groups (a secondary analysis), and examined whether the differences between the HC vs. IBD changed after BP. RESULTS: In comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the Shannon's index (SI) decreased only in the biopsy samples of IBD subjects post-BP (P=0.025) and phylogenetic diversity-whole tree (PD-WT) metric decreased in biopsy samples of HC subjects post-BP (P=0.021). In secondary comparisons, the subtle differences between the fecal samples of the HC vs. IBD groups, in terms of evenness and the SI, were not apparent post-BP. In terms of ß-diversity, in comparisons-across-bowel-prep, the proportion of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in pre- and post-BP samples was low (~30%) and unweighted Unifrac distances between pre- and post-BP specimens ranged from 0.52 to 0.66. HC biopsies were affected more than IBD biopsies with BP (P=0.004). In comparisons-across-compartments, the proportion of shared OTUs between biopsy and fecal samples increased and Unifrac distances decreased post-BP in IBD subjects, reducing the differences between the mucosal and luminal compartments of the gut microbiota. Interindividual differences in Unifrac distances were preserved even with BP effects, although the effects were greater on weighted Unifrac distances. Bacteroidetes and its subtypes increased post-BP in both the luminal and mucosal compartments. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel preparations affect the composition and diversity of the fecal and luminal microbiota in the short term, introducing potential bias into experiments examining the gut microbiota. The magnitude of the effect of BP is not greater than that of interindividual variation. Both the luminal and mucosal compartments of the gut microbiota get affected, and samples from controls and IBD subjects may get affected differently. Studies of the colonic microbiota should take into account the direction and the magnitude of the change introduced by BP during the design stage of the experiments, and consider sample sizes so that potential bias is minimized.

PI3K/AKT signaling is essential for communication between tissue-infiltrating mast cells, macrophages, and epithelial cells in colitis-induced cancer.

PURPOSE: To understand signaling pathways that shape inflamed tissue and predispose to cancer is critical for effective prevention and therapy for chronic inflammatory diseases. We have explored phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity in human inflammatory bowel diseases and mouse colitis models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted immunostaining of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) and unbiased high-throughput image acquisition and quantitative analysis of samples of noninflamed normal colon, colitis, dysplasia, and colorectal cancer. Mechanistic insights were gained from ex vivo studies of cell interactions, the piroxicam/IL-10(-/-) mouse model of progressive colitis, and use of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. RESULTS: Progressive increase in densities of pAKT-positive tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and increase in densities of mast cells in the colonic submucosa were noted with colitis and progression to dysplasia and cancer. Mast cells recruited macrophages in ex vivo migration assays, and both mast cells and TAMs promoted invasion of cancer cells. Pretreatment of mast cells with LY294002 blocked recruitment of TAMs. LY294002 inhibited mast cell and TAM-mediated tumor invasion, and in mice, blocked stromal PI3K, colitis, and cancer. CONCLUSION: The PI3K/AKT pathway is active in cells infiltrating inflamed human colon tissue. This pathway sustains the recruitment of inflammatory cells through a positive feedback loop. The PI3K/AKT pathway is essential for tumor invasion and the malignant features of the piroxicam/IL-10(-/-) mouse model. LY294002 targets the PI3K pathway and hinders progressive colitis. These findings indicate that colitis and progression to cancer are dependent on stromal PI3K and sensitive to treatment with LY294002.

Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Adenomatous polyps greater than 1 cm are defined as advanced adenomas. Inaccurate size estimation can lead to inappropriate surveillance recommendations of colorectal adenomas. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of endoscopic polyp mis-sizing on colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. DESIGN: This is a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a gastroenterology practice at a US academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Endoscopic size estimates of polyps 10 to 25 mm were compared with postfixation histopathologic polyp measurements for 15 different gastroenterologists. Only adenomatous polyps removed in entirety by snare polypectomy were included in the analysis. Size variation was defined as (endoscopic estimate - histopathologic size)/(histopathologic size). Clinical mis-sizing was defined as a size variation of >33%. The mean size variation, the percentage of clinical mis-sizing, and the percentage of inappropriate surveillance recommendation due to size variation >33% were reported per endoscopist. RESULTS: : Included for analysis were 4990 procedures from 15 gastroenterologists. A total of 230 polyps from 200 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 62.6 years (SD 10.1), and 52% were men. The mean size variation between the endoscopic polyp size estimation and the histopathologic polyp was 73.6% (range of mean size variation, 13%-127%). 62.6% (range, 0%-91%) of included polyps had clinical mis-sizing. Of included polypectomies, 35.2% (range, 0%-67%) resulted in an inappropriate surveillance recommendation due to clinical mis-sizing even after considering histology and synchronous polyps. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in endoscopists' ability to accurately size adenomatous polyps. Some endoscopists rarely mis-size adenomas, and their surveillance recommendations are appropriate in regard to sizing. However, other endoscopists inaccurately size adenomas, and this leads to inappropriate surveillance of colorectal polyps. In this study, approximately 1 of 3 included polypectomies yielded inappropriate surveillance recommendations because of clinical mis-sizing.

Histopathology predictors of medically refractory ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: The ability of ulcerative colitis histology to predict medically refractory disease was evaluated. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent colectomy for medically refractory disease were compared with 48 medically managed patients. All patients were followed up for > or =6 months. The study design was a retrospective longitudinal observational chart review to determine whether specific histologic parameters were predictive of a later colectomy for medically refractory disease. RESULTS: On initial biopsy, medically refractory patients were more likely to have severe cryptitis, 75% vs 49%; lymphoid follicles, 78% vs 48%; and erosions, 35% vs 11%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of crypt abscesses, mucin depletion, crypt distortion, or mucosal ulceration between medically refractory and medically managed patients. Active inflammation on endoscopy was not statistically different between groups (P = .192). In a recursive partition model, the strongest predictors of future colectomy were age dependent. Among older patients (>38 y), severe cryptitis was the strongest determinant of refractory disease. Only 1 of 21 (5%) of the patients who initially did not have severe cryptitis progressed to colectomy. In younger patients (< or =38 y), the presence of lymphoid follicles was the strongest predictor of future colectomy; 9 of 14 (64%) patients with lymphoid follicles progressed to colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Medically refractory ulcerative colitis was associated with initial biopsy findings of severe cryptitis, lymphoid follicles, and erosions. Refractory disease was not predicted by the severity or extent of endoscopic findings. In younger patients, the presence of lymphoid follicles, and in older patients, severe cryptitis, were the most important predictors of medically refractory disease.