Optimizing the results of facial animation surgery: Botulinum toxin injection into free functional gracilis flap transfer.

Although neuromuscular gracilis transplantation is the best choice for facial reanimation in patients with congenital or inveterate palsy, the results are not completely satisfactory. Ancillary procedures developed to achieve better symmetry of the smile and reduce the hypercontractility of the transplanted muscle have been reported. However, the intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin has not been described for this purpose. Patients undergoing gracilis injections of botulinum toxin after facial reanimation surgery between September 1, 2020, and June 1, 2022, were retrospectively enrolled in this study. We collected photographs taken before and 20-30 days after injection and compared the symmetry of the face using software. Nine patients with a mean age of 23.56 years (range, 7-56 years) were enrolled. Reinnervation of the muscle was provided by the contralateral healthy facial nerve via a sural cross-graft (four patients), by the ipsilateral masseteric nerve (three cases), and by the contralateral masseteric and facial nerve (two). Using Emotrics software, we identified differences in the commissure excursion discrepancy of 3.82 mm, the smile angle discrepancy of 0.084°, and the dental show discrepancy of 1.49 mm; the average difference in the commissure height deviation was 2.26 mm (P = 0.02), and those in the upper- and lower-lip height deviation were 1.05 mm and 1.49 mm, respectively. Gracilis injection of botulinum toxin after gracilis transplantation is a safe and feasible procedure that could be applicable to all patients with asymmetric smiles related to excessive transplant contraction. It yields good esthetic results with little to no related morbidity.

Safety of boneless reconstruction of the mandible with a CAD/CAM designed titanium device: The replica cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of REPLICA, a CAD/CAM-designed patient-specific titanium mandible, in patients with mandibular defects not suitable for reconstruction with traditional techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cohort study with a composite primary outcome assigned at the end of a 1-year follow-up. The outcome was assigned in the presence of all the following: 1) absence of intraoral or skin extrusion of REPLICA; 2) decrease or cessation of oral pain; 3) stability or increase in mouth opening; 4) resumption of oral feeding without the need of nasogastric tube; 5) absence of fracture at multidetector computer tomography (MDCT); 6) absence of displacement (MDCT); 7) absence of screw loosening (MDCT). The secondary outcome was the patient-reported QOL at 6 months of follow-up as detected by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. RESULTS: Between March 2012 and June 2017, 18 consecutive patients, with a median (IQR) age of 67 (65;74) underwent reconstruction of mandibular defects with REPLICA at our Unit. The primary outcome was reached by 14 of the 18 patients. QOL data were available for 15 patients at the 6-month follow-up, showing a good profile of general and disease-specific QOL. CONCLUSION: REPLICA offered a safe solution at 1-year for the treatment of mandibular defects not suitable for reconstruction with traditional techniques, and was associated with subjective well-being and satisfaction. Further studies are needed to assess the full range of indications of REPLICA.