Preferred language and diagnostic errors in the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between language and diagnostic errors (DxE) in the pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Electronic trigger identified ED encounters resulting in unplanned hospital admission that occurred within 10 days of an index visit from January 2018 through February 2022. Manual screening of each triggered encounter identified cases where the index visit diagnosis and hospitalization discharge diagnosis differed, and these were screened in for review using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to determine if a diagnostic error (DxE) occurred. Non-English primary language (NEPL) and English-proficient (EP) groups were established based on caregiver language. The primary outcome was the proportion of DxE each group. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of DxE. RESULTS: Electronic trigger identified 3,551 patients, of which 806 (22.7 %) screened in for Safer Dx review. 172 (21.3 %) experienced DxE. The proportion of DxE was similar between EP and NEPL groups (21.5 vs. 21.7 %; p=0.97). Age≥12 years and fewer prior admissions in the preceding 6 months predicted higher odds of DxE. NEPL did not predict higher odds of DxE. CONCLUSIONS: NEPL was not associated with increased odds DxE resulting in unplanned admission.

Breathing Easier: Decreasing Tracheal Intubation-associated Adverse Events in the Pediatric ED and Urgent Care.

Tracheal intubation is a high-risk procedure in the pediatric emergency department (PED) and pediatric urgent care (PUC) settings. We aimed to develop an airway safety intervention to decrease severe tracheal intubation-associated adverse events (TIAEs) by decreasing process variation. METHODS: After gathering baseline data on TIAE, an interdisciplinary team underwent a mini-Delphi process to identify key drivers for decreasing severe TIAE rates. We launched a 4-part airway safety bundle that included: (1) color-coded weight-based equipment chart, (2) visual schematic of airway equipment, (3) recommended medication dosing, and (4) safety checklist across a single, tertiary PED and 5 satellite community PUCs/PEDs. Multiple plan-do-study-act cycles were undertaken, and results were monitored using statistical process control charts. Charts were restaged when special cause variation was achieved. This study aimed to decrease the severe TIAE rate from a baseline of 23% in the tertiary site and 25% in the community sites to <15% within 12 months and to sustain these outcomes for 6 months. RESULTS: During the study period, we noted decreased rates of severe TIAE in both the PED and PUC setting during the intervention period, and we have sustained this improvement for more than 6 months in all sites with no associated change in balancing measures. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an airway safety bundle over a wide geographic area and among personnel with variable levels of training is possible and has the potential to decrease severe TIAE across multiple clinical settings.