ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Racial inequities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality constitute a public health crisis in the United States. Doula care, defined as care from birth workers who provide culturally appropriate, non-clinical support during pregnancy and postpartum, has been proposed as an intervention to help disrupt obstetric racism as a driver of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Black and other birthing persons of colour. Many state Medicaid programs are implementing doula programs to address the continued increase in SMM and mortality. Medicaid programs are poised to play a major role in addressing the needs of these populations with the goal of closing the racial gaps in SMM and mortality. This study will investigate the most effective ways that Medicaid programs can implement doula care to improve racial health equity. METHODS: We describe the protocol for a mixed-methods study to understand how variation in implementation of doula programs in Medicaid may affect racial equity in pregnancy and postpartum health. Primary study outcomes include SMM, person-reported measures of respectful obstetric care, and receipt of evidence-based care for chronic conditions that are the primary causes of postpartum mortality (cardiovascular, mental health, and substance use conditions). Our research team includes doulas, university-based investigators, and Medicaid participants from six sites (Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia) in the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN). Study data will include policy analysis of doula program implementation, longitudinal data from a cohort of doulas, cross-sectional data from Medicaid beneficiaries, and Medicaid healthcare administrative data. Qualitative analysis will examine doula and beneficiary experiences with healthcare systems and Medicaid policies. Quantitative analyses (stratified by race groups) will use matching techniques to estimate the impact of using doula care on postpartum health outcomes, and will use time-series analyses to estimate the average treatment effect of doula programs on population postpartum health outcomes. DISCUSSION: Findings will facilitate learning opportunities among Medicaid programs, doulas and Medicaid beneficiaries. Ultimately, we seek to understand the implementation and integration of doula care programs into Medicaid and how these processes may affect racial health equity. Study registration The study is registered with the Open Science Foundation ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NXZUF ).
Subject(s)
Doulas , Health Equity , Medicaid , Humans , United States , Female , Pregnancy , Racism , Healthcare Disparities , Maternal Health Services , Maternal Mortality , Postpartum Period , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome , Research DesignABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are demonstrated racial inequities in coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease burden, and the initial vaccine rollout did not equitably address these disparities. METHODS: We conducted analyses of a national Facebook survey restricted to Black adult residents of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania for the period of May 2021 to January 2022. We assessed the associations between demographics, health status, social normative context, perceived racial discrimination, and beliefs about COVID-19 mitigation strategies on vaccine uptake and intention and compared reasons reported for vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine non-intention among the unvaccinated. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted on a subset of unvaccinated respondents to explore variables associated with vaccine intent. RESULTS: Over 85â¯% of 1,552 respondents were vaccinated against COVID-19 at the time of the survey. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated respondents were older and more highly educated (Pâ¯<â¯0.001), more likely to have at least one chronic health condition (Pâ¯=â¯0.03) and had a stronger social normative context in support of vaccination (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Vaccinated respondents also reported greater personal adherence to wearing face masks when out in public and were more likely to report positive perceptions of the effectiveness of mitigation strategies (e.g., face masks) towards preventing COVID-19 transmission (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Unvaccinated respondents were more likely to report intention to be vaccinated if they felt that face masks were very effective in the prevention of COVID-19 compared to those who felt this mitigation strategy was only moderately/slightly/not at all effective (OR: 4.52; 95â¯% CI: 1.23-16.59; Pâ¯=â¯0.02) and if they did not report mistrust in the government or COVID-19 vaccines compared to those reporting mistrust (OR: 7.72; 95â¯% CI: 1.34-44.64; Pâ¯=â¯0.02). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination levels were high among Black adult residents of Allegheny County who responded to the survey. Future efforts should continue to strive towards addressing reasons for mistrust with focused attention from healthcare institutions and the government on increasing their trustworthiness, alongside employment of evidence-based strategies to increase vaccination rates. Additionally, efforts should continue to engage unvaccinated and vaccine hesitant persons' perspectives to inform ongoing health equity interventions.
ABSTRACT
Background: Neighborhood poverty is associated with adiposity in women, though longitudinal designs, annually collected residential histories, objectively collected anthropometric measures, and geographically diverse samples of midlife women remain limited. Objective: To investigate whether longitudinal exposure to neighborhood concentrated poverty is associated with differences in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) among 2,328 midlife women (age 42-52 years at baseline) from 6 U.S. cities enrolled in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) from 1996 to 2007. Methods: Residential addresses and adiposity measures were collected at approximately annual intervals from the baseline visit through a 10-year follow-up. We used census poverty data and local spatial statistics to identify hot-spots of high concentrated poverty areas and cold-spots of low concentrated poverty located within each SWAN site region, and used linear mixed-effect models to estimate percentage differences (95% confidence interval [CI]) in average BMI and WC levels between neighborhood concentrated poverty categories. Results: After adjusting for individual-level sociodemographics, health-related factors, and residential mobility, compared to residents of moderate concentrated poverty communities, women living in site-specific hot-spots of high concentrated poverty had 1.5% higher (95% CI: 0.6, 2.3) BMI and 1.3% higher (95% CI: 0.5, 2.0) WC levels, whereas women living in cold-spots of low concentrated poverty had 0.7% lower (95% CI: -1.2, -0.1) BMI and 0.3% lower (95% CI: -0.8, 0.2) WC. Site-stratified results remained in largely similar directions to overall estimates, despite wide CIs and small sample sizes. Conclusions: Longitudinal exposure to neighborhood concentrated poverty is associated with slightly higher BMI and WC among women across midlife.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are large racial inequities in pregnancy and early childhood health within state Medicaid programs in the United States. To date, few Medicaid policy interventions have explicitly focused on improving health in Black populations. Pennsylvania Medicaid has adopted two policy interventions to incentivize racial health equity in managed care (equity payment program) and obstetric service delivery (equity focused obstetric bundle). Our research team will conduct a mixed-methods study to investigate the implementation and early effects of these two policy interventions on pregnancy and infant health equity. METHODS: Qualitative interviews will be conducted with Medicaid managed care administrators and obstetric and pediatric providers, and focus groups will be conducted among Medicaid beneficiaries. Quantitative data on healthcare utilization, healthcare quality, and health outcomes among pregnant and parenting people will be extracted from administrative Medicaid healthcare data. Primary outcomes are stakeholder perspectives on policy intervention implementation (qualitative) and timely prenatal care, pregnancy and birth outcomes, and well-child visits (quantitative). Template analysis methods will be applied to qualitative data. Quantitative analyses will use an interrupted time series design to examine changes over time in outcomes among Black people, relative to people of other races, before and after adoption of the Pennsylvania Medicaid equity-focused policy interventions. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study are expected to advance knowledge about how Medicaid programs can best implement policy interventions to promote racial equity in pregnancy and early childhood health.
Subject(s)
Health Equity , Healthcare Disparities , Medicaid , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Focus Groups , Health Policy , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Interviews as Topic , Pennsylvania , Pregnancy Outcome/ethnology , Prenatal Care , Qualitative Research , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Initiative, Live Well Allegheny: Lifting Wellness for African Americans (LWA) in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, aims to enhance health equity by addressing chronic disease in six African American communities via three key strategies: nutrition, physical activity, and community-clinical linkages. OBJECTIVES: This manuscript describes the coalition's partnership dynamics and evaluation methods with a focus on nutrition strategies. METHODS: We have a network of committed partners implementing the strategies and we are evaluating our efforts using community asset mapping, county population-based survey data, qualitative process interviews, focus groups, and program performance measures. RESULTS: The LWA coalition is the culmination of years of partnership building, which allows for more targeted activities related to health equity in the region. Thus far, the LWA coalition is thriving. The network of committed and talented partners in the nutrition strategy (healthy nutrition standards, food systems, and breastfeeding) reached 22 sites and more than 46,000 people during the first 2 years of the project. Process interviews conducted as part of the evaluation identified challenges and successes of implementation, and development of the coalition. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive evaluation approach supports formative processes, evaluation metrics, and prolonged sustainability plans of this community-based coalition.
Subject(s)
Community-Based Participatory Research , Health Equity , Healthcare Disparities , Racial Groups , Humans , Black or African American , Chronic Disease , Pennsylvania , United States , Healthcare Disparities/ethnologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To measure racial inequities in drug testing among pregnant people during the first prenatal visit based on their drug use disclosure pattern. METHODS: We used data from a cohort study of patient-clinician communication patterns regarding substance use in first prenatal visits from February 2011 to August 2014. We assessed racial differences (Black-White) in the receipt of urine toxicology testing, stratifying on patients' drug use disclosure to the clinician. RESULTS: Among 341 study participants (205 Black [60.1%] and 136 White [39.9%] participants), 70 participants (33 Black [47.1%] and 37 White [52.9%] participants) disclosed drug use, and 271 participants (172 Black [63.5%] and 99 White [36.5%] participants) did not disclose drug use during their first obstetric visit. Of 70 participants who disclosed drug use, 50 (28 Black [56.0%] and 22 White [44.0%] White) had urine drug testing conducted. Black pregnant patients who disclosed drug use were more likely to be tested for drugs than their White counterparts in the adjusted regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.9, 95% CI 1.3-58.6). Among the 271 participants who did not disclose drug use, 38 (18 Black [47.4%] and 20 White [52.6%] participants) had urine drug testing conducted. For those who did not disclose drug use, the adjusted model showed no statistically significant differences in urine drug testing by patients' race (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.6). CONCLUSION: When pregnant people disclosed drug use, clinicians were more likely to order urine drug testing for Black pregnant people compared with their White counterparts, suggesting clinician racial bias. Current practice patterns and protocols such as urine drug testing in pregnancy care deserve review to identify and mitigate areas of potential clinician discrimination.
Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Prenatal Care , Racism , Substance Abuse Detection , Substance-Related Disorders , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Black or African American , Cohort Studies , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Substance Abuse Detection/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/ethnology , Substance-Related Disorders/urine , White People , Racism/ethnology , Racism/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of exclusive breastfeeding is important in maternal and child health research. Exclusive breastfeeding is often measured using the 24-hour recall or the since birth method for the first 6 months. These methods can produce different estimates, introducing problems in interpreting breastfeeding behavior and making accurate comparisons across settings or countries. RESEARCH AIM: Our aim was to compare the exclusive breastfeeding rates between the 24-hour recall and since birth methods among a diverse cohort of birthing people using the ecological momentary assessments method. In addition, we compared the exclusive breastfeeding rates between the two methods across race and other maternal characteristics. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis using data from the Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study (PMOMS), a prospective longitudinal study which recruited participants during pregnancy and followed them for 12 months after delivery. Participants completed surveys in real-time via ecological momentary assessment. Individual exclusive breastfeeding rates from months 1-6 were computed using 24-hour recall and since birth methods for 284 participants. We calculated the percentage point difference between the two methods across child age and maternal characteristics. We used a two-sample test of proportions to determine if the differences observed in the proportions were significant. RESULTS: Exclusive breastfeeding rates from the 24-hour recall were higher than the since birth rates across all ages and maternal characteristics. The difference between the two methods at 3 months was 25.7 percentage points and at 6 months was a 17.2 percentage points. Irrespective of the method used to measure exclusive breastfeeding, White participants had higher exclusive breastfeeding rates than Black participants. CONCLUSION: The 24-hour recall and the since birth methods of assessing exclusive breastfeeding provided substantially different estimates. These findings highlight the importance of specificity in measuring and reporting exclusive breastfeeding.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Ecological Momentary Assessment , Female , Pregnancy , Child , Humans , Infant , Breast Feeding/methods , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Pennsylvania , MothersABSTRACT
Black childbearing individuals in the US experience a higher risk of postpartum weight retention (PPWR) compared to their White counterparts. Given that PPWR is related to adverse health outcomes, it is important to investigate predictors of weight-related health behaviors, such as self-weighing (i.e., using a scale at home). Regular self-weighing is an evidence-based weight management strategy, but there is minimal insight into sociodemographic factors related to frequency. The Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study (PMOMS) facilitated longitudinal ambulatory weight assessments to investigate racial inequities in PPWR. Our objective for the present study was to describe self-weighing behavior during and after pregnancy in the PMOMS cohort, as well as related demographic and psychosocial factors. Applying tree modeling and multiple regression, we examined self-weighing during and after pregnancy. Participants (N = 236) were 30.2 years old on average (SD = 4.7), with the majority being college-educated (53.8%, n = 127), earning at least $30,000 annually (61.4%, n = 145), and self-identifying as non-Hispanic White (NHW; 68.2%, n = 161). Adherence to regular self-weighing (at least once weekly) was highest among participants during pregnancy, with a considerable decline after giving birth. Low-income Black participants (earning < $30,000) were significantly less likely to reach a completion rate of ≥ 80% during pregnancy (AOR = 0.10) or the postpartum period (AOR = 0.16), compared to NHW participants earning at least $30,000 annually. Increases in perceived stress were associated with decreased odds of sustained self-weighing after delivery (AOR = 0.79). Future research should consider behavioral differences across demographic intersections, such as race and socioeconomic status, and the impact on efficacy of self-weighing.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Efforts to address vaccine uptake and access among black adults will be relevant for continued coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) eradication efforts and can be transferable to other prevention efforts in future pandemics. This study investigated factors related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake and access among black residents in Allegheny County, PA. Methods: Surveys were administered electronically from October 2021 to January 2022 to black Allegheny County residents aged 18 and older. Questions included thoughts on COVID mitigation strategies (e.g., masking, social distancing), vaccination status, intention to vaccinate children, trust of COVID-19 information sources and vaccines, family needs, access to support services, and social media use to access information. Descriptive statistics and significant correlates of being vaccinated using adjusted logistic regression models are reported. Results: Of the overall sample (N=397), the majority were fully vaccinated (n=306, 77%). Fully vaccinated participants were more likely to be female (62.5%, p=0.010), age 60 years or older (34.3%, p=0.0002), have some college education (23.2%, p<0.0001), and be employed full time (50.0%, p=0.0001) compared with nonvaccinated individuals. Among the unvaccinated participants (n=91), the primary reason was fear of illness (8.9%), long-term effects (6.5%), mistrust in the vaccine (6.3%), and needing more information (4.5%). Vaccine-hesitant participants were more likely to be unvaccinated (adjusted odds ratio=2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.25-4.14) after adjusting for age, education, employment, insurance, health status, and income. Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy may be improved by directly addressing fear of illness resulting from vaccines and improving clarity in the vaccine development and approval process to improve uptake among black adults.
ABSTRACT
Context: Historically, Black women strategically employed silence to endure enslavement to the U.S., and other forms of racial violence. The current study aimed to understand contemporary perspectives on self-silencing. Objective: To explore young adult Black women's experiences of self-silencing and its potential impact on their physical and mental well-being. Methods: Data are from 16 semi-structured interviews with Black women ages 18 to 39 in southwest Pennsylvania conducted between October 2021 - May 2022. We analyzed the interviews using inductive thematic analysis. Results: We identified four themes: "Self-silencing is Inherited," "Silencing Here and Now," "Wear and Tear," and "The Flip Side." The first theme represents the overwhelming consensus that limiting self-expression has a generational component rooted in racism. Most participants identified self-silencing in school and employment settings. Participants described the wear and tear of self-silencing as negatively impacting health behaviors (e.g., diet) and mental health both when deciding whether to self-silence and later ruminations on the decision. "The Flip Side" represents counter perspectives that not self-silencing liberates and improves health. Conclusions: The findings highlight that many Black women may use or resist self-silencing as a vigilance-based coping strategy to preserve their mental and physical well-being. We present measurement considerations for research on health impacts of racism and other forms of oppression.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine whether longitudinal exposure to neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability influences blood pressure changes throughout midlife in a racially, ethnically, and geographically-diverse cohort of women transitioning through menopause. METHODS: We used longitudinal data on 2738 women (age 42-52 at baseline) living in six United States cities from The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Residential histories, systolic blood pressures (SBP), and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were collected annually for ten years. We used longitudinal latent profile analysis to identify patterns of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability occurring from 1996 to 2007 in participant neighborhoods. We used linear mixed-effect models to determine if a woman's neighborhood profile throughout midlife was associated with blood pressure changes. RESULTS: We identified four unique profiles of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability - differentiated by residential socioeconomic status, population density, and vacant housing conditions - which remained stable across time. Women residing in the most socioeconomically vulnerable neighborhoods experienced the steepest increase in annual SBP growth by 0.93 mmHg/year (95% CI: 0.65-1.21) across ten-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability was significantly associated with accelerated SBP increases throughout midlife among women.
Subject(s)
Residence Characteristics , Women's Health , Humans , Female , United States , Adult , Middle Aged , Blood Pressure , Longitudinal Studies , Social ClassABSTRACT
Achieving health equity (where every person has the opportunity to attain their full health potential) requires the removal of obstacles to health, including barriers to high-quality medical care. Innovations in service delivery can inadvertently maintain, worsen, or introduce inequities. As such, implementation of innovations must be accompanied by a dual commitment to evaluate impact on marginalized groups and to restructure systems that obstruct people from health and healthcare. Understanding the impact innovations have on access to high-quality care is central to this effort. In this Perspective, we join conceptual models of healthcare access and quality with health equity frameworks to conceptualize healthcare receipt as a series of interactions between people and systems unfolding over time. This synthesized model is applied to illustrate the effects of telemedicine on patient, population, and system outcomes. Telemedicine may improve or worsen health equity by altering access to care and by altering quality of care once it is accessed. Teasing out these varied effects is complex and requires considering multilevel influences on the outcome of a care-seeking episode. This synthesized model can be used to inform research, practice, and policy surrounding the equity implications of care delivery innovations more broadly.
Subject(s)
Health Equity , Telemedicine , Humans , Health Services Accessibility , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Health PolicyABSTRACT
Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for 6 months; however, many childbearing people wean their infants before 6 months. Psychosocial factors such as stress, social support and race are significant determinants of breastfeeding; however, few studies have longitudinally explored the effect of perceived stress and various forms of social support on exclusive breastfeeding. We used quantitative methodologies to examine exclusive breastfeeding, perceived stress and social support among 251 participants from the Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study. Participants between 18 and 44 years were recruited during pregnancy (irrespective of parity) and completed surveys in real-time via Ecological Momentary Assessment up to 12 months postpartum from December 2017 to August 2021. We measured perceived stress with the adapted Perceived Stress Scale and perceived social support with the Multi-dimensional Social Support Scale. Received social support was measured using a single question on breastfeeding support. We conducted a mixed-effects logistic regression to determine the effect of stress, race and social support on exclusive breastfeeding over 6 months. We examined the moderation effect of perceived social support and breastfeeding support in the relationship between perceived stress and exclusive breastfeeding. Black, compared with White, participants were less likely to breastfeed exclusively for 6 months. Participants who reported higher perceived stress were less likely to breastfeed exclusively for 6 months. Perceived social support moderated the relationship between perceived stress and exclusive breastfeeding (odds ratio: 0.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.001-0.072). However, breastfeeding support directly increased the likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding over 6 months. Perceived stress is negatively associated with exclusive breastfeeding. Birthing people who intend to breastfeed may benefit from perinatal support programs that include components to buffer stress.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Mothers , Infant , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Race Factors , Mothers/psychology , Postpartum Period , Social SupportABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Socio-environmental factors may affect uptake and utility of behavioral interventions targeting weight loss and cardiometabolic health. To evaluate the relation of neighborhood walkability to physical activity (PA) and glucose control in a sample of adults with overweight/obesity participating in a weight loss study. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a 12-month behavioral weight loss intervention (2011-2015) using one-group pretest-posttest design. Neighborhood walkability was assessed via residential Walk Score (0-100) at study entry. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) via phlebotomy and PA via waist-worn ActiGraph GT3X were assessed at baseline and end of study. Study variables included neighborhood walkability (car-dependent: Walk Score < 50 vs. walkable: Walk Score ≥ 50), prediabetes (FPG 100-125 mg/dL), and recommended PA (moderate to vigorous PA [MVPA] > 22 min/day). Generalized linear model with logit link results were reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The sample (N = 114) was mostly female (88.6%), white (83.3%), college educated (73.7%), and on average 51.4 ± 1.0 years of age. At baseline, persons residing in car-dependent neighborhoods tended to have higher income than those in walkable neighborhoods. Neighborhood walkability interacted with household income at study entry to predict participants' ability to meet the MVPA goal at 12 months (AOR = 13.52, 95% CI: 1.86-119.20). Those from walkable neighborhoods had 67% lower odds of having prediabetes compared to those from car-dependent neighborhoods (AOR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.10-0.87) at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings corroborate previous research characterizing the relationship between neighborhood walkability, PA, and prediabetes status. Key drivers of this impact warrant further investigation in a study with a larger, more diverse sample.
Subject(s)
Prediabetic State , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Prediabetic State/therapy , Environment Design , Exercise , Walking , Weight Loss , Residence CharacteristicsABSTRACT
Live Well Allegheny: Lifting Wellness for African Americans (LWA2) is a coalition in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) initiative. LWA2 consists of partner organizations addressing chronic disease prevention in six Black communities through nutrition, physical activity, and community-clinical linkage strategies. This analysis focuses on qualitative data exploring the influence of COVID-19 on coalition functioning and communities. We conducted focus groups with residents in REACH communities and collected evaluation reports from partner organizations. Three focus groups assessed awareness of and participation in the REACH initiative, feedback, and the impact of COVID-19 when applicable. An additional focus group included questions related to flu vaccine messaging and the COVID-19 vaccine. These data sources provided insight regarding how COVID-19 affected planned tasks. Evaluation team members analyzed focus groups and collated summaries as part of a larger comprehensive evaluation. Partner organizations experienced an increase in food stamp applications, delays in opening farmers' markets, a shift to virtual preventive health programs, canceled in-person events, and programmatic interruptions that shifted long-term goals. Community resident concerns included difficulty accessing public transportation, decreased physical activity, fear of in-person interactions, and increased wait times for mental health services. Coalition members developed methods to continue functioning and sustaining program activities. Residents were able to engage differently with chronic illness prevention techniques. Reports from the ongoing analysis will be used to adapt coalition functioning.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Public Health , Humans , Focus Groups , Pennsylvania , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In 2018, The Live Well Allegheny: Lifting Wellness for African Americans (LWA2) Initiative was developed to support six priority, Black communities in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania to address health equity in chronic disease. The LWA2 coalition members participated in ongoing anti-racism and racial equity sessions with a nationally recognized anti-racist facilitation team. The sessions included a 2-days experience in January 2020 along with follow up meetings throughout 2020. METHODS: Surveys were administered to understand their perceptions related to anti-racism and oppression and subsequent actions as a result of the sessions. Additionally, we conducted nine in-depth interviews with organizational partners (January -May 2020) to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the coalition and inform future activities. RESULTS: Ten participants completed the post session surveys. Seven out of 10 survey respondents felt they had a good understanding of how oppression (racism, sexism, capitalism) influenced their life and work. However, the majority indicated needing the tools to implement anti-racist strategies in their work. The in-depth interviews with organizational partners revealed that racial equity was of concern to all partners but there was variability in intentionality around racial equity as a core element of each organization's mission, goals and subsequent actions. DISCUSSION: As a result of the interviews, coalition members developed a racial equity statement and theory of change for implementation in the coalition work and within individual organizations along with a plan for implementing an equity audit of the coalition. Coalitions of this kind should be intentional about implementing continuous strategies related to anti-racism for structural changes toward achieving racial equity in their overall work.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there are associations between driving distance from the patient residence to the delivery hospital and adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using 2011-2015 Pennsylvania birth records of live births at 20 weeks of gestation or more, excluding inpatient hospital transfers or implausible distances. The shortest driving distance from patient residence to the delivery hospital was calculated in ArcGIS and was evaluated in association with a composite of adverse maternal outcomes (blood transfusion, unplanned operation, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Multivariable-adjusted Poisson models were used to estimate relative risks with 95% CIs with a referent difference of 1 km distance to the delivery hospital. RESULTS: A total 662,245 birth records were included, and the median driving distance to the hospital was 11.3 km (interquartile range 5.4-21.6 km). The overall rate of the composite maternal outcome was 0.6% and of NICU admission was 8.4%. Compared with the referent distance, increasing driving distance was significantly associated with increased adjusted risks of the maternal composite outcome (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.36 for 60 km; aRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.19-1.53 for 70 km; and 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.75 for 80 km) and NICU admission (aRR 1.70, 95% CI 1.65-1.76 for 60 km; aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.90-2.02 for 70 km; and aRR 2.25, 95% CI 2.18-2.33 for 80 km). CONCLUSION: Longer distances to the delivery hospital were associated with greater risk of adverse maternal outcomes and NICU admission. Whether these findings reflect health care delivery deficits or simply serve as a marker of social deprivation requires further study.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Maternity , Live Birth , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , Pennsylvania/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stress can lead to adverse physiological and psychological outcomes. Therefore, understanding stress during pregnancy provides insight into racial disparities in maternal health, particularly Black maternal health. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe (1) daily exposure to self-reported stress levels during pregnancy, and (2) sources of stress among participants that identified as Black or White using data collected via ecological momentary assessment. METHODS: We leveraged survey data from the Postpartum Mothers Mobile Study, a prospective longitudinal study using ecological momentary assessment data collection methods to describe patterns of stress during pregnancy. This article is descriptive and documents patterns of self-reported stress levels and sources of stress. Frequencies and percentages of stress responses were computed to describe these patterns. RESULTS: The sample (n = 296) was 27% Black (n = 78) and 63% White (n = 184). Results were based on at least one measurement of that stress level during pregnancy. A similar number of Black and White participants reported no stress during pregnancy. White (85%-95%) and Black (60%-70%) participants reported low to moderate levels of stress. Black participants (38%) and White participants (35%) reported experiencing high stress. Black and White participants reported similar sources of stress: stress from a partner, too many things to do, a baby or other children, and financial concerns. White participants reported work as a top stressor, and Black participants reported financial issues as a top source of stress. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into daily exposure to stress that has implications for maternal health. We described patterns of self-reported stress and sources of stress among Black and White participants. The daily exposures to stress reported by this sample exist within a context of root causes of structural inequities in education, health care, income, wealth, and housing that must be addressed to achieve maternal health equity.
Subject(s)
Ecological Momentary Assessment , Maternal Health , Black People , Child , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
There are a disproportionate number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among Black and Latinx communities, a result of a history of structural racism and exploitation. An equity framework and approach are critical but have been lacking in the COVID-19 response, including vaccine dissemination. We provide an overview and application of remove, repair, remediate, restructure, and provide (R4P), an equity framework, in examining COVID-19 vaccine trial development and related interventions. R4P is an equity framework and tool that applies critical race theory, intersectional, and dimensionality in planning, assessment, and research for creating action to eliminate inequities.