Improving Medical Student Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Introduction: Owing to limited clinical clerkships and travel restrictions related to COVID-19, recent medical student mentorship in orthopaedic surgery has been impacted negatively. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine if medical student awareness of orthopaedics as a possible career field may be improved through a mentoring program designed and delivered by orthopaedic residents. Methods: A five-resident QI team developed four educational sessions aimed at a medical student audience. Forum topics included: (1) orthopaedics as a career, (2) fracture conference, (3) splinting workshop, and (4) residency application process. Pre- and post-forum surveys were administered to student participants to assess changes in their perceptions regarding orthopaedic surgery. Data derived from the questionnaires were analyzed with nonparametric statistical tests. Results: Of 18 forum participants, 14 were men and 4 were women. A total of 40 survey pairs were collected, averaging 10 per session. In the all-participant encounter analysis, there were statistically significant improvements in all outcome measures including interest in, exposure to, and knowledge of orthopaedics; exposure to our training program; and ability to interact with our residents. Those undecided regarding their specialty demonstrated larger increases in post-forum responses, suggesting that the learning experience was more impactful for that subgroup. Conclusions: This QI initiative was a successful demonstration of orthopaedic resident mentorship of medical students, wherein perceptions of orthopaedics were influenced favorably by the educational experience. For some students with limited access to orthopaedic clerkships or formal one-on-one mentoring, forums like these may be an acceptable alternative.

Supraspinatus Fatty Infiltration Correlation with Handgrip Strength, Shoulder Strength, and Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Rotator Cuff Tears.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between supraspinatus atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other objective parameters in patients with rotator cuff tears. It was hypothesized that high-grade supraspinatus fatty infiltration would be correlated negatively with handgrip strength, shoulder strength, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: Patients with MRI-proven rotator cuff tears treated by a single sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedist at a single institution underwent comprehensive preoperative evaluation including bilateral handgrip and shoulder strength measurements with dynamometers and multiple online questionnaires from the Surgical Outcomes SystemTM (Arthrex, Naples, FL). Available shoulder MRIs were reviewed to grade supraspinatus fatty infiltration severity according to the 5-tier Goutallier system and an alternate 3-tier classification scheme. Difference analysis and Spearman (rho) rank order correlation were applied to the collected data to define the relationships between supraspinatus fatty infiltration and key variables including handgrip strength, shoulder strength, and scores derived from the shoulder PROMs. Results: Ninety of the 121 patients enrolled in the study had shoulder MRIs available for review. There was no correlation found between supraspinatus fatty infiltration and handgrip strength, shoulder abduction strength, or any of the seven common shoulder PROM scores evaluated. There was statistically significant, albeit weak, correlation between MRI-derived fatty infiltration and shoulder external rotation strength. Conclusions: Contrary to the hypothesis, high-grade supraspinatus fatty infiltration is largely unrelated to and should not be considered predictive of handgrip strength, shoulder strength, or common shoulder PROM scores.

Improving Electronic Patient Handoff in an Orthopaedic Residency using the Listrunner© Application.

Introduction: Miscommunication during shift change and other handoff events is a common source of malpractice claims and patient-care errors. An efficient patient handoff system is imperative to prevent miscommunication. Owning to limitations with our current handoff system and to an ever-increasing reliance on electronic health information, our residency program sought to modernize our handoff method. Methods: To improve handoff communication, the HIPAA-compliant application Listrunner© was adopted. Members of the orthopaedic trauma team were oriented to the new application. Change-of-shift patient handoff was transitioned from the current email system to List-runner©. After three months of using the new application, a web-based questionnaire was administered to all members of the care team to assess their experiences, including perceived benefits and limitations of the Listrunner© application. Results: Seventeen orthopaedic resident physicians and three orthopaedic trauma attending physicians completed the survey. While almost half of the respondents were satisfied using email as a checkout tool, more than half of study participants indicated that it lacked security and several users believed there was a need for improvement. Most indicated that Listrunner© was easy to use, improved clinical efficiency, and improved patient care and safety. Seventeen of 20 respondents reported that they would like to continue using Listrunner© as a check-out tool. Conclusions: The Listrunner© application was adopted quickly by our orthopaedic trauma team, whose members opined that the application increased the efficiency and accuracy of handoff when compared to the previous secure email system.

Creating and Implementing a Protocol for the Management of Patients in Skeletal Traction: A Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal traction use generally has decreased over generations and is used most often for temporary fracture stabilization. Proper nursing management of patients in skeletal traction is crucial. A hospital protocol was created and implemented to educate and direct registered nurses (RNs) in the care of patients requiring skeletal traction. METHODS: A skeletal traction management protocol was drafted and implemented as hospital policy. Twenty-nine RNs from an orthopaedic unit at a level 1 trauma center attended a financially compensated, 45-minute, in-person, off-shift educational session. An anonymous pre-test utilizing a 5-point Likert scale was completed to assess RN knowledge and comfort regarding the following topics of traction care: pin care, manual traction, frame assembly, weight application and removal, skin evaluation, neurovascular checks, and reporting issues. The RNs were provided with a copy of the new hospital policy and key points were highlighted and demonstrated. After the demonstration, the RNs were given a post-test to assess their perceived knowledge and comfort with traction care. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in RN knowledge and comfort were seen in six of the seven evaluated topics. The greatest increase was seen in the manual traction topic. No significant change regarding neurovascular checks was observed with this topic having the highest pre-test scores. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital protocol was created successfully and implemented that significantly improved the level of RN knowledge and comfort with the management of patients requiring skeletal traction. Future studies should assess the effectiveness of annual education regarding the traction policy.

Aspirin for Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism After Orthopaedic Oncologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo orthopaedic oncologic surgical procedures are at increased risk of developing a venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines from surgical societies are shifting to include aspirin as a postoperative VTE prophylactic agent. The purpose of this study was to review our experience using aspirin as postoperative VTE prophylaxis for orthopaedic oncologic surgical procedures. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with a primary malignant soft-tissue or bone tumor or metastatic carcinoma. Demographic information, histopathologic diagnosis, VTE history, surgical procedure, and VTE prophylaxis were analyzed. VTE rates in the overall and prophylactic-specific cohorts were recorded and compared. RESULTS: A total of 142 distinct surgical procedures in 130 patients were included. VTE prophylaxis with aspirin was used after 103 procedures, and non-aspirin prophylaxis was used after 39. In 33 cases, imaging was used to investigate for VTE because of clinical signs and symptoms. VTE developed after 7 (4.9%) of the 142 procedures. There were 6 deep venous thromboses (DVTs) and 1 pulmonary embolism, and 2 of the VTEs presented in patients with a VTE history. VTE developed in 2.9% (3) of the 103 aspirin cases and 10.3% (4) of the 39 non-aspirin cases. No patient in the aspirin group who had been diagnosed with metastatic carcinoma, malignant soft-tissue sarcoma, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma developed a VTE. Risk factors for VTE development included diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] = 10.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.61 to 67.30), a history of VTE (OR = 7.26, 95% CI = 1.19 to 44.25), postoperative transfusion (OR = 34.50, 95% CI = 3.94 to 302.01), and estimated blood losses of 250 mL (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.03), 500 mL (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.23 to 4.13), and 1,000 mL (OR = 5.10, 95% CI = 1.52 to 17.04). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin may be a suitable and effective option for VTE chemoprophylaxis in patients treated with orthopaedic oncologic surgery, especially those diagnosed with a soft-tissue sarcoma. Research with a more advanced study design is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.