Enhancing Pharmacovigilance in Côte d'Ivoire: Impact of GSK's Training and Mentoring Pilot Project in the Abidjan Region.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacovigilance (PV) in sub-Saharan Africa relies on passive surveillance but underreporting of adverse events (AEs) by health care professionals (HCPs) is a major challenge. A PV enhancement project was implemented to address this in Côte d'Ivoire. OBJECTIVE: To improve safety surveillance of medicines through PV training and mentoring of HCPs in selected health care facilities (HCFs). METHODS: This collaborative project between national PV stakeholders, GSK, and PATH was implemented from September 2018 to February 2020 in Abidjan region, Côte d'Ivoire. Trained PV focal points provided training and regular mentoring of HCPs. Key performance indicator (KPI) categories for AE reporting were the volume of AE reports, efficiency of report transmission and data entry, quality of reports, and quality of the central (Vigilance Unit) response to AE reports. RESULTS: Overall, 1427 HCPs at 91 HCFs were trained. In the 8 months before implementation, 33 AE reports were received versus 85 after 3 months and 361 after 18 months of implementation (71 [83.5%] and 278 [77.0%], respectively, from Abidjan). The KPIs with the highest proportions were: AE reports received centrally (100%), complete AE reports (69.0%), AE reports entered into the local PV database within 48 h (99.6%), and AE reports entered into the global database, VigiBase (86.7%). Report notification within 72 h, causality assessment, and serious AE reporting had proportions below 20%; feedback to reporters was provided for only 0.4% of reports. CONCLUSION: Regular PV trainings and mentoring improved AE reporting in Côte d'Ivoire but further enhancement is required to improve passive safety surveillance.

Medicines and vaccines should be safe and effective for use in the general population. Health care professionals therefore have the responsibility to continuously monitor medicinal products and report any unwanted medical occurrence (adverse event). Training and mentoring of health care professionals can improve adverse event reporting. In Côte d'Ivoire, a training and mentoring project was implemented by GSK, PATH (a non-governmental organisation), and the Ministry of Health, with the objective of increasing adverse event reporting. Over the period of 18 months, 1427 health care professionals from 91 health care facilities in the Abidjan region received training and mentoring. Between January and August 2018, before the project began, 33 adverse event reports were submitted at the central level (to the country's Vigilance Unit), with 11 (33.3%) from the Abidjan region. From September to December 2018, the first three months of project implementation, 85 reports were received, with 71 (83.5%) coming from the Abidjan region. This number increased to 361 by the end of the 18-month project, with 278 (77.0%) coming from the Abidjan region. Training of health care professionals therefore improved adverse event reporting, mainly from the Abidjan region but also nationwide. Assessments of the efficiency of adverse event reporting and the quality of adverse events reports received by the Vigilance Unit showed promising results, although there was room for improvement. Lessons learned from this project can flexibly serve the needs of other countries with less functional systems for reporting adverse events associated with medicinal products.

Challenges and lessons learned from four years of planning and implementing pharmacovigilance enhancement in sub-Saharan Africa.

Pharmacovigilance (PV) systems in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are not fully functional. The spontaneous adverse events (AE) reporting rate in SSA is lower than in any other region of the world, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in SSA countries have limited awareness of AE surveillance and reporting procedures. The GSK PV enhancement pilot initiative, in collaboration with PATH and national PV stakeholders, aimed to strengthen passive safety surveillance through a training and mentoring program of HCPs in healthcare facilities in three SSA countries: Malawi, Côte d'Ivoire, and Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Project implementation was country-driven, led by the Ministry of Health via the national PV center or department, and was adapted to each country's needs. The implementation phase for each country was scheduled to last 18 months. At project start, low AE reporting rates reflected that awareness of PV practices was very low among HCPs in all three countries, even if a national PV center already existed. Malawi did not have a functional PV system nor a national PV center prior to the start of the initiative. After 18 months of PV training and mentoring of HCPs, passive safety surveillance was enhanced significantly as shown by the increased number of AE reports: from 22 during 2000-2016 to 228 in 18 months to 511 in 30 months in Malawi, and ~ 80% of AE reports from trained healthcare facilities in Côte d'Ivoire. In DRC, project implementation ended after 7 months because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Main challenges encountered were delayed AE report transmission (1-2 months, due mainly to remoteness of healthcare facilities and complex procedures for transmitting reports to the national PV center), delayed or no causality assessment due to lack of expertise and/or funding, negative perceptions among HCPs toward AE reporting, and difficulties in engaging public health programs with the centralized AE reporting processes. This pilot project has enabled the countries to train more HCPs, increased reporting of AEs and identified KPIs that could be flexibly replicated in each country. Country ownership and empowerment is essential to sustain these improvements and build a stronger AE reporting culture.

Assessing the safety, impact and effectiveness of RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine following its introduction in three sub-Saharan African countries: methodological approaches and study set-up.

BACKGROUND: Following a 30-year development process, RTS,S/AS01E (GSK, Belgium) is the first malaria vaccine to reach Phase IV assessments. The World Health Organization-commissioned Malaria Vaccine Implementation Programme (MVIP) is coordinating the delivery of RTS,S/AS01E through routine national immunization programmes in areas of 3 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The first doses were given in the participating MVIP areas in Malawi on 23 April, Ghana on 30 April, and Kenya on 13 September 2019. The countries participating in the MVIP have little or no baseline incidence data on rare diseases, some of which may be associated with immunization, a deficit that could compromise the interpretation of possible adverse events reported following the introduction of a new vaccine in the paediatric population. Further, effects of vaccination on malaria transmission, existing malaria control strategies, and possible vaccine-mediated selective pressure on Plasmodium falciparum variants, could also impact long-term malaria control. To address this data gap and as part of its post-approval commitments, GSK has developed a post-approval plan comprising of 4 complementary Phase IV studies that will evaluate safety, effectiveness and impact of RTS,S/AS01E through active participant follow-up in the context of its real-life implementation. METHODS: EPI-MAL-002 (NCT02374450) is a pre-implementation safety surveillance study that is establishing the background incidence rates of protocol-defined adverse events of special interest. EPI-MAL-003 (NCT03855995) is an identically designed post-implementation safety and vaccine impact study. EPI-MAL-005 (NCT02251704) is a cross-sectional pre- and post-implementation study to measure malaria transmission intensity and monitor the use of other malaria control interventions in the study areas, and EPI-MAL-010 (EUPAS42948) will evaluate the P. falciparum genetic diversity in the periods before and after vaccine implementation. CONCLUSION: GSK's post-approval plan has been designed to address important knowledge gaps in RTS,S/AS01E vaccine safety, effectiveness and impact. The studies are currently being conducted in the MVIP areas. Their implementation has provided opportunities and posed challenges linked to conducting large studies in regions where healthcare infrastructure is limited. The results from these studies will support ongoing evaluation of RTS,S/AS01E's benefit-risk and inform decision-making for its potential wider implementation across sub-Saharan Africa.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Seven Dosing Regimens of the Candidate RTS,S/AS01E Malaria Vaccine Integrated Within an Expanded Program on Immunization Regimen: A Phase II, Single-Center, Open, Controlled Trial in Infants in Malawi.

BACKGROUND: In a phase III trial, the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine produced lower anti-circumsporozoite (CS) antibody titers when co-administered with Expanded Programme on Immunization vaccines (0-, 1- and 2-month schedule) at 6 to 12 weeks compared with 5 to 17 months at first vaccination. Alternative infant immunization schedules within the Expanded Programme on Immunization were investigated. METHODS: This phase II, open, single-site (Blantyre, Malawi) trial was conducted in infants 1 to 7 days of age. Subjects were equally randomized across 7 groups to receive 3 doses of RTS,S/AS01E at time points that included ≤7 days, 6, 10, 14 and 26 weeks, and 9 months. All RTS,S/AS01E groups plus a control group (without RTS,S/AS01E) received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin + oral poliovirus vaccine at ≤7 days, diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine + oral poliovirus vaccine at 6, 10, and 14 weeks and measles vaccine at 9 months; one RTS,S/AS01E group and the control additionally received hepatitis B vaccination at ≤7 days. Serum anti-CS antibody geometric mean concentration (GMC; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and safety were assessed up to age 18 months. RESULTS: Of the 480 infants enrolled, 391 completed the study. No causally related serious adverse event was reported. A higher frequency of fever within 7 days of RTS,S/AS01E vaccination compared with control was observed. Compared with the standard 6-, 10-, 14-week schedule, anti-CS antibody GMC ratios post-dose 3 were significantly higher in the 10-, 14- and 26-week group only (ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.60); RTS,S/AS01E vaccination at ≤7 days and 10 and 14 weeks produced significantly lower anti-CS GMCs (ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of RTS,S/AS01E vaccination above 6 weeks of age tended to improve anti-CS antibody responses. Neonatal vaccination was well tolerated but produced a comparatively lower immune response.

Safety and immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in infants and children with WHO stage 1 or 2 HIV disease: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a major global public health concern, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. The RTS,S/AS01 malaria candidate vaccine was reviewed by the European Medicines Agency and received a positive scientific opinion; WHO subsequently recommended pilot implementation in sub-Saharan African countries. Because malaria and HIV overlap geographically, HIV-infected children should be considered for RTS,S/AS01 vaccination. We therefore aimed to assess the safety of RTS,S/AS01 in HIV-infected children at two sites in western Kenya. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial at the clinical trial sites of the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Walter Reed Army Institute of research in Kisumu and the KEMRI/US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Siaya. Eligible participants were infants and children aged from 6 weeks to 17 months with WHO stage 1 or 2 HIV disease (documented positive by DNA PCR), whether or not they were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive three doses of either RTS,S/AS01 or rabies vaccine (both 0·5 mL per dose by intramuscular injection), given once per month at 0, 1, and 2 months. We did the treatment allocation using a web-based central randomisation system stratified by age (6 weeks-4 months, 5-17 months), and by baseline CD4% (<10, 10-14, 15-19, and ≥20). Data were obtained in an observer-blind manner, and the vaccine recipient, their parent or carer, the funder, and investigators responsible for the assessment of endpoints were all masked to treatment allocation (only staff responsible for the preparation and administration of the vaccines were aware of the assignment and these individuals played no other role in the study). We provided ART, even if the participants were not receiving ART before the study, and daily co-trimoxazole for prevention of opportunistic infections. The primary outcome was the occurrence of serious adverse events until 14 months after dose 1 of the vaccine, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01148459. FINDINGS: Between July 30, 2010, and May 24, 2013, we enrolled 200 children to our study and randomly assigned 99 to receive RTS,S/AS01 and 101 to receive rabies vaccine. 177 (89%) of the 200 children enrolled completed 14 months of follow-up. Serious adverse events were noted in 41 (41·4%, 95% CI 31·6-51·8) of 99 RTS,S/AS01 recipients and 37 (36·6%, 27·3-46·8) of 101 rabies-vaccine recipients (relative risk 1·1, 95% CI 0·8-1·6). 20 (20·2%, 95% CI 12·8-29·5) of 99 RTS,S/AS01 recipients and 12 (11·9%, 6·3-19·8) of 101 rabies-vaccine recipients had at least one serious adverse event within 30 days after vaccination, mainly pneumonia, febrile convulsions, and salmonella sepsis. Five (5·1%, 95% CI 1·7-11·4) of 99 RTS,S/AS01 recipients and four (4·0%, 1·1-9·8) of 101 rabies-vaccine recipients died, but no deaths were deemed related to vaccination. Mortality was associated with five cases of pneumonia (1% RTS,S/AS01 recipients vs 3% rabies-vaccine recipients), five cases of gastroenteritis (3% RTS,S/AS01 recipients vs 2% rabies-vaccine recipients), five cases of malnutrition (2% RTS,S/AS01 recipients vs 3% rabies-vaccine recipients), one case of sepsis (1% rabies-vaccine recipients), one case of Haemophilus influenza meningitis (1% rabies-vaccine recipients), and one case of tuberculosis (1% RTS,S/AS01 recipients). INTERPRETATION: RTS, S/AS01 was well tolerated when given to children with WHO clinical stage 1 or 2 HIV disease along with high antiretroviral and co-trimoxazole use. Children with HIV disease could be included in future RTS,S/AS01 vaccination programmes. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative.