Impact of solid organ transplant status on outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, it remains unclear whether the risk factor for SOT patients is the immunosuppression inherent to transplantation versus patient comorbidities. METHODS: We reviewed outcomes in a cohort of SOT (n = 129) and non-SOT (NSOT) patients (n = 708) admitted to the University of California, Los Angeles for COVID-19 infection. Data analyses utilized multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of patient demographics, comorbidities, and transplant status on outcomes. SOT patients were analyzed by kidney SOT (KSOT) versus nonkidney SOT (NKSOT) groups. RESULTS: SOT and NSOT patients with COVID-19 infection differed in terms of patient age, ethnicity, and comorbidities. NKSOT patients were the most likely to experience death, with a mortality rate of 16.2% compared with 1.8% for KSOT and 8.3% for NSOT patients (p = .013). Multivariable analysis of hospitalized patients revealed that patient age (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, p = .001) and neurologic condition (OR 2.66, p < .001) were significantly associated with mortality. Analysis of ICU patients revealed a 2.98-fold increased odds of death in NKSOT compared with NSOT patients (p = .013). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of transplant status in predicting adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized or admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, especially for NKSOT patients. Transplant status and comorbidities, including age, could be used to risk stratify patients with COVID-19. This data suggests that immunosuppression contributes to COVID-19 disease severity and mortality and may have implications for managing immunosuppression, especially for critically ill patients admitted to the ICU.

Donor-derived human herpesvirus 8 and development of Kaposi sarcoma among 6 recipients of organs from donors with high-risk sexual and substance use behavior.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of recipient human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or through donor-derived HHV-8 transmission. We describe 6 cases of donor-derived HHV-8 infection and KS investigated from July 2018 to January 2020. Organs from 6 donors, retrospectively identified as HHV-8-positive, with a history of drug use disorder, were transplanted into 22 recipients. Four of 6 donors had risk factors for HHV-8 infection reported in donor history questionnaires. Fourteen of 22 organ recipients (64%) had evidence of posttransplant HHV-8 infection. Lung recipients were particularly susceptible to KS. Four of the 6 recipients who developed KS died from KS or associated complications. The US opioid crisis has resulted in an increasing number and proportion of organ donors with substance use disorder, and particularly injection drug use history, which may increase the risk of HHV-8 transmission to recipients. Better awareness of the risk of posttransplant KS for recipients of organs from donors with HHV-8 infection risk could be useful for recipient management. Testing donors and recipients for HHV-8 is currently challenging with no validated commercial serology kits available. Limited HHV-8 antibody testing is available through some US reference laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Utilization Using Telemedicine in Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Post-liver transplantation care is limited to tertiary care centers. Concentration at expert centers leads to high-volume clinics with long wait times and decreased accessibility. AIM: To assess whether telemedicine can be utilized to overcome barriers to care while sustaining strong patient-physician relationships. METHODS: The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18, Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Health Utilization Questionnaire were used to assess patient satisfaction and healthcare utilization among patients who received care via video connection (telemedicine group) and in clinic (control group). Propensity matching was performed. Scores for questionnaires were reported as mean and standard deviations (SD) and were compared by one-way multivariate analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were 21 matched telemedicine patients in our study. Overall mean age (± SD) was 51 (± 5.62) years and 52 (± 6.12) years for telemedicine group and control group, respectively. General patient satisfaction was similar between the two groups (p = 0.89). While telemedicine patients were just as satisfied with communication and interpersonal approach compared to clinic patients, they experienced significantly less commute (p < 0.0001) and waiting (p < 0.0001) times. Given ease of using telemedicine without compromising patient-physician interaction, 90% (19/21) of the telemedicine patients opted to use the service again. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine appeared to be both a time and cost-saving alternative to clinic follow-up without compromise of the valuable patient-physician relationship. Telemedicine has the potential to improve clinic flow, reduce wait times, and decrease costs for liver transplant recipients.

Performance Characteristics of Galactomannan and ß-d-Glucan in High-Risk Liver Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The utility of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) and ß-D-glucan (BG) in liver transplant recipients remains uncertain. METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients at risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs), GM and BG were assessed in 199 patients at baseline (enrollment) and weekly thereafter for the duration of study drug. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of these for the diagnosis of IFIs. RESULTS: Overall, 46.4% of the patients at baseline had positive GM (index ≥ 0.5) and 89.6% had BG of 80 pg/mL or greater with BG level of 500 pg/mL or greater in 31.8%. Patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA) (3/3) had positive GM at baseline as did 45.5% of those without IA (P = 0.098); the area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of IA was 0.77 (fair test, ie, good sensitivity but poor specificity). Using BG cutoff of 80 pg/mL or higher, 100% (12/12) of the patients with IFI had positive baseline BG and as did 88.9% (160/180) of those without IFI (P = 0.618); the area under the ROC curve for predicting IFIs was 0.56 (poor test). In multivariate analyses, GM positivity was associated with study site (P = 0.041), and BG positivity with renal replacement therapy (P = 0.05) and study site (P = 0.01). The GM and BG levels declined over time; positivity at subsequent time points was lower in comparison with baseline (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The GM and BG tests had significant center variability and limited accuracy for the diagnosis of IFIs in high-risk liver transplant recipients.