Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9957, 2024 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693285

ABSTRACT

Our previous study in children and young people (CYP) at 3- and 6-months post-infection showed that 12-16% of those infected with the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 met the research definition of Long Covid, with no differences between first-positive and reinfected CYP. The primary objective of the current study is to explore the impact of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 infection on young people 12 months post infection. 345 CYP aged 11-17 years with a first laboratory-confirmed infection with the Omicron variant and 360 CYP reinfected with the Omicron variant completed an online questionnaire assessing demographics, symptoms, and their impact shortly after testing and again at 3-, 6-and 12-months post-testing. Vaccination status was determined from information held at UKHSA. Comparisons between groups were made using chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The most common symptoms in first-positive and reinfected CYP 12-months post-testing were tiredness (35.7 and 33.6% respectively) and sleeping difficulties (27.5 and 28.3% respectively). Symptom profiles, severity and impact were similar in the two infection status groups. Overall, by 12-months, 17.4% of first-positives and 21.9% of reinfected CYP fulfilled the research consensus Long Covid definition (p = 0.13). 12-months post Omicron infection, there is little difference between first-positive and reinfected CYP with respect to symptom profiles and impact. Clinicians may not therefore need to consider number of infections and type of variant when developing treatment plans. Further studies are needed to assess causality of reported symptoms up to 12-months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Male , Female , Reinfection/virology , Prospective Studies , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
2.
Vaccine ; 41(41): 5957-5964, 2023 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658001

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Countries routinely offering acellular pertussis vaccine, where long-term protection is not sustained, have the challenge of selecting an optimal schedule to minimise disease among young infants. We conducted a narrative systematic review and synthesis of information to evaluate different pertussis immunisation strategies at controlling pertussis disease, hospitalisation, deaths, and vaccine effectiveness among young infants. METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature on studies about the primary, booster, and/or maternal vaccination series and synthesised findings narratively. Countries offering the first three doses of vaccine within six-months of life and a booster on or before the second year or life were defined as accelerated primary and booster schedules, respectively. Countries offering primary and booster doses later were defined as extended primary and booster schedules. All search results were screened, and articles reviewed and reconciled, by two authors. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Intervention tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. FINDINGS: A total of 98 studies were included in the analyses and the following recurring themes were described: timing of vaccination, vaccine coverage, waning immunity/vaccine effectiveness, direct and indirect effectiveness, switching from an accelerated to extended schedule, impact of changes in testing. The risk of bias was generally low to moderate for most studies. CONCLUSION: Comparing schedules is challenging and there was insufficient evidence to that one schedule was superior to another. Countries must select a schedule that maintains high vaccine coverage and reduced the risk of delaying the delivery vaccines to protect infants.


Subject(s)
Whooping Cough , Humans , Infant , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Vaccination , Evidence Gaps , Family , Hospitalization
3.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 7(3): 190-198, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36736341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the UK included 4CMenB, a multi-component, recombinant protein-based vaccine against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease, in the national infant immunisation programme. We aimed to assess the effect of 4CMenB vaccination on the severity of MenB disease presentation and outcomes. METHODS: In this active, prospective, national surveillance study, we used data from the UK Health Security Agency national surveillance of meningococcal disease. We included data from follow-up of children younger than 5 years with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease who were eligible for 4CMenB vaccination with general practice 3-6 months after disease onset. All invasive MenB isolates were tested using the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System to determine whether the isolate was potentially preventable by 4CMenB. Admission to intensive care, death, and, when possible, reported sequelae in survivors were reviewed alongside vaccine status. For the epidemiological analysis, we compared laboratory-confirmed MenB disease cases before 4CMenB implementation (Sept 1, 2010, to March 31, 2015) with those after implementation (Sept 1, 2015, to March 31, 2020). For clinical follow-up and outcomes, we included all children younger than 5 years with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease between Sept 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021. FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021, there were 371 cases of MenB disease in children younger than 5 years, including 256 (69%) in those younger than 1 year and 128 (35%) in those younger than 3 months. After the introduction of 4CMenB, the peak age of patients with MenB disease shifted from 5-6 months to 1-3 months. Overall, 108 (29%) of 371 children were too young for vaccination, unvaccinated, or developed MenB disease within 14 days of the first dose. Of 110 meningococcal strains characterised, 11 (92%) of 12 were potentially preventable by 4CMenB in unvaccinated children compared with 53 (66%) of 80 in partly vaccinated and 11 (69%) of 16 in fully vaccinated children. 78 (21%) of 371 children required intensive care, and the case fatality ratio was 5% (17 of 371), with 11 of 17 deaths occurring before 1 year of age, including seven in infants who were too young (<8 weeks) for vaccination. Of 354 survivors, 57 (16%) had 74 sequelae reported; 45 (61%) of 74 were neurological, 17 (23%) were physical, two (3%) were behavioural or psychological, and ten (14%) were other complications. Prevalence of sequelae was similar in unvaccinated (15 [15%] of 98) and vaccinated (42 [16%] 256) children, as were composite outcomes of death or sequelae, and intensive care or death or sequelae. INTERPRETATION: Cases of MenB disease in vaccine-eligible children declined after 4CMenB implementation, but morbidity in vaccinated and unvaccinated children remained unchanged, highlighting the importance of vaccination to prevent MenB disease. The lower peak age of infants with MenB disease after 4CMenB implementation, with a higher case fatality ratio in young infants, highlights the importance of timely vaccination. FUNDING: UK Health Security Agency.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Infant , Humans , Child , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Serogroup , Vaccination , England , Vaccines, Combined , Disease Progression
4.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 6(6): 384-392, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35358491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reinfection after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncommon in adults, but little is known about the risks, characteristics, severity, or outcomes of reinfection in children. We aimed to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in children and compare this with the risk in adults, by analysis of national testing data for England. METHODS: In our prospective, national surveillance study to assess reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in children in England, we used national SARS-CoV-2 testing data to estimate the risk of reinfection at least 90 days after primary infection from Jan 27, 2020, to July, 31, 2021, which encompassed the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variant waves in England. Data from children up to age 16 years who met the criteria for reinfection were included. Disease severity was assessed by linking reinfection cases to national hospital admission data, intensive care admission, and death registration datasets. FINDINGS: Reinfection rates closely followed community infection rates, with a small peak during the alpha wave and a larger peak during the delta wave. In children aged 16 years and younger, 688 418 primary infections and 2343 reinfections were identified. The overall reinfection rate was 66·88 per 100 000 population, which was higher in adults (72·53 per 100 000) than children (21·53 per 100 000). The reinfection rate after primary infection was 0·68% overall, 0·73% in adults compared with 0·18% in children age younger than 5 years, 0·24% in those aged 5-11 years, and 0·49% in those aged 12-16 years. Of the 109 children admitted to hospital with reinfection, 78 (72%) had comorbidities. Hospital admission rates were similar for the first (64 [2·7%] of 2343) and second episode (57 [2·4%] of 2343) and intensive care admissions were rare (seven children for the first episode and four for reinfections). There were 44 deaths within 28 days after primary infection (0·01%) and none after reinfection. INTERPRETATION: The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is strongly related to exposure due to community infection rates, especially during the delta variant wave. Children had a lower risk of reinfection than did adults, but reinfections were not associated with more severe disease or fatal outcomes. FUNDING: UK Health Security Agency.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Child , England/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Reinfection
5.
J Infect ; 84(4): 542-550, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085659

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to look at the burden of disease caused by SARS-COV-2 reinfections and identified potential risk factors for disease severity. METHODS: We used national surveillance data to collect information on all SARS-CoV-2 primary infection and suspected reinfection cases between January 2020 until early May 2021. Reinfection cases were positive COVID-19 PCR or antigen test, 90 days after their first COVID-19 positive test. We collected information on case demographics, hospital and ICU admission, immunisation status and if individuals were at risk of complication for COVID-19. RESULTS: Deaths reported within 28 days of testing positive were 61% (95% confidence interval: 56% to 65%) lower in suspected COVID-19 reinfection than primary infection cases. In the unvaccinated cohort, reinfections were associated with 49% (37% to 58%) lower odds of hospital admission in cases aged 50 to 65 years in the population not identified at risk of complication for COVID-19, and 34% (17% to 48%) in those at risk. ICU admission at reinfection compared to primary infection decreased 76% (55% to 87%). Individuals at risk and those aged below 50 years, who received at least 1 dose of vaccine against COVID-19, were 62% (39% to 74%) and 58% (24% to 77%) less likely to get admitted to hospital at reinfection, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower odds of dying, and both prior infection and immunisation showed a protective effect against severe disease in selected populations. Older age, sex and underlying comorbidities appeared as principal risk factors for illness severity at reinfection. FUNDING: PHE/UKHSA.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Reinfection/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index
6.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 6: 100120, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The full reopening of schools in September 2020 was associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases and outbreaks in educational settings across England. METHODS: Primary and secondary schools reporting an outbreak (≥2 laboratory-confirmed cases within 14 days) to Public Health England (PHE) between 31 August and 18 October 2020 were contacted in November 2020 to complete an online questionnaire. INTERPRETATION: There were 969 school outbreaks reported to PHE, comprising 2% (n = 450) of primary schools and 10% (n = 519) of secondary schools in England. Of the 369 geographically-representative schools contacted, 179 completed the questionnaire (100 primary schools, 79 secondary schools) and 2,314 cases were reported. Outbreaks were larger and across more year groups in secondary schools than in primary schools. Teaching staff were more likely to be the index case in primary (48/100, 48%) than secondary (25/79, 32%) school outbreaks (P = 0.027). When an outbreak occurred, attack rates were higher in staff (881/17,362; 5.07; 95%CI, 4.75-5.41) than students, especially primary school teaching staff (378/3852; 9.81%; 95%CI, 8.90-10.82%) compared to secondary school teaching staff (284/7146; 3.97%; 95%CI, 3.79-5.69%). Secondary school students (1105/91,919; 1.20%; 95%CI, 1.13-1.28%) had higher attack rates than primary school students (328/39,027; 0.84%; 95%CI, 0.75-0.94%). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of secondary schools than primary schools reported a COVID-19 outbreak and experienced larger outbreaks across multiple school year groups. The higher attack rate among teaching staff during an outbreak, especially in primary schools, suggests that additional protective measures may be needed. FUNDING: PHE.

7.
J Infect ; 82(4): 67-74, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639175

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concern for the safety of staff and students, their families and the wider community. We monitored SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in school-aged children and compared them with adult infection rates before and after schools reopened in England. METHODS: Public Health England receives daily electronic reports of all SARS-CoV-2 tests nationally. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates by school year from July to December 2020 were analysed, including the effect of a national month-long lockdown whilst keeping schools open in November 2020 RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 infections rates were low during early summer but started increasing in mid-August, initially in young adults followed by secondary and then primary school-aged children prior to schools reopening in September 2020. Cases in school-aged children lagged behind and followed adult trends after schools reopened, with a strong age gradient in weekly infection rates. There was a strong (P<0.001) correlation in regional infection rates between adults and secondary (R2=0.96-0.98), primary (R2=0.93-0.94) and preschool-aged (R2=0.62-0.85) children. The November lockdown was associated with declines in adult infection rates, followed a week later, by declines in student cases. From 23 November 2020, cases in adults and children increased rapidly following the emergence of a more transmissible novel variant of concern (VOC-202,012/01; B.1.1.7). CONCLUSIONS: In school-aged children, SARS-CoV-2 infections followed the same trajectory as adult cases and only declined after national lockdown was implemented whilst keeping schools open. Maintaining low community infection rates is critical for keeping schools open during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control , England/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Schools
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...