Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(1): 150-156, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29982375

ABSTRACT

To find the millions of missed tuberculosis (TB) cases, national TB programs are under pressure to expand TB disease screening and to target populations with lower disease prevalence. Together with imperfect performance and application of existing diagnostic tools, including empirical diagnosis, broader screening risks placing individuals without TB on prolonged treatment. These false-positive diagnoses have profound consequences for TB patients and prevention efforts, yet are usually overlooked in policy decision making. In this article we describe the pathways to a false-positive TB diagnosis, including trade-offs involved in the development and application of diagnostic algorithms. We then consider the wide range of potential consequences for individuals, households, health systems, and reliability of surveillance data. Finally, we suggest practical steps that the TB community can take to reduce the frequency and potential harms of false-positive TB diagnosis and to more explicitly assess the trade-offs involved in the screening and diagnostic process.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Errors , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Humans
2.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 40(4): 811-822, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29027125

ABSTRACT

A survey of radiation oncology medical physics departments across Australia and New Zealand was conducted to assess the usage, commissioning and quality assurance of modulated radiotherapy techniques such as IMRT and VMAT. Survey responses were collected in April-May 2015 to snapshot current practice and historical implementation. The survey asked 142 questions, and is the most detailed survey of its kind published to date. Analysis of results at overall department level, as well as sub-analysis for different equipment and techniques in use, was performed. Results show a high prevalence of IMRT and VMAT in use, and demonstrate the large heterogeneity in clinical practice and experience across the region.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Surveys and Questionnaires , Australia , Calibration , Humans , New Zealand , Particle Accelerators , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Time Factors
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 57(1): e1-6, 2011 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346585

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has supported the extension of HIV care and treatment to 2.4 million individuals as of September 2009. With increasing resources targeted toward rapid scale-up, it is important to understand the characteristics of current PEPFAR-supported HIV care and treatment sites. METHODS: Forty-five sites in Botswana, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Uganda, and Vietnam were sampled. Data were collected retrospectively from successive 6-month periods through reviews of facility records and interviews with site personnel between April 2006 and March 2007. Facility size and scale-up rate, patient characteristics, staffing models, clinical and laboratory monitoring, and intervention mix were compared. RESULTS: Sites added a median of 293 patients per quarter. By the evaluation's end, sites supported a median of 1649 HIV patients, 922 of them receiving antiretroviral therapy. Patients were predominantly adult (97.4%), and the majority (96.5%) were receiving regimens based on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The ratios of physicians to patients dropped substantially as sites matured. Antiretroviral therapy patients were commonly seen monthly or quarterly for clinical and laboratory monitoring, with CD4 counts being taken at 6-month intervals. One-third of sites provided viral load testing. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was the most prevalent supportive service. CONCLUSIONS: HIV treatment sites scaled up rapidly with the influx of resources and technical support through PEPFAR, providing complex health services to progressively expanding patient cohorts. Human resources are stretched thin, and delivery models and intervention mix differ widely between sites. Ongoing research is needed to identify best-practice service delivery models.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Male , Retrospective Studies , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 54(3): 317-23, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20453819

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study compares client volume, demographics, testing results, and costs of 3 "mobile" HIV counseling and testing (HCT) approaches with existing "stand-alone" HCT in Kenya. A retrospective cohort of 62,173 individuals receiving HCT between May 2005 and April 2006 was analyzed. Mobile HCT approaches assessed were community-site mobile HCT, semimobile container HCT, and fully mobile truck HCT. Data were obtained from project monitoring data, project accounts, and personnel interviews. RESULTS: Mobile HCT reported a higher proportion of clients with no prior HIV test than stand-alone (88% vs. 58%). Stand-alone HCT reported a higher proportion of couples than mobile HCT (18% vs. 2%) and a higher proportion of discordant couples (12% vs. 4%). The incremental cost-effectiveness of adding mobile HCT to stand-alone services was $14.91 per client tested (vs. $26.75 for stand-alone HCT); $16.58 per previously untested client (vs. $43.69 for stand-alone HCT); and $157.21 per HIV-positive individual identified (vs. $189.14 for stand-alone HCT). CONCLUSIONS: Adding mobile HCT to existing stand-alone HCT seems to be a cost-effective approach for expanding HCT coverage for reaching different target populations, including women and young people, and for identifying persons with newly diagnosed HIV infection for referral to treatment and care.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Mobile Health Units/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/economics , Counseling/methods , Disease Outbreaks , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/therapy , Health Care Costs , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mobile Health Units/economics , Public Health Administration/economics , Public Health Administration/methods , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
5.
AIDS ; 23(3): 395-401, 2009 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19114865

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: HIV counseling and testing (HCT) is a key intervention for HIV/AIDS control, and new strategies have been developed for expanding coverage in developing countries. We compared costs and outcomes of four HCT strategies in Uganda. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 84 323 individuals received HCT at one of four Ugandan HCT programs between June 2003 and September 2005. HCT strategies assessed were stand-alone HCT; hospital-based HCT; household-member HCT; and door-to-door HCT. METHODS: We collected data on client volume, demographics, prior testing and HIV diagnosis from project monitoring systems, and cost data from project accounts and personnel interviews. Strategies were compared in terms of costs and effectiveness at reaching key population groups. RESULTS: Household-member and door-to-door HCT strategies reached the largest proportion of previously untested individuals (>90% of all clients). Hospital-based HCT diagnosed the greatest proportion of HIV-infected individuals (27% prevalence), followed by stand-alone HCT (19%). Household-member HCT identified the highest percentage of discordant couples; however, this was a small fraction of total clients (<4%). Costs per client (2007 USD) were $19.26 for stand-alone HCT, $11.68 for hospital-based HCT, $13.85 for household-member HCT, and $8.29 for door-to-door-HCT. CONCLUSION: All testing strategies had relatively low per client costs. Hospital-based HCT most readily identified HIV-infected individuals eligible for treatment, whereas home-based strategies more efficiently reached populations with low rates of prior testing and HIV-infected people with higher CD4 cell counts. Multiple HCT strategies with different costs and efficiencies can be used to meet the UNAIDS/WHO call for universal HCT access by 2010.


Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/economics , Counseling/economics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , HIV Infections/diagnosis , AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Developing Countries , Female , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Uganda , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL