Vaginal tamoxifen for treatment of vulvar and vaginal atrophy: Pharmacokinetics and local tolerance in a rabbit model over 28 days.

Vaginally delivered tamoxifen is being developed as alternative to estrogen-based therapies for the treatment of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) symptoms in subjects at high risk for breast cancer, undergoing treatment for breast cancer with aromatase inhibitors or are breast cancer survivors. Tamoxifen (1 or 20 mg) was administered intra-vaginally to female rabbits once-daily over a 28-day period to assess its pharmacokinetics, systemic exposure and local vaginal tolerance. Plasma samples were taken to assess concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites 4-hydroxytamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen over the first day of vaginal administration and following the last dose on Day 28. In-life observations included evaluation of the vaginal region for signs of irritation. At necropsy, vaginal irritation was assessed by the method of Eckstein which reflect collective histopathological grading of four parameters within the vagina including epithelial morphology, leukocytic infiltration, congestion, and edema. Uterine effects of vaginal tamoxifen were also assessed. Plasma concentrations of tamoxifen were higher following administration of 20 mg tamoxifen compared to 1 mg tamoxifen at both Day 1 and Day 28. The metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen could not be detected on Day 1 and concentrations were low at Day 28 at the 1 mg tamoxifen dose. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen concentrations were low, but detectable at Day 1 and 28 following administration of 20 mg tamoxifen. The metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen was undetectable at the 1 mg and 20 mg doses on Day 1; it remained undetectable at the 1 mg tamoxifen dose at Day 28. N-desmethyltamoxifen was detected over the first 8 h of Day 28 then fell below the quantitation limits. There was little to no vaginal or systemic accumulation of tamoxifen following once-daily dosing for 28 days. Tamoxifen accounted for more than 85% of the total systemic exposure compared to its metabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and N-desmethyltamoxifen. There was essentially no detectable vaginal irritation evident over the course of the study. At necropsy the individual Eckstein scores (maximum score of 16) of the proximal, mid, and distal vagina of females in the 1 mg and 20 mg dose groups were generally comparable in both groups and ranged from minimal to mild magnitude (1 mg dose group: ranging from 1 to 3 in the proximal vagina, 4 to 5 in the mid vagina, and 3 to 7 in the distal vagina; 20 mg dose group: ranging from 3 to 5 in the proximal vagina, 4 to 7 in the mid vagina, and 4 to 5 in the distal vagina). Overall, tamoxifen was absorbed and metabolized following vaginal administration and vaginal irritation was minimal to none at both doses.

Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of intravenous and intramuscular HPßCD-diclofenac (Dyloject) compared with other diclofenac formulations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate single- and repeated-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and dose proportionality of hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HPßCD)-diclofenac compared with Voltarol after intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administration. DESIGN: Study 1: Single-dose randomized four-way crossover study. Study 2: Multiple-dose randomized three-way crossover study. SETTING: Clinical research center. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTION: Study 1: Subjects received HPßCD-diclofenac and Voltarol, IV and IM, with a 5-day washout between treatment periods. Study 2: Subjects received two doses of IV HPßCD-diclofenac and oral Cataflam once every 6 hours for four doses with a 48-hour washout period between treatment periods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Study 1: IV HPßCD-diclofenac had a higher peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and earlier time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax ), but equivalent plasma exposure (area under the curve from time zero to t [AUC0-t ]) to IV Voltarol. The geometric mean ratio of HPßCD-diclofenac (IV) to Voltarol (IV) for AUC0-t was 106.27%. The geometric mean ratio of HPßCD-diclofenac (IM) to Voltarol (IM) for AUC0-t was 110.91%. The geometric mean ratio of HPßCD-diclofenac (IV) to HPßCD-diclofenac (IM) for AUC0-t was 101.25%. The geometric mean ratio of HPßCD-diclofenac (IM) to Voltarol (IV) for AUC0-t was 104.96%. Study 2: Cmax for diclofenac was 2904 and 6031 ng/ml after the first IV dose of 18.75 and 37.5 mg HPßCD-diclofenac, respectively, and was 3090 and 5617 ng/ml after the fourth dose, indicating no accumulation. Plasma exposures to 18.75 mg (866 ng·hour/ml) and 37.5 mg (1843 ng·hour/ml) IV HPßCD-diclofenac bracketed that of oral Cataflam 50 mg (1473 ng·hour/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Study 1: Bioavailability in terms of AUC after IV administration was equivalent for HPßCD-diclofenac compared with Voltarol and after IM administration of HPßCD-diclofenac and Voltarol. Bioavailability in terms of AUC after IM administration of HPßCD-diclofenac was equivalent to IV administration of HPßCD-diclofenac and IV administration of Voltarol. Study 2: HPßCD-diclofenac showed dose proportionality after single- and multiple-dose administration and no accumulation of HPßCD-diclofenac. HPßCD-diclofenac was safe and well tolerated following IV and IM administration.

A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of a novel formulation of intravenous diclofenac and ketorolac for postoperative third molar extraction pain.

Dyloject is a novel formulation of diclofenac intended for intravenous (IV) administration. This formulation employs the solubilizing agent hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin to permit bolus IV administration. The efficacy and safety of 5 dose levels of IV diclofenac were compared with IV ketorolac and placebo following third molar extraction. This was a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and comparator-controlled, parallel-group study. A total of 353 subjects with moderate to severe pain received placebo; ketorolac 30 mg; or IV diclofenac 3.75, 9.4, 18.75, 37.5, or 75 mg (N  =  51 for all groups, except N  =  47 for ketorolac). The primary endpoint was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOTPAR6) as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included multiple measures of pain intensity and relief; patient global evaluation; and times to pain relief and rescue medication. Dropouts and adverse effects (AEs) were also monitored. IV diclofenac was superior to placebo as measured by TOTPAR6 (P < .0001 for all doses except 3.75 mg, for which P  =  .0341). IV diclofenac 3.75 mg was statistically superior to placebo for TOTPAR2 and TOTPAR4. IV diclofenac at both 37.5 and 75 mg was superior to placebo (P < .05) at the earliest (5 minute) assessments of pain intensity and pain relief, but ketorolac was not. The proportion of patients reporting 30% or greater pain relief at 5 minutes was significantly greater after IV diclofenac 37.5 and 75 mg than after ketorolac 30 mg or placebo. Secondary endpoints confirmed the primary findings. Treatment-related AEs were generally mild to moderate and were typical for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The more rapid onset of action of IV diclofenac compared with the reference injectable NSAID ketorolac suggests additional clinical benefit. If confirmed in larger series, these findings may improve the safety and efficacy of postoperative NSAID analgesia.

Efficacy and safety of vaginal estriol and progesterone in postmenopausal women with atrophic vaginitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravaginal estriol and progesterone on atrophic vaginitis in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Under a physician-sponsored Investigational New Drug application, 19 healthy postmenopausal women with atrophic vaginitis received vaginal suppositories containing estriol (1 mg) and progesterone (30 mg). The participants were instructed to insert one suppository intravaginally once daily for 2 weeks and thrice weekly for a total of 6 months. Vaginal pH, Vaginal Maturation Index, urinalysis, self-reported vaginal dryness, menopausal quality of life, and serum estriol and progesterone levels were measured at enrollment and after 3 and 6 months of suppository use. Endometrial biopsies were obtained at enrollment and at 6 months. After 2 weeks of therapy, six participants had serum estriol and progesterone measured. RESULTS: The Vaginal Maturation Index, vaginal pH, and vaginal dryness rating improved significantly at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. Menopausal quality of life scores improved significantly in all domains, with the sexual subscale showing the most improvement. There were no cases of endometrial hyperplasia after 6 months of suppository use. Serum preinsertion estriol at week 2 and months 3 and 6 were similar to baseline levels. Serum preinsertion progesterone increased but returned to baseline preinsertion levels at month 6, and preinsertion levels were significantly less at month 6 compared with month 3. CONCLUSIONS: Intravaginal administration of a combination estriol and progesterone agent to women with atrophic vaginitis may represent a safe and effective alternative to systemic hormone replacement, although this study was not adequate to provide proof of efficacy given that it was uncontrolled.

The analgesic efficacy and safety of a novel intranasal morphine formulation (morphine plus chitosan), immediate release oral morphine, intravenous morphine, and placebo in a postsurgical dental pain model.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are standard treatment for postoperative pain. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal (i.n.) morphine to i.v. and oral morphine and placebo. METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-five patients with moderate-to-severe pain after third molar extraction were randomized to receive a single dose of i.n. morphine 7.5 mg or 15 mg, i.v. morphine 7.5 mg, oral morphine 60 mg or placebo. Pain intensity was assessed using visual analog and categorical scales, and pain relief using a categorical scale. Outcomes included total pain relief, pain intensity difference, summed pain intensity difference, time to analgesic onset, time to requesting rescue medication, and patients' global evaluation of their treatment. Safety assessments included adverse event recording and nasal examinations. RESULTS: Across the various efficacy outcomes, both i.n. morphine doses were statistically similar to the positive comparators (i.v. and oral morphine), and all four morphine treatments were statistically superior to placebo. Overall, i.n. morphine 15 mg presented an efficacy profile similar to i.v. morphine 7.5 mg; both treatments demonstrated rapid onset of efficacy, generally persistent throughout the 6-h assessment period. The lower dose of i.n. morphine, 7.5 mg, was statistically similar to the other active treatments at 2 h and 6 h and similar to placebo at 4 h. Study medications were generally well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to adverse events or other safety concerns, and no serious adverse events reported. The most frequently reported adverse events were typical systemic opioid effects. CONCLUSIONS: I.n. morphine offers a noninvasive alternative to i.v. morphine for postoperative analgesia.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of morphine-chitosan nasal solution in patients with moderate to severe pain following orthopedic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Parenteral opioids are the standard of care for treating moderate to severe postsurgical pain. This randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal (IN) morphine with intravenous (IV) morphine and placebo. METHODS: In total, 187 postbunionectomy patients with moderate to severe pain were randomized to receive IN morphine 3.75 mg, 7.5 mg, 15 mg, or 30 mg, IV morphine 7.5 mg, or placebo in the single-dose phase and IN morphine 7.5 mg or 15 mg thereafter. The primary outcome was a dose-response assessment for total pain relief based upon visual analog scales. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity, pain relief, patient global evaluation, and time to rescue medication. Safety assessments included adverse events and nasal examination. RESULTS: A statistically significant linear dose response was observed over the IN morphine dose range for 4-hour total pain relief. Patients reported statistically significant pain relief and pain intensity differences following IV morphine and IN morphine at doses of 7.5 mg and greater within 30 minutes postdose, compared with placebo. Median times to rescue medication were 124 and 140 minutes for IN morphine 7.5 mg and 15 mg dosage groups, respectively, and 130 minutes for IV morphine. Local adverse events associated with IN morphine were transient and mostly mild (bad taste, nasal congestion, throat irritation, and sneezing). Systemic adverse events, regardless of route of administration, were dose-related and consistent with expected opioid effects. CONCLUSIONS: By multiple measures of pain intensity and pain relief, IN morphine provides sustained analgesia in postsurgical patients and thus may offer a safe and less invasive alternative to IV morphine.

Dyloject, a novel injectable diclofenac formulation, offers greater safety and efficacy than voltarol for postoperative dental pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Voltarol for injection (a diclofenac sodium formulation employing polyethylene glycol and benzyl alcohol [PG-BA] as excipients) is marketed in Europe but not in North America. A suspension, PG-BA diclofenac sodium, requires preparation for each patient and slow IV infusion to minimize venous irritation. Dyloject, a novel diclofenac formulation, employs hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin (HPbetaCD) to solubilize diclofenac in a small volume. We compared the efficacy and safety of an IV HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium bolus, a 30-minute PG-BA diclofenac sodium infusion, and placebo in post-molar extraction pain. METHODS: A total of 155 adult patients were randomized to receive HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium 75 mg, PG-BA diclofenac sodium 75 mg, or placebo. Primary endpoints were superiority of HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium to placebo and noninferiority of HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium to PG-BA diclofenac sodium with respect to total pain relief over 4 hours (TOTPAR4) on a 0 to 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included categorical TOTPAR4, VAS and categorical TOTPAR up to 8 hours, other measures of pain intensity and relief, patient global evaluation, and time to rescue medication. RESULTS: HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium had efficacy superior to both placebo and PG-BA diclofenac sodium. At 15 minutes, more patients given HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium than PG-BA diclofenac sodium reported 30% reduction in pain intensity (52% vs. 21%, P = .0022). Both diclofenac products had a 6-hour duration of effect and were well tolerated. Patient global evaluations of HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium were high, superior to placebo, and similar to PG-BA diclofenac sodium. The adverse event (AE) incidence was similar for HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium and PG-BA diclofenac sodium, except that in the current trial and in integrated safety results from the present and prior studies, phlebitis was more common with PG-BA diclofenac sodium. No cardiac or renal AEs or gastrointestinal bleeding were reported or observed. CONCLUSIONS: IV bolus HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium produced analgesia more quickly than, and with equal duration as, the 30-minute PG-BA diclofenac sodium infusion. Pooled data on thrombophlebitis from the present investigation and our prior studies of the novel formulation indicate this adverse effect is less frequent and less severe with HPbetaCD diclofenac sodium than with PG-BA diclofenac sodium.

Safety and efficacy of intranasal ketamine for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with chronic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Few placebo-controlled trials have investigated the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP) in patients with chronic pain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine for BTP in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Twenty patients with chronic pain and at least two spontaneous BTP episodes daily self-administered up to five doses of intranasal ketamine or placebo at the onset of a spontaneous BTP episode (pain intensity > or =5 on a 0-10 scale). Two BTP episodes at least 48 h apart were treated with either ketamine or placebo. Patients reported significantly lower BTP intensity following intranasal ketamine than after placebo (P < 0.0001) with pain relief within 10 min of dosing and lasting for up to 60 min. No patient in the ketamine group required his/her usual rescue medication to treat the BTP episode, while seven out of 20 (35%) patients in placebo group did (P = 0.0135). Intranasal ketamine was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. After ketamine administration, four patients reported a transient change in taste, one patient reported rhinorrhea, one patient reported nasal passage irritation, and two patients experienced transient elevation in blood pressure. A side effect questionnaire administered 60 min and 24 h after drug or placebo administration elicited no reports of auditory or visual hallucinations. These data suggest that intranasal administration of ketamine provides rapid, safe and effective relief for BTP.