Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Does Not Increase the 90-Day Risk of Complications Compared With Inpatient Surgery in Prescreened Patients.

Outpatient total joint arthroplasty is becoming a more attractive option for hospitals, surgeons, and patients. In this study, the authors evaluated the safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty by comparing an outpatient cohort with an inpatient cohort. Ninety-day outcomes of consecutively performed elective shoulder arthroplasty cases from 2012 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were preoperatively assigned to outpatient or inpatient care. Primary outcomes were emergency department visits, readmissions, mortality, and surgical morbidity within 90 days of surgery. Two-tailed t tests were used to evaluate differences. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine if the odds of emergency department visit, readmission, or complications were significantly different between the cohorts. There were 118 outpatient and 64 inpatient shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Mean age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group-68.1 vs 72.4 years (P=.01) and 2.3 vs 2.6 (P<.01), respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model including all arthroplasty cases, the odds of outpatient to inpatient readmission was significantly different (odds ratio, 0.181; P=.027). However, when only total shoulder arthroplasty cases were included, no difference was detected. No statistically significant difference was noted for number of emergency department visits, mortality, or surgical morbidity within 90 days of surgery in any of the models. There was 1 death in the ambulatory group at 28 days after surgery. On the basis of these findings, the authors believe that, for carefully selected patients, an outpatient shoulder arthroplasty protocol is safe when compared with inpatient protocols. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e563-e568.].

Surgical excision of a symptomatic congenital coracoclavicular joint.

The coracoclavicular joint is a rare anatomic variant that consists of an articulation between the conoid tubercle of the clavicle and the superior surface of the coracoid process of the scapula. The coracoclavicular joint is most often asymptomatic and is found incidentally. A symptomatic coracoclavicular joint is exceedingly rare, with only 17 cases reported from 1915 to 2009. Symptoms may include limited range of motion, paresthesia, and brachialgia with radiation to the ipsilateral extremity. In the case of symptomatic coracoclavicular joints for which treatment data are reported, the response to conservative management with rest, analgesics, and physical therapy has been poor. Operative management resulted in complete resolution of symptoms in most patients and symptomatic improvement in the rest. This article reports the case of a 63-year-old man who presented with chronic left anterior shoulder pain exacerbated by forward flexion and overhead activities. Radiographs and computed tomography scan of the affected shoulder showed a bony articulation between the clavicle and the coracoid process of the scapula. The patient did not achieve long-term relief through conservative measures and corticosteroid injections, so the joint was surgically excised by an open procedure. Intraoperative findings were significant for a fully formed synovial joint with a capsule articulating between the clavicle and the coracoid process. After resection, the patient had minimal residual pain, improved range of motion, and symptomatic improvement with activity. The current case provides further data that the coracoclavicular joint can be the cause of significant shoulder pain and can be treated successfully with total resection of the joint if symptoms do not improve with conservative non-operative measures.

Does patient sex affect the anatomic relationships between the sternoclavicular joint and posterior vascular structures?

BACKGROUND: Despite increased concern for injury during surgical reconstruction of the sternoclavicular joint, to our knowledge there are few studies detailing the vascular relationships adjacent to the joint. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We investigated sex differences in the following relationships for sternoclavicular joint reconstruction: (1) safe distance from the posterior surface of the medial clavicle's medial and lateral segments to the major vessels, (2) length of the first costal cartilage and safe distance from the first rib to the internal mammary artery, (3) minimum distance medial to the sternoclavicular joint for optimal hole placement, and (4) safe distance from the manubrium to the great vessels. METHODS: Fifty normal postcontrast CT scans of the chest were reviewed. Means, standard deviations, and 95% CI were calculated for each aforementioned measurement. A t-test was used to determine if a sex difference exists (p≤0.05). RESULTS: At the medial end of the clavicle, the safe distance from the medial segment (first 10 mm) to the major vessels was greater in males than in females (3.5 mm versus 2.4 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 3 mm-4 mm versus 1.7 mm-3 mm, respectively; p=0.014). For the lateral segment (next 10 mm), the distance also was safer in males than in females (3.3 mm versus 1.7 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 2.7 mm-4 mm versus 1.1 mm-2.3 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The mean length of the first costal cartilage also was greater in males (35.8 mm versus 30.1 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 33.8 mm-37.8 mm versus 28.5 mm-31.9 mm, respectively; p<0.001); the distance from the first costochondral joint to the internal mammary artery was safer in males than in females (19.1 mm versus 15.4 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 16.5 mm-21.8 mm versus 13 mm-17.9 mm, respectively; p=0.05). The minimum distance to avoid inadvertent penetration of the sternoclavicular joint was greater in males than in females (16 mm versus 12.3 mm, respectively; 95% CI, 14.6 mm-17.5 mm versus 11 mm-13.6 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The distance to vessels after penetration of the manubrium was not different between males and females (5.6 mm versus 3.9, respectively; 95% CI, 4.4 mm-6.8 mm versus 2.6 mm-5.2 mm, respectively; p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This study makes apparent the intimate relationships between vessels and the musculoskeletal structures associated with sternoclavicular reconstruction. Based on our findings, we recommend considering the sex of the patient, using caution when drilling, and protecting essential structures posterior to the joint.

Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic shoulder infection.

BACKGROUND: Infection after shoulder arthroplasty can be a devastating complication, and subacute and chronic low-grade infections have proven difficult to diagnose. Serum marker analyses commonly used to diagnose periprosthetic infection are often inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a marker of periprosthetic shoulder infection. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of thirty-four patients who had previously undergone shoulder arthroplasty and required revision surgery was conducted. The serum levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the white blood-cell count (WBC) were measured. The definitive diagnosis of an infection was determined by growth of bacteria on culture of intraoperative specimens. Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) tests were used to determine the presence of a significant difference in the ESR and WBC between patients with and those without infection, while the Fisher exact test was used to assess differences in IL-6 and CRP levels between those groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of each marker were also calculated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the IL-6 level, WBC, ESR, or CRP level between patients with and those without infection. With a normal serum IL-6 level defined as <10 pg/mL, this test had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 0.14, 0.95, 0.67, 0.61, and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 analysis may have utility as a confirmatory test but is not an effective screening tool for periprosthetic shoulder infection. This finding is in contrast to the observation, in previous studies, that IL-6 is more sensitive than traditional serum markers for periprosthetic infection.

Tension band plating of a nonunion anterior tibial stress fracture in an athlete.

The authors present a rare technique of tension band plating of the anterior tibia in the setting of a nonunion stress fracture. Surgical management with an intramedullary nail is a viable and proven option for treating such injuries. However, in treating elite athletes, legitimate concerns exist regarding the surgical disruption of the extensor mechanism and the risk of anterior knee pain associated with intramedullary nail use. The described surgical technique demonstrates the use of tension band plating as an effective treatment of delayed union and nonunion anterior tibial stress fractures in athletes without the potential risks of intramedullary nail insertion.