Development of a Hematology-General Medicine Hybrid Team to Improve Care of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.

PROBLEM: Approximately 100,000 individuals in the United States have sickle cell disease (SCD). These individuals face multiple barriers to equitable care. At Brigham and Women's Hospital, existing health inequities for these patients were compounded by admitting, rounding, and team structures that assigned patients with SCD to multiple medicine teams with a hematologist attending, leading to delays in patient care and gaps in residents' hematology knowledge. APPROACH: A hematology-general medicine hybrid team was created in September 2021 to enhance trainee knowledge, skill, and confidence in managing hematology conditions and improve the quality of care delivered to individuals with SCD. This allowed for regionalization of patients with classical hematology conditions to specific hospital floors under the care of one team with a hematologist as the attending of record. OUTCOMES: From October 1, 2021-January 11, 2022, the majority (745/824, 90%) of in-hospital days for patients with a primary hematology diagnosis were under the care of the hematology-general medicine hybrid team. Regionalization to the home floor of the hybrid team was achieved on 331 (40%) of these 824 hospital days, consistent with regionalization rates for other teams. From October 1, 2021-September 30, 2022, there were 128 unique patients with SCD admitted over 511 encounters and cared for by approximately 78 residents and 12 medical students. Feedback from residents reported improved knowledge in the management of hematology conditions, especially SCD, and hematology attendings reported increased teaching opportunities. NEXT STEPS: The authors are working on a comprehensive analysis of the hybrid team's impact on trainee skill and confidence in managing SCD. The authors believe that this model can be replicated at other institutions to optimize trainee education, consolidate care, and address implicit bias against patients with SCD, even with the hematology attending as a consultant instead of as the attending of record.

Development of a Pipeline for Removing Allergy Labels in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Penicillin allergy is reported by 10% to 20 % of patients, but when evaluated only 1% to 2% may have a true allergy. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a high likelihood of requiring beta-lactam antibiotics due to increased infection risk, which can be limited by a penicillin allergy label. When a penicillin allergy is recorded, alternatives are needed, including more expensive broader-spectrum antibiotics, with increases in drug-resistant bacteria, longer hospital stays, higher expenditures, and increases in nosocomial infections, such as Clostridium difficile colitis. This group of patients already undergoes extensive pretreatment testing and would especially benefit from allergy delabeling. This study aimed to develop a self-sustaining, low-cost pipeline between an HSCT clinic and an allergy clinic to identify and successfully delabel low-risk patients who endorse an allergy to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, or ampicillin before admission to the hospital. We developed a survey to triage allergy risk, identified key stakeholders in building the pipeline, and underwent 4 plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles. Changes were made in each of the PDSA cycles to minimize cost and uncompensated provider time, as well as to increase patient retention throughout the pipeline by increasing appointment availability and decreasing reliance on patients to independently progress through the pathway. Of the 410 patients with planned HSCT who were screened over 11 months, 89 (21.7%) were listed as having a penicillin and/or beta lactam allergy. All but 1 (66 of 67; 98.5%) of the participants completed the survey accurately when confirmed by an allergist, and the survey was 100% accurate in predicting delabeling success in low-risk patients. Of eligible patients, 43.8% (n = 39) were successfully delabeled before their transplant date, and 97.4% of these (n = 38) have undergone HSCT to date. This pipeline is maintained by approximately 5 hours of work per week (1 hour of allergy physician time, 4 hours of nurse and/or clinical coordinator time), with no other direct costs. There is an estimated direct savings of at least $1914.93 per patient delabeled. We successfully designed and implemented a pipeline between the HSCT clinic and the allergy clinic as a quality improvement initiative to identify and address high rates of reported beta-lactam allergies. We identified and addressed patient-based factors, logistical, temporal, and financial barriers that impacted patient retention and sustainability. This model is expected to yield significant and sustained cost savings for the healthcare system as well as to improve patient outcomes, and this hypothesis is currently undergoing formal analysis. We anticipate that this model can be used to create a similar pipeline in other healthcare systems for HSCT recipients, as well as patients in other clinical settings, such as oncology and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

A Massive Case of Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and extranodal involvement is seen in approximately 40% of cases. However, cases involving the skin and muscle are rare, and skin manifestations most commonly present as plaques, papules, small nodules, or ulcers. In this report, we discuss a case of a large exophytic mass involving skin, soft tissue, and muscle initially thought to be baso-squamous carcinoma subsequently identified as DLBCL and treated solely with chemotherapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1223-1224.     doi:10.36849/JDD.6936.

Development of Duffy Null-Specific Absolute Neutrophil Count Reference Ranges.

This study establishes a Duffy null phenotype­specific absolute neutrophil count reference range to optimize care and improve health equity.

Laboratory-based inequity in thrombosis and hemostasis: review of the evidence.

The concept of normal in hematology, similar to that in other areas of medicine, is anchored to the perspective of those setting the standard. This means that several laboratory reference intervals and approaches to the conditions of thrombosis and hemostasis are influenced by the vantage point of those in power. Structural inequity, including systemic racism and sexism, can lead to inappropriate normalization of disease states, such as anemia or iron deficiency, or delayed diagnoses, such as in von Willebrand disease. This review will focus on how laboratory reference intervals perpetuate the cycles of inequity in care of patients with disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis. We provide examples and case studies in maternal mortality as well as in disorders such as von Willebrand disease and iron deficiency, question physiology versus pathophysiology, acknowledge the distinction between social constructs and biologic influence, and highlight opportunities for much-needed restructuring in areas such as defining anemia and iron deficiency.

Persistence of Unequal Access to Classical Hematology Telemedicine Visits by Race and Other Demographics During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Unequal access to telemedicine services exacerbates health inequities and was evident at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to explore whether unequal access persisted within a classical hematology division beyond the peak of COVID-19. Methods: Patient demographics by virtual visit type (telephone only [TO] or video only [VO]) between March 2020 and December 2021 were analyzed using adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Results: Of 8,207 patients, 18.4% had TO and 28.4% had VO visits. Fewer Black (21.8%; aOR 0.5 [0.4-0.62]), Hispanic or Latino (18.8%; 0.45 [0.34-0.59]), Spanish-speaking (7.6%; 0.32 [0.19-0.54]), high school (21.2%; 0.64 [0.52-0.78]), and older (24.2%) patients used VO compared with White (30.6%), English-speaking (29.5%), college (31%), postgraduate (34.9%), and younger (35.4%) patients. Conclusions: Groups that historically experience health inequities had fewer VO visits during and beyond the pandemic peak. Thus, there is a need to continue digital inclusion efforts to promote video access equity.

Thrombosis-Related Loss of Arterial Lines in the First Wave of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with severe respiratory distress requiring intensive care unit (ICU)-level care. Such care often requires placement of an arterial line for monitoring of pulmonary disease progression, hemodynamics, and laboratory tests. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, experienced physicians anecdotally reported multiple attempts, decreased insertion durations, and greater need for replacement of arterial lines in patients with COVID-19 due to persistent thrombosis. Because invasive procedures in patients with COVID-19 may increase the risk for caregiver infection, better defining difficulties in maintaining arterial lines in COVID-19 patients is important. We sought to explore the association between COVID-19 infection and arterial line thrombosis in critically ill patients. METHODS: In this primary exploratory analysis, a multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was used to retrospectively estimate the association between critically ill COVID-19 (versus sepsis/acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) patients and the risk of arterial line removal for thrombosis (with arterial line removal for any other reason treated as a competing risk). As a sensitivity analysis, we compared the number of arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days between critically ill COVID-19 and sepsis/ARDS patients using multivariable negative binomial regression. RESULTS: We retrospectively identified 119 patients and 200 arterial line insertions in patients with COVID-19 and 54 patients and 68 arterial line insertions with non-COVID ARDS. Using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model, we found the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for arterial line clot to be 2.18 (1.06-4.46) for arterial lines placed in COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID-19 sepsis/ARDS patients ( P = .034). Patients with COVID-19 had 36.3 arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days compared to 19.1 arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days in patients without COVID-19 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% CI], 1.78 [0.94-3.39]; P = .078). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that arterial line complications due to thrombosis are more likely in COVID-19 patients and supports the need for further research on the association between COVID-19 and arterial line dysfunction requiring replacement.

Absolute neutrophil count by Duffy status among healthy Black and African American adults.

Many people of African ancestry have lower absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) without increased risk for infection. This is associated with the Duffy-null phenotype (nonexpression of the Duffy antigen on red blood cells), which is commonly found in those of African descent. Currently, there are no studies that compare the ANC of individuals with Duffy-null phenotype to those with Duffy non-null phenotypes within a self-identified Black population. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Duffy status on ANCs based on complete blood counts with differential and Duffy testing in a healthy population of self-identified Black individuals at a single primary care center. This study found that 66.7% (80 of 120) of Black individuals have the Duffy-null phenotype and that there is a significant difference in ANCs between Duffy-null and Duffy non-null individuals (median, 2820 cells per µL vs 5005 cells per µL; P < .001). Additionally, 19 of 80 (23.8%) Duffy-null individuals had an ANC of <2000 cells per µL compared with no (0) Duffy non-null individuals. The Duffy-null phenotype is clinically insignificant; however, inappropriate reference ranges can propagate systemic racism. Therefore, we advocate for the development of Duffy-null-specific ANC reference ranges as well as replacing the term benign ethnic neutropenia with Duffy-nullassociated neutrophil count.

The Conundrum of Anticoagulation for Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Thrombosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is driven by complex interactions between immune, complement, fibrinolytic, endothelial, and coagulation systems.1 In addition to venous thromboembolism (VTE), microthrombi have also been implicated in contributing to end-organ damage, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and kidney dysfunction, as well as to overall mortality.1 As available therapies, variants, and vaccines have evolved, so have reported rates of VTE attributable to Covid-19.

Impact of sickle cell trait on morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted racial health disparities within the United States. Although social determinants of health are the most likely drivers of this disparity, it is possible that genetic traits enriched in the black population like sickle cell trait (SCT) could worsen the morbidity and mortality of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection who identified as black or African American were included in the study (n = 166). Blood remnants were tested for SCT, and clinical data were abstracted from the chart. There was no difference in mortality between those with SCT and those without. There was no difference in respiratory complications between groups, but those without SCT had a much higher burden of chronic lung disease (P = .004). Those with SCT had higher creatinine on admission (P = .004), but no difference in in-hospital renal complications (P = .532). Notably, 12% of the cohort had SCT, which is higher than the expected 7.31% (P = .025). Our study did not show any evidence of increased end organ damage, morbidity, or mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with SCT but did show differences in admission creatinine and preexisting lung disease.

Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in chronic severe neutropenia conditions.

Quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessments in immunodeficiency patients, including those with chronic severe neutropenia conditions, are imperative to determining modifiable health-related features to optimize care. We present the largest study to date of QOL in those with chronic severe neutropenia conditions with further evaluation of patient provider satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures. Subjects completed electronic surveys assessing QOL, PROs, and patient provider satisfaction. There is a significantly negative impact of a chronic severe neutropenia disorder on QOL, fatigue, physical function, cognitive function and pain in adult patients when compared to controls. Children with a chronic neutropenia condition had comparable QOL to controls, but reported fewer depressive symptoms, improved mobility, and stronger self-reported peer relationships. Adults had worse scores for QOL, depression and fatigue when compared to children. Adult and pediatric chronic severe neutropenia patients or their caregivers felt that their medical provider was compassionate, trustworthy, and accessible. However, less than 50% of adult patients agreed their clinician had excellent expertise in white blood cell disorders. Chronic neutropenia complexly affect QOL and PROs. An analysis of these parameters allows for targeted interventions to improve patient psychosocial, physical and neurocognitive health.

When non-Whiteness becomes a condition.

The term "benign ethnic neutropenia" describes the phenotype of having an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1500 cells/µL with no increased risk of infection. It is most commonly seen in those of African ancestry. In addition, ANC reference ranges from countries in Africa emphasize that ANC levels <1500 cells/µL are common and harmless. The lower ANC levels are driven by the Duffy null [Fy(a-b-)] phenotype, which is protective against malaria and seen in 80% to 100% of those of sub-Saharan African ancestry and <1% of those of European descent. Benign ethnic neutropenia is clinically insignificant, but the average ANC values differ from what are typically seen in those of European descent. Thus, the predominantly White American medical system has described this as a condition. This labeling implicitly indicates that common phenotypes in non-White populations are abnormal or wrong. We believe that it is important to examine and rectify practices in hematology that contribute to systemic racism.