Crosschecking the subjective everyday Parkinson's experience among patients and their caregiving spouses: French versions of the Belastungsfragebogen Parkinson Kurzversion (Bela-P-k and Bela-A-k).

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) affects all dimensions of the patient's and the caregiver's daily life. There are two questionnaires in German, Bela-A-k (for caregivers) and Bela-P-k (for PD patients), that can be used to assess the PD-related psychosocial burden in a dyad. The patient's and the caregiver's perspective of living with PD can be crosschecked. Four dimensions are explored: physical performance, emotional load, social relationships, and couple/family life. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to translate these questionnaires into French and to test them among patients and caregivers. METHODS: The questionnaires were translated from German into French by forward and backward translation, followed by a cultural crosscheck. Participants were invited to test the consensual French version in its online administered version created via Lime Survey® software. Participants filled out the questionnaires twice (five-day interval) according to the test-retest method. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Thirty dyads were recruited and eighteen completed the study. Bela-A-K showed strong temporal stability, though it was weak for the social relationships dimension. Bela-P-k showed strong internal consistency, but significant test-retest differences for ten items due to day-by-day changes in patient status. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaires are useful and reliable for dyad-centered follow-up in case of PD. Some items of the Bela-P-k were simplified to improve its temporal stability, considering the patient's changing status through the day. The items concerning social relationships were adjusted for the Bela-A-k.

[Association between screen time and sleep habits in 11-to-12-year-old French middle school students]. / Associations entre les temps d'écran et les habitudes de sommeil chez des jeunes collégiens.

BACKGROUND: Screen media usage has become increasingly commonplace in daily life with children initiating themselves to screen media at an early age. Given the high prevalence of screen viewing among children worldwide, its impact on children's health has become a cause for concern. Unfortunately, little information on the independent association between sleep habits and screen time in French children is currently available. The main aim of this study was to assess possible relationships between screen time and sleep habits (quality, duration, etc.) among young middle school students in France. METHODS: A total of 448 (55 % girls) 11-to-12-year-olds from 5 schools were included. Body weight and height were measured according to standard procedures and BMI percentiles were determined based on international reference values. Sleep parameters were obtained by sleep diaries and visual estimations. A sleep diary was maintained for one week to record sleeping and waking times and related information. Information on lifestyle habits (sedentary behaviours, physical activity, and dietary intake) was obtained via standardised questionnaires. RESULTS: Participants were 11.5 (±0.4) years of age. From total sample, 25.5 % reported screen time ≥2hours/d during school days and 62.7 % during school-free days. High screen time was associated with significantly poorer sleep habits and these results remained valid after adjustment for several confounding factors (body mass index, sex, center and parental level of educational attainment) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study highlights an association between longer screen time and shorter sleep duration in French middle school students aged 11 to 12 years. Preventive measures on use of and exposure to screens are called for. Further studies are necessary to confirm our findings.

[Non-donor patients' opinions about general practitioners' influence on first blood donation]. / Influence du médecin généraliste dans la promotion du primo-don du sang selon les patients.

BACKGROUND: Needs for labile blood products are continuously increasing in France. National self-sufficiency is currently achieved because important promotional efforts for blood donation have resulted in more than three million donations per year. Despite the peculiar relationship general practitioners (GPs) have with every patient and with public health actions, GPs are not included in the blood donation promotion chain. In this study, the main goal was to determine, from a non-donor patient's point of view, whether a discussion with their GP could be an efficient tool in blood donation promotion. The study was also designed to identify barriers to donation and information patients would expect from their GPs in such a discussion. METHODS: This was an epidemiological analytical cross-sectional and multicenter study. All patients aged 18 to 70 years attending a GP's clinic in Nord-Pas-de-Calais was asked to complete a seven-item closed-question survey. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who stated that the discussion with their GP could be an efficient tool for promoting blood donation. RESULTS: One thousand and forty-eight surveys were included in the analysis. Four hundred and fifty of the 660 non-donors interviewed (68.2 %) declared that a discussion with their GP could encourage them in the blood donation process. Non-donors declared that lack of time was the main barrier (33.5 %) and that they expected information from their GP about when and where they could donate blood (40.3 %). CONCLUSION: Many non-donor patients attending primary care clinics declare that a discussion with their GP could encourage them to make a blood donation and therefore significantly increase the number of potential donors.

[Organ donation: point of view of private practice physicians in the region Nord-Pas de Calais in France]. / Le don d'organes : point de vue des médecins libéraux de la région Nord-Pas de Calais en France.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, in France, 222 patients died because they did not receive the graft they expected. The main objective of this study was to determine the attitude of private practice physicians concerning organ donation. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all private practice office-based physicians in the Nord-Pas de Calais region. This questionnaire was elaborated with a panel of physicians and sociologists. It was sent with the monthly journal of the regional union of private physicians of June 2008. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy eight questionnaires were returned. One hundred and thirty four (48.2%) respondents declared they knew what the regulations about organ donation were. The majority of respondents approved organ donation. Information to patients was provided during visits by 34.53% (96) of practitioners. For those who were knowledgeable about regulations, 50.75% of them talked about organ donation. Physicians who had already had experience with organ donation were more inclined to talk about it with other patients. The practitioners described three actions they felt could have a positive influence on family acceptance: providing information before death, talking about organ donation in an appropriate sensitive way, and relying on the confidence established by a solid patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSION: Almost 90% of private physicians who responded to the survey were in favor of organ donation but only 34.5% delivered information and discussed the issue with their patients. The physicians coped with the topics more easily when they had experienced cases and when they were informed about existing regulations. A specific educational program on the current regulations and how to interact with patients on this subject during a visit could be a first answer to the problem and would be welcomed by practitioners.