Efficacy and safety of deflazacort vs prednisone and placebo for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of deflazacort (DFZ) and prednisone (PRED) vs placebo in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHODS: This phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated muscle strength among 196 boys aged 5-15 years with DMD during a 52-week period. In phase 1, participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with DFZ 0.9 mg/kg/d, DFZ 1.2 mg/kg/d, PRED 0.75 mg/kg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. In phase 2, placebo participants were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 active treatment groups. Participants originally assigned to an active treatment continued that treatment for an additional 40 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was average change in muscle strength from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo. The study was completed in 1995. RESULTS: All treatment groups (DFZ 0.9 mg/kg/d, DFZ 1.2 mg/kg/d, and PRED 0.75 mg/kg/d) demonstrated significant improvement in muscle strength compared with placebo at 12 weeks. Participants taking PRED had significantly more weight gain than placebo or both doses of DFZ at 12 weeks; at 52 weeks, participants taking PRED had significantly more weight gain than both DFZ doses. The most frequent adverse events in all 3 active treatment arms were Cushingoid appearance, erythema, hirsutism, increased weight, headache, and nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSIONS: After 12 weeks of treatment, PRED and both doses of DFZ improved muscle strength compared with placebo. Deflazacort was associated with less weight gain than PRED. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for boys with DMD, daily use of either DFZ and PRED is effective in preserving muscle strength over a 12-week period.

Safety and Efficacy of Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Adult Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system compared with sham placebo in adults. METHODS: Adult patients participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either the needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system or sham placebo 1 to 3 minutes before a required venipuncture or venous cannulation. The primary efficacy endpoint measured the analgesic effect of the active system using a pain visual analogue scale. RESULTS: In 693 adults who completed the study, the needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system was associated with significantly less pain during venipuncture and venous cannulation compared with sham placebo, as demonstrated by a difference between groups in age-adjusted mean pain score (P=0.003). Secondary analyses demonstrating significant differences between groups included the proportion of patients who were pain free, the proportion of responders, and the difference between pain experienced during the current venous procedure compared with the recollection of pain experienced during a prior venous procedure. Use of the active system was not associated with any serious adverse events or any adverse events resulting in study discontinuation. All treatment-related adverse events were mild. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial demonstrated that use of a needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system resulted in a significant reduction of pain during venipuncture and peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults. Both the predefined primary endpoint and all 3 secondary endpoints were met. The needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system may be an option for analgesia during venous access procedures in adults.

Safety and Efficacy of a Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation: Randomized Double-blind COMFORT-004 Trial.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine if a lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate powder intradermal system designed to provide cutaneous analgesia is efficacious, safe, and tolerable for pediatric subjects compared with a sham placebo system. METHODS: COMFORT-004, A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Confirm the Effectiveness and Safety of ALGRX 3268 in Pediatric Subjects, was a single-dose, parallel group study of children undergoing venipuncture or peripheral venous cannulation at the antecubital fossa or back of the hand. Included were subjects (3-18 years) in 3 age groups: 3-7, 8-12, and 13-18 years. Excluded were those with recent similar procedures or with implantable devices or skin pathologies at the anatomical site, insufficient cognitive skills, or allergies to local anesthetics or adhesives. Subjects were randomized to receive the needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system (active system, 0.5 mg of lidocaine/21 ± 1 bar of pressure [n = 269]) or sham placebo (n = 266) 1-3 minutes before venipuncture or peripheral venous cannulation. Analgesic efficacy was assessed patient self-report of venous access pain (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale [3-18 years] and visual analog scale [VAS; 8-18 years]) and parental observational VAS. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and relationship to study treatment. Skin signs and symptoms were graded numerically. Wong-Baker FACES scores, VAS, and parental VAS were analyzed by using an ANOVA model. Responder ratings and success rates were compared by using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified according to center, age group, and body site. FINDINGS: The active system group had significantly (P = 0.0022) less pain compared with the sham placebo in all age groups combined according to the modified Wong-Baker FACES scale. Secondary efficacy analyses found that the active system resulted in less pain as assessed by subjects' VAS pain assessments aged 8-18 years (P = 0.1856), responder analysis (P = 0.054), and parents' VAS assessments (P = 0.002). Venous procedures were successful in 95.5% and 96.2% of the active system and sham placebo groups, respectively. Treatment-emergent AEs, most commonly nausea and/or emesis, were not significant between groups. There were no serious AEs. The active system group had significantly more minor erythema and hemorrhage/petechiae. IMPLICATIONS: The needle-free powder lidocaine delivery system was well tolerated and produced superior analgesia compared with sham placebo when administered 1-3 minutes before pediatric venipuncture or peripheral venous cannulation. Treatment-related AEs occurred primarily at the administration site and were infrequent, generally mild, and resolved without sequelae. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00140088.