Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 94
Filter
1.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(11): 8393-8402, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079052

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: For patients with a cancer diagnosis, coping abilities are of high importance. Cancer patients with a high sense of coherence may cope better. The purpose of this study is to learn more about the correlation of sense of coherence and different aspects, such as demographics, psychological factors, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and lay aetiology. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in ten cancer centres in Germany. The questionnaire consisted of ten sub-items, collecting information about sense of coherence, demographics, general life satisfaction, resilience, spirituality, self-efficacy, physical activity and sports, nutrition, CAM methods and cancer causes. RESULTS: As many as 349 participants were evaluable. The mean sense of coherence score was M = 47.30. Significant associations were shown for sense of coherence and financial situation (r = 0.230, p < 0.001), level of education (r = 0.187, p < 0.001), marital status (η = 0.177, p = 0.026) and time interval since diagnosis (r = - 0.109, p = 0.045). Sense of coherence and resilience correlated on a high level, as well as spirituality, self-efficacy and general life satisfaction (r = 0.563, r = 0.432, r = 0.461, r = 0.306, p's < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several aspects, such as demographics and psychological factors, have a great influence on the sense of coherence. To help patients to cope better, physicians should try to strengthen sense of coherence, resilience and self-efficacy and, at the same time, consider patients' individual background such as level of education, financial capacity and emotional support by family members.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Sense of Coherence , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life/psychology , Life Style , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(4): 235, 2023 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971861

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-related polyneuropathy (CIPN) is a very common, often dose-limiting side effect that affects the patients' quality of life. Treatment usually consists of a combination of medicinal, medical, and individualized treatment approaches, although the effectiveness of these therapies is insufficient for many patients. The aim of this article is to review and evaluate the impact of CIPN on patients' daily lives and possible effective treatment approaches. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was developed based on ten anonymous telephone interviews with CIPN patients. The content of the questionnaire was divided into 5 categories: demographics, clinical presentation, everyday symptoms, treatment of CIPN symptoms, and medical care. Mostly closed questions were used but multiple choice and individual additions by free text answers were possible. RESULTS: CIPN limits patients' quality of life over a long period of time. In addition to diurnal and situational fluctuations, the emotional burden negatively affects patients' daily lives in many ways. From the patients' point of view, the individually implemented therapy measures were most effective in treating their complaints. But even the combination of different therapy methods insufficiently alleviates the symptoms of the patients. CONCLUSION: It is important and necessary to comprehensively inform patients about CIPN as a possible side effect, to point out prevention strategies, and to critically examine and evaluate different therapy approaches. In this way, misunderstandings of the doctor-patient relationship can be avoided. In addition, patient satisfaction and quality of life can be increased in the long term.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Neoplasms , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Polyneuropathies , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Physician-Patient Relations , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Polyneuropathies/therapy , Polyneuropathies/drug therapy , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy
3.
Inn Med (Heidelb) ; 64(1): 3-9, 2023 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36594968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all cancer patients use complementary or alternative medicine. AIM: The results of the German S3 guidelines on complementary oncology are presented and placed into the context of patient consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The core recommendations of the S3 guidelines are summarized including an overview of the evidence. RESULTS: Selected methods of complementary medicine can be used with the aim of improving the quality of life and reducing side effects. Comprehensive data are available for physical activity with respect to survival, quality of life and supportive therapy. For most other methods the evidence is relatively low. Therefore, weighing up the benefits and risks more frequently resulted in negative recommendations in the guidelines, especially for methods based on substances. Exceptions to this are three micronutrients (vitamins B12, D and selenium), as even in the case of a well-balanced diet, deficiency symptoms are possible. Therefore, routine measurement of the blood levels of these micronutrients is recommended. CONCLUSION: The questions from patients on what they can do by themselves should be answered respectfully and based on evidence. The benefits and risks of complementary methods must be carefully considered. To do this, regular questioning of patients on the interest in complementary methods is recommended. The decisive benefit of complementary medicine is the chance for patients to become active themselves. Therefore, all recommendations refer to the discussion with the patient, which do not formulate a therapy but are consultation recommendations: should be recommended instead of should be done.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/therapy , Micronutrients
4.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(9): 6067-6074, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36653538

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The usage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among cancer patients. While reasons for and aims of using CAM have been evaluated in many studies, less is known about whether patients' concepts of how and why cancer develops has an influence on the choice of the CAM method. METHODS: We pooled the data from all studies of our working group containing questions on lay etiological concepts and CAM usage and reanalyzed them with respect to the associations between these parameters. RESULTS: The pooled dataset from 12 studies included 4792 patients. A third (1645 patients) reported using CAM. Most often used were supplements (55.9%), relaxation techniques (43.6%), and homeopathy (37.9%). Regarding perceived causes, patients most often marked stress (35.4%) followed by genes (31.9%). While all lay etiological beliefs were highly significantly associated with usage of CAM in general, there was no association between single lay etiological concepts and types of CAM used. Yet, in a network analysis, we found two associations: one comprising trauma, mistletoe, genes, and nutritional supplements, the other yoga, vitamin C, nutritional supplements, and TCM herbs. In the correlation heatmap, one cluster comprises etiological concepts of personality, immune system and trauma, and two clusters of CAM methods emerged: one comprising praying, yoga, meditation, and relaxation procedures, the other nutritional supplements, selenium, vitamins A and C. CONCLUSION: While physicians are trained to derive treatment strategies from etiological concepts, lay people choosing CAM do not follow these rules, which may point to other needs of patients addressed by CAM.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Neoplasms , Physicians , Humans , Complementary Therapies/methods , Mind-Body Therapies , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Dietary Supplements , Vitamins , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(8): 5279-5287, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Being diagnosed with cancer is challenging. Many patients wish to be actively involved in treatment and contribute to therapy, but the patients' coping abilities and desire for involvement differ. The individual level of resilience seems to play a major role. Our study aims to learn more about the associations of resilience and factors as demographics and psychological factors. METHODS: This multicentric cross-sectional study was conducted in ten oncological centers in Germany in summer 2021. The questionnaire collected information on demographics, resilience, self-efficacy, general satisfaction with life, and sense of coherence. Considered lifestyle-aspects were diet and physical activity. 416 patients were included in the analyses. RESULTS: A moderate mean resilience score was achieved (M = 69). Significant correlations in demographics were found for resilience and education (r = 0.146, p = 0.003), income (r = 0.205, p = 0.001), and time since receiving diagnosis (r = - 0.115, p = 0.021). Resilience and self-efficacy correlated on a high level (r = 0.595, p < 0.001), resilience and sense of coherence, and resilience and general satisfaction with life in a moderate way (r = 0.339, p < 0.001; r = 0.461, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resilience portrays an important aspect in cancer treatment. Detecting patients at risk, stabilizing, or improving resilience are important to focus on and strengthen them accordingly. Possible negatively influencing factors (e.g., low self-efficacy) need to be considered. Factors affecting resilience but difficult to influence, as educational background, should be screened for. Also, the combination of low resilience and low income seems to describe a vulnerable patient group.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adaptation, Psychological , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Life Style , Demography , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 145(4): 927-939, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673872

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: One important goal of any cancer therapy is to improve or maintain quality of life. In this context, mistletoe treatment is discussed to be highly controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about the current state of evidence concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding quality of life and side effects of cancer treatments. METHODS: In September and October 2017, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 articles and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Regarding quality of life, 17 publications reported results. Studies with better methodological quality show less or no effects on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to quality of life or reduction of treatment-associated side effects, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Mistletoe , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Humans , Phytotherapy/methods , Quality of Life
10.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 145(3): 695-707, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673873

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment of cancer patients is discussed highly controversial in the scientific literature. Aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about current state of research concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding survival, quality of life and safety. METHODS: In September and October 2017 Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 hits and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Patient relevant endpoints were overall survival (14 studies, n = 1054), progression- or disease-free survival or tumor response (10 studies, n = 1091). Most studies did not show any effect of mistletoe on survival. Especially high quality studies do not show any benefit. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to survival, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Mistletoe , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/mortality
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(8): 2783-2788, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on patients' needs with respect to physicians' ethical behavior and virtues are important but not available in most cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an iterative process together with patients' representatives, we developed a standardized questionnaire which was distributed to the representatives of the Women's Self-Help after Cancer in Germany. We started with the classical ethical virtues and clustered them to characteristics. The patients' representatives were asked to rate in different communications settings. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients' representatives took part in the survey. For four communication situations (first communication on symptoms, diagnosis of cancer, choice of therapy, doubts on therapy), competence was rated as very important by 80-89% and as important by 6-7%; honesty as very important by 78-89% and as important by 5-12%; respect as very important by 66-71% and as important by 19-21%; and patience as very important by 55-68% and as important by 6-24%. Compassion was rated as less important, with only 24-31% rating it as very important and another 26-32% as important. Additional desires expressed by the participants were physicians having more time (9.1%) and a better relationship between physician and patient (7.0%). CONCLUSION: Competence, honesty, respect, and patience are important characteristics which should be focused on in communication training of medical students and physicians. In spite of compassion being rated as less important, training on compassion/empathy might help doctors to improve coping with the continuous confrontation with complications, progress, suffering, and death of their patients.


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Services Needs and Demand , Neoplasms , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians , Virtues , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Empathy , Ethics, Medical , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Advocacy , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/psychology , Physicians/standards , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Truth Disclosure/ethics
13.
Br J Radiol ; 88(1051): 20150080, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25955230

ABSTRACT

Every year in Germany about 50,000 patients are referred and treated by radiotherapy (RT) for "non-malignant disorders". This highly successful treatment is applied only for specific indications such as preservation or recovery of the quality of life by means of pain reduction or resolution and/or an improvement of formerly impaired physical body function owing to specific disease-related symptoms. Since 1995, German radiation oncologists have treated non-malignant disorders according to national consensus guidelines; these guidelines were updated and further developed over 3 years by implementation of a systematic consensus process to achieve national upgraded and accepted S2e clinical practice guidelines. Throughout this process, international standards of evaluation were implemented. This review summarizes most of the generally accepted indications for the application of RT for non-malignant diseases and presents the special treatment concepts. The following disease groups are addressed: painful degenerative skeletal disorders, hyperproliferative disorders and symptomatic functional disorders. These state of the art guidelines may serve as a platform for daily clinical work; they provide a new starting point for quality assessment, future clinical research, including the design of prospective clinical trials, and outcome research in the underrepresented and less appreciated field of RT for non-malignant disorders.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiotherapy/trends , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany , Humans , Quality of Life
14.
J Cancer Educ ; 30(2): 340-3, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25056420

ABSTRACT

About half of all patients with cancer use complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). In 2013, we started a lecture program for patients, followed by evidence-based recommendations on counseling on CAM. These recommendations have been published before by this working group. The aim of the program is to provide scientific facts on the most often used CAM methods in standardized presentations which help patients discuss the topic with their oncologists and support shared decision making. The article presents the evaluation of the pilot phase. Participants received a standardized questionnaire before the start of the lecture. The questionnaire comprises four parts: demographic data, data concerning experience with CAM, satisfaction with the lecture, and needs for further information on CAM. In 2013, seven lectures on CAM were given in cooperation with regional branches of the German Cancer Society in several German states. Four hundred sixty patients and relatives took part (75% females and 16% males). Forty-eight percent formerly had used CAM. Most often named sources of information on CAM were print media (48%) and the Internet (37%). Most participants rated additional written information valuable. About one third would like to have an individual consultation concerning CAM. A standardized presentation of evidence on CAM methods most often used, together with recommendations on the self-management of symptoms, is highly appreciated. The concept of a highly interactive lecture comprising is feasible and if presented in lay terminology, adequate. In order to give additional support on the topic, written information should be provided as the first step.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Decision Making , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Patients/psychology , Adult , Aged , Complementary Therapies/psychology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life
15.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 140(7): 1229-37, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24706260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A high proportion of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). In oncology, risks of CAM are side effects and interactions. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to conduct a survey on professionals in palliative care regarding attitudes toward CAM. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: An internet-based survey with a standardized questionnaire was sent to all members of the German Society for Palliative Care. MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire collected data on attitude toward CAM and experiences. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety questionnaires (19 %) were returned (49 % physicians, 35 % nurses, 3 % psychologists). Acceptance of CAM is high (92 % for complementary and 54 % for alternative medicine). Most participants had already been asked on CAM by patients (95 %) and relatives (89 %). Forty-four percent already had used complementary methods and 5 % alternative methods. Only 21 % think themselves adequately informed. Seventy-four percent would use complementary methods in a patient with advanced tumor, and 62 % would use alternative therapy in patients if there was no other therapy. Even from those who are skeptical 45 % would treat a patient with alternative methods. CONCLUSIONS: In order to inform patients on CAM and to further patients' autonomy, evidence on benefits and harms of CAM must be provided. As awareness of risks from CAM is low and critical appraisal especially of alternative medicine missing, but interest on information on CAM is high, experts should provide evidence-based recommendations for CAM in palliative care to members of different professions. This could be done by a curriculum focusing on the most often used CAM methods.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Complementary Therapies/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Perception , Physicians/psychology , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce , Young Adult
16.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 23(2): 173-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23889081

ABSTRACT

Patient-reported outcomes are an important tool in clinical research. In the setting of cancer treatments, benefit of therapy is essentially characterised by improvement of survival as well as quality of life (QoL). A standardised instrument to assess QoL is the standardised QoL questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire). QoL instruments provide data on different aspects (domains) of the framework of QoL. Using these questionnaires in studies provides data on how a treatment affects QoL in a group of patients. The goal of our concept is to individualise QoL and to use validated instruments in order to integrate patients' perspectives and aims into treatment assessment, planning and control. We propose to use the domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and to ask the patient to determine which objectives besides survival are relevant for him and should be achieved by treatment. These individual goals can be used in a process of shared decision-making to choose and monitor treatment. In clinical studies, this approach would allow to recruit more patients who would most probably benefit from the therapy. In addition, supportive data could be gathered in correlation to treatment goals and actual benefits.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient Participation , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Ann Oncol ; 24(10): 2641-2645, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23942776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), yet discussion with the oncologist is often missing and oncologists lack knowledge in CAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to learn more about the attitude of professionals in oncology toward CAM, a survey was conducted on employees of a German university clinic using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 547 employees took part in the survey. One-third would definitely use CAM on cancer patients. Female employees are more interested in CAM than males (80% versus 20%; P = 0.001); physicians are less interested than nurses (57% versus 72%; P = 0.008). 2.5% of physicians and 9% of nurses are convinced that CAM is as effective as conventional therapy in cancer. Fifty-two percent of physicians and 12% of nurses agree that adverse effects due to CAM may be possible. Seventy-three percent did not consider themselves adequately informed on CAM for their professional work. CONCLUSIONS: As a substantial part of participants would use CAM on cancer patients and most are interested in but not trained on this topic, there is a need for training of professionals from different professions working in oncology.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Complementary Therapies/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms/therapy , Academic Medical Centers , Female , Humans , Male , Nurses , Physicians , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities
18.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 189(8): 613-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23824107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is of high relevance in oncology. Only a minority of professionals feel competent in CAM. Our aim was to provide a strategy for establishing evidence-based counseling on CAM in oncology in the German health system. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature on patient counseling concerning CAM. Of 811 articles identified in this search 51 met our inclusion criteria. Data from these articles were analyzed and adapted to the needs of German patients by a group of experts of the DEGRO ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie") and the German Cancer Society. In the next step a strategy about how to integrate evidence-based counseling on CAM at cancer centers and oncological institutions was developed. RESULTS: First, evidence-based recommendations on CAM counseling were derived. The core of our strategy combines two levels of information provision: level 1 will be oncologists, radiotherapists and other specialists and level 2 oncological CAM experts. The latter group will serve as trainers and backup for complicated or advanced questions and for individual counseling of patients with complex needs. Professionals in level 1 will be offered special training. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based counseling on CAM is not only possible but also mandatory in order to meet patient information needs. Our proposal would allow for integrated counseling available at all oncological institutions and guarantee a high quality. Furthermore, provision of information on two different levels allows the effective use of resources (manpower and financing).


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Directive Counseling/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Neoplasms/therapy , Germany , Humans
19.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 138(22): 1165-71, 2013 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23700303

ABSTRACT

Aim of the recommendations of the German Society for Magnesium Research: Recognition and compensation of magnesium deficiency in patients with risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias or manifest rhythm disturbances. Prevention of arrhythmias by administration of magnesium. Therapeutic administration of magnesium in patients with arrhythmias with and without magnesium deficiency. The current state of knowledge claims for considering the status of magnesium and the possibility of a therapeutic intervention with magnesium within the concept of the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The use of magnesium as single agent or as an adjunct to other therapeutic actions in the prevention and therapy of cardiac arrhythmias can be effective and, in case of oral administration, very safe. In case of parenteral administration, it is important to use adequate doses, monitor cardiovascular and neuromuscular parameters and to consider contraindications.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Cardiology/standards , Magnesium Deficiency/complications , Magnesium Deficiency/drug therapy , Magnesium/therapeutic use , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Germany , Humans
20.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 138(1-2): 17-22, 2013 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23250690

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is important for cancer patients. The internet has a rising relevance of source of health information. Patient set strong confidence in websites from patient advocacy groups. The websites of German patient advocacy groups were analysed regarding information on CAM. METHODS: An analysis on the homepages of the most important self-help organizations for cancer patients in Germany was performed. A descriptive analysis of the contents at a cutoff date (20.12.2011) listing the contents was done using an instrument based on the HonCode criteria. RESULTS: The homepages of the self-help groups are heterogeneous concerning CAM. Only few sites provide more information. The differences between the self-help groups do not correlate with the known user rate of patients with different kinds of cancer. Most homepages dealing with the topic also point to the associated problems of side effects and interactions. All homepages make a clear difference between information and opinion. Influences from outside were not detected. CONCLUSION: In spite of a high number of patients using CAM the topic is only infrequently represented on the homepages. This could be due to difficult and contradictory data on KAM. As websites of patient advocacy are well suited to provide information on CAM the patient version of a S3 guideline in the German national guideline program in oncology could provide a fundament.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/education , Computer-Assisted Instruction/statistics & numerical data , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Self-Help Groups/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL