Opioid Prescribing and Outcomes in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Post-2016 CDC Guideline.

Importance: Although the intention of the 2016 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain was not to limit pain treatment for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), clinicians and patients have recognized the possibility that the guideline may have altered outcomes for this population. However, the outcomes of the 2016 guideline for this patient population are unknown. Objective: To examine changes in opioid prescribing patterns and health outcomes among patients with SCD before and after the release of the 2016 CDC guideline. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted interrupted time series analysis of claims data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. In this population-based study in the US, individuals with SCD who were at least 1 year of age, had no cancer diagnosis, and had pharmacy coverage for the month of measurement were included. The data were analyzed from January 2021 to November 2023. Exposure: The CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain released in March 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main variables measured in this study included the practice of opioid prescribing among patients with SCD (ie, rate of opioid prescriptions dispensed, mean number of days supplied, mean total morphine milligram equivalents [MME] per patient, and mean daily MME per opioid prescription) and pain-related health outcomes (rates of emergency department visits related to vaso-occlusive crises [VOC] and hospitalizations related to VOC). Results: The cohort included 14 979 patients with SCD (mean [SD] age, 25.9 [16.9] years; 8520 [56.9%] female). Compared with the preguideline trends, the following changes were observed after the guideline was released: significant decreases in the coefficient for change in slope of the opioid dispensing rate (-0.29 [95% CI, -0.39 to -0.20] prescriptions per 100 person-month; P < .001), the number of days supplied per prescription (-0.05 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.04] days per prescription-month; P < .001), and opioid dosage (-141.0 [95% CI, -219.5 to -62.5] MME per person-month; P = .001; -10.1 [95% CI, -14.6 to -5.6] MME/prescription-month; P < .001). Conversely, a significant increase in VOC-related hospitalizations occurred after the guideline release (0.16 [95% CI, 0.07-0.25] hospitalizations per 100 person-month; P = .001). These changes were observed to a greater extent among adult patients, but pediatric patients experienced similar changes in several measures, even though the guideline focused exclusively on adult patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This retrospective cohort study showed that the 2016 CDC guideline may have had unintended negative outcomes on the patient population living with SCD.

Impact of adherence to hydroxyurea on health outcomes among patients with sickle cell disease.

Although new pharmaceutical therapy options have recently become available, hydroxyurea is still the most commonly used and affordable treatment option for sickle cell disease (SCD). This study aimed to update the evidence on hydroxyurea adherence and its association with clinical and economic outcomes among individuals with SCD. This retrospective study used Texas Medicaid claims data from 09/2011-08/2016. Individuals were included if they had ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient SCD diagnoses, had ≥1 hydroxyurea prescription, were 2-63 years of age, and were continuously enrolled in Texas Medicaid between 6 months before and 1 year after the first hydroxyurea prescription fill date (index date). Hydroxyurea adherence (Medication Possession Ratio; MPR), vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC)-related outcomes, healthcare utilization and expenditures (SCD-related and all-cause) during the 1 year following the index date were measured. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to address the study objectives. Among 1035 included individuals (age: 18.8 ± 12.5 years, female: 52.1%), 20.9% were adherent to hydroxyurea (defined as MPR≥0.8). After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, compared to being non-adherent, adhering to hydroxyurea was significantly associated with: a lower risk (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.480, p = .0007) and hazard rate (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.748, p = .0005) of a VOC event, fewer VOC events (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 0.767, p = .0009), fewer VOC-related hospital days (IRR = 0.593, p = .0003), fewer all-cause and SCD-related hospitalizations (IRR = 0.712, p = .0008; IRR = 0.707, p = .0008, respectively) and emergency department visits (IRR = 0.768, p = .0037; IRR = 0.746, p = .0041, respectively), and lower SCD-related total healthcare expenditures (IRR = 0.796, p = .0266). Efforts to increase adherence to hydroxyurea could improve clinical and economic outcomes among individuals with SCD.