Interpersonal Media and Face-to-Face Communication: Relationship with Life Satisfaction and Loneliness.

Framed by need to belong theory, this study considers the role of communication modality, geographic proximity, and the number of close relationship partners to predict life satisfaction and loneliness. A quota sample of American adults (N = 1,869) completed four name generation tasks to identify up to 16 alters, resulting in four alters per participant (n = 7,471). Participants reported the frequency with which they communicated with each alter in the past year in person and through eight interpersonal media. Results suggest that number of relationship partners and frequency of face-to-face interaction were robust predictors of life satisfaction and loneliness. Those living alone faced significant threats to well-being. Video chat and voice call frequency were also associated with greater life satisfaction. Mediation analyses showed voice call frequency was indirectly associated with less loneliness through greater relationship maintenance satisfaction, while lean media was indirectly associated with greater loneliness through relationship maintenance frustration. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10902-022-00581-8.

Development and initial evaluation of a multidimensional digital stress scale.

Digital stress is believed to play a role in the association between social media use and psychosocial outcomes. However, the literature is limited by a lack of measures that conform to published theoretical models of the construct. The present investigation details the development of a new multidimensional measure of digital stress. Based on an earlier conceptualization of Digital Stress (Steele et al., 2020), Study 1 identified items from extant measures of digital stress, conducted a qualitative review of the literature to compose new items, and conducted focus groups with young adults and adolescents (N = 23) to improve item wording and interpretation. Study 2 conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of items with a young adult sample (N = 247) collected online, yielding support for four hypothesized factors (i.e., availability stress, approval anxiety, fear of missing out [FoMO], and connection overload) plus one unanticipated factor (i.e., online vigilance). In Study 3, college students (N = 174) completed paper-and-pencil surveys, and EFA results showed a similar structure as detected in Study 2. In Study 4, confirmatory factor analysis examining the five-factor model was conducted on data from adolescents (N = 163) and college students (N = 152). These procedures yielded 24 items measuring 5 components of digital stress: availability stress, approval anxiety, FoMO, connection overload, and online vigilance. Associations between digital stress and psychosocial distress and functioning are reported to demonstrate convergent and divergent validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).