ABSTRACT
La manometría esofágica de alta resolución (MAR) está en fase de desarrollo, como se evidencia por las diferentes clasificaciones de Chicago. Con el fin de unificar criterios en algunos aspectos prácticos con limitada evidencia científica se llevó a cabo la Primera Reunión Nacional de Consenso en Manometría de Alta Resolución del Grupo Español de Motilidad Digestiva, en la que participaron un amplio grupo de expertos. Las propuestas se basaron en una encuesta previa con 47 preguntas, la exhaustiva revisión de la bibliografía disponible y la experiencia de los participantes. Se plantearon aspectos metodológicos sobre criterios de análisis poco definidos de algunos nuevos parámetros de alta resolución y otros aspectos no considerados, como la actividad espontánea o las ondas secundarias, elaborándose conclusiones finales con utilidad práctica (AU)
High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is currently under development as can be seen in the various Chicago classifications. In order to standardize criteria in certain practical aspects with limited scientific evidence, the First National Meeting for Consensus in High Resolution Manometry of the Spanish Digestive Motility Group took place, bringing together a wide group of experts. The proposals were based on a prior survey composed of 47 questions, an exhaustive review of the available literature and the experience of the participants. Methodological aspects relating to the poorly defined analysis criteria of certain new high resolution parameters were discussed, as well as other issues previously overlooked such as spontaneous activity or secondary waves. Final conclusions were drawn with practical application (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Manometry/instrumentation , Manometry/methods , Manometry , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , Anesthesia/trends , Anesthesia , Administration, Topical , Gastrointestinal Motility , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Esophageal Motility Disorders/chemically induced , Esophageal Motility Disorders/complications , Muscle Contraction , Perfusion/methodsABSTRACT
High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is currently under development as can be seen in the various Chicago classifications. In order to standardize criteria in certain practical aspects with limited scientific evidence, the First National Meeting for Consensus in High Resolution Manometry of the Spanish Digestive Motility Group took place, bringing together a wide group of experts. The proposals were based on a prior survey composed of 47 questions, an exhaustive review of the available literature and the experience of the participants. Methodological aspects relating to the poorly defined analysis criteria of certain new high resolution parameters were discussed, as well as other issues previously overlooked such as spontaneous activity or secondary waves. Final conclusions were drawn with practical applications.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Manometry/methods , Anesthesia , Consensus , Gastrointestinal Motility , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal and are characterized by the overexpression of KIT protein (tyrosine kinase). Their prognosis has improved significantly with the discovery of imatinib mesylate for advanced GIST treatment. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective, descriptive study of GISTs diagnosed in our center during the past 5 years. We excluded patients with incidental diagnoses in the context of other pathologies because GIST did not affect outcome or prognosis. The variables studied were clinical characteristics, location, size, imaging techniques, resectability, neoadjuvant imatinib, surgical technique, histology, immunohistochemistry, prognostic classification of Fletcher, morbidity, monitoring, and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were diagnosed (14 males/5 females) with a mean age of 63 years (range: 30-84 years). Diagnosis was incidental in eight patients (42%). Tumor location of the remaining 11 patients (58%) was six tumors of the small intestine (55%), four gastric (36%) and one rectal (9%). Predominant gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia were diagnosed mainly by abdominal computed tomography (CT). At diagnosis, nine patients were considered resectable with radical intent (82%) and the other two patients (18%) received neoadjuvant treatment with a favorable response after 6 months. Three patients were treated with imatinib after surgery (33%). Median survival was 34 months (range: 5-58 months). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of GIST is often incidental. The predominant clinical symptom is usually gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia and the most widely used imaging test is CT. Treatment is surgical unless advanced GIST is diagnosed, which will be treated with imatinib mesylate neoadjuvant therapy. A multidisciplinary approach to this pathology is essential, a fact that affects prognosis and patient survival.
