A cold case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn resolved by genomic sequencing and population studies to define a new antigen in the Rh system.

BACKGROUND: We report an obstetric case involving an RhD-positive woman who had developed a red blood cell (RBC) antibody that was not detected until after delivery of a newborn, who presented with a positive direct antiglobulin test result. Immunohematology studies suggested that the maternal antibody was directed against a low-prevalence antigen on the paternal and newborn RBCs. RESULTS: Comprehensive blood group profiling by targeted exome sequencing revealed a novel nonsynonymous single nucleotide variant (SNV) RHCE c.486C>G (GenBank MZ326705) on the RHCE*Ce allele, for both the father and newborn. A subsequent genomic-based study to profile blood groups in an Indigenous Australian population revealed the same SNV in 2 of 247 individuals. Serology testing showed that the maternal antibody reacted specifically with RBCs from these two individuals. DISCUSSION: The maternal antibody was directed against a novel antigen in the Rh blood group system arising from an RHCE c.486C>G variant on the RHCE*Ce allele linked to RHD*01. The variant predicts a p.Asn162Lys change on the RhCE protein and has been registered as the 56th antigen in the Rh system, ISBT RH 004063. CONCLUSION: This antibody was of clinical significance, resulting in a mild to moderate hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In the past, the cause of such HDFN cases may have remained unresolved. Genomic sequencing combined with population studies now assists in resolving such cases. Further population studies have potential to inform the need to design population-specific red cell antibody typing panels for antibody screening in the Australian population.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn caused by anti-sD antibody in a GP.Mur/Mur Thai mother and review of the prevalence of sD in Thai blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Low-prevalence antigen sD (MNS23) is encoded by GYPB c.173C > G. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to anti-sD is rare. A mother delivered a newborn whose red blood cells (RBCs) were DAT-positive and was later diagnosed with HDFN. Serum from the mother was incompatible with the father's RBCs and was used to screen 184 Thai blood donors. This study aimed to investigate the cause of HDFN in a Thai family and determine the prevalence of sD in Thai blood donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three family members and four blood donors were investigated in the study. Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) was used for genotyping. Standard hemagglutination techniques were used in titration studies, phenotyping, and enzyme/chemical studies. Anti-s, anti-Mia , anti-JENU, and anti-sD reagents were used in serological investigations. RESULTS: The mother was GYP*Mur/Mur. The father and the four donors were GYPB*s/sD predicting S - s + sD +. The baby was GYP*Mur/sD and his RBCs were Mia +, s + w with anti-s (P3BER) and JENU+w . RBCs from two GYPB*sD -positive blood donors reacted with anti-sD (Dreyer). Proteolytic enzyme α-chymotrypsin-treated sD + cells did not react with anti-sD (Wat) produced by the GP.Mur/Mur mother but reacted with the original anti-sD (Dreyer). DISCUSSION: This is the first report of HDFN due to anti-sD in the Asian population. The genotype frequency for GYPB*sD in a selected Thai blood donor population is 2.2% (4/184). Anti-sD should be considered in mothers with Southeast Asian or East Asian background when antibody identification is unresolved in pregnancies affected by HDFN.

Fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Ena and identification of a novel GYPA c.295delG variant in a Thai family.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-frequency antigen Ena (MNS 28) is expressed on glycophorin A (GPA). En(a-) individuals can form anti-Ena when exposed to GPA. A Thai patient formed an antibody that reacted against all reagent red blood cells (RBCs). The patient received incompatible blood resulting in a fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR). This study aimed to characterize the antibody detected in the patient and investigate the cause of HTR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from the patient and three of his family members were investigated. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) and DNA-microarray were used for genotyping. Standard haemagglutination techniques were used for phenotyping and antibody investigations. RESULTS: DNA sequencing showed the patient was homozygous for GYPA*M c.295delG (p.Val99Ter) predicting En(a-). Three family members were heterozygous for GYPA c.295delG. MPS and DNA-microarray predicted the patient was N- discordant with the N+ RBC phenotype. The patient's plasma was positive with enzyme/chemical-treated reagent RBCs but failed to react with En(a-) and Mk Mk RBCs. CONCLUSION: The GYPA c.295delG variant prevented GPA expression on RBCs resulting in En(a-) phenotype. The N+ phenotype result was probably due to the anti-N typing reagent detecting 'N' (MNS30) on GPB. The patient's alloantibody has anti-Ena specificity.

A new high-prevalence LW antigen detected by an antibody in an Indigenous Australian homozygous for LW*A c.309C>A variant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The LW gene encodes the LW glycoprotein that carries the antigens of the LW blood group system. LW antigens are distinct from D antigen, however, they are phenotypically related and anti-LW antibodies are often mistaken as anti-D. An antibody was detected in an Australian patient of Aboriginal descent who consistently typed as LW(a+b-). This study aimed to describe the antibody recognizing a high-prevalence antigen on the LW glycoprotein. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from the patient and her four siblings were investigated. DNA was genotyped by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-microarray and massively parallel sequencing (MPS) platforms. Red blood cells (RBCs) were phenotyped using standard haemagglutination techniques. Antibody investigations were performed using a panel of phenotyped RBCs from adults and cord blood cells. RESULTS: SNP-microarray and MPS genotyped all family members as LW*A/A, (c.299A), predicting LW(a+b-). In addition, a novel LW*A c.309C>A single nucleotide variant was detected in all family members. The patient and one of her siblings (M4) were LW c.309C>A homozygous. Antibody from the patient reacted positive to all reagent panel RBCs and cord blood cells but negative with RBCs from LW(a-b-), Rhnull and sibling M4. Antibody failed to react with RBCs treated with dithiothreitol. CONCLUSION: Antibody detected in the patient recognized a novel high-prevalence antigen, LWEM, in the LW blood group system. LWEM-negative patients who developed anti-LWEM can be safely transfused with D+ RBCs, however, D- is preferred. Accurate antibody identification can help better manage allocation of blood products especially when D- RBCs are in short supply.

Frequency of Mia (MNS7) and Classification of Mia-Positive Hybrid Glycophorins in an Australian Blood Donor Population.

BACKGROUND: MNS blood group system genes GYPA and GYPB share a high degree of sequence homology and gene structure. Homologous exchanges between GYPA and GYPB form hybrid genes encoding hybrid glycophorins GP(A-B-A) and GP(B-A-B). Over 20 hybrid glycophorins have been characterised. Each has a distinct phenotype defined by the profile of antigens expressed including Mia. Seven hybrid glycophorins carry Mia and have been reported in Caucasian and Asian population groups. In Australia, the population is diverse; however, the prevalence of hybrid glycophorins in the population has never been determined. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of Mia and to classify Mia-positive hybrid glycophorins in an Australian blood donor population. METHOD: Blood samples from 5,098 Australian blood donors were randomly selected and screened for Mia using anti-Mia monoclonal antibody (CBC-172) by standard haemagglutination technique. Mia-positive red blood cells (RBCs) were further characterised using a panel of phenotyping reagents. Genotyping by high-resolution melting analysis and DNA sequencing were used to confirm serology. RESULT: RBCs from 11/5,098 samples were Mia-positive, representing a frequency of 0.22%. Serological and molecular typing identified four types of Mia-positive hybrid glycophorins: GP.Hut (n = 2), GP.Vw (n = 3), GP.Mur (n = 5), and 1 GP.Bun (n = 1). GP.Mur was the most common. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive study on the frequency of Mia and types of hybrid glycophorins present in an Australian blood donor population. The demographics of Australia are diverse and ever-changing. Knowing the blood group profile in a population is essential to manage transfusion needs.

Investigation of the variable In(Lu) phenotype caused by KLF1 variants.

INTRODUCTION: KLF1 is an essential transcriptional activator that drives erythropoiesis. KLF1 variants can result in the Inhibitor of Lutheran, or In(Lu), phenotype where red blood cells (RBCs) have reduced BCAM (LU) and CD44 (IN). Other RBC surface molecules also have changed expression; however, there is controversy in the literature regarding which are truly impacted. We aimed to investigate KLF1 variants in the Australian population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In(Lu) samples were sourced through screening and through the RBC reference laboratory. Blood donor samples (8036) were screened to identify weakened/absent Lub antigen. Samples were genotyped by massively parallel sequencing, while surface carbohydrates and blood group molecules were assessed by flow cytometry. Hemoglobin (Hb) types were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Four of 8036 donors were identified to be In(Lu), and two previously identified In(Lu) samples were provided from the RBC reference laboratory. Five different KLF1 variants were identified; two were novel: c.954G>C/p.Trp318Cys and c.421C>T/p.Arg141*. BCAM and CD44 were reduced in all samples, consistent with previous reports. As a group, In(Lu) RBCs had reduced CD35 (KN), ICAM4 (LW), and CD147 (OK), and demonstrated increased binding of lectins ECA and SNAI. One In(Lu) sample had elevated HbF and another elevated HbA2. CONCLUSION: Different KLF1 variants may potentially produce variable phenotypes. A framework for investigating KLF1 variants and their phenotypic impact has been provided. In the future, given available international databases, further testing algorithms (as advocated here) will allow for correlation of phenotype with genotype and therefore accurately document this variability between KLF1 variants.

A DEL phenotype attributed to RHD Exon 9 sequence deletion: slipped-strand mispairing and blood group polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND: The RhD blood group antigen is extremely polymorphic and the DEL phenotype represents one such class of polymorphisms. The DEL phenotype prevalent in East Asian populations arises from a synonymous substitution defined as RHD*1227A. However, initially, based on genomic and cDNA studies, the genetic basis for a DEL phenotype in Taiwan was attributed to a deletion of RHD Exon 9 that was never verified at the genomic level by any other independent group. Here we investigate the genetic basis for a Caucasian donor with a DEL partial D phenotype and compare the genomic findings to those initial molecular studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The 3'-region of the RHD gene was amplified by long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for massively parallel sequencing. Primers were designed to encompass a deletion, flanking Exon 9, by standard PCR for Sanger sequencing. Targeted sequencing of exons and flanking introns was also performed. RESULTS: Genomic DNA exhibited a 1012-bp deletion spanning from Intron 8, across Exon 9 into Intron 9. The deletion breakpoints occurred between two 25-bp repeat motifs flanking Exon 9 such that one repeat sequence remained. CONCLUSION: Deletion mutations bordered by repeat sequences are a hallmark of slipped-strand mispairing (SSM) event. We propose this genetic mechanism generated the germline deletion in the Caucasian donor. Extensive studies show that the RHD*1227A is the most prevalent DEL allele in East Asian populations and may have confounded the initial molecular studies. Review of the literature revealed that the SSM model explains some of the extreme polymorphisms observed in the clinically significant RhD blood group antigen.

Targeted exome sequencing defines novel and rare variants in complex blood group serology cases for a red blood cell reference laboratory setting.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that targeted exome sequencing accurately defined blood group genotypes for reference panel samples characterized by serology and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. Here we investigate the application of this approach to resolve problematic serology and SNP-typing cases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The TruSight One sequencing panel and MiSeq platform was used for sequencing. CLC Genomics Workbench software was used for data analysis of the blood group genes implicated in the serology and SNP-typing problem. Sequence variants were compared to public databases listing blood group alleles. The effect of predicted amino acid changes on protein function for novel alleles was assessed using SIFT and PolyPhen-2. RESULTS: Among 29 unresolved samples, sequencing defined SNPs in blood group genes consistent with serologic observation: 22 samples exhibited SNPs associated with varied but known blood group alleles and one sample exhibited a chimeric RH genotype. Three samples showed novel variants in the CROM, LAN, and RH systems, respectively, predicting respective amino acid changes with possible deleterious impact. Two samples harbored rare variants in the RH and FY systems, respectively, not previously associated with a blood group allele or phenotype. A final sample comprised a rare variant within the KLF1 transcription factor gene that may modulate DNA-binding activity. CONCLUSION: Targeted exome sequencing resolved complex serology problems and defined both novel blood group alleles (CD55:c.203G>A, ABCB6:c.1118_1124delCGGATCG, ABCB6:c.1656-1G>A, and RHD:c.452G>A) and rare variants on blood group alleles associated with altered phenotypes. This study illustrates the utility of exome sequencing, in conjunction with serology, as an alternative approach to resolve complex cases.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping for RhD negative women stratified into RHD gene deletion or variant groups: comparative accuracy using two blood collection tube types.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping in Australia to reduce anti-D usage will need to accommodate both prolonged sample transport times and a diverse population demographic harbouring a range of RHD blood group gene variants. We compared RHD genotyping accuracy using two blood sample collection tube types for RhD negative women stratified into deleted RHD gene haplotype and RHD gene variant cohorts. Maternal blood samples were collected into EDTA and cell-free (cf)DNA stabilising (BCT) tubes from two sites, one interstate. Automated DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to amplify RHD exons 5 and 10 and CCR5. Automated analysis flagged maternal RHD variants, which were classified by genotyping. Time between sample collection and processing ranged from 2.9 to 187.5 hours. cfDNA levels increased with time for EDTA (range 0.03-138 ng/µL) but not BCT samples (0.01-3.24 ng/µL). For the 'deleted' cohort (n=647) all fetal RHD genotyping outcomes were concordant, excepting for one unexplained false negative EDTA sample. Matched against cord RhD serology, negative predictive values using BCT and EDTA tubes were 100% and 99.6%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 99.7% for both types. Overall 37.2% of subjects carried an RhD negative baby. The 'variant' cohort (n=15) included one novel RHD and eight hybrid or African pseudogene variants. Review for fetal RHD specific signals, based on one exon, showed three EDTA samples discordant to BCT, attributed to high maternal cfDNA levels arising from prolonged transport times. For the deleted haplotype cohort, fetal RHD genotyping accuracy was comparable for samples collected in EDTA and BCT tubes despite higher cfDNA levels in the EDTA tubes. Capacity to predict fetal RHD genotype for maternal carriers of hybrid or pseudogene RHD variants requires stringent control of cfDNA levels. We conclude that fetal RHD genotyping is feasible in the Australian environment to avoid unnecessary anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

Evaluation of targeted exome sequencing for 28 protein-based blood group systems, including the homologous gene systems, for blood group genotyping.

BACKGROUND: Blood group single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping probes for a limited range of polymorphisms. This study investigated whether massively parallel sequencing (also known as next-generation sequencing), with a targeted exome strategy, provides an extended blood group genotype and the extent to which massively parallel sequencing correctly genotypes in homologous gene systems, such as RH and MNS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donor samples (n = 28) that were extensively phenotyped and genotyped using single nucleotide polymorphism typing, were analyzed using the TruSight One Sequencing Panel and MiSeq platform. Genes for 28 protein-based blood group systems, GATA1, and KLF1 were analyzed. Copy number variation analysis was used to characterize complex structural variants in the GYPC and RH systems. RESULTS: The average sequencing depth per target region was 66.2 ± 39.8. Each sample harbored on average 43 ± 9 variants, of which 10 ± 3 were used for genotyping. For the 28 samples, massively parallel sequencing variant sequences correctly matched expected sequences based on single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data. Copy number variation analysis defined the Rh C/c alleles and complex RHD hybrids. Hybrid RHD*D-CE-D variants were correctly identified, but copy number variation analysis did not confidently distinguish between D and CE exon deletion versus rearrangement. CONCLUSION: The targeted exome sequencing strategy employed extended the range of blood group genotypes detected compared with single nucleotide polymorphism typing. This single-test format included detection of complex MNS hybrid cases and, with copy number variation analysis, defined RH hybrid genes along with the RHCE*C allele hitherto difficult to resolve by variant detection. The approach is economical compared with whole-genome sequencing and is suitable for a red blood cell reference laboratory setting.

A D+ blood donor with a novel RHD*D-CE(5-6)-D gene variant exhibits the low-frequency antigen RH23 (D(W) ) characteristic of the partial DVa phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors whose red blood cells (RBCs) exhibit a partial RhD phenotype, lacking some D epitopes, present as D+ in routine screening. Such phenotypes can exhibit low-frequency antigens (LFAs) of clinical significance. The aim of this study was to describe the serologic and genetic profile for a blood donor with an apparent D+ phenotype carrying a variant RHD gene where D Exons 5 and 6 are replaced by RHCE Exon (5-6). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Anti-D monoclonal antibodies were used to characterize the presentation of RhD epitopes on the RBCs. RHD exon scanning and DNA sequencing of short- and long-range polymerase chain reaction amplicons were used to determine the RHD structure and sequence. Extended phenotyping for LFAs RH23 (D(W) ) and Rh32 was performed. RESULTS: The donor serology profile was consistent with partial RhD epitope presentation. The donor was hemizygous for an RHD variant allele described as RHD*D-CE(5-6)-D hybrid. The RHCE gene insert is at least 3.868 kb with 5' and 3' breakpoints between IVS4 + 132-c.667 and IVS6 + 1960-IVS6 + 2099, respectively. The sequence for this hybrid was assigned GenBank Accession Number KT099190.2. The RBCs were RH23 (D(W) )+ and Rh32-. CONCLUSION: A novel RHD*D-CE(5-6)-D hybrid allele encodes a partial RhD epitope and carries the LFA RH23 (D(W) ). This and the epitope profile resemble the partial DVa phenotype. Given that RBCs from this individual lack some RhD epitopes, there is an alloimmunization risk if the donor is exposed to D+ RBCs. Conversely, transfusions of RH23 (D(W) )+ cells to RH23 (D(W) )- recipients also pose an alloimmunization risk.