Diplomate in Medical Laboratory Immunology Certification Examination: A New Chapter for Medical Laboratory Immunology.

It is indeed a privilege to be an immunologist in what is arguably the golden age of immunology. From astounding advances in fundamental knowledge to groundbreaking immunotherapeutic offerings, immunology has carved out an enviable niche for itself in basic science and clinical medicine. The need and the vital importance of appropriate education, training, and certification in clinical immunology was recognized by the World Health Organization as far back as 1972. In the United States, Ph.D. scientists with board certification in medical laboratory immunology have served as directors of high-complexity Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments- and College of American Pathologists-certified clinical immunology laboratories since 1977. From 1977 to 2017, board certification for medical laboratory immunology was administered by the American Society for Microbiology through the American Board of Medical Laboratory Immunology examination. The American Board of Medical Laboratory Immunology examination was phased out in 2017, and in the fall of 2019, the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC) examination committee took on the responsibility of developing a new doctoral-level certification examination for medical laboratory immunology. This transition to the ASCP BOC represents a well-deserved and much-needed recognition of the rapid advances in and the highly specialized nature of medical laboratory immunology and its ever-increasing relevance to patient care. This new ASCP BOC certification is called the Diplomate in Medical Laboratory Immunology, and, as of April 1, 2023, it is now available to potential examinees. In this report, we describe the examination, eligibility routes, and potential career pathways for successful diplomates.

The clinical performance of Invader technology and SurePath when detecting the presence of high-risk HPV cervical infection.

BACKGROUND: Testing for high-risk genotypes of the human papillomavirus (HR HPV) has been fully integrated into the management algorithms for the prevention of cervical cancer. The literature is limited with regard to the evaluation of the clinical performance of laboratory-developed tests (LDT) utilizing Invader V2.0 assay (ThirdWave/Hologic, Madison, WI, USA) for the detection of HR HPV. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of Invader V2.0 LDT by determining its sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). STUDY DESIGN: This study evaluated Invader V2.0 assay results from 12,490 SurePath Pap specimens and 1,931 cervical biopsies in order to assess the clinical performance of the Invader V2.0 assay. The cervical biopsy results were correlated with Invader V2.0 results to determine clinical sensitivity, NPV, clinical specificity, and PPV. RESULTS: The clinical sensitivity and NPV of Invader V2.0 LDT for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3) or higher were 97.4% and 99.1% respectively. The clinical specificity and PPV for CIN 3 were 10.3% and 3.7% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of the Invader V2.0 in identifying patients who are at low risk for CIN 3 or higher. The power of the assay implies that it could be used as a primary screening tool for prevention of cervical cancer if a paradigm shift in cervical screening ever occurs.

A comparison of two methods to determine the presence of high-risk HPV cervical infections.

Clinical tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA require clinical validation before being offered for use by laboratories. To determine the clinical viability of a laboratory-developed test using the Invader HPV reagents (Third Wave Technologies, Madison, WI), a retrospective study was designed using 213 patient cervical cytologic samples. The results of the Invader assay were directly compared with the results obtained using the Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV assay (Digene, Gaithersburg, MD). The results of both assays were also compared with cytologic evaluation. In addition, clinical performance was evaluated using a standard-of-care approach in which colposcopically guided biopsies were done in cases where standard of care dictated, and the histologic features of the biopsy specimens were noted. The Invader-based test demonstrated a clinical sensitivity in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cases of 98% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse and 100% for CIN 3 or worse and a negative predictive value of 96.9% (confidence interval, 89.3%-99.6%) using data generated mostly from the use of an earlier version of reagents. These findings support the clinical and laboratory benefits of the Invader method.

The data warehouse as a foundation for population-based reference intervals.

The volume of data contained in a data warehouse represents a potential resource to provide the basis for detailed and specific reference intervals. Routine chemistry panel testing data were derived from an outreach laboratory patient population of 438,180 people and then screened by multiple data filters to identify a large and demographically diverse reference population. Reference intervals were determined for 4 common analytes: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. Each derived reference population contained more than 60,000 people with sex- and age-specific subgroups comprising between 495 and 4,949 persons. These intervals are particularly representative of the aging patient population and demonstrate a degree of age and sex diversity not reflected commonly in routine laboratory reference intervals. Warehouse data also can yield other interpretative data, such as percentile ranking of results or disease-specific reference intervals. As the warehouse accumulates data from other disciplines (such as from clinical notes or pharmacy), there is increasing potential for the laboratory to enhance the clinician's ability to diagnose and treat disease.

Methionine enkephalin: immunomodulator in normal volunteers, cancer and AIDS patients

Clinical studies of the immunological effects of methionine enkephalin in normal volunteers, cancer, and AIDS patients are summarized. The major immunology changes seen were increases in T cell subsets, natural killer activity, as well as mitogen blastogenesis. Clinically, the cancer and ARC patients did not develop infections.