Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 74
Filter
1.
Eur Respir J ; 63(4)2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Forced expiratory volume in 1 s quotient (FEV1Q) is a simple approach to spirometry interpretation that compares measured lung function to a lower boundary. This study evaluated how well FEV1Q predicts survival compared with current interpretation methods and whether race impacts FEV1Q. METHODS: White and Black adults with complete spirometry and mortality data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for lung transplant referrals were included. FEV1Q was calculated as FEV1 divided by 0.4 L for females or 0.5 L for males. Cumulative distributions of FEV1 were compared across races. Cox proportional hazards models tested mortality risk from FEV1Q adjusting for age, sex, height, smoking, income and among UNOS individuals, referral diagnosis. Harrell's C-statistics were compared between absolute FEV1, FEV1Q, FEV1/height2, FEV1 z-scores and FEV1 % predicted. Analyses were stratified by race. RESULTS: Among 7182 individuals from NHANES III and 7149 from UNOS, 1907 (27%) and 991 (14%), respectively, were Black. The lower boundary FEV1 values did not differ between Black and White individuals in either population (FEV1 first percentile difference ≤0.01 L; p>0.05). Decreasing FEV1Q was associated with increasing hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (NHANES III HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.28-1.39) and UNOS HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.23)). The associations were not confounded nor modified by race. Discriminative power was highest for FEV1Q compared with alternative FEV1 approaches in both Black and White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: FEV1Q is an intuitive and simple race-neutral approach to interpreting FEV1 that predicts survival better than current alternative methods.


Subject(s)
Lung , Male , Adult , Female , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , Respiratory Function Tests , Forced Expiratory Volume , Spirometry/methods , Vital Capacity
4.
Chest ; 164(6): 1361-1363, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070960
7.
Int J Circumpolar Health ; 82(1): 2151158, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36471626

ABSTRACT

Rigorous lung function prediction equations for the Inuit are lacking. We used spirometry from 351 Inuit and 29 people of other ancestry obtained during an occupational survey in Greenland to determine how to obtain valid lung function predictions for the Inuit using Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations for Europeans. Standing height for the Inuit was used in the predictions as well as their height modified in line with the known differences in standing to sitting height ratio (SHR) for the Inuit. With recorded height in predicting lung function, mean±SD Inuit z-scores for FVC and FEV1 were significantly higher than predicted (0.81±1.20 and 0.53±1.36, respectively, p<0.0001) which was not true for the non-Inuit participants (-0.01±1.04 and 0.15±1.17, respectively). When using height modified for SHR the mean±SD Inuit z-scores for FVC and FEV1 were no longer significantly different from predicted (0.10±1.10 and -0.12±1.24, respectively). The mean±SD Inuit FEV1/FVC z-scores were not significantly different from the non-Inuit, being respectively -0.45±0.98 and -0.01±1.04. Modified height changed the mean±SD Inuit FEV1/FVC z-scores to -0.39±0.99. Representative lung function predictions from GLI equations can be made for Inuit by using standing height modified for the known differences in SHR between Inuit and those of European ancestry.


Subject(s)
Lung , Humans , Forced Expiratory Volume , Reference Values , Spirometry , Respiratory Function Tests
10.
Eur Respir J ; 60(1)2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34949706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Appropriate interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) involves the classification of observed values as within/outside the normal range based on a reference population of healthy individuals, integrating knowledge of physiological determinants of test results into functional classifications and integrating patterns with other clinical data to estimate prognosis. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) jointly adopted technical standards for the interpretation of PFTs. We aimed to update the 2005 recommendations and incorporate evidence from recent literature to establish new standards for PFT interpretation. METHODS: This technical standards document was developed by an international joint Task Force, appointed by the ERS/ATS with multidisciplinary expertise in conducting and interpreting PFTs and developing international standards. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and published evidence was reviewed. RESULTS: Recommendations for the choice of reference equations and limits of normal of the healthy population to identify individuals with unusually low or high results are discussed. Interpretation strategies for bronchodilator responsiveness testing, limits of natural changes over time and severity are also updated. Interpretation of measurements made by spirometry, lung volumes and gas transfer are described as they relate to underlying pathophysiology with updated classification protocols of common impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of PFTs must be complemented with clinical expertise and consideration of the inherent biological variability of the test and the uncertainty of the test result to ensure appropriate interpretation of an individual's lung function measurements.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents , Respiratory System , Humans , Lung Volume Measurements , Respiratory Function Tests , Spirometry , United States
11.
Respir Med ; 184: 106399, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how the spirometric definition of airway obstruction affects the association between COPD and comorbidities and whether these associations might be due to genetic predisposition. AIM: 1) To examine the impact of the spirometric definition on the associations between COPD and its comorbidities and 2) To examine whether these associations can be explained by shared genetic or environmental factors. METHODS: 11,458 twins, aged 40-80 years, from the Danish Twin Registry were recruited who completed a questionnaire on medical history, life style factors and had a clinical examination. COPD was defined by respiratory symptoms (RS) plus airway obstruction according to either GOLD (FR-COPD) or ERS/ATS guidelines (LLN-COPD). Self-reported physician diagnoses were used to identify comorbidities. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 58.4 years ±SD 9.7, mean BMI was 26.6 kg/m2 ± SD 4.4, 52% were female and the prevalence of LLN2.5-COPD and FR-COPD was 2.5% and 6.3%, respectively. Among eight major comorbidities, multivariate logistic regression showed COPD was only associated with heart failure, whereas RS alone were associated with 6 out of 8 comorbidities after Bonferroni-correction. There was an increased risk of heart failure, ischemic heart disease, depression and pulmonary embolism in twin individuals with RS compared with the co-twin without RS. CONCLUSIONS: COPD was only associated with an increased risk of heart failure. Discordant COPD-individuals (FR-COPD+/LLN5-COPD-) were at increased risk of heart failure. Sub-analyses showed that RS, but not airway obstruction were associated with an increased risk of comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Spirometry , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Environment , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Risk
13.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 200(8): e70-e88, 2019 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613151

ABSTRACT

Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities.Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients' experiences.Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices.Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Respiratory Function Tests/standards , Spirometry/standards , Advisory Committees , Europe , Humans , Societies, Medical , United States
15.
Respir Med ; 144: 16-21, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30366579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although smoking is the major risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) many patients with obstructive lung function suggesting COPD are never-smokers. Therefore, other lifestyle factors have been suggested as risk factors. AIMS: i) To examine the association between self-reported intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of COPD and ii) to examine whether the association between these traits are due to underlying genetic factors. METHODS: 12,449 twins, aged 40-80, from the Danish Twin Registry were recruited. The participants completed a questionnaire on medical history and lifestyle factors and participated in clinical examination. COPD was defined according to ATS/ERS recommendations. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate the risk of COPD in individuals with a low intake of fruit and vegetables. Co-twin control analyses were performed to examine whether the association between fruit and vegetables and COPD is explained by genetic factors. Self-reported physician-diagnosed asthmatic individuals were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 11,458 individuals were included in the analyses, 48% of the participants were males. Mean age was 58.9 (years)±SD 9.6, mean BMI (kg/m2)26.6 ±â€¯SD 4.4. A multivariate logistic regression, including sex, age and BMI showed that both smoking, no and heavy drinking and physical inactivity were independent predictors of COPD. There was a significant frequency-pendent association between intake of fruit and vegetables and increased risk of COPD. Conditional logistic regression analyses showed that the association might be controlled by genetic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that low intake of fruit and vegetables is associated with an increased risk of COPD and the association might be under influence of genetic factors.


Subject(s)
Diet , Fruit , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Twins , Vegetables , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Life Style , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/genetics , Risk , Risk Factors , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 62(9): 1064-1076, 2018 11 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165410

ABSTRACT

Objectives: There is a lack of longitudinal studies exploring the association between organic wood dust exposure and new-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and change in lung function. We have re-investigated these associations in a 6-year follow-up cohort of furniture workers exposed to wood dust using improved outcome measures and methods. Methods: A large follow-up study of 1112 woodworkers (63%) from the Danish furniture industry and 235 controls (57%) was conducted between 1998 and 2004. Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and the ratio (FEV1/FVC) standardized for age, height, and sex using the Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 equations were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Questionnaires on respiratory symptoms, wood dust exposure, and smoking habits were collected. Exposure was assessed as exposure level at baseline and as cumulative exposure in the follow-up period from quantitative task specific job exposure matrix available at both baseline and follow-up based on personal dust sampling using passive dust monitors. The association between exposure to wood dust and new-onset COPD was assessed with logistic regression, whereas the association between wood dust and the longitudinal change in z-score for lung function was assessed with linear regression. Results: Similar associations were seen for different exposure metrics. An exposure-response relation was seen for new-onset COPD for female smokers with an odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 8.47 (0.9-82.4) in the highest exposed group compared to controls, and a significant test for trend P = 0.049. No such association was seen among males for whom only smoking was strongly associated to new-onset COPD. For change in lung function, a significant exposure-response was seen for females, confirming previous findings, with increasing levels of wood dust exposure showing larger decline in lung function (ß [95% CI]: -0.32 ΔzFEV1 (-0.56 to -0.08, P = 0.009) for third quartile exposure compared to controls, test for trend, P = 0.005, equivalent to an excess loss of 125 ml in the 6 years of follow-up). An opposite association was seen for men. Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that female woodworkers have a dose-dependent increased OR of new-onset COPD and an excess decline in lung function suggesting that female woodworkers may be more susceptible to wood dust exposure than male woodworkers. Among male woodworkers, only smoking and asthma were significant predictors for new-onset COPD and excess decline in lung function. These results emphasize that reduction in both smoking and wood dust exposure should continuously be an effort to prevent adverse pulmonary health effects.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/adverse effects , Dust/analysis , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Wood , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Denmark , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Odds Ratio , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Regression Analysis , Respiratory Function Tests , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Vital Capacity/physiology , Young Adult
17.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 13: 1979-1986, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29950827

ABSTRACT

Background: Consensus on the definition of airflow obstruction to diagnose COPD remains unresolved. Methods: We undertook systematic case finding for COPD in primary care using the fixed ratio (FR) criterion (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC] <0.7) for defining airflow obstruction and also using the lower limit of normal (LLN). We then compared the clinical characteristics of those identified by the 2 criteria. Results: A total of 3,721 individuals reporting respiratory symptoms were invited for spirometry. A total of 2,607 attended (mean age 60.4 years, 52.8% male, 29.8% current smokers) and 32.6% had airflow obstruction by FR ("FR+") and 20.2% by LLN ("LLN+"). Compared with the LLN+/FR+ group, the LLN-/FR+ group (12.4%) was significantly older, had higher FEV1 and FEV1/FVC, lower COPD assessment test scores, and less cough, sputum, and wheeze, but was significantly more likely to report a diagnosis of heart disease (14.2% versus 6.9%, p<0.001). Compared with the LLN+/FR+ group, the LLN-/FR- group was younger, had a higher body mass index, fewer pack-years, a lower prevalence of respiratory symptoms except for dyspnea, and lower FVC and higher FEV1. The probability of known heart disease was significantly lower in the LLN+/FR+ group compared with those with preserved lung function (LLN-/FR-) (adjusted odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.90) but this was not seen in the LLN-/FR+ group (adjusted odds ratio 0.90, 95% CI: 0.63-1.29). Conclusion: In symptomatic individuals, defining airflow obstruction by FR instead of LLN identifies a significant number of individuals who have less respiratory and more cardiac clinical characteristics.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Spirometry/statistics & numerical data , Vital Capacity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...