Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Ergon ; 106: 103868, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049446

ABSTRACT

A housekeeper's job includes a variety of repetitive and strenuous tasks, which can put workers at high risk for musculoskeletal disorders. In 2018, a new standard was implemented in California aiming to prevent work-related injuries of hospitality industry workers. This paper assesses California housekeepers performing regular work tasks during their shifts from 2018 to 2020. Rapid Upper Limb Assessments (RULA) after the standard was implemented found average right-arm scores for scrubbing tasks (M = 6.93, SD = 0.00), vacuuming (M = 6.27, SD = 0.45), and trash-collecting (M = 4.48, SD = 0.50). Forces to move housekeeping carts were also evaluated, with 98% of pushing forces and 73% of turning forces observed within the accepted range. Results show that RULA scores remain high even after the implementation of the standard, with improvements only seen in tasks that required just changing of the method.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Humans , Household Work , Upper Extremity , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , California , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control
2.
Workplace Health Saf ; 68(7): 313-319, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32364026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Planning and executing healthcare for the patient or resident living with obesity can be a challenging task that has implications to the occupational health professional. METHODS: Leading global experts in the areas of occupational health, ergonomics, bariatrics, technology, and patient care were identified and invited to participate in a round table discussion. Questions posed to experts were based on literature that addressed patient handling and mobility, architectural design recommendations, clinical care of the person with obesity, and ergonomic guidelines. FINDINGS: Experts agreed that special considerations must be in place to care for the person who is obese. These special considerations should address not only clinical care of the patient, but ways to protect workers from occupational injury associated with clinical care. Experts suggested that, in some situations, a bariatric training suit may be helpful in better understanding space and design challenges, as well as a better understanding of the physical limitations associated with a larger body habitus (although simulated). Further, experts agreed that insensitivities often stem from failure to have proper space, technology and design accommodations in place. Conclusions/Application to Practice: The occupational health professional is a key resource to teams charged with planning and executing healthcare for the patient or resident living with obesity. Interprofessional understanding and communication can lead to a more comprehensive approach to space, design and technology that not only addresses the patient, but the worker providing direct care.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Medicine/methods , Moving and Lifting Patients/methods , Obesity , Bariatric Medicine/instrumentation , Ergonomics , Health Personnel , Hospital Design and Construction , Humans , Interior Design and Furnishings , Moving and Lifting Patients/instrumentation , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Patient Safety
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL