The outcomes measured and reported in observational studies of incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma: A systematic review.

Background: The clinical management of patients with incidental intracranial meningioma varies markedly and is often based on clinician choice and observational data. Heterogeneous outcome measurement has likely hampered knowledge progress by preventing comparative analysis of similar cohorts of patients. This systematic review aimed to summarize the outcomes measured and reported in observational studies. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify published full texts describing active monitoring of adult cohorts with incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL via EBSCO, completed January 24, 2022). Reported outcomes were extracted verbatim, along with an associated definition and method of measurement if provided. Verbatim outcomes were de-duplicated and the resulting unique outcomes were grouped under standardized outcome terms. These were classified using the taxonomy proposed by the "Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials" (COMET) initiative. Results: Thirty-three published articles and 1 ongoing study were included describing 32 unique studies: study designs were retrospective n = 27 and prospective n = 5. In total, 268 verbatim outcomes were reported, of which 77 were defined. Following de-duplication, 178 unique verbatim outcomes remained and were grouped into 53 standardized outcome terms. These were classified using the COMET taxonomy into 9 outcome domains and 3 core areas. Conclusions: Outcome measurement across observational studies of incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma is heterogeneous. The standardized outcome terms identified will be prioritized through an eDelphi survey and consensus meeting of key stakeholders (including patients), in order to develop a Core Outcome Set for use in future observational studies.

The outcomes measured and reported in intracranial meningioma clinical trials: A systematic review.

Background: Meningioma clinical trials have assessed interventions including surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy. However, agreement does not exist on what, how, and when outcomes of interest should be measured. To do so would allow comparative analysis of similar trials. This systematic review aimed to summarize the outcomes measured and reported in meningioma clinical trials. Methods: Systematic literature and trial registry searches were performed to identify published and ongoing intracranial meningioma clinical trials (PubMed, Embase, Medline, CINAHL via EBSCO, and Web of Science, completed January 22, 2022). Reported outcomes were extracted verbatim, along with an associated definition and method of measurement if provided. Verbatim outcomes were deduplicated and the resulting unique outcomes were grouped under standardized outcome terms. These were classified using the taxonomy proposed by the "Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials" (COMET) initiative. Results: Thirty published articles and 18 ongoing studies were included, describing 47 unique clinical trials: Phase 2 n = 33, phase 3 n = 14. Common interventions included: Surgery n = 13, radiotherapy n = 8, and pharmacotherapy n = 20. In total, 659 verbatim outcomes were reported, of which 84 were defined. Following de-duplication, 415 unique verbatim outcomes remained and were grouped into 115 standardized outcome terms. These were classified using the COMET taxonomy into 29 outcome domains and 5 core areas. Conclusions: Outcome measurement across meningioma clinical trials is heterogeneous. The standardized outcome terms identified will be prioritized through an eDelphi survey and consensus meeting of key stakeholders (including patients), in order to develop a core outcome set for use in future meningioma clinical trials.

Patient-reported outcomes in Primary Spinal Intradural Tumours: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVES: Primary Spinal Intradural Tumours (PSITs) are rare pathologies that can significantly impact quality of life. This study aimed to review patient reported outcomes (PROs) in PSITs. METHODS: A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase was performed to identify studies measuring PROs in adults with PSITs. PRO results were categorised as relating to Global, Physical, Social, or Mental health. Outcomes were summarised descriptively. RESULTS: Following review of 2382 records, 11 studies were eligible for inclusion (737 patients). All studies assessed surgically treated patients. Schwannoma was the commonest pathology (n = 190). 7 studies measured PROs before and after surgery, the remainder assessed only post-operatively. For eight studies, PROs were obtained within 12 months of treatment. 21 PRO measurement tools were used across included studies, of which Euro-Qol-5D (n = 8) and the pain visual/numerical analogue scale (n = 5) were utilised most frequently. Although overall QoL is lower than healthy controls in PSITs, improvements following surgery were found in Extramedullary tumours (EMT) in overall physical, social, and mental health. Similar improvements were not significant across studies of Intramedullary tumours (IMT). Overall QoL and symptom burden was higher in IMT patients than in brain tumour patients. No studies evaluated the effect of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with PSITs suffer impaired PROs before and after surgery. This is particularly true for IMTs. PRO reporting in PSITs is hindered by a heterogeneity of reporting and varied measurement tools. This calls for the establishment of a standard set of PROs as well as the use of registries.

Identification and Assessment of Outcome Measurement Instruments in Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review of surgically managed Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) Outcome Measurement Instruments (OMI). OBJECTIVE: A core outcome set (COS) defines agreed outcomes which should be reported as a minimum in any research study for a specific condition. This study identified OMIs used in the wider CES literature and compare these to the established CESCOS. METHODS: To identify measurement methods and instruments in the CES surgical outcome evidence base, a systematic review was performed. Medline, Embase and CINAHL plus databases were queried. In addition, a secondary search for validation studies of measurement instruments in CES was undertaken. Identified studies from this search were subject to the COSMIN risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: In total, 112 studies were identified investigating surgical outcomes for CES. The majority (80%, n = 90) of these OMI studies were retrospective in nature and only 55% (n = 62) utilised a measurement method or instrument. The remaining 50 studies used study specific definitions for surgical outcomes defined within their methods. Of the 59 measurement instruments identified, 60% (n = 38 instruments) were patient reported outcome measures. Only one validated instrument was identified, which was a patient reported outcome measure. The validated instrument was not used in any study identified in the initial search (to identify measurement instruments). CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the wide heterogeneity of measurement instruments used in surgically managed CES research. Subsequently, there is need for consensus agreement on which instrument or instruments should be used to measure each core outcome for CES surgical outcomes.

Evaluation of systemic inflammation in seizure phenotypes following meningioma resection.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between perioperative peripheral blood inflammatory markers and seizures in patients who have undergone meningioma resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single neurosurgery tertiary centre blood bank database was screened to extract pre-operative and post-operative white cell count (WCC), neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR (dNLR). All patients who underwent resection of meningioma from 2012 to 2020 were eligible. Patients were excluded if they had an inflammatory condition, peri-operative infection, medical illness or operative complication. RESULTS: 30 patients suffered pre-operative seizures only, 16 experienced de novo post-operative seizures within 1 year and 42 patients did not experience seizures throughout their treatment timeline. Patients with post-operative de novo seizures had a significantly higher WCC when compared those who never had a seizure (7.1 vs. 4.8x109/L, p =.048, 95 % 1.96 to 5.60). However, this difference of WCC was poorly predictive of de novo seizures at one year (AUC 0.61). dNLR was significantly higher in patients with continued post-operative seizures than in patients in which seizures were terminated with tumour resection (1.2 vs. 0.1, p =.035, 95 % 1.47 to 2.29). dNLR was predictive of seizures at one year with an 87.5 % sensitivity and 82.1 % specificity. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significantly higher post-operative systemic white cell count response in patients who suffered de novo seizures after meningioma resection. Peripheral blood markers have the potential to predict seizures in patients with meningioma.

Beyond the WHO classification of meningioma: using molecular diagnostics to guide management.

Meningioma are the most common primary brain tumour. Classically, meningioma are phenotypically grouped using the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification system. However, it is now understood that the WHO approach overfits tumours into three grades, resulting in similarly graded tumours displaying phenotypically distinct behaviour. There is a growing body of research investigating the molecular biology of these tumours, including genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, proteomic, and methylomic profiling. Such advancements in molecular profiling of meningioma are providing greater accuracy in prognostication of tumours. Furthermore, a clearer understanding of tumour molecular biology highlights potential targets for pharmacotherapies. Currently, the routine application of in-depth tumour molecular analysis is limited, however as it becomes more widely available it will likely result in improved patient care. This review seeks to explore the important developments in meningioma molecular biology, discussed in the context of their clinical importance.

Benefits of Mentoring in Oncology Education for Mentors and Mentees: Pre-Post Interventional Study of the British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies' National Oncology Mentorship Scheme.

BACKGROUND: Formal education of oncology is lacking in many undergraduate medical curricula. Mentoring schemes can expose participants to specific areas of medicine and may address the shortfalls in oncology education. Few mentoring schemes have been designed within the United Kingdom, especially within oncology. There is a need to understand reasons for mentor and mentee participation in such schemes and to identify ways to minimize barriers to engagement. OBJECTIVE: This study identifies motivations for participation in an oncology mentoring scheme and its benefits and limitations to both the mentee and the mentor. METHODS: The British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies launched a National Oncology Mentorship Scheme (NOMS) on September 1, 2021. Mentees (medical student or foundation doctor) were paired with mentors (specialty registrar or consultant), for 6 months of mentoring. In total, 86 mentors and 112 mentees were recruited to the scheme. The mentees and mentors were asked to meet at least 3 times during this period and suggestions were provided on the content of mentoring. Mentees and mentors were invited to complete a prescheme questionnaire, exploring motivations for involvement in the scheme, current experiences within oncology, and knowledge and interests in the field. At the end of the scheme, mentors and mentees were asked to complete a postscheme questionnaire exploring experiences and benefits or limitations of participation. Paired analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For free text data, content analysis was applied to summarize the main themes in the data. RESULTS: Of the 66 (59%) mentees who completed the prescheme questionnaire, 41 (62%) were clinical, 21 (32%) preclinical medical students, and the remainder were junior doctors. For mentees, networking was the primary reason for joining the scheme (n=25, 38%). Mentees ranked experience of oncology at medical school at 3 on 10 (IQR 2-5). In this, 46 (53%) mentors completed the prescheme questionnaire, 35 (76%) were registrar level, and the remainder were consultant level (n=11). The most common reason for mentor participation was to increase awareness and interest in the field (n=29, 63%). Of those who completed the prescheme questionnaire, 23 (35%) mentees and 25 (54%) mentors completed the postscheme questionnaire. Knowledge in all areas of oncology assessed significantly increased during the scheme (P<.001). Most mentees (n=21, 91%) and mentors (n=18, 72%) felt they had benefited from the scheme. Mentees cited gaining insights into oncology as most beneficial; and mentors, opportunities to develop professionally. Whilst mentees did not report any barriers to participating in the scheme, mentors stated lack of time as the greatest barrier to mentoring. CONCLUSIONS: British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies' NOMS is expanding and is beneficial for mentees through increasing knowledge, providing exposure, and career advice in oncology. Mentors benefit from improving their mentoring skills and personal satisfaction.

Assessing the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology protocols, abstracts, and trials: Adherence to the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.

Background: Comprehensive and transparent reporting of clinical trial activity is important. The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statements define the items to be reported in clinical trial protocols and randomized controlled trials, respectively. The aim of this methodological review was to assess the reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles. Methods: Adult primary and secondary brain tumor phase 3 trial protocols and result articles published after the introduction of the SPIRIT 2013 statement, were identified through searches of 4 electronic bibliographic databases. Following extraction of baseline demographic data, the reporting quality of independently included trial protocols and result articles was assessed against the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements respectively. The CONSORT-A checklist, an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement, was used to specifically assess the abstract accompanying the trial results article. Percentage adherence (standard deviation [SD]) was calculated for each article. Results: Seven trial protocols, and 36 trial result articles were included. Mean adherence of trial protocols to the SPIRIT statement was 79.4% (SD: 0.11). Mean adherence of trial abstracts to CONSORT-A was 75.3% (SD: 0.12) and trial result articles to CONSORT was 74.5% (SD: 0.10). Conclusion: The reporting quality of adult neuro-oncology trial protocols and trial result articles requires improvement to ensure comprehensive and transparent communication of planned neuro-oncology clinical trials and results within the literature. Raising awareness by clinical triallists and implementing mandatory evidence of proof of adherence by journals should improve reporting quality.

Clinical Presentation and Prognosis.

Over the past three decades, the care for patients with meningioma has steadily improved as a result of a better understanding of the natural history, molecular biology, and classification of these tumors. Surgical frameworks for management have been established and validated with more options for adjuvant and salvage treatment available for patients with residual or recurrent disease. Overall these advances have improved clinical outcomes and prognosis.Alongside the improved clinical management has come an increase in biological understanding of these tumors. The number of publications within the field of meningioma research continues to expand and biological studies identifying molecular factors at the cytogenic and genomic level offer exciting potential for more personalized management strategies. As survival and understanding have increased, treatment outcomes are moving from traditional metrics, which describe the morbidity and mortality to more patient-centered measures. The subjective experiences of patients with meningioma are gaining interest among clinical researchers and it is recognized that even supposedly mild symptoms arising from meningioma can have a significant effect on a patient's quality of life.This chapter reviews the varied clinical presentations of meningioma, which in the modern era of widespread brain imaging must include a discussion of incidental meningioma. The second part examines prognosis and the clinical, pathological, and molecular factors that can be used to predict outcomes.

The management of incidental meningioma: An unresolved clinical conundrum.

The widespread availability and use of brain magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography has led to an increase in the frequency of incidental meningioma diagnoses. Most incidental meningioma are small, demonstrate indolent behavior during follow-up, and do not require intervention. Occasionally, meningioma growth causes neurological deficits or seizures prompting surgical or radiation treatment. They may cause anxiety to the patient and present a management dilemma for the clinician. The questions for both patient and clinician are "will the meningioma grow and cause symptoms such that it will require treatment within my lifetime?" and "will deferment of treatment result in greater treatment-related risks and lower chance of cure?." International consensus guidelines recommend regular imaging and clinical follow-up, but the duration is not specified. Upfront treatment with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy may be recommended but this is potentially an overtreatment, and its benefits must be balanced against the risk of related adverse events. Ideally, treatment should be stratified based on patient and tumor characteristics, but this is presently hindered by low-quality supporting evidence. This review discusses risk factors for meningioma growth, proposed management strategies, and ongoing research in the field.

Health-related quality of life following cranioplasty - a systematic review.

Cranioplasty is a neurosurgical procedure that repairs a defect in the skull Coupled with the underlying pathology cranioplasty associated morbidity can have a large impact on patient quality of life, which is often poorly explored. The objective of this systematic review was to identify patient-reported outcomes evaluating health-related quality of life following cranioplasty. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021251543) and a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 1 May 2022. All studies reporting HRQoL following cranioplasty were included. Reporting was assessed using the ISOQOL checklist and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Johanna-Briggs Institute Scale, as appropriate. A total of 25 studies were included of which 20 were cross-sectional and 2 longitudinal. Most studies utilized study specific questionnaires and Likert scales to assess HRQoL. The studies found a significant improvement in physical functioning, social functioning, cosmetic outcome, and overall HRQoL following cranioplasty. Further longitudinal studies utilising validated measurement tools are required to better understand the effect of cranioplasty at a patient level.

Tranexamic acid use in meningioma surgery - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) has been used in medical and surgical practice to reduce haemorrhage. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of TXA use on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of meningioma surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021292157). Six databases were searched up to November 2021 for phase 2-4 control trials or cohort studies, in the English language, examining TXA use during meningioma surgery. Studies ran outside of dedicated neurosurgical departments or centres were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Random effects meta-analysis were performed to delineate differences in operative and postoperative outcomes. Four studies (281 patients) were included. TXA use significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 315.7 mls [95% confidence interval [CI] -532.8, -98.5]). Factors not affected by TXA use were transfusion requirement (odds ratio = 0.52; 95% CI 0.27, 0.98), operation time (mean difference = -0.2 h; 95% CI -0.8, 0.4), postoperative seizures (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.88; 95% CI 0.31, 2.53), hospital stay (mean difference = -1.2; 95% CI -3.4, 0.9) and disability after surgery (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.23, 1.06). The key limitations of this review were the small sample size, limited data for secondary outcomes and a lack of standardised method for measuring blood loss. TXA use reduces blood loss in meningioma surgery, but not transfusion requirement or postoperative complications. Larger trials are required to investigate the impact of TXA on patient-reported postoperative outcomes.

Volumetric Growth and Growth Curve Analysis of Residual Intracranial Meningioma.

BACKGROUND: After meningioma surgery, approximately 1 in 3 patients will have residual tumor that requires ongoing imaging surveillance. The precise volumetric growth rates of these tumors are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify the volumetric growth rates of residual meningioma, growth trajectory, and factors associated with progression. METHODS: Patients with residual meningioma identified at a tertiary neurosurgery center between 2004 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume was measured using manual segmentation, after surgery and at every follow-up MRI scan. Growth rates were ascertained using a linear mixed-effects model and nonlinear regression analysis of growth trajectories. Progression was defined according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (40% volume increase). RESULTS: There were 236 patients with residual meningioma. One hundred and thirty-two patients (56.0%) progressed according to the RANO criteria, with 86 patients being conservatively managed (65.2%) after progression. Thirteen patients (5.5%) developed clinical progression. Over a median follow-up of 5.3 years (interquartile range, 3.5-8.6 years), the absolute growth rate was 0.11 cm 3 per year and the relative growth rate 4.3% per year. Factors associated with residual meningioma progression in multivariable Cox regression analysis were skull base location (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.02-2.50) and increasing Ki-67 index (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.19-9.90). Most meningioma exhibited exponential and logistic growth patterns (median R 2 value 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-0.90). CONCLUSION: Absolute and relative growth rates of residual meningioma are low, but most meet the RANO criteria for progression. Location and Ki-67 index can be used to stratify adjuvant treatment and surveillance paradigms.

Long term quality of life outcomes following surgical resection alone for benign paediatric intracranial tumours.

PURPOSE: Survivors of paediatric intracranial tumours are at increased risk of psychosocial, neuro-developmental, and functional impairment. This study aimed to evaluate long-term health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients with benign paediatric brain tumours treated curatively with surgical resection alone. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with benign paediatric intracranial tumours managed with surgery alone between 2000 and 2015. Eligible patients with a minimum of 5-years follow-up after surgery were identified. Validated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires were administered: SF-36, QLQ-BN20, QLQ-C30 and PedsQL™. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients participated (median age at surgery 13 years; range 1-18; 12 male). The most common diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 15). Median time from surgery to participation was 11 years(range 6-19). Fourteen patients achieved A-level qualifications and two obtained an undergraduate degree. Twelve patients were employed, eight were studying and three were unemployed or volunteering. HRQOL outcomes demonstrated significant limitation from social functioning (p = 0.03) and cognitive functioning (p = 0.023) compared to the general population. Patients also experienced higher rates of loss of appetite (p = 0.009) and nausea and vomiting (p = 0.031). Ten patients were under transitional teenager and young-adult (TYA) clinic follow-up. TYA patients achieved higher levels of education (p = 0.014), were more likely to hold a driver's license (p = 0.041) compared to patients not followed-up through these services. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood brain-tumour survivors have a greater risk of developing psychological, neuro-cognitive and physical impairment. Early comprehensive assessment, specialist healthcare and TYA services are vital to support these patients.

Sporadic multiple intracranial meningioma does not infer worse patient outcomes: results from a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Sporadic multiple meningioma are uncommon. Population-based data suggests that these patients have a reduced overall survival when compared to patients with solitary meningioma. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes in multiple and solitary meningioma. METHODS: A single-center matched cohort study (2008-2018) was performed. Patients with synchronous multiple meningioma at presentation, with no history of prior intracranial radiation, concurrent hormone replacement therapy or features of NF2-schwannomatosis were included. Eligible patients were matched 1:1 to patients with solitary meningioma. Outcomes of interest were occurrence of an intervention, recurrence, new meningioma development and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients harboring 76 meningioma at presentation were included. Mean age was 59.3 years (SD = 13.5). Thirty-one (91.2%) were female. The median number of meningioma per patient was 2 (range 2-6). Eighteen patients (52.9%) were symptomatic at presentation. Median overall follow-up was 80.6 months (IQR 44.1-99.6). Compared to patients with a sporadic meningioma, there was no difference in intervention rates (67.6% vs 70.6%, P = 0.792). Eight patients (34.8%) with a multiple meningioma had a WHO grade 2 meningioma compared to 7 (29.2%) with a solitary meningioma (P = 0.679). Median recurrence-free survival was 89 months (95% CI 76-104) with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.209). Mean overall survival was 132 months (95% CI 127-138) with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.860). One patient with multiple meningioma developed two further new meningioma 36 months following diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Sporadic multiple meningioma may not have worse clinical outcomes. Management of patients with sporadic multiple meningioma should be tailored towards the symptomatic meningioma or high-risk asymptomatic meningioma.

Quality of life outcomes in incidental and operated meningiomas (QUALMS): a cross-sectional cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated meningioma patients' longer-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following diagnosis and treatment, particularly in those with incidental, actively monitored tumours. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional study was completed. Adult patients with surgically managed or actively monitored meningioma with more than five years of follow-up were included. The patient-reported outcome measures RAND SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 were used to evaluate HRQoL. HRQoL scores were compared to normative population data. Outcome determinants were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: 243 patient responses were analyzed, and the mean time from diagnosis was 9.8 years (range 5.0-40.3 years). Clinically relevant, statistically significant HRQoL impairments were identified across several SF-36 and QLQ-C30 domains. Increasing education level (ß = 2.9, 95% CI 0.9 to 4.9), P = .004), employment (ß = 7.7, 95% CI 2.2 to 13.1, P = .006) and absence of postoperative complications (ß=-6.7, 95% CI -13.2 to (-)0.3, P = .041) were associated with a better QLQ-C30 summary score. Other tumour and treatment variables were not. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the longer-term disease burden of patients with meningioma nearly one decade after diagnosis or surgery. Patients with actively monitored meningioma have similar HRQoL to operated meningioma patients. Healthcare professionals should be mindful of HRQoL impairments and direct patients to sources of support as needed.

Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews (SR) and systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMA) can constitute the highest level of research evidence. Such evidence syntheses are relied upon heavily to inform the clinical knowledge base and to guide clinical practice for meningioma. This review evaluates the reporting and methodological quality of published meningioma evidence syntheses to date. METHODS: Eight electronic databases/registries were searched to identify eligible meningioma SRs with and without meta-analysis published between January 1990 and December 2020. Articles concerning spinal meningioma were excluded. Reporting and methodological quality were assessed against the following tools: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2), and Risk Of Bias in Systematic reviews (ROBIS). RESULTS: 116 SRs were identified, of which 57 were SRMAs (49.1%). The mean PRISMA score for SRMA was 20.9 out of 27 (SD 3.9, 77.0% PRISMA adherence) and for SR without meta-analysis was 13.8 out of 22 (SD 3.4, 63% PRISMA adherence). Thirty-eight studies (32.8%) achieved greater than 80% adherence to PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment against AMSTAR 2 revealed that 110 (94.8%) studies were of critically low quality. Only 21 studies (18.1%) were judged to have a low risk of bias against ROBIS. CONCLUSION: The reporting and methodological quality of meningioma evidence syntheses was poor. Established guidelines and critical appraisal tools may be used as an adjunct to aid methodological conduct and reporting of such reviews, in order to improve the validity and transparency of research which may influence clinical practice.

Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.

OBJECTIVE: Cranioplasty remains an essential procedure following craniectomy but is associated with high morbidity. We investigated factors associated with outcomes following first alloplastic cranioplasty. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing first alloplastic cranioplasty at a tertiary neuroscience centre (01 March 2010-01 September 2021). Patient demographics and craniectomy/cranioplasty details were extracted. Primary outcome was all-cause explantation. Secondary outcomes were explantation secondary to infection, surgical morbidity and mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression or binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Included were 287 patients with a mean age of 42.9 years [SD = 15.4] at time of cranioplasty. The most common indication for craniectomy was traumatic brain injury (32.1%, n = 92). Cranioplasty materials included titanium plate (23.3%, n = 67), hydroxyapatite (22.3%, n = 64), acrylic (20.6%, n = 59), titanium mesh (19.2%, n = 55), hand-moulded PMMA cement (9.1%, n = 26) and PEEK (5.6%, n = 16). Median follow-up time after cranioplasty was 86.5 months (IQR 44.6-111.3). All-cause explantation was 12.2% (n = 35). Eighty-three patients (28.9%) had surgical morbidity. In multivariable analysis, the risk of all-cause explantation and explantation due to infection was reduced with the use of both hydroxyapatite (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.07-0.71], p = .011, HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05-0.93], p = .040) and acrylic (HR 0.20 [95% CI 0.06-0.73], p = .015, HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.06-0.97], p = .045), respectively. In addition, risk of explantation due to infection was increased when time to cranioplasty was between three and six months (HR 6.38 [95% CI 1.35-30.19], p = .020). Mean age at cranioplasty (HR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03-2.11], p = .034), titanium mesh (HR 5.36 [95% CI 1.88-15.24], p = .002), and use of a drain (HR 3.37 [95% CI 1.51-7.51], p = .003) increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity is high following cranioplasty, with over a tenth requiring explantation. Hydroxyapatite and acrylic were associated with reduced risk of all-cause explantation and explantation due to infection. Cranioplasty insertion at three to six months was associated with increased risk of explantation due to infection.

Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings.

INTRODUCTION: Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumour in adults. The majority are non-malignant, but a proportion behave more aggressively. Incidental/minimally symptomatic meningioma are often managed by serial imaging. Symptomatic meningioma, those that threaten neurovascular structures, or demonstrate radiological growth, are usually resected as first-line management strategy. For patients in poor clinical condition, or with inoperable, residual or recurrent disease, radiotherapy is often used as primary or adjuvant treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy treatments do not currently exist. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in meningioma clinical studies. Two 'Core Outcome Sets' (COS) will be developed: (COSMIC: Intervention) for use in meningioma clinical effectiveness trials and (COSMIC: Observation) for use in clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two systematic literature reviews and trial registry searches will identify outcomes measured and reported in published and ongoing (1) meningioma clinical effectiveness trials, and (2) clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. Outcomes include those that are clinician reported, patient reported, caregiver reported and based on objective tests (eg, neurocognitive tests), as well as measures of progression and survival. Outcomes will be deduplicated and categorised to generate two long lists. The two long lists will be prioritised through two, two-round, international, modified eDelphi surveys including patients with meningioma, healthcare professionals, researchers and those in caring/supporting roles. The two final COS will be ratified through two 1-day online consensus meetings, with representation from all stakeholder groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional review board (University of Liverpool) approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. Participant eConsent will be obtained prior to participation in the eDelphi surveys and consensus meetings. The two systematic literature reviews and two final COS will be published and freely available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: COMET study ID 1508.