Impact of Magnetic Resonance Lymphography on Lymphaticolvenular Anastomosis for Lower-Limb Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Although several investigations have described the safety, utility, and precision of magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) as a preoperative examination for lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), it is unclear how much MRL assistance impacts LVA results. The present study aimed to clarify the outcome of MRL-assisted LVA for leg lymphedema using body water measurements obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis. METHODS: The water reductive effect of MRL-assisted LVA in female secondary leg lymphedema patients was compared with that of non-MRL-assisted controls in this retrospective study. In the MRL-assisted group, all LVA candidates underwent MRL prior to surgery, and the lymphatic vessels to be anastomosed were primarily determined by MRL findings. The body water composition of the treated legs was assessed before LVA and at 6 months postoperatively using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyzer. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients in the MRL-assisted study group and an equal number in the non-MRL-assisted control group were analyzed. Although mean leg water volume before LVA, mean excess water volume of the affected leg before LVA, and number of anastomoses created were comparable between the groups, the water volume reduction (1.02 L versus 0.49 L; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-1.03, p < 0.05) and edema reduction rate (46.7% versus 27.2%; 95% CI: 3.7-35.5%, p < 0.05) in the MRL-assisted group were significantly greater than in controls. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRL-assisted lymph vessel visualization and selection appeared to significantly enhance the water reductive effect of LVA for International Society of Lymphology classification stage 2 leg lymphedema. MRL also helped to reliably identify lymphatic vessels for anastomosis. Without increasing the number of anastomoses, LVA could be performed more effectively by better detecting stagnant lymphatic vessels using MRL.

Magnetic resonance lymphography as three-dimensional navigation for lymphaticovenular anastomosis in patients with leg lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Precise mapping of functional lymphatic vessels is essential for successful lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). This study aimed to clarify the precision of magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) in detecting lymphatic vessels prior to LVA. METHODS: Eighteen patients with leg lymphedema were recruited for this prospective study. All patients underwent MRL before LVA to obtain three-dimensional coordinates of lymphatic vessels from MRL images. The precision of MRL for detecting lymphatic vessels was evaluated and compared with those of other contrast techniques. RESULTS: Twenty legs from 18 patients were analyzed. A total of 40 skin incisions were made, 32 of which were determined by MRL. The precision of MRL to detect lymphatic vessels was 94%. With the addition of MRL, the number of lymphatic vessels identified preoperatively was increased as compared with indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L) alone. Assuming a detection sensitivity of MRL for lymphatic vessels of 1, those of other contrast techniques were 0.90 for ICG-L under microscopy, 0.73 for patent blue staining, and 0.43 for ICG-L before incision. Whereas ICG-L before incision could not detect lymphatic vessels at depths greater than 17.0 mm, all deeper anastomosed lymphatic vessels were identified by MRL. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic vessels enhanced on MRL can be reliably identified intraoperatively. MRL is a promising preoperative examination in LVA that can selectively depict suitable lymphatic vessels even in deep tissue layers.

Extracellular Water Ratio as an Indicator of the Development and Severity of Leg Lymphedema Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.

Background: This case-control retrospective study focused on the extracellular water ratio (%ECW) of lymphedemic limbs measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a possible indicator of the development and severity of unilateral and bilateral leg lymphedema. Methods and Results: BIA was used to evaluate changes in %ECW due to lymphedema in female patients with unilateral secondary leg lymphedema and in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess the diagnostic ability of %ECW to distinguish leg lymphedema patients from controls. Thirty-eight female patients were eligible for inclusion along with an equal number of healthy control volunteers. The %ECW of the affected leg correlated with leg body water volume (R2 = 0.28) and the water volume difference between affected and unaffected legs (R2 = 0.58). The ROC analysis showed that %ECW had a high diagnostic ability as a screening tool for the development of leg lymphedema (area under the ROC curve = 0.96). A cutoff %ECW value of 40.0% could predict the presence of leg lymphedema with a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 97.4%. Conclusions: %ECW value may be a simple and useful indicator of the development and severity of leg lymphedema. As a screening test, %ECW measurement can predict the presence of unilateral or bilateral leg lymphedema in a single measurement without the need for arm, contralateral leg, or previous measurements as controls.

Water Reductive Effect of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis on Upper-Limb Lymphedema: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Comparison with Lower-Limb Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: We previously examined the water reductive effect of lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurement on lower-limb lymphedema and revealed mean water volume reduction and edema reduction rate by leg LVA to be 0.86 L and 45.1%, respectively. This study aimed to clarify the water reductive effect of LVA on arm lymphedema and compare its results with those for leg lymphedema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of LVA for unilateral arm lymphedema was evaluated using BIA in a retrospective cohort. Limb circumference and arm body water volume (ABW) of the affected and unaffected arms were measured before and after LVA. Mean water volume reduction (ΔABW) and edema reduction rate by arm LVA were compared with values for leg LVA cited from our previous report as a historical control. RESULTS: Nineteen consecutive patients were enrolled. The mean ΔABW and edema reduction rate by BIA were 0.267 L and 46.0%, respectively. The decreasing rate of ABW by BIA was significantly larger than those of the upper extremity lymphedema index and sum of 5 circumferences measurement methods. ΔABW could be predicted by a regression line based on the preoperative water volume difference between affected and unaffected limbs. The mean edema reduction rates for arm and leg LVA were comparable. CONCLUSION: The water reductive effect of LVA on upper-limb lymphedema was demonstrated by BIA assessment. BIA can reflect the effect of LVA more sensitively than conventional objective measurements and may facilitate the interpretation of LVA results. Although water volume reduction by arm LVA was less than that by leg LVA, the edema reduction rates were comparable.