Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 87: 174-180, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35257922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring hemodialysis access creation often have significant comorbid conditions, which may impact access maturation. Underlying cardiac dysfunction likely plays an important role in the maturation of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). The effect of specific parameters of cardiac function on successful AVF creation has not previously been explored. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of patients undergoing first-time AVF creation at a single center from 2011 to 2018 was performed. Patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram within the 12 months prior to surgery were included. Standard demographic and perioperative variables were collected, in addition to echocardiographic and vascular mapping data. The primary outcome was access maturation, defined as the use of the access site for hemodialysis at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients met inclusion criteria with a cumulative AVF maturation rate of 57% (69/121) in this select population. Patients with pre-existing systolic cardiac dysfunction were more than 5 times less likely to see their AVF mature by one year postsurgery (OR = 0.17, P = 0.018). Preoperative venous diameter, access site location, and the type of fistula did not differ significantly between patients with and without systolic dysfunction. Selection of the cephalic vein as the venous anastomosis and diastolic dysfunction (≥ Grade 2) were also associated with lower rates of access maturation, although these associations were less robust. CONCLUSIONS: Systolic cardiac dysfunction is the most important nonmodifiable variable associated with failed AVF maturation. Patients requiring hemodialysis with significant pre-existing cardiac dysfunction may not be appropriate for permanent access creation, and long-term catheter use should be seriously considered as an alternative.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Fistula , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Heart Diseases , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/adverse effects , Vascular Patency , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Renal Dialysis
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 76: 174-178, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) encompasses a myriad of clinical manifestations including lower extremity swelling and pain, ulcerations and chronic skin changes such as stasis dermatitis, and lipodermatosclerosis. CVI effects greater than 25 million Americans and has a significant socioeconomic and psychosocial impact. Treatment of CVI varies depending on the etiology. For those patients with deep venous reflux, restoration of the deep venous valvular system is critical. Popliteal vein external banding is a novel technique to treat deep venous reflux. Our study aims to retrospectively review the early outcomes for the largest U.S. series of patients undergoing popliteal vein external banding. METHODS: Patients with C4, C5, and C6 disease with underlying deep venous reflux were treated with external banding of the popliteal vein. Basic demographic, ultrasound, and procedural data were collected. Patients were seen in clinic and underwent post procedure duplex. Procedure-specific complications were also assessed. The primary outcome was improvement of symptoms or wound healing. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified. Seventy-five percent of patients had a history of DVT on the ipsilateral extremity and 66.7% (n = 6) of those patients had previous common or external iliac vein stenting for post-phlebitic syndrome. 58.3% of patients had active ulcerations (C6) at the time of popliteal vein banding and the mean VCSS score was 12.7, consistent with advanced venous disease. Patients were followed for a mean 8.62 months. Of the 8 patients that had active ulcers (C6), 75% completely healed with a mean time to healing of 3.3 months. 91.6% of patients reported clinical improvement in their symptoms (i.e., reduction in edema/swelling, pain or improvement in size of ulcer). Three patients had post-operative wound complications and 1 required oral antibiotic for associated cellulitis. CONCLUSION: Popliteal vein external banding represents a viable treatment modality for patients with venous insufficiency secondary to deep venous reflux. It is technically easier than most deep venous reconstructive options and may have an important role in the multimodal treatment of patients with advanced CVI.


Subject(s)
Popliteal Vein/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Venous Insufficiency/surgery , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Georgia , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Popliteal Vein/diagnostic imaging , Popliteal Vein/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/physiopathology , Wound Healing
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 87-94, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32422294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is preliminary evidence that vascular surgeons are increasingly relied on nationally to assist with the management of lower extremity vascular trauma. Current trauma center verification, however, does not require any level of vascular surgery coverage. We sought to assess practice patterns regarding vascular surgery consultation and temporal trends in the surgical management of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent surgical repair for vascular trauma of the lower extremity at a single, academic, public hospital from 2011 to 2018. Demographic data and procedural data were collected. Patients were assigned to a vascular surgery (VS) or nonvascular surgery (NV) group. The primary outcome measure was the rate of VS consultation. Secondary outcome measures included 30-day mortality, length-of-stay, and limb salvage. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were identified (77 VS group, 103 NV group). There was an increase in the proportion of repairs done by VS from 2011 to 2018 (P < 0.05). There were significant management differences between the 2 groups, with vascular surgeons more likely to perform primary end-to-end anastomosis for both arterial (21.33% vs. 6.90%) and venous (19.15% vs. 5.26%) injuries (both P < 0.05). Patients in the VS group were less likely to have balloon embolectomy, fasciotomy, or intravascular shunting than the NV group (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mortality (5.35% vs. 4.85%), length-of-stay (15.05 vs. 18.38 days), or limb salvage (94.81% vs. 95.15%). CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity vascular trauma is increasingly managed by vascular surgeons. Furthermore, vascular surgeons are more selective in the use of potentially unnecessary adjunctive maneuvers. Current accreditation guidelines should be revisited to mandate vascular surgery coverage in trauma centers that frequently treat this patient population.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/blood supply , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Surgeons/trends , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Workload , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Limb Salvage/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/trends , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/mortality , Young Adult
4.
Clin Cardiol ; 43(6): 537-545, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is recommended in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as first-line therapy, although patient adoption remains low. Home-based exercise therapy (HBET) delivered through smartphones may expand access. The feasibility of such programs, especially in low-resource settings, remains unknown. METHODS: Smart Step is a pilot randomized trial of smartphone-enabled HBET vs walking advice in patients with symptomatic PAD in an inner-city hospital. Participants receive a smartphone app with daily exercise reminders and educational content. A trained coach performs weekly phone-based coaching sessions. All participants receive a Fitbit Charge HR 2 to measure physical activity. The primary outcome changes in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance at 12 weeks over baseline. Secondary outcomes are the degree of engagement with the smartphone app and changes in health behaviors and quality of life scores after 12 weeks and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients are randomized as of December 15, 2019 with a mean (SD) age of 66.1 (5.8) years. The majority are female (60%) and black (87%). At baseline, the mean (SD) ABI and 6MWT were 0.86 (0.29) and 363.5 m, respectively. Enrollment is expected to continue until December 2020 to achieve a target size of 50 participants. CONCLUSIONS: The potential significance of this trial will be to provide preliminary evidence of a home-based, "mobile-first" approach for delivering a structured exercise rehabilitation program. Smartphone-enabled HBET can be potentially more accessible than center-based programs, and if proven effective, may have a potential widespread public health benefit.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise/physiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Smartphone , Telemedicine/instrumentation , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/rehabilitation , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...