Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism and Eventual Amputation in Traumatic Femoral and Iliac Vein Injuries: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Iliac and femoral venous injuries represent a challenging dilemma in trauma surgery with mixed results. Venous restoration of outflow (via repair or bypass) has been previously identified as having higher rates of VTE (venous thromboembolism) compared to ligation. We hypothesized that rates of VTE and eventual amputation were similar whether restoration of venous outflow vs ligation was performed at initial operation. METHODS: Patients in the 2019-2021 National Trauma Data Bank with iliac and femoral vein injuries were abstracted and analyzed. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital lower extremity amputation and VTE. RESULTS: A total of 2642 patients with operatively managed iliac and femoral vein injuries were identified VTE was found in 10.8% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed and identified bowel injury, higher ISS, older age, open repair, and longer time to VTE prophylaxis initiation as independent predictors of VTE. Amputation was required in 4.2% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified arterial or nerve injury, femur or tibia fracture, venous ligation, percutaneous intervention, fasciotomy, bowel injury, and higher ISS as independent factors of amputation. CONCLUSION: Venous restoration was not an independent predictor of VTE. Venous ligation on index operation was the only modifiable independent predictor of amputation identified on regression analysis.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone Training Ratings and Surgeons' Early Outcomes.

Importance: National data on the development of competence during training have been reported using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones system. It is now possible to consider longitudinal analyses that link Milestone ratings during training to patient outcomes data of recent graduates. Objective: To evaluate the association of in-training ACGME Milestone ratings in a surgical specialty with subsequent complication rates following a commonly performed operation, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This study of patient outcomes followed EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry (4213 admissions from 208 hospitals treated by 327 surgeons). All surgeons included in this study graduated from ACGME-accredited training programs from 2015 through 2019 and had Milestone ratings 6 months prior to graduation. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021, through September 15, 2023. Because Milestone ratings can vary with program, they were corrected for program effect using a deviation score from the program mean. Exposure: Milestone ratings assigned to individual trainees 6 months prior to graduation, based on judgments of surgical competence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Surgical complications following EVAR for patients treated by recent graduates during the index hospitalization, obtained using the nationwide Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization's VQI registry, which includes 929 participating centers in 49 US states. Results: The study included outcomes for 4213 patients (mean [SD] age, 73.25 [8.74] years; 3379 male participants [80.2%]). Postoperative complications included 9.5% major (400 of 4213 cases) and 30.2% minor (1274 of 4213 cases) complications. After adjusting for patient risk factors and site of training, a significant association was identified between individual Milestone ratings of surgical trainees and major complications in early surgical practice in programs with lower mean Milestone ratings (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI; 0.27-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, Milestone assessments of surgical trainees were associated with subsequent clinical outcomes in their early career. Although these findings represent one surgical specialty, they suggest Milestone ratings can be used in any specialty to identify trainees at risk for future adverse patient outcomes when applying the same theory and methodology. Milestones data should inform data-driven educational interventions and trainee remediation to optimize future patient outcomes.

Trust but Verify? Utility of Intraoperative Angiography After Revascularization for Vascular Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trauma surgical dogma teaches that patients should have intraoperative angiography (IA) if the surgeon cannot identify a pulse in the injured extremity following a vascular repair. This study was undertaken to assess the utility of IA in trauma patients who underwent open brachial or femoral artery revascularization. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial (PROOVIT) database from 2013 to 2021 evaluated patients >15 years with penetrating or blunt injuries requiring operative intervention of the brachial, superficial femoral, or common femoral arteries. Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial data evaluated included documented pulse in the injured extremity at revascularization completion, adjunctive IA, immediate revision, and vascular reintervention during the hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 5057 patients with vascular injury, 185 patients met our inclusion criteria. The majority were male (86.5%) with a median age, injury severity score, and systolic blood pressure of 29, 12, and 117, respectively. Of the study patients, 39% underwent IA, 14% had immediate revision, and 8% required vascular reoperation during their admission. Patients who underwent IA and with no documented palpable pulse after repair were significantly more likely to require immediate revision before leaving the operating room (22% vs 9%, P = .013) and were not more likely to require reoperation, than those who did not undergo IA (7% vs 9%, P = .613). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative angiography is a valuable tool for surgeons for vascular extremity trauma and is associated with a greater rate of immediate revision. Familiarity with angiographic technique is essential for vascular trauma and should be a focal point of training.

Management of Traumatic Radial and Ulnar Artery Injuries and Risk Factors for Amputation.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic injuries to the radial and/or ulnar arteries represent a subset of arterial injuries. In the absence of injury to both forearm arteries, treatment was historically ligation if perfusion was maintained to the hand via the uninjured vessels or adequate collateral vessels. We sought to determine management of traumatic forearm arterial injuries in 2019 and to identify risk factors for major upper extremity amputation. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried by International Classification of Diseases 10 code for patients with traumatic radial and/or ulnar artery injuries within the year 2019. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, time to operating room, type of repair, outcomes, and mortality were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for major upper extremity amputation. RESULTS: A total of 4048 patients with traumatic radial and/or ulnar artery injuries were identified. A total of 1907 radial artery operations were performed including repair (59%), ligation (29%), and interposition bypass (12%). A total of 1637 ulnar artery operations were completed including repair (67%), ligation (21%), and interposition bypass (12%). Major upper extremity amputation occurred in 0.6%. Older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.014, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-1.024, P = 0.0048), blunt mechanism (AOR: 2.457, 95% CI: 1.730-3.497, P < 0.0.0001), and ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery injury (AOR: 2.148, 95% CI: 1.298-3.553, P = 0.0029) were associated with major amputation. Surgical revascularization, time to operating room, fasciotomy, and compartment syndrome were not associated with major amputation, but this may be secondary to Type II error. CONCLUSIONS: In the operating room, radial and ulnar artery injuries were managed more often with restoration of flow versus ligation. Older age, blunt mechanism, and ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery injury were associated with major amputation. Amputation rate was low at 3% overall and 0.6% for amputation of the hand or a more proximal level. Upper extremity fracture, upper extremity nerve injury, and ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery injury were associated with need for revision operation.

The Use of Learning Analytics to Enable Detection of Underperforming Trainees: An Analysis of National Vascular Surgery Trainee ACGME Milestones Assessment Data.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate at-risk scores of semiannual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone ratings for vascular surgical trainees' final achievement of competency targets. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: ACGME Milestones assessments have been collected since 2015 for Vascular Surgery. It is unclear whether milestone ratings throughout training predict achievement of recommended performance targets upon graduation. METHODS: National ACGME Milestones data were utilized for analyses. All trainees completing 2-year vascular surgery fellowships in June 2018 and 5-year integrated vascular surgery residencies in June 2019 were included. A generalized estimating equations model was used to obtain at-risk scores for each of the 31 subcompetencies by semiannual review periods, to estimate the probability of trainees achieving the recommended graduation target based on their previous ratings. RESULTS: A total of 122 vascular surgery fellows (VSFs) (95.3%) and 52 integrated vascular surgery residents (IVSRs) (100%) were included. VSFs and IVSRs did not achieve level 4.0 competency targets at a rate of 1.6% to 25.4% across subcompetencies, which was not significantly different between the 2 groups for any of the subcompetencies ( P = 0.161-0.999). Trainees were found to be at greater risk of not achieving competency targets when lower milestone ratings were assigned, and at later time-points in training. At a milestone rating of 2.5, with 1 year remaining before graduation, the at-risk score for not achieving the target level 4.0 milestone ranged from 2.9% to 77.9% for VSFs and 33.3% to 75.0% for IVSRs. CONCLUSION: The ACGME Milestones provide early diagnostic and predictive information for vascular surgery trainees' achievement of competence at completion of training.

Predicting Performance at Graduation From Early ACGME Milestone Ratings: Longitudinal Learning Analytics in Professionalism and Communication in Vascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Program directors in surgical disciplines need more tools from the ACGME to help them use Milestone ratings to improve trainees' performance. This is especially true in competencies that are notoriously difficult to measure, such as professionalism (PROF) and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS). It is now widely understood that skills in these two areas have direct impact on patient care outcomes. This study investigated the potential for generating early predictors of final Milestone ratings within the PROF and ICS competency categories. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study utilized Milestone ratings from all ACGME-accredited vascular surgery training programs, covering residents and fellows who completed training in June 2019. The outcome measure studied was the rate of achieving the recommended graduation target of Milestone Level 4 (possible range: 1-5), while the predictors were the Milestone ratings attained at earlier stages of training. Predictive probability values (PPVs) were calculated for each of the 3 PROF and two ICS sub-competencies to estimate the probability of trainees not reaching the recommended graduation target based on their previous Milestone ratings. SETTING: All ACGME-accredited vascular surgery training programs within the United States. PARTICIPANTS: All trainees completing a 2 year vascular surgery fellowship (VSF) in June 2019 (n = 119) or a 5 year integrated vascular surgery residency (IVSR) in June 2019 (n = 52) were included in the analyses. RESULTS: The overall rate of failing to achieve the recommended graduation target across all PROF and ICS sub-competencies ranged from 7.7% to 21.8% of all trainees. For trainees with a Milestone rating at ≤ 2.5 with 1 year remaining in their training program, the predictive probability of not achieving the recommended graduation target ranged from 37.0% to 71.5% across sub-competencies, with the highest risks observed under PROF for "Administrative Tasks" (71.5%) and under ICS for "Communication with the Healthcare Team" (56.7%). CONCLUSIONS: As many as 1 in 4 vascular surgery trainees did not achieve the ACGME vascular surgery Milestones targets for graduation in at least one of the PROF and ICS sub-competencies. Biannual ACGME Milestone assessment ratings of PROF and ICS during early training can be used to predict achievement of competency targets at time of graduation. Early clues to problems in PROF and ICS enable programs to address potential deficits early in training to ensure competency in these essential non-technical skills prior to entering unsupervised practice.

Expert consensus on the conceptual alignment of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies with patient outcomes after common vascular surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: The quality and effectiveness of vascular surgery education should be evaluated based on patient care outcomes. To investigate predictive associations between trainee performance and subsequent patient outcomes, a critical first step is to determine the conceptual alignment of educational competencies with clinical outcomes in practice. We sought to generate expert consensus on the conceptual alignment of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Vascular Surgery subcompetencies with patient care outcomes across different Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registries. METHODS: A national panel of vascular surgeons with expertise in both clinical care and education were recruited to participate in a modified Delphi expert consensus building process to map ACGME Vascular Surgery subcompetencies (educational markers of resident performance) to VQI clinical modules (patient outcomes). A master list of items for rating was created, including the 31 ACGME Vascular Surgery subcompetencies and 8 VQI clinical registries (endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stent, infrainguinal, suprainguinal, and peripheral vascular intervention). These items were entered into an iterative Delphi process. Positive consensus was reached when 75% or more of the participants ranked an item as mandatory. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used to evaluate consistency between experts for each Delphi round. RESULTS: A total of 13 experts who contributed to the development of the Vascular Surgery Milestones participated; 12 experts (92%) participated in both rounds of the Delphi process. Two rounds of Delphi were conducted, as suggested by excellent expert agreement (round 1, ICC = 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.84]; round 2, ICC = 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.960-.98]). Using the predetermined consensus cutoff threshold, the Delphi process reduced the number of subcompetencies mapped to patient care outcomes from 31 to a range of 9 to 15 across the 8 VQI clinical registries. Practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism subcompetencies were identified as less relevant to patient outcome variables captured by the VQI registries after the final round, and the only the systems-based practice subcompetency that was identified as relevant was radiation safety in two of the endovascular registries. CONCLUSIONS: A national panel of vascular surgeon experts reported a high degree of agreement on the relevance of ACGME subcompetencies to patient care outcomes as captured in the VQI clinical registry. Systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism competencies were identified as less relevant to patient outcomes after specific surgical procedures.

A gender-based analysis of predictors and sequelae of burnout among practicing American vascular surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: Surgeons report higher burnout and suicidal ideation (SI) rates than the general population. This study sought to identify the prevalence and gender-specific risk factors for burnout and SI among men and women vascular surgeons to guide future interventions. METHODS: In 2018, active Society for Vascular Surgery members were surveyed confidentially using the Maslach Burnout Index embedded in a questionnaire that captured demographic and practice-related characteristics. Results were stratified by gender. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify predictors for the end points of burnout and SI. RESULTS: Overall survey response rate was 34.3% (N = 878) of practicing vascular surgeons. A higher percentage of women responded (19%) than compose membership in the Society for Vascular Surgery (13.7%). Women respondents were significantly younger, with fewer years in practice, and were less likely to be in private practice than the men who responded. Women were also less likely to be married/partnered, or to have children. The prevalence of burnout was similar for women and men (42.3% and 40.9%; P = nonsignificant); however, the prevalence of SI was significantly higher in women (12.9% vs 6.6%; P < .007). Whereas there was no difference in mean hours worked or call taken, women were more likely to have had a recent conflict between work and home responsibilities and to have resolved this conflict in favor of work. Although men and women had the same incidence of reported recent medical errors, women were less likely to self-report a recent malpractice suit or to think that a fair resolution was reached. There was no gender difference in reported work-related pain. Multivariable analysis revealed that not enough family time and work-related pain were predictors for burnout in both men and women. Additional factors were associated with burnout in men, such as malpractice and electronic medical record dissatisfaction. Multivariable analysis revealed that work-related pain was an independent predictor for SI for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of burnout among vascular surgeons is high. Women vascular surgeons have double the rates of SI compared with male vascular surgeons. Taken together, this study demonstrated that many of the same factors are associated with burnout in women and men, which include not enough family time, conflict between work and personal life, and work-related pain. Additional factors in men included conflict between work and family, work-related pain, and electronic medical record dissatisfaction.

Society for Vascular Surgery best practice recommendations for use of social media.

The use of social media (SoMe) in medicine has demonstrated the ability to advance networking among clinicians and other healthcare staff, disseminate research, increase access to up-to-date information, and inform and engage medical trainees and the public at-large. With increasing SoMe use by vascular surgeons and other vascular specialists, it is important to uphold core tenets of our commitment to our patients by protecting their privacy, encouraging appropriate consent and use of any patient-related imagery, and disclosing relevant conflicts of interest. Additionally, we recognize the potential for negative interactions online regarding differing opinions on optimal treatment options for patients. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting appropriate and effective use of SoMe content that is honest, well-informed, and accurate. The Young Surgeons Committee of the SVS convened a diverse writing group of SVS members to help guide novice as well as veteran SoMe users on best practices for advancing medical knowledge-sharing in an online environment. These recommendations are presented here with the goal of elevating patient privacy and physician transparency, while also offering support and resources for infrequent SoMe users to increase their engagement with each other in new, virtual formats.

Using Learning Analytics to Examine Achievement of Graduation Targets for Systems-Based Practice and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: A National Cohort of Vascular Surgery Fellows.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons provide patient care in complex health care systems and must be able to participate in improving both personal performance and the performance of the system. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Vascular Surgery Milestones are utilized to assess vascular surgery fellows' (VSF) achievement of graduation targets in the competencies of Systems Based Practice (SBP) and Practice Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI). We investigate the predictive value of semiannual milestones ratings for final achievement within these competencies at the time of graduation. METHODS: National ACGME milestones data were utilized for analysis. All trainees entering the 2-year vascular surgery fellowship programs in July 2016 were included in the analysis (n = 122). Predictive probability values (PPVs) were obtained for each SBP and PBLI sub-competencies by biannual review periods, to estimate the probability of VSFs not reaching the recommended graduation target based on their previous milestones ratings. RESULTS: The rate of nonachievement of the graduation target level 4.0 on the SBP and PBLI sub-competencies at the time of graduation for VSFs was 13.1-25.4%. At the first time point of assessment, 6 months into the fellowship program, the PPV of the SBP and PBLI milestones for nonachievement of level 4.0 upon graduation ranged from 16.3-60.2%. Six months prior to graduation, the PPVs across the 6 sub-competencies ranged from 14.6-82.9%. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of VSFs do not achieve the ACGME Vascular Surgery Milestone targets for graduation in the competencies of SBP and PBLI, suggesting a need to improve curricula and assessment strategies in these domains across vascular surgery fellowship programs. Reported milestones levels across all time point are predictive of ultimate achievement upon graduation and should be utilized to provide targeted feedback and individualized learning plans to ensure graduates are prepared to engage in personal and health care system improvement once in unsupervised practice.

Ensuring equity, diversity, and inclusion in the Society for Vascular Surgery: A report of the Society for Vascular Surgery Task Force on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion represent interconnected goals meant to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their innate identity characteristics, feel welcomed and valued among their peers. Equity is achieved when all individuals have equal access to leadership and career advancement opportunities as well as fair compensation for their work. It is well-known that the unique backgrounds and perspectives contributed by a diverse workforce strengthen and improve medical organizations overall. The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is committed to supporting the highest quality leadership, patient care, surgical education, and societal recommendations through promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS. The overarching goal of this document is to provide specific context and guidance for enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion within the SVS as well as setting the tone for conduct and processes beyond the SVS, within other national and regional vascular surgery organizations and practice settings.

RETRACTED: Prevalence of unprofessional social media content among young vascular surgeons.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, the Editor-in-Chief and the Senior Editor of the Journal of Vascular Surgery. This article has been retracted in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines because the authors did not have permission to use the Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery (APDVS) directory of program directors and trainees to conduct research. In addition, the methodology, analysis and conclusions of this article were based on published but not validated criteria, judging a series of behaviors including attire, alcohol consumption, controversial political and religious comments like abortion or gun control, in which significant conscious and unconscious biases were pervasive. The methodology was in part predicated on highly subjective assessments of professionalism based on antiquated norms and a predominantly male authorship supervised the assessments made by junior, male students and trainees. The authors did not identify biases in the methodology, i.e., judging public social media posts of women wearing bikinis on off-hours as "potentially unprofessional". The goal of professionalism in medicine is to help ensure trust among patients, colleagues and hospital staff. However, professionalism has historically been defined by and for white, heterosexual men and does not always speak to the diversity of our workforce or our patients. The Editors deeply regret the failures in the Journal's peer review process which allowed this paper to be published. The Editors and the review process failed to identify errors in the design of the study, to detect unauthorized use of the data, and to recognize the conscious and unconscious biases plaguing the methodology. For this, we express our most sincere apology.

The pathway to a national vascular skills examination and the role of simulation-based training in an increasingly complex specialty.

The evolving demands of surgical training have led to the successful implementation of skills examinations in the areas of laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery. Currently, there is no similar formal skills assessment in vascular surgery, despite endovascular intervention replacing open surgery in treatment of many vascular conditions. The adoption of less invasive techniques to treat aneurysm and occlusive disease has resulted in new training paradigms and technical challenges for trainees. The duty hour restriction for trainees and declining numbers of complex open vascular interventions have added to the challenges of vascular surgery training. Simulation is a promising avenue for both skills training and assessment. The ability to evaluate the fundamental skills of trainees would be an important step to ensure a degree of uniformity in trainees' technical abilities. The role of simulation-based training in acquiring, testing, and refining these skills is still in its infancy in the vascular surgery training paradigm. This article aims to impart a deeper understanding of the conditions for developing and implementing the fundamentals of vascular and endovascular surgery, and to provide guidance regarding the role of simulation-based training in a rapidly evolving specialty. There are various forms of simulation available, including benchtop models, high-fidelity simulators, and virtual-reality simulators, and each requires a different method of proficiency assessment. Both open surgery and endovascular skills can be assessed and the application of successful implementation in academic vascular surgery training program is presented.

Characterization of profunda femoris vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of and risk factors for profunda femoris vein (PFV) thrombosis are poorly characterized. We prospectively identified patients with PFV deep venous thrombosis (DVT) to characterize the demographics and anatomic distribution of proximal DVT in patients with PFV DVT. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of patients at a tertiary care university hospital with DVT diagnosed by venous duplex ultrasound scanning between June 2014 and June 2015. DVT patients were categorized as having PFV involvement (yes or no), and the anatomic distribution of other sites of ipsilateral venous thrombi was further stratified to determine whether there was external iliac vein (EIV), common femoral vein (CFV), or femoropopliteal vein (FPV) DVT. Demographic characteristics of the patients were compared between groups, PFV DVT vs proximal DVT without PFV DVT. RESULTS: Of 4584 lower extremity venous duplex ultrasound studies performed, 398 (8.7%) scans were positive for proximal DVT from 260 patients; 23.1% of patients with DVT (60/260) had DVT involving the PFV. Of 112 patients who had CFV DVT, 55 (49.1%) also had ipsilateral involvement of the PFV. Of 60 patients with PFV DVT, 55 (91.7%) had involvement of the ipsilateral CFV. Patients in the PFV DVT group were more likely to have a history of a hypercoagulable disorder (26.7% vs 14.5%; P = .029) and a history of immobility (58.3% vs 42%; P = .026) compared with those with proximal DVT without PFV DVT. There were no differences in smoking, recent surgery, personal or family history of DVT, other medical comorbidities, inpatient status, or survival. There was no difference in laterality of DVT between the PFV DVT and proximal DVT without PFV DVT groups (35% vs 41.5% left, 35% vs 33.5% right, 30% vs 25% bilateral; P = .619). There was a higher proportion of PFV DVT with EIV involvement (21.7% vs 2.5%; P < .00001) and a higher proportion of PFV DVT with CFV + FPV involvement (65.0% vs 19%; P < .00001) compared with proximal DVT without PFV DVT. There was no difference in survival between the PFV DVT and proximal DVT without PFV DVT groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PFV thrombosis tend to have more thrombus burden with more frequent concurrent DVT in the EIV and FPV. Patients with PFV DVT are also more likely to have a history of hypercoagulable disorder and immobility. Ultrasound protocols for assessment of DVT should include routine examination of the PFV as a potential marker of a more virulent prothrombotic state.

Causes and outcomes of finger ischemia in hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons may be consulted to evaluate hospitalized patients with finger ischemia. We sought to characterize causes and outcomes of finger ischemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: All ICU patients who underwent evaluation for finger ischemia from 2008 to 2015 were reviewed. All were evaluated with finger photoplethysmography. The patients' demographics, comorbidities, ICU care (ventilator status, arterial lines, use of vasoactive medications), finger amputations, and survival were also recorded. ICU patients were compared with concurrently evaluated non-ICU inpatients with finger ischemia. RESULTS: There were 98 ICU patients (55 male, 43 female) identified. The mean age was 57.1 ± 16.8 years. Of these patients, 42 (43%) were in the surgical ICU and 56 (57%) in the medical ICU. Seventy (72%) had abnormal findings on finger photoplethysmography, 40 (69%) unilateral and 30 (31%) bilateral. Thirty-six (37%) had ischemia associated with an arterial line. Twelve (13%) had concomitant toe ischemia. Eighty (82%) were receiving vasoactive medications at the time of diagnosis, with the most frequent being phenylephrine (55%), norepinephrine (47%), ephedrine (31%), epinephrine (26%), and vasopressin (24%). Treatment was with anticoagulation in 88 (90%; therapeutic, 48%; prophylactic, 42%) and antiplatelet agents in 59 (60%; aspirin, 51%; clopidogrel, 15%). Other frequently associated conditions included mechanical ventilation at time of diagnosis (37%), diabetes (34%), peripheral arterial disease (32%), dialysis dependence (31%), cancer (24%), and sepsis (20%). Only five patients (5%) ultimately required finger amputation. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survival was 84%, 69%, and 59%. By Cox proportional hazards modeling, cancer (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.6; P = .035) was an independent predictor of mortality. There were 50 concurrent non-ICU patients with finger ischemia. Non-ICU patients were more likely to have connective tissue disorders (26% vs 13%; P = .05) and hyperlipidemia (42% vs 24%; P = .03) and to undergo finger amputations (16% vs 5%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Finger ischemia in the ICU is frequently associated with the presence of arterial lines and the use of vasopressor medications, of which phenylephrine and norepinephrine are most frequent. Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy is appropriate treatment. Whereas progression to amputation is rare, patients with finger ischemia in the ICU have a high rate of mortality, particularly in the presence of cancer. Non-ICU patients hospitalized with finger ischemia more frequently require finger amputations, probably because of more frequent connective tissue disorders.

Ambulation and functional outcome after major lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Major lower extremity amputations (MLEAs) remain a significant source of disability. It is unknown whether postamputation functional outcomes and outcome predictability have changed with a population of increasingly aging and obese patients. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate contemporary trends. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients undergoing MLEA using Current Procedural Terminology codes in a university hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative variables, and outcomes were obtained. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and χ2 and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used where appropriate. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From October 2005 to November 2016, 206 patients (147 male; mean age, 63 ± 13.5 years) underwent 256 MLEAs (90.9% below-knee amputations, 1.3% through-knee amputations, and 7.8% above-knee amputations [AKAs]) related to acute and critical limb ischemia, infection, or other causes. Mean follow-up was 178.7 ± 266.9 days. Conversion from below-knee amputation to AKA was 3.5%. Estimated 1-year survival was 83%, and it was 15% lower in nonambulatory patients (75% vs 90%; P = .04). Overall 1-year postamputation ambulatory rate was 46.1%. Nonambulatory patients had a higher body mass index (30.9 ± 8.0 vs 25.6 ± 5.4; P < .001), lower preoperative hematocrit (31.0% ± 7.4% vs 33.3% ± 8.1%; P < .05), higher modified frailty index (mFI; 8.4 ± 1.0 vs 5.4 ± 1.2; P < .0001), higher chronic alcohol use (9% vs 1%; P = .01), dependent preoperative functional status (29% vs 2.1%; P < .01), and lack of family support (66.3% vs 17.9%; P < .01); they were less likely to be married (83.2% vs 35.8%; P < .01) and more likely to have an AKA (20% vs 52.6%; P = .004). There were no patients with dementia, on dialysis, or with bilateral MLEAs who were ambulatory after amputation. Factors predictive of nonambulatory status after MLEA with multivariate logistic regression analysis included increased body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.98; P = .017) and an increased mFI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16-0.34; P < .0001); a higher hemoglobin level was protective (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be counseled that <50% of patients receiving MLEAs are ambulatory after amputation. Educating patients about the deleterious effects of obesity on ambulatory status after MLEA may motivate patients to improve their level of fitness to achieve successful ambulation. Patients with an elevated mFI, patients with dementia, and those on dialysis should be considered for AKAs.