ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A reduction in endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) count is considered to correlate with cumulative cardiovascular risk factors including hyperglycemia. This study was conducted to elucidate the influence of glycemic variability on EPC count in patients with diabetes. METHODS: In study 1, we examined the number of EPCs in 57 patients with type 1 diabetes and 43 patients with type 2 diabetes. The number of EPCs (CD34+, CD34+CD133+, CD34+CD309+, and CD34+CD133+CD309+) was counted as the number of cells per 106 events. In study 2, we examined 37 outpatients with type 1 diabetes without macrovascular complications. We assessed associations between EPC count and seven parameters of glycemic variability (blood glucose standard deviation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, J index, M value, mean of daily differences, low blood glucose index, and high blood glucose index), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. We further analyzed the correlation between EPC count and the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in 24 patients. RESULTS: In study 1, the number of circulating CD34+ and CD34+CD133+ cells was significantly decreased in patients with type 1 diabetes relative to that in patients with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.020 and 0.036, respectively). In study 2, a univariate analysis showed that the J index was negatively correlated with logCD34+ (r = -0.342, p = 0.039). LogCD34+ was significantly negatively associated with the max IMT (r = -0.486, p = 0.012) and the mean IMT (r = -0.503, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the J index, which reflects both hyperglycemia and glycemic variability, is associated with a reduction in the EPC count, which might result in the progression of diabetic vascular complications.
ABSTRACT
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) is a distinct subtype of type 1 diabetes and is fatal without immediate diagnosis and treatment. At present, there are no biomarkers for early and predictive detection of FT1D. METHODS: First, we analyzed a total of 6 serum samples from 3 patients with FT1D (1 sample in the acute and 1 in the sub-acute phases from each patient) by seromic analysis. Second, titres of the antibody were measured by ELISA in sera from 30 patients with FT1D (both in the acute and sub-acute phases), 13 patients with FT1D in the chronic phase, 32 patients with autoimmune type 1 (type 1A) diabetes (T1AD), 30 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 23 patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and 31 healthy control subjects (HC). RESULTS: Seromic analysis revealed 9 antibodies which showed high signals from all 3 patients with FT1D in the acute phase. Among them, the titre of anti-CD300e antibody was significantly higher in FT1D patients in the acute phase than that in T1AD, T2D, AITD patients and HC, as determined by ELISA (P<0.01, respectively). The titre of anti-CD300e antibody was also higher in FT1D in the acute phase than that in the sub-acute phase (P = 0.0018, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The titre of anti-LGALS3 antibody in FT1D patients in the acute phase did not differ from that in patients with FT1D in the sub-acute phase, T1AD, T2D, AITD and HC. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The titre of a novel antibody, anti-CD300e, was high in sera from patients with FT1D. This antibody might be a diagnostic marker and provide new insight into the pathogenesis of FT1D.
