ABSTRACT
Objective: To present our strategy and the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted Barlow mitral valve keyhole surgery. Methods: From May 2015 to March 2022, a total of 1281 patients underwent mitral valve repair at our institution, including 763 with robotics surgeries. Of these, 124 patients with Barlow mitral valve (49 ± 12 years, male/female ratio = 81:43) were treated using robotic assistance and included in this study. Results: All operations were completed using 3 to 5 keyholes. Neochordae implantation using the loop technique was the first option, and resection was performed only in cases with an intrinsic risk of developing systolic anterior motion. Neochordae implantation was performed in 118 cases (95.1%) using 6.6 ± 3.0 neochordae. Posterior leaflet resection was performed in 27 (21.7%) patients. Operation time was 177 ± 42 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time was 127 ± 25 minutes, and aorta crossclamp time was 76 ± 16 minutes. Blood transfusion was required in 5 cases (4%). None of the patients required a conversion to valve replacement. The postoperative complications included bleeding (n = 4), stroke (n = 1), and infection (n = 2). Mitral valve regurgitation 1 week after repair was none or trivial in 122 cases (98.3%), mild in 2 cases (1.7%), and more than moderate in 0 cases. Freedom from reoperation was 99.2% during the follow-up period of 36 ± 21 months. One patient required reoperation due to infective endocarditis. Conclusions: Robot-assisted keyhole surgery using the loop-first concept was adequate to help achieve satisfactory and safe perioperative outcomes for Barlow mitral valve.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Precise diagnosis of mitral valve regurgitation is challenging, particularly for distinguishing between commissure leaflet prolapse and anterior leaflet perforation, based exclusively on 2-dimensional (2-D) imaging by transesophageal echocardiography. CASE 1: Two mitral regurgitation jets suggesting anterior leaflet perforation, but no regurgitation orifices, were observed in the mid esophageal (ME) 4-chamber view. Multiple 2-D and 3-dimensional (3-D) images revealed prolapse of the anterior (A3) leaflet and posterior commissure, not anterior leaflet perforation. CASE 2: A regurgitation jet suggesting an anterior leaflet prolapse with a regurgitation orifice was observed in ME long-axis view. Multiple 2-D and 3-D images showed only anterior commissure prolapse, but no signs of anterior leaflet perforation. CONCLUSIONS: A regurgitant jet caused by commissure leaflet prolapse closely resembles anterior leaflet perforation in 2-D imaging. Careful evaluation of multiple 2-D and 3-D images, as well as of the regurgitation orifices, is crucially important for making an accurate diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin sodium and nafamostat mesylate have long been used as anticoagulants in continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) where citrate is unavailable. This study aimed to determine whether heparin or nafamostat mesylate used during CKRT was associated with a longer filter life. METHODS: In this single-centre observational study, we included adult patients who required CKRT and used heparin or nafamostat mesylate for their first CKRT in the intensive care unit from September 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was filter life (from the start to the end of using the first filter). We used propensity score matching to adjust for the imbalance in patients' characteristics and laboratory data at the start of CKRT and compared the outcomes between the two groups. We also performed restricted mean survival time analysis to compare the filter survival times. RESULTS: We included 286 patients, 157 patients on heparin and 129 patients on nafamostat mesylate. After propensity score matching, the mean filter life with heparin was 1.58 days (N = 91, Standard deviation [SD], 1.52) and with nafamostat mesylate was 1.06 days (N = 91, SD, 0.94, p = 0.006). Multivariable regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors supported that heparin was associated with a longer filter life compared with nafamostat mesylate (regression coefficient, days, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.15, 0.89]). The between group difference of the restricted mean filter survival time in the matched cohort was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.07-0.50, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Compared to nafamostat mesylate, heparin was associated with one-third to one-half a day longer filter life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Adult , Humans , Heparin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation , Citric Acid/therapeutic use , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Renal Replacement TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiac herniation has been reported in thoracic trauma and after pneumonectomy; however, it is sporadic in cardiac surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old male patient underwent an elective totally endoscopic robotic-assisted mitral valve repair (TERMVR). His hemodynamics were stable after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, and no residual mitral valve regurgitation was observed. However, during suturing of the port wound, the patient developed hypotension, which improved with phenylephrine administration. Four-chamber transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images showed cardiac deformity, and postoperative chest radiography confirmed the dextrocardia. The cardiac herniation was repaired by deflating the left lung and over-inflating the right lung using a double-lumen tube, allowing selective ventilation without re-thoracotomy. The patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day without complications. CONCLUSIONS: This was a very unusual case of cardiac herniation during TERMVR visualized using distinct TEE images. The cardiac herniation was successfully repaired using a double-lumen tube without re-thoracotomy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Thrombosis is a common complication of the novel COVID-19. Pre-COVID-19 studies reported racial differences in the risk of developing thrombosis. This study aimed to describe the geographical variations in the reported incidences and outcomes of thromboembolic events and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. The final search for randomised clinical trials was carried out in January 2022. Screening eligible articles and data extraction were independently performed in duplicate by multiple reviewers. DESIGN: Scoping review. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Libraries were searched using terms related to COVID-19 and thromboembolism. SETTING: Hospitals all over the world. PARTICIPANTS: In-hospital patients with COVID-19. OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and the prophylactic anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: In total, 283 studies were eligible, representing (239 observational studies, 39 case series and 7 interventional studies). The incidence of DVT was the highest in Asia (40.8%) and hospital mortality was high (22.7%). However, the incidence of PE was not very high in Asia (3.2%). On the contrary, the incidence of PE was the highest in the Middle East (16.2%) and Europe (14. 6%). Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin was the main treatment provided in all areas. Four of the seven randomised clinical trials were conducted internationally. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DVT was the highest in Asia. The incidence of PE was higher in the Middle East and Europe; however, detection bias during the pandemic cannot be ruled out. There were no major differences in the type or dose of prophylactic anticoagulants used for thromboprophylaxis among the regions.