Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Ergon ; 117: 104238, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316071

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to establish an easy-to-use questionnaire for subjective evaluations of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) and visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic 3D (s3D) images. We reviewed previously used questionnaires and extracted 51 important subjective evaluation items from them. We then recruited 251 participants to observe 3D images designed to easily induce sickness or visual fatigue, and we asked them to respond to the 51 items. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, four factors were extracted according to their factor loadings, and the number of items was reduced to 21. Further processing by confirmatory factor analysis led to the selection of 15 items. Comparing mean ratings for each factor before and after item reduction indicated that item reduction did not significantly affect the participant responses. Therefore, the 15-item Visually Induced Symptoms Questionnaire (VISQ), can be used to evaluate VIMS and s3D visual fatigue.


Subject(s)
Asthenopia , Motion Sickness , Humans , Asthenopia/etiology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Motion Sickness/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Vision Res ; 47(15): 2067-75, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17574645

ABSTRACT

The cyclopean illusion is the apparent lateral shift of stationary stimuli on a visual axis that occurs when vergence changes. This illusion is predictable from the rules of visual direction. There are three stimulus situations reported in the literature, however, in which the illusion does not occur. In the three experiments reported here we examine those stimulus situations. Experiment 1 showed that an afterimage seen on a stimulus moving on the visual axis does not produce the illusion as reported in the literature but an afterimage seen on a screen does. Experiment 2 showed that the illusion occurs for an intermittently presented stimulus in contrast to what has been reported previously. Experiment 3 showed that a monocular stimulus presented against a random-dot background produced the illusion, also in contrast to what has been reported. The results were consistent with the rules of visual direction.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception/physiology , Optical Illusions/physiology , Afterimage , Female , Field Dependence-Independence , Fixation, Ocular/physiology , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...