Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 10, 2024 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the combined pathological risk factors (PRFs) to stratify low-risk (pT1-3N1) stage III colon cancer (CC), providing a basis for individualized treatment in the future. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PRFs for low-risk stage III CC were identified using COX model. Low-risk stage III CC was risk-grouped combining with PRFs, and survival analysis were performed using Kaplan-Meier. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases was used for external validation. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-two stage III CC patients were included with 634 (65.9%) as low risk and 328 (34.1%) as high risk. Poor differentiation (OS: P = 0.048; DFS: P = 0.011), perineural invasion (OS: P = 0.003; DFS: P < 0.001) and tumor deposits (OS: P = 0.012; DFS: P = 0.003) were identified as PRFs. The prognosis of low-risk CC combined with 2 PRFs (OS: HR = 3.871, 95%CI, 2.004-7.479, P < 0.001; DFS: HR = 3.479, 95%CI, 2.158-5.610, P < 0.001) or 3 PRFs (OS: HR = 5.915, 95%CI, 1.953-17.420, P = 0.002; DFS: HR = 5.915, 95%CI, 2.623-13.335, P < 0.001) was similar to that of high-risk CC (OS: HR = 3.927, 95%CI, 2.317-6.656, P < 0.001; DFS: HR = 4.132, 95%CI, 2.858-5.974, P < 0.001). In the SEER database, 18,547 CC patients were enrolled with 10,023 (54.0%) as low risk and 8524 (46.0%) as high risk. Low-risk CC combined with 2 PRFs (OS: HR = 1.857, 95%CI, 1.613-2.139, P < 0.001) was similar to that of high-risk CC without PRFs (HR = 1.876, 95%CI, 1.731-2.033, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Combined PRFs improved the risk stratification of low-risk stage III CC, which could reduce the incidence of undertreatment and guide adjuvant chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Assessment , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(1): 141-151, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of endoscopic obstruction (eOB) on the survival of stage II colon cancer patients and the role of eOB in guiding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of stage II colon cancer are little known. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients who had undergone curative surgery and preoperative colonoscope for stage II colon carcinoma were included. The eOB was defined as severe luminal colon obstruction that prevented the standard colonoscope from passing beyond the tumor. The association between eOB and stage II colon cancer survival and the predictive role of eOB for adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 1102 included patients, 616 (55.9%) had eOB and 486 (44.1%) had no eOB. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range, 38-68 months). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with eOB had poor 5-year overall survival (OS; 85.3% vs. 95.3%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without eOB. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS; 78.5% vs. 87.6%, p = 0.004) was also poor in these patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated eOB was a significant prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.531, p < 0.001), but not for DFS (p = 0.081). Even when patients with clinical colonic obstruction were excluded from the population with eOB, the worse OS (HR = 2.262, p = 0.001) was observed. The OS and DFS of eOB patients improved slightly after adjuvant chemotherapy, but there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Stage II colon cancer patients with eOB have a poor prognosis. However, whether eOB can guide adjuvant chemotherapy still needs further study.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
4.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) ; 10: goac020, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35711715

ABSTRACT

Background: The impact of the preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level on the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing primary tumor resection (PTR) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients with and without an elevated preoperative CA125 level. Methods: All metastatic CRC patients receiving PTR between 2007 and 2017 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were retrospectively included. OS and CSS rates were compared between patients with and without elevated preoperative CA125 levels. Results: Among 326 patients examined, 46 (14.1%) exhibited elevated preoperative CA125 levels and the remaining 280 (85.9%) had normal preoperative CA125 levels. Patients with elevated preoperative CA125 levels had lower body mass index, lower preoperative albumin level, lower proportion of preoperative chemotherapy, higher carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, poorer differentiation, and more malignant histopathological type than patients with normal preoperative CA125 levels. In addition, patients with elevated preoperative CA125 levels exhibited more advanced pathological T and N stages, more peritoneal metastasis, and more vessel invasion than patients with normal preoperative CA125 levels. Moreover, the primary tumor was more likely to be located at the colon rather than at the rectum in patients with elevated CA125 levels. Both OS and CSS rates in patients with elevated preoperative CA125 levels were significantly lower than those in patients with normal preoperative CA125 levels. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that an elevated preoperative CA125 level was significantly associated with poor prognosis in metastatic CRC patients undergoing PTR. The hazard ratio (HR) in OS was 2.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-3.33, P < 0.001) and the HR in CSS was 2.50 (95% CI, 1.77-3.55, P < 0.001). The survival analysis stratified by peritoneal metastasis also demonstrated that patients with elevated preoperative CA125 levels had lower OS and CSS rates regardless of peritoneal metastasis. Conclusion: Based on an analysis of metastatic CRC patients undergoing PTR, an elevated preoperative CA125 level was associated with poor prognosis, which should be taken into consideration in clinical practice.

5.
J Surg Oncol ; 126(4): 757-771, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35661159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonmetastatic pT3-4 colon cancers are prone to develop metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (mPC). Risk factors for mPC and the influence of mutant kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS)/neuroblastoma rat sarcoma (NRAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status on mPC remain to be described in these patients. METHOD: All enrolled patients were identified from the prospectively collected colorectal cancer database of a tertiary referral hospital between 2013 and 2018. Multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with mPC. RESULTS: Of the 1689 patients with nonmetastatic pT3-4 colon carcinoma, 8.4% (142/1689) progressed to mPC. Endoscopic obstruction (HR = 3.044, p < 0.001), elevated CA125 (HR = 1.795, p = 0.009), pT (T4a vs. T3, HR = 2.745, p < 0.001; T4b vs. T3, HR = 3.167, p = 0.001), pN (N1 vs. N0, HR = 2.592, p < 0.001; N2 vs. N0, HR = 4.049, p < 0.001), less than 12 lymph nodes harvested (HR = 2.588, p < 0.001), mucinous or signet ring cell carcinoma (HR = 1.648, p = 0.038), perineural invasion (HR = 1.984, p < 0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.522, p = 0.039) were strongly related to mPC but that mutant KRAS/NRAS/BRAF and MMR status was not associated with mPC. CONCLUSION: This study identified the high-risk factors for mPC in patients with nonmetastatic pT3-4 colon carcinoma, and these factors should be considered in selective preventive therapy and close follow-up for patients subsequently deemed to have high risk for mPC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell , Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Animals , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Mice , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Peritoneal Neoplasms/genetics , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...