Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Coll Surg ; 234(5): 964-968, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426413

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: The robotic platform offers many benefits to patients and surgeons; however, incorporating this new surgical tool has also introduced challenges in intraoperative documentation accuracy. In 2019, we began to investigate our institution's robotic intraoperative supply documentation accuracy. We identified a 60% case error rate between the robotic items logged by the operating room staff in the electronic medical record and the true robotic items used for a case as logged on the Intuitive platform. This can be a widespread and unrecognized problem for other organizations as well. We then addressed this problem through patient safety and quality improvement-based interventions including error notification to operating room personnel, a barcode scanning system, peer-to-peer education, improving robotic item descriptions, and procedure receipt messaging. These interventions helped us decrease our institution's case error rate from 60% to 16.9% during the past 2 years, which generated a cumulative 2.1% net increase in our billed robotic items, through the addition and/or subtraction of robotic items from each case. Through our multiple interventions, we have created a robust, flexible, and efficient item-capturing system for robotic surgery cases.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Surgeons , Documentation , Humans , Patient Safety , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 233(6): 710-721, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34530125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As operating room (OR) expenditures increase, faculty and surgical trainees will play a key role in curbing future costs. However, supply cost utilization varies widely among providers and, despite requirements for cost education during surgical training, little is known about trainees' comfort discussing these topics. To improve OR cost transparency, our institution began delivering real-time supply "receipts" to faculty and trainees after each surgical case. This study compares faculty and surgical trainees' perceptions about supply receipts and their effect on individual practice and cultural change. STUDY DESIGN: Faculty and surgical trainees (residents and fellows) from all adult surgical specialties at a large academic center were emailed separate surveys. RESULTS: A total of 120 faculty (30.0% response rate) and 119 trainees (35.7% response rate) completed the survey. Compared with trainees, faculty are more confident discussing OR costs (p < 0.001). Two-thirds of trainees report discussing OR costs with faculty as opposed to 77.0% of faculty who acknowledge having these conversations (p = 0.08). Both groups showed a strong commitment to reduce OR expenditures, with 87.3% of faculty and 90.0% of trainees expressing a responsibility to curb OR costs (p = 0.84). After 1 year of implementation, faculty continue to have high interest levels in supply receipts (82.4%) and many surgeons review them after each case (67.7%). In addition, 74.3% of faculty are now aware of how to lower OR costs and 52.5% have changed the OR supplies they use. Trainees, in particular, desire additional cost-reducing efforts at our institution (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Supply receipts have been well received and have led to meaningful cultural changes. However, trainees are less confident discussing these issues and desire a greater emphasis on OR cost in their curriculum.


Subject(s)
Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Operating Rooms/economics , Specialties, Surgical/education , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Clinical Competence , Cost Savings , Humans , Internship and Residency/economics , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Specialties, Surgical/economics , Surgeons/economics , Surgeons/education , Surgical Equipment/economics , Surgical Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 231(2): 275-280, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353399

ABSTRACT

Personal protective equipment (PPE) has been an invaluable yet limited resource when it comes to protecting healthcare workers against infection during the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. In the US, N95 respirator supply chains are severely strained and conservation strategies are needed. A multidisciplinary team at the Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Jewish Hospital, and BJC Healthcare was formed to implement a program to disinfect N95 respirators. The process described extends the life of N95 respirators using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) disinfection and allows healthcare workers to retain their own N95 respirator across a large metropolitan healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hydrogen Peroxide/chemistry , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Masks/virology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Academic Medical Centers , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Masks/supply & distribution , Missouri/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...