Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Soc Sci Med ; 356: 117129, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39059130

ABSTRACT

Flexible working time arrangements (FWTA) have increased over the last decades, favored by labor market deregulation, the decentralization of collective bargaining and the development of new technologies. The negative impact of some non-standard working hours on health (like night work, shift work) is quite well-known but other forms of FWTA have been studied less so far. This article aims to investigate the relationship between FWTA and workers' health. It focuses on employer-oriented FWTA and uses a job demands-control framework to identify different types of working time demands and control. The study uses individual data from the French working conditions survey, including panel data from 2013 to 2019 (64,981 observations) and cross-sectional employer-employee linked data from 2019 (5687 employees from 4672 workplaces). We identify empirically two main dimensions of employer-oriented FWTA, based on 14 working time variables. The first type involves "atypical working hours", such as working weekends, nights, early mornings, evenings, or doing shift work. The second type - "work overflow" - is characterized by long working hours, overtime, taking work home, and having variable working hours. Using a fixed-effects model based on panel data, we show that both types of FWTA have a negative impact on workers' self-rated general health and mental health, as measured by the WHO-5 index. The study also finds that workers who have more control - both individual and collective - to face these demands demonstrate better health. Workers with control over their working hours report better health and are less negatively affected by FWTA. Moreover, workplace-level practices have ambiguous relationships with workers' health. However, those involving social dialogue and workers' participation have more favorable effects: the positive effect of health and safety committees is especially clear. To improve workers' health in the context of increased flexible working time arrangements, public policies should promote the development of control over working time and participation of workers to social dialogue on working time related issues.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health , Work Schedule Tolerance , Humans , France , Adult , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Workplace/standards , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Employment/statistics & numerical data
2.
Soc Sci Med ; 350: 116919, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Telework was massively adopted during the COVID-19 crisis. Related changes in working conditions may have affected women's and men's health differently due to the gendered division of work. Our study aimed to assess the gendered association of telework with physical and mental health outcomes one year after the onset of the pandemic and to determine whether the pathways of working conditions underlying these associations are gender-related. METHODS: We compared pre-pandemic and Covid-crisis work contexts using a large representative sample of French employees surveyed in early 2021. We identified potential work-related mediators of the relationship between telework and well-being, i.e., change in autonomy, low support, work overload, digital issues, atypical working time, meaning at work, and work-life balance, and used multiple-matching and adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: All things being equal, the health and well-being of teleworkers were, on average, less favourable than that of on-site workers, with little gender differences. The selected working conditions mediated a substantial part of the relationship, indicating that important pathways were captured, such as meaning at work. These pathways partly differed between women and men. In particular, in new teleworkers, the largest contributions came from digital issues for women, and from low support at work and work overload for men. CONCLUSION: People who teleworked during the pandemic were at higher odds of deterioration of health and well-being than onsite workers. Health patterns were similar among male and female teleworkers; however, the pathways differed. These negative effects may yet have been absorbed once the government pandemic response became less stringent.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Teleworking , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Male , Adult , France/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Mental Health , Workplace/psychology , Work-Life Balance , Health Status , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workload/psychology , Working Conditions
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL