Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(1): 83-91, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32924644

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of aspirin in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have suggested the risk of aspirin may outweigh its benefit in individuals once thought to be candidates for aspirin therapy. These results led to the publication of updated guideline recommendations in 2019 for aspirin use in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA). AREAS COVERED: Recent clinical trials and guidelines relevant to aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD were identified using PubMed® (July 1, 2016 to April 1, 2019). Studies were limited to randomized, controlled clinical trials. The most current clinical practice guidelines were prioritized. EXPERT OPINION: Recent clinical trials demonstrated an increased risk of bleeding associated with aspirin use, which often outweighed cardiovascular risk reduction. In light of this new evidence, the ACC/AHA guidelines recommend aspirin for primary prevention in patients 40-70 years of age at a high ASCVD risk and low bleeding risk, who are unable to optimally control modifiable ASCVD risk factors.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , American Heart Association , Humans , Middle Aged , Primary Prevention , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , United States
2.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(8): ajpe7805, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32934385

ABSTRACT

Objective. To develop, implement, and evaluate a co-curricular activity in which second-year Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students developed an idea for a new clinical pharmacy service. Methods. A brief co-curricular activity based on the television series SharkTank was developed to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship. Second-year pharmacy students worked in assigned teams and were allowed one hour to develop an innovative clinical service to solve a pharmacy-related problem. Students then "pitched" their idea to a panel of four faculty members who served as the "sharks" and graded the teams using a rubric. The rubric which was employed was mapped to the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) Educational Outcomes. A pre- and post-activity survey was administered to students to gather information about changes in their perceptions of innovation and entrepreneurship in pharmacy. Results. Student groups received higher scores on their ability to present background information and the need for their clinical service and lower scores in areas such as tracking outcomes and predicting challenges. On the post-activity survey, 96.7% of students agreed that the activity gave them a better understanding of pharmacists' roles in establishing new clinical services, and 86.7% stated they intend to actively seek out new clinical pharmacy service opportunities in their future career. Conclusion. Results of the survey demonstrate that students understand the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship in pharmacy practice, and almost all students felt that the activity gave them an even better understanding of the pharmacist's role in clinical service development. This activity can serve as a blueprint for schools of pharmacy looking to incorporate creative and fun methods of exposing PharmD students to innovation and entrepreneurship activities.


Subject(s)
Curriculum/statistics & numerical data , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Education, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Entrepreneurship/statistics & numerical data , Students, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Creativity , Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(8): 1615-1625, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31062225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common malady in women. Numerous nonsurgical treatments are available, each associated with risk of adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We systematically reviewed nonsurgical interventions for urgency, stress, or mixed UI in women, focusing on AEs. We searched MEDLINE®, Cochrane Central Trials Registry, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase® through December 4, 2017. We included comparative studies and single-group studies with at least 50 women. Abstracts were screened independently in duplicate. One researcher extracted study characteristics and results with verification by another independent researcher. When at least four studies of a given intervention reported the same AE, we conducted random effects model meta-analyses of proportions. We also assessed the strength of evidence. RESULTS: There is low strength of evidence that AEs are rare with behavioral therapies and neuromodulation, and that periurethral bulking agents may result in erosion and increase the risk of voiding dysfunction. High strength of evidence finds that anticholinergics and alpha agonists are associated with high rates of dry mouth and constitutional effects such as fatigue and gastrointestinal complaints. Onabotulinum toxin A (BTX) is also associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and voiding dysfunction (moderate strength of evidence). DISCUSSION: Behavioral therapies and neuromodulation have low risk of AEs. Anticholinergics and alpha agonists have high rates of dry mouth and constitutional effects. BTX is associated with UTIs and voiding dysfunction. Periurethral bulking agents are associated with erosion and voiding dysfunction. These AEs should be considered when selecting appropriate UI treatment options. AE reporting is inconsistent and AE rates across studies tended to vary widely. Trials should report AEs more consistently.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Conservative Treatment/methods , Female , Humans
5.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 12(4): e004942, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31002274

ABSTRACT

Background Secondary prevention medications are often not prescribed to frail, older adults following acute myocardial infarction, potentially because of the absence of data to support use, perceived lack of benefit, and concern over possible harms. We examined the effect of using more guideline-recommended medications after myocardial infarction on mortality, rehospitalization, and functional decline in the frailest and oldest segment of the US population-long-stay nursing home residents. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing home residents aged ≥65 years using 2007 to 2010 national US Minimum Data Set clinical assessment data and Medicare claims. Exposure was the number of secondary prevention medications (antiplatelets, ß-blockers, statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) initiated after myocardial infarction. Outcomes were 90-day death, rehospitalization, and functional decline. We compared outcomes for new users of 2 versus 1 and 3 or 4 versus 1 medications using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted odds ratios with 95% CI. The cohort comprised 4787 residents, with a total of 509 death, 820 functional decline, and 1226 rehospitalization events. Compared with individuals who initiated 1 medication, mortality odds ratios were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.79-1.22) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.97) for users of 2 and 3 or 4 medications, respectively. Rehospitalization odds ratios were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85-1.17) for 2 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.8-1.17) for 3 or 4 medications. Functional decline odds ratios were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.85-1.28) for 2 and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.89-1.40) for 3 or 4 medications. In a stability analysis excluding antiplatelet drugs from the exposure definition, more medication use was associated with functional decline. Conclusions Use of more guideline-recommended medications after myocardial infarction was associated with decreased mortality in older, predominantly frail adults, but no difference in rehospitalization. Results for functional decline from the main and stability analyses were discordant and did not rule out an increased risk associated with more medication use.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Frail Elderly , Frailty/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Drug Utilization , Female , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/mortality , Geriatric Assessment , Homes for the Aged , Humans , Male , Medicare , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Nursing Homes , Protective Factors , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
6.
Ann Pharmacother ; 53(9): 947-953, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907116

ABSTRACT

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of baricitinib, a recently approved selective Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and explore its potential role in therapy. Data Sources: Articles were identified using a PubMed search from inception through January 2019 using the terms rheumatoid arthritis, Olumiant, baricitinib, and LY3009104, its molecular name. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles relating to randomized clinical trials, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of baricitinib were evaluated. Data Synthesis: Baricitinib exerts its effects by inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes, targeting cytokine and growth factor receptor stimulation, thus reducing downstream immune cell function. Four trials have demonstrated the efficacy of baricitinib with or without methotrexate in patients naïve to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and those who had an inadequate response to or intolerance to both conventional and biological DMARDs. Furthermore, baricitinib was associated with delayed radiographic progression. Despite baricitinib 4 mg often demonstrating greater efficacy compared with the 2 mg dose, only the 2 mg dose is Food and Drug Administration approved because of safety concerns with the 4 mg dose, primarily thromboembolism. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Baricitinib provides an oral treatment option for patients failing tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Safety, cost, and comparative effectiveness to tofacitinib should be considered prior to prescribing baricitinib. Conclusion: Baricitinib is the second medication in its class and has been proven efficacious for the treatment of RA. Given concerns for adverse effects associated with baricitinib, it should be reserved for patients who have failed one or more TNFis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Azetidines/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Azetidines/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Male , Purines , Pyrazoles , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL