ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Low voltage areas (LVA) are pivotal in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathogenesis, influencing local left atrial LA excitation and perpetuating AF occurrences. While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryo-balloon (CB) ablation is effective for AF, it doesn't provide insights into the LA substrate or detect LVA, which affects ablation success rates. This study examines whether LA voltage and LVAs can be anticipated by analyzing the voltage signal amplitude at the coronary sinus (CS) catheter, which is standard in CB and radiofrequency ablation procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 284 patients with recurrent AF undergoing RF catheter ablation was conducted at a high-volume EP center in Germany. The correlation between LA voltage and LVA with the CS signal was explored. RESULTS: The signal amplitude in the CS significantly correlated with voltage in LA walls, particularly in the proximal CS (correlation coefficient ρ = 0.81, p < 0.001). A CS signal cut-off of 1.155 mV effectively predicted severe atrial LVAs (>40%) with a sensitivity of 90.7% and a specificity of 100%. While a threshold of 1.945 mV identified patients with no significant atrial LVAs (<5%) with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 50% (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CS signal amplitude is associated with the LA voltage. Due to its potential as a diagnostic tool for atrial LVAs, the signal amplitude in the CS could provide valuable information about the LA substrate, especially when 3D mapping is not feasible.
ABSTRACT
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers atrial remodeling, impacting atrial function and ablation efficacy. This remodeling leads to atrial cardiomyopathy and dilatation, linked to mitral regurgitation, forming atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR). Our study explores the relationship between early-stage-aFMR and the atrial electrical architecture, focusing on left atrial bipolar voltage and low-voltage areas (LVAs) in AF patients. Methods: We enrolled 282 patients undergoing redo-PVI after AF recurrence post-PVI. Echocardiography was performed prior to ablation, and only patients with no, mild, or mild-to-moderate aFMR were included. Ablation used radiofrequency and a 3D mapping system, with atrial voltage documented on each atrial wall. LVAs were calculated using high-density maps, and patients were followed for 15 months. Results: Significant differences in left atrial voltage and LVA extent were observed based on aFMR severity. Patients with aFMR 1 + had significantly lower atrial voltage compared to no-aFMR, but no significant increase in LVAs. Patients with aFMR 2 + showed lower voltage amplitudes in all atrial regions and larger LVAs compared to no-aFMR patients. AF recurrence was significantly higher in the aFMR group (62.9% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.027) within 1 year. aFMR was associated with AF recurrence after adjusting for sex, age, and AF types (HR: 1.517, 95% CI: 1.057-2.184, p = 0.025). Conclusion: aFMR in AF patients may indicate progressive atrial remodeling and left atrial cardiomyopathy, characterized by reduced atrial voltage and increased LVAs. aFMR is linked to PVI outcomes, suggesting its consideration in AF therapy decision-making.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy plays an important role in determining the outcome of ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Two main methods are being used for the evaluation of fibrosis: voltage-based high-density (HD) electroanatomical mapping (EAM) and late gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI). The comparability between both methods in detecting fibrosis has not been systematically investigated. METHODS: LGE-MRIs of the left atrium (LA) were performed in 21 patients. LA-fibrosis was evaluated using a custom-designed software generating a 3D-model of the LA. HD-electroanatomical maps were recorded in each patient. After processing the maps and the MRI models by excluding the mitral valve, pulmonary veins, and the left atrial appendage, the LGE areas were measured and compared to the low voltage areas (LVA) in the HD maps using three different cutoff values of 0.5 mV, 0.7 mV, and 1.0 mV. RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant differences between EAM and LGE-MRI in assessing LA-fibrosis at 0.5-mV (for anterior and posterior walls) and 1.0-mV cutoffs (for anterior and posterior wall and septum). However, no significant differences were found between EAM and LGE-MRI when using a 0.7-mV cutoff for all the investigated areas. CONCLUSIONS: A voltage cutoff of 0.7 mV provided the best correlation between EAM and LGE MRI for detecting left atrial fibrosis. It supports the idea that a 0.5-mV cutoff may underestimate fibrosis, as areas with local signal voltages between 0.6 and 0.8 mV could also show LGE on MRI. Further research is needed to determine the ideal voltage cutoff for detecting left atrial fibrosis.