Surgical sexism in Canada: structural bias in reimbursement of surgical care for women.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that female physicians in Canada are reimbursed at lower rates than their male counterparts. To explore if a similar discrepancy exists in reimbursement for care provided to female and male patients, we addressed this question: Do Canadian provincial health insurers reimburse physicians at lower rates for surgical care provided to female patients than for similar care provided to male patients? METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, we generated a list of procedures performed on female patients, which we paired with equivalent procedures performed on male patients. We then collected data from provincial fee schedules for comparison. RESULTS: In 8 out of 11 Canadian provinces and territories studied, we found that surgeons were reimbursed at significantly lower rates (28.1% [standard deviation 11.1%]) for procedures performed on female patients than for similar procedures performed on male patients. CONCLUSION: The lower reimbursement of the surgical care of female patients than for similar care provided to male patients represents double discrimination against both female physicians and their female patients, as female providers predominate in obstetrics and gynecology. We hope our analysis will catalyze recognition and meaningful change to address this systematic inequity, which both disadvantages female physicians and threatens the quality of care for Canadian women.

Associations between perceptions of shared decision making and health among hysterectomy patients: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient and clinical factors that are associated with perceptions of shared decision making between hysterectomy patients and surgeons and to evaluate associations between shared decision making and postoperative health. METHODS: This study is based on a prospective cohort scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions in Vancouver, Canada. Validated patient-reported outcomes assessed shared decision making, pelvic health, depression, and pain. Regression analyses measured the association between perceptions of shared decision making with patient and clinical factors. Then, associations between shared decision making with postoperative pelvic health, pain and depression were evaluated using regression analysis and adjusted for patient and clinical factors. RESULTS: In this study, 308 participants completed preoperative measures, and a subset of 146 participants also completed the postoperative measures. More than 50% of participants reported less than optimal shared decision making scores. No significant associations were identified between patients' perceptions of shared decision making with patients' age, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, indication for surgery, or preoperative depression and pain. Regression analyses found that higher/better self-reported shared decision making scores were associated with fewer postoperative pelvic organ symptoms (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Many patients' reporting lower than optimal scores on the shared decision making instrument highlight the opportunity to improve surgeon-patient communication in this surgical cohort. Strengthening shared decision making between surgeons and their patients may be associated with improved self-reported postoperative health.

A comparison of patient-reported outcomes among Canadian women having hysterectomies.

PURPOSE: Many indications for hysterectomy can negatively affect patients' quality of life. This study uses patient-reported outcomes to measure changes in self-reported health among hysterectomy patients. METHOD: A prospective cohort of 294 hysterectomy patients completed patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and six months postoperatively in Vancouver, Canada. Patient-reported outcomes measured pelvic health, sexual function, pain, and depression. Changes in health were compared with paired t-tests, and multi-variable regression analysis measured associations between patient and clinical factors with postoperative outcomes RESULTS: Many patients reported improvements in health. Unadjusted analysis found that 65% of participants reported less pelvic distress, 55% reported less pain, and 47% reported less depression symptoms postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis found that poorer preoperative health was associated with poorer postoperative outcomes in all domains of health measured (p-value < 0.01). Postoperative pain scores were lower (less pain) by 0.78 among residents of the most affluent neighborhoods (p-value = 0.02) compared to those in less affluent neighborhoods. Postoperative depression scores were 1.58 points worse among participants with endometriosis (p-value = 0.03) and 1.02 points worse among participants having abdominal surgery (p-value = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Many participants reported improvements in pelvic symptoms, pain, and depression after hysterectomy. Lower socioeconomic status patients may be at risk for reporting higher pain after surgery, and endometriosis patients may report higher depression. Further investigation is needed to determine effective interventions for the higher postoperative pain observed in this study for residents of less affluent neighborhoods.

Increasing the Technicity Index to 92% in a Community Hospital: A 5-Year Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the observed trends in hysterectomy routes at Langley Memorial Hospital (LMH) in Langley, British Columbia, over 5 consecutive years. Associations between patient characteristics and surgical approach were explored, and approach-based surgical outcomes were evaluated using the institutional technicity index (TI), defined as the ratio of hysterectomies performed by minimally invasive surgery to all hysterectomies. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study involving 706 women who underwent hysterectomy at LMH between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 by six full-time surgeons was performed. From the patient characteristics and surgical outcomes associated with the route of hysterectomy, the annual institutional and overall rates of hysterectomy by type were calculated according to the Canadian Task Force Classification II-2. RESULTS: The TI increased from 67% to 92% from 2012 to 2016. Specifically, the proportion of hysterectomies completed by a total laparoscopic approach increased from 37% to 78%, whereas hysterectomies performed by the abdominal or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal approach decreased from 32% to 8% and from 17% to 1%, respectively. Vaginal hysterectomy rates remained constant across the study period. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with significantly reduced surgical blood loss and decreased length of hospital stay, with no difference in surgical time compared with an open approach. CONCLUSIONS: As far as the study investigators are aware, the TI at LMH is among the highest reported to date in Canada. Potential contributing factors include well-trained and experienced gynaecologic surgeons, readily available peer-to-peer mentorship, certified gynaecologic assistance, dedicated surgical staff, and consistency in the operating room set-up. Hence, achieving a high TI in a community setting is feasible without increasing the risk of surgical complications or length of surgery.

Comparing technical dexterity of sleep-deprived versus intoxicated surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The evidence on the effect of sleep deprivation on the cognitive and motor skills of physicians in training is sparse and conflicting, and the evidence is nonexistent on surgeons in practice. Work-hour limitations based on these data have contributed to challenges in the quality of surgical education under the apprentice model, and as a result there is an increasing focus on competency-based education. Whereas the effects of alcohol intoxication on psychometric performance are well studied in many professions, the effects on performance in surgery are not well documented. To study the effects of sleep deprivation on the surgical performance of surgeons, we compared simulated the laparoscopic skills of staff gynecologists "under 2 conditions": sleep deprivation and ethanol intoxication. We hypothesized that the performance of unconsciously competent surgeons does not deteriorate postcall as it does under the influence of alcohol. METHODS: Nine experienced staff gynecologists performed 3 laparoscopic tasks in increasing order of difficulty (cup drop, rope passing, pegboard exchange) on a box trainer while sleep deprived (<3 hours in 24 hours) and subsequently when legally intoxicated (>0.08 mg/mL blood alcohol concentration). Three expert laparoscopic surgeons scored the anonymous clips online using Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills criteria: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, and efficiency. Data were analyzed by a mixed-design analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were large differences in mean performance between the tasks. With increasing task difficulty, mean scores became significantly (P < .05) poorer. For the easy tasks, the scores for sleep-deprived and intoxicated participants were similar for all variables except time. Surprisingly, participants took less time to complete the easy tasks when intoxicated. However, the most difficult task took less time but was performed significantly worse compared with being sleep deprived. Notably, the evaluators did not recognize a lack of competence for the easier tasks when intoxicated; incompetence surfaced only in the most difficult task. CONCLUSIONS: Being intoxicated hinders the performance of more difficult simulated laparoscopic tasks than being sleep deprived, yet surgeons were faster and performed better on simple tasks when intoxicated.

A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists.

BACKGROUND: Concern regarding the quality of surgical training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs is focusing attention on competency based education. Because open surgical skills cannot necessarily be translated into laparoscopic skills and with minimally invasive surgery becoming standard in operative gynecology, the discrepancy in training between obstetrics and gynecology will widen. Training on surgical simulators with virtual reality may improve surgical skills. However, before incorporation into training programs for gynecology residents the validity of such instruments needs to first be established. We sought to prove the construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator, the SurgicalSim(TM), by showing its ability to distinguish between surgeons with different laparoscopic experience. METHODS: Eleven gynecologic surgeons (experts) and 11 perinatologists (controls) completed 3 tasks on the simulator, and 10 performance parameters were compared. RESULTS: The experts performed faster, more efficiently, and with fewer errors, proving the construct validity of the SurgicalSim. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic virtual reality simulators can measure relevant surgical skills and so distinguish between subjects having different skill levels. Hence, these simulators could be integrated into gynecology resident endoscopic training and utilized for objective assessment. Second, the skills required for competency in obstetrics cannot necessarily be utilized for better performance in laparoscopic gynecology.