ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses technologies recapitulating four dimensions of human intelligence, i.e. sensing, thinking, acting and learning. The convergence of technological advances in those fields allows to integrate massive data and build probabilistic models of a problem. The latter can be continuously updated by incorporating new data to inform decision-making and predict the future. In support of drug discovery and development, AI allows to generate disease models using data obtained following extensive molecular profiling of patients. Given its superior computational power, AI can integrate those big multimodal data to generate models allowing: (i) to represent patient heterogeneity; and (ii) identify therapeutic targets with inferences of causality in the pathophysiology. Additional computational analyses can help identifying and optimizing drugs interacting with these targets, or even repurposing existing molecules for a new indication. AI-based modeling further supports the identification of biomarkers of efficacy, the selection of appropriate combination therapies and the design of innovative clinical studies with virtual placebo groups. The convergence of biotechnologies, drug sciences and AI is fostering the emergence of a computational precision medicine predicted to yield therapies or preventive measures precisely tailored to patient characteristics in terms of their physiology, disease features and environmental risk exposure.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Precision Medicine , Drug Development , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accurate allergen quantification is needed to document the consistency of allergen extracts used for immunotherapy. Herein, we characterize the epitope specificities of two monoclonal antibodies used in an ELISA for the quantification of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1, established as a reference by the BSP090 European project. METHODS: The ability of mAbs 5B4 and 6H4 to recognize Bet v 1 isoforms was addressed by immunochromatography. The capacity of each mAb to compete with patients' IgE for binding to Bet v 1 was measured by ELISA inhibition. Epitope mapping was performed by pepscan analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, and hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The 5B4 epitope corresponds to a peptide sequence (I56-K68) overlapping with the binding sites of patients' serum IgEs. Mutation of residues P59, E60, and K65 abolishes 5B4 binding to Bet v 1 and reduces the level of IgE recognition. In contrast, 6H4 recognizes a conformational epitope lying opposite to the 5B4 binding site, involving residues located in segments I44-K55 and R70-F79. Substitution of E45 reduces the binding capacity of 6H4, confirming that it is critical for the interaction. Both mAbs interact with >90% of Bet v 1 content present in the birch pollen extract, while displaying a weak cross-reactivity with other allergens of the PR-10 family. CONCLUSIONS: MAbs 5B4 and 6H4 recognize structurally distinct epitopes present in the vast majority of Bet v 1 isoforms. These results support the relevance as a reference method of the Bet v 1-specific quantitative ELISA adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/standards , Epitope Mapping/methods , Allergens/immunology , Epitope Mapping/standards , Humans , Protein IsoformsABSTRACT
To date, the potency of allergen products in Europe is expressed in manufacturer-specific units relative to a product-specific in-house reference. Consequently, cross-product comparability of allergen products from different manufacturers with respect to strength and efficacy is impossible. The Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) project BSP090 addresses this issue via the establishment of reference standards in conjunction with ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Since the initiation of BSP090, the recombinant major allergen Bet v 1 has been adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission as a Chemical Reference Substance (CRS). In parallel, two sandwich ELISA systems for quantification of Bet v 1 were found suitable in preliminary phases of BSP090 to be validated in a large collaborative study. In this study, the candidate ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy, precision and variability. Thirteen participating laboratories tested model samples containing the CRS as well as spiked and unspiked birch pollen extracts. Both in pre-testing and in the collaborative study, the 2 candidate ELISA systems confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. As no clear-cut decision for one of the ELISA systems could be made based on the results of the collaborative study, a post-study testing was performed. Bet v 1 content of 30 birch pollen allergen products was determined in parallel in both ELISA systems. Consequently, 1 candidate ELISA system was selected to be proposed as the future European Pharmacopoeia standard method for Bet v 1 quantification.
Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Antigens, Plant/analysis , Biological Products/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Plant Proteins/analysis , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Biological Products/immunology , Biological Products/standards , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Europe , Humans , Plant Proteins/immunology , Plant Proteins/standards , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) relies on high doses of allergens to treat patients with type I allergies. Although SLIT is commonly performed without any adjuvant or delivery system, allergen(s) could be further formulated with allergen-presentation platforms to better target oral dendritic cells eliciting regulatory immune responses. Improving the availability of allergens to the immune system should enhance SLIT efficacy, while allowing to decrease allergen dosing. Herein, we present an overview of adjuvants and vector systems that have been, or could be, considered as candidate allergen-presentation platforms for the sublingual route. Such platforms encompass adjuvants capable of stimulating allergen-specific TH1 and/or regulatory CD4+ T-cell responses, including 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3, glucocorticoids, Toll-like receptor ligands as well as selected bacterial probiotic strains. A limiting factor for SLIT efficacy is the number of dendritic cells capturing the allergens in the upper layers of oral tissues. Thus, adsorption or encapsulation of the allergen(s) within mucoadhesive particulate vector (or delivery) systems also has the potential to significantly enhance SLIT efficacy due to a facilitated allergen uptake by tolerogenic oral dendritic cells.
Subject(s)
Allergens/therapeutic use , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Mouth Mucosa/immunology , Mouth/immunology , Sublingual Immunotherapy/methods , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Antigen Presentation , Cholecalciferol/analogs & derivatives , Cholecalciferol/immunology , Glucocorticoids/immunology , Humans , Probiotics/metabolism , Sublingual Immunotherapy/trends , Toll-Like Receptors/metabolismABSTRACT
In this review, we report on relevant current topics in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) which were broadly discussed during the first Aarhus Immunotherapy Symposium (Aarhus, Denmark) in December 2015 by leading clinicians, scientists and industry representatives in the field. The aim of this symposium was to highlight AIT-related aspects of public health, clinical efficacy evaluation, mechanisms, development of new biomarkers and an overview of novel therapeutic approaches. Allergy is a public health issue of high socioeconomic relevance, and development of evidence-based action plans to address allergy as a public health issue ought to be on national and regional agendas. The underlying mechanisms are in the focus of current research that lays the ground for innovative therapies. Standardization and harmonization of clinical endpoints in AIT trials as well as current knowledge about potential biomarkers have substantiated proof of effectiveness of this disease-modifying therapeutic option. Novel treatments such as peptide immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy and use of recombinant allergens herald a new age in which AIT may address treatment of allergy as a public health issue by reaching a large fraction of patients.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Biomarkers , Clinical Trials as Topic , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Disease Management , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Immune Tolerance , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The complement subunit C1q was recently identified as a marker for monocyte-derived regulatory dendritic cells supporting the differentiation of interleukin (IL)-10-secreting CD4+ T cells with a suppressive activity. Furthermore, C1q expression is upregulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of allergic patients in the course of successful allergen immunotherapy. Herein, we investigated a potential direct role of C1q in downregulating allergic inflammation. In mice with ovalbumin (OVA) or birch pollen (BP)-induced allergic asthma, C1q is as efficacious as dexamethasone to reduce both airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophil, and ILC2 infiltrates in bronchoalveolar lavages, as well as allergen-specific T helper 2 cells in the lungs. Administration of C1q does not expand IL-10+/Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in the lungs, spleen, or in the blood. Depletion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) abrogates the capacity of C1q to reduce AHR and eosinophilic infiltrates in OVA-sensitized mice. Also C1q treatment inhibits the activation of human and mouse pDCs by CpGs, thereby demonstrating a critical role for pDCs in the anti-inflammatory activity of C1q. We conclude that regulatory dendritic cells can mediate a potent direct anti-inflammatory activity via the expression and/or secretion of molecules such as C1q, independently of their capacity to expand the pool of regulatory T cells.
Subject(s)
Complement C1q/metabolism , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Eosinophils/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Lung/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Betula , Cells, Cultured , Complement C1q/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Interleukin-10/metabolism , Lymphocyte Activation , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Ovalbumin/immunology , Plant Extracts , Pollen/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090. METHODS: Two Bet v 1-specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method. RESULTS: In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA-A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA-B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of 'real-life' birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA-B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA-B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA-A. CONCLUSIONS: In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long-term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1-specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.
Subject(s)
Allergens , Antigens, Plant , Biological Products/standards , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Betula/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Understanding patterns of IgE sensitization in Dermatophagoides-allergic patients living in various geographical areas is necessary to design a product suitable for worldwide allergen immunotherapy (AIT). METHODS: Using a HIFI Allergy customized microarray assay, IgEs specific for 12 purified allergens from Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or D. farinae were assessed in sera from 1302 house dust mite (HDM)-allergic patients living in various areas. Comprehensive mass spectrometric (MS) analyses were conducted to characterize HDM extracts, as well as purified bodies and feces. RESULTS: Patterns of IgE reactivity to HDM allergens are comparable in all cohorts of patients analyzed, encompassing adults and 5- to 17-year-old children, as well as American, Canadian, European, and Japanese patients. Overall, >70% and >80% of HDM-allergic patients are sensitized to group 1 and group 2 allergens, respectively, from D. pteronyssinus and/or D. farinae species. Furthermore, 20-47% of patients also have IgEs to allergens from groups 4, 5, 7, 13, 15, 21, and 23. All patients have IgEs to allergens present in mite bodies and feces. MS-based analyses confirmed the presence of mite allergens recorded by IUIS in D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae extracts, with groups 2, 8, 10, 11, 14, and 20 prominent in bodies and groups 1, 6, 18, and 23 well represented in feces. CONCLUSIONS: Mite-specific AIT should rely upon a mixture of D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae extracts, manufactured from both feces and bodies. Such a combination is appropriate to treat children and adult Dermatophagoides-allergic patients from Asia, Europe, and North America.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens/isolation & purification , Animals , Antibody Specificity , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/isolation & purification , Child , Child, Preschool , Desensitization, Immunologic , Europe , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunization , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) applied to type I respiratory allergies is commonly performed with natural allergen extracts. Herein, we developed a sublingual tablet made of pharmaceutical-grade recombinant Bet v 1.0101 (rBet v 1) and investigated its clinical safety and efficacy in birch pollen (BP)-allergic patients. METHODS: Following expression in Escherichia coli and purification, rBet v 1 was characterized using chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, circular dichroism, mass spectrometry and crystallography. Safety and efficacy of rBet v 1 formulated as a sublingual tablet were assessed in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 483 patients with BP-induced rhinoconjunctivitis. RESULTS: In-depth characterization confirmed the intact product structure and high purity of GMP-grade rBet v 1. The crystal structure resolved at 1.2 Å documented the natural conformation of the molecule. Native or oxidized forms of rBet v 1 did not induce the production of any proinflammatory cytokine by blood dendritic cells or mononuclear cells. Bet v 1 tablets were well tolerated by patients, consistent with the known safety profile of SLIT. The average adjusted symptom scores were significantly decreased relative to placebo in patients receiving once daily for 5 months rBet v 1 tablets, with a mean difference of 17.0-17.7% relative to the group treated with placebo (P < 0.025), without any influence of the dose in the range (12.5-50 µg) tested. CONCLUSION: Recombinant Bet v 1 has been produced as a well-characterized pharmaceutical-grade biological drug. Sublingual administration of rBet v 1 tablets is safe and efficacious in patients with BP allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Recombinant Proteins , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens/chemistry , Allergens/genetics , Allergens/isolation & purification , Antigens, Plant/chemistry , Antigens, Plant/genetics , Antigens, Plant/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Molecular , Protein Conformation , Respiratory Function Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Sublingual Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A detailed characterization of human oral immune cells is needed to better understand local mechanisms associated with allergen capture following oral exposure. METHODS: Oral immune cells were characterized by immunohistology and immunofluorescence in biopsies obtained from three healthy individuals and 23 birch pollen-allergic patients with/without oral allergy syndrome (OAS), at baseline and after 5 months of sublingual allergen immunotherapy (AIT). RESULTS: Similar cell subsets (i.e., dendritic cells, mast cells, and T lymphocytes) were detected in oral tissues from healthy and birch pollen-allergic individuals. CD207+ Langerhans cells (LCs) and CD11c+ myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) were found in both the epithelium and the papillary layer of the Lamina propria (LP), whereas CD68+ macrophages, CD117+ mast cells, and CD4+ /CD8+ T cells were rather located in both the papillary and reticular layers of the LP. Patterns of oral immune cells were identical in patients with/without OAS, except lower numbers of CD207+ LCs found in oral tissues from patients with OAS, when compared to OAS- patients (P < 0.05). A 5-month sublingual AIT had a limited impact on oral immune cells, with only a significant increase in IgE+ cells in patients from the active group. Colocalization experiments confirmed that such IgE-expressing cells mostly encompass CD68+ macrophages located in the LP, and to a lesser extent CD207+ LCs in the epithelium. CONCLUSION: Two cell subsets contribute to antigen/allergen uptake in human oral tissues, including (i) CD207+ LCs possibly involved in the physiopathology of OAS and (ii) CD68+ macrophages likely critical in allergen capture via IgE-facilitated mechanisms during sublingual AIT.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigen-Presenting Cells/immunology , Betula , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Antigen-Presenting Cells/metabolism , Antigens, Surface/metabolism , Biomarkers , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gene Expression , Gingiva/immunology , Gingiva/metabolism , Gingiva/pathology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulin E/genetics , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Immunophenotyping , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Mast Cells/immunology , Mast Cells/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Syndrome , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/metabolismABSTRACT
There is an urgent need to identify environmental risk and protective factors in early life for the prevention of allergy. Our study demonstrates the presence of respiratory allergen from house dust mite, Der p 1, in human breast milk. Der p 1 in milk is immunoreactive, present in similar amounts as dietary egg antigen, and can be found in breast milk from diverse regions of the world. In a mouse model of asthma, oral exposure to Der p through breast milk strongly promotes sensitization rather than protect the progeny as we reported with egg antigen. These data highlight that antigen administration to the neonate through the oral route may contribute to child allergic sensitization and have important implications for the design of studies assessing early oral antigen exposure for allergic disease prevention. The up-to-now unknown worldwide presence of respiratory allergen in maternal milk allows new interpretation and design of environmental control epidemiological studies for allergic disease prevention.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Asthma/immunology , Milk, Human/immunology , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Arthropod Proteins/immunology , Colostrum/immunology , Cysteine Endopeptidases/immunology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), the relevance of changes in specific IgE and IgG antibody titres to treatment efficacy remains to be evaluated at an individual patient level. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether antibody responses can be used as biomarkers for SLIT efficacy. METHODS: Comprehensive quantitative, qualitative and functional analyses of allergen-specific IgA, IgE, IgG1-4 and IgM responses were performed using purified Phl p 1 to 12 allergens in sera, saliva and nasal secretions from 82 grass pollen allergic patients. These patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study and assessed in an allergen challenge chamber (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00619827). Antibody responses were monitored in parallel to clinical responses before and after daily sublingual treatment for 4 months with either a grass pollen or a placebo tablet. RESULTS: A significant mean improvement (i.e. 33-40.6%) in rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom scores was observed in SLIT recipients, irrespective of their baseline patterns of IgE sensitization (i.e. narrow, intermediate, broad) to grass pollen allergens. SLIT did not induce any de novo IgE sensitization. Clinical responders encompassed both immunoreactive patients who exhibited strong increases in titres, affinity and/or blocking activity of grass-pollen-specific IgGs (representing 17% of treated patients), as well as patients with no detectable antibody responses distinguishing them from the placebo group. No significant changes were detected in antibody titres in saliva and nasal washes, even in clinical responders. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sublingual immunotherapy with a grass pollen tablet is efficacious irrespective of the patients' baseline sensitization to either single or multiple grass pollen allergens. Seric IgG responses may contribute to SLIT-induced clinical tolerance in a fraction (i.e. 17%) of patients, but additional immune mechanisms are involved in most patients. Consequently, antibody responses cannot be used as a marker of SLIT efficacy at an individual patient level.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Poaceae/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Allergens/administration & dosage , Antibodies/blood , Antibodies/immunology , Antibodies/metabolism , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Respiratory Mucosa/immunology , Respiratory Mucosa/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/metabolism , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Relevant allergens are major contributors to the safety and efficacy of allergenic extracts used in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). As such, they should be accurately quantified, as recommended by the 2008 European guidelines on allergen products. Until now, the quantification of relevant allergens was mainly performed by using immunoassays (e.g. ELISA) that relying upon specific antibodies. Although antibody-based quantification is commonly used to assess the concentration of relevant allergens in allergenic extracts, results must be taken with caution in the light of the inherent limitations of such techniques. In the present study, we discuss how those limitations can be overcome by using comprehensive mass spectrometry-based techniques.
Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Desensitization, Immunologic , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surrogate biomarkers of efficacy are needed in support of allergen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to relate changes in peripheral CD4(+) T cell responses to clinical efficacy during sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: Allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 89 grass pollen-allergic individuals enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled SLIT study conducted in an allergen exposure chamber (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00619827). Surface phenotype, proliferative responses, cytokine production and gene expression were analysed in coded samples at baseline, and after 2 and 4 months of SLIT, in PBMCs after in vitro allergen stimulation or among MHC class II/peptide (pMHCII)-tetramer-positive CD4(+) T cells. RESULTS: SLIT induced a 29.3% improvement of the average rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score in the active group, when compared to the placebo group. In parallel, only minor changes in proportions of CD4(+) T cells expressing Th1 (CCR5(+), CXCR3(+)), Th2 (CRTh2(+), CCR4(+)) and Treg (CD25(+), CD127(-), Foxp3(+)) markers were detected. A down-regulation of IL-4 and IL-10 gene expression and IL-10 secretion (P < 0.001) were observed, as well as a decrease in the frequency of potential "pro-allergic" CD27(-) Th2 cells from patients receiving active tablets (P < 0.001), but without any correlation with clinical benefit. pMHCII-tetramer analyses failed to document any major impact in both numbers and polarization of circulating Phl p 1- and Phl p 5-specific CD4(+) T cells, confirming that early clinical improvement during SLIT is not associated with dramatic alterations in T lymphocyte responses. CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Changes in patterns of peripheral CD4(+) T cells are not markers for the early onset of efficacy during SLIT.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Plant Proteins/immunology , Poaceae/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Administration, Sublingual , Allergens/administration & dosage , Antigens, Plant/administration & dosage , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/immunology , Cytokines/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , Male , Plant Proteins/administration & dosage , Pollen/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on IgE neosensitization remains to be evaluated in large cohorts of patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the dynamics of antibody responses induced in patients with allergic rhinitis during a 12-month treatment with sublingual tablets of house dust mites (HDM) allergen extracts. METHODS: Antibody responses were assessed in relationship with neosensitization and clinical benefit in sera from 509 European house dust mite-allergic patients before and after 1 year of daily sublingual immunotherapy, using tablets containing Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus plus D farinae extracts or placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00674700). Patients were followed for one additional year after treatment cessation. IgE and IgG4 antibodies specific for mite extracts or purified group 1, 2 and 10 allergens were assessed using Immulite, Immunocap and ISAC assays. RESULTS: After 1 year of SLIT, mite-specific IgE and IgG4 titres increased by 1.5-fold and fourfold, respectively, in the active, but not in the placebo group. A strong IgG4 induction occurred in a subgroup (i.e. 10-15%) of "immunoreactive" patients, without any correlation with improvement in the average adjusted symptom score. Pre-existing IgE levels to purified mite allergens were not impacted during immunotherapy, and no de novo IgE responses to group 1, 2, 10 allergens were induced in patients who were unsensitized prior to immunotherapy. Similarly, no IgE neosensitization to wheat germ or yeast components used in the mite culture medium was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We document in a cohort of 509 patients followed over a 2-year period that SLIT does not induce any IgE neosensitization to allergens contained in the vaccine, such as groups 1, 2 as well as the food-related group 10 allergen. This observation further corroborates the safer safety profile of SLIT over SCIT.
Subject(s)
Dermatophagoides farinae/immunology , Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/therapy , Tablets/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) displays anti-inflammatory activities in many diseases. Subcutaneous administration of anti-IgE in humans provides benefit in severe persistent allergic asthma. Given the well established efficacy of sublingual allergen immunotherapy in respiratory type I allergies, we investigated the therapeutic potential of sublingual immunoglobulin (SLIG), most particularly anti-IgE SLIG, in a murine model of allergen-driven airway inflammation. METHODS: BALB/c mice sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) were treated sublingually with rat monoclonal IgG1 or IgG2a, either directed to mouse IgE or with no reported specificity. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was assessed by whole body plethysmography, and eosinophil infiltrates were characterized in bronchial alveolar lavages (BAL). OVA-specific antibody and T cell responses were analyzed in sera and saliva or lung and draining lymph nodes, by ELISA or CBA measurement of cytokine production, respectively. RESULTS: AHR and BAL eosinophil infiltrates were substantially decreased in mice treated sublingually with particulate OVA (positive control), as well as in animals receiving various rat IgG1, irrespective of their specificity for murine IgE. In contrast, no improvement was observed in mice treated with PBS (negative control) or various rat IgG2a. SLIG anti-inflammatory activity is not related to a downregulation of Th2, Th17 or an induction of Foxp3(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cell responses. Mass spectrometry analysis of glycan moieties, such as sialic acid, suggests that the differential efficacy of rat IgG1 and IgG2a is not related to their capacity to interact with lectins borne by oral immune cells. CONCLUSIONS: In a murine model of allergen-driven airway inflammation, SLIG exhibits an anti-inflammatory activity irrespective of the immunoglobulin specificity, and in the absence of allergen. As a noninvasive approach, SLIG deserves to be further studied as a treatment for other inflammatory diseases beyond allergic asthma.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/administration & dosage , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulin G/administration & dosage , Immunotherapy/methods , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Administration, Sublingual , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/cytology , Eosinophils/immunology , Female , Humans , Lung/pathology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Ovalbumin/immunology , Plethysmography, Whole Body , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The potency of allergen extracts is determined as total allergenic activity without consideration of their composition and the units differ from one manufacturer to another, making it very difficult to compare the different products. Recently, purified major allergens have been obtained by recombinant DNA technology and produced under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions. In principle, such recombinant allergens could be established as reference standards and could help for the standardisation of the major allergen content of allergen extracts. Two recombinant major allergens, one from birch pollen, rBet v 1, and one from Timothy grass pollen, Phl p 5a, have been selected at the end of the CREATE programme as a potential starting point for the establishment as European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Reference Standards through a project run by the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). To this end, bulk candidate recombinant materials, produced under GMP conditions, were procured from two European manufacturers and subsequently formulated and lyophilised. Four ELISA systems from three different manufacturers were included in the project, two for Bet v 1 and two for Phl p 5a with the aim of establishing reference methods for determination of the respective major antigens both in natural allergen extracts as well as in recombinant allergen products. The project was run in 3 phases: a preparatory and preliminary testing phase (feasibility phase or Phase 1), an extended feasibility phase carried out in 3 laboratories (Phase 2) to confirm the transferability of the methods and an international collaborative study with a large number of participating laboratories (Phase 3). This article describes the work done in Phase 1 and Phase 2, i.e. the physico-chemical and biological characterisation of the recombinant candidate reference standards, the assessment of their suitability for the intended purpose as well as the evaluation of the candidate ELISA systems. The results show that both candidate reference standards are suitable for the intended purpose. In addition, three out of the four ELISA systems that were included in the preliminary phase were found to be appropriate for further evaluation in the collaborative study which was organised in 2011. The results of the collaborative study will be published separately.
Subject(s)
Allergens/chemistry , Antigens, Plant/chemistry , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Plant Proteins/standards , Pollen/chemistry , Allergens/genetics , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/genetics , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Basophils/drug effects , Basophils/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Escherichia coli/genetics , Feasibility Studies , Histamine Release/immunology , Humans , Plant Proteins/chemistry , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/immunology , Pollen/genetics , Pollen/immunology , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Allergen immunotherapy reorients inappropriate immune responses in allergic patients. Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) has been approved, notably in the European Union, as an effective alternative to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) for allergic rhinitis patients. Compared with SCIT, SLIT has a better safety profile. This is possibly because oral antigen-presenting cells (mostly Langerhans and myeloid dendritic cells) exhibit a tolerogenic phenotype, despite constant exposure to danger signals from food and microbes. This reduces the induction of pro-inflammatory immune responses leading to systemic allergic reactions. Oral tissues contain relatively few mast cells and eosinophils (mostly located in submucosal areas) and, in comparison with subcutaneous tissue, are less likely to give rise to anaphylactic reactions. SLIT-associated immune responses include the induction of circulating, allergen-specific Th1 and regulatory CD4+ T cells, leading to clinical tolerance. Although 40-75% of patients receiving SLIT experience mild, transient local reactions in the oral mucosa, these primary reactions rarely necessitate dose reduction or treatment interruption. We discuss 11 published case reports of anaphylaxis (all nonfatal) diagnosed according to the World Allergy Organization criteria and relate this figure to the approximately 1 billion SLIT doses administered worldwide since 2000. Anaphylaxis risk factors associated with SCIT and/or SLIT should be characterized further.
Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Mucosa/immunology , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Second generation therapeutic vaccines based upon recombinant allergens or natural extracts, potentially formulated in vector systems or adjuvants, are being developed. To this aim, preclinical studies in relevant animal models are needed to select proper allergens, formulations and administration schemes. OBJECTIVE: To develop a chronic house dust mite (HDM) allergy model to evaluate sublingual therapeutic vaccine candidates. METHODS: The BABL/c mice that were used were sensitized with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dpte) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Dfar) mite extracts by intraperitoneal injections followed by aerosol exposures. Animals subsequently underwent sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with either Dpte, Dfar or Dpte/Dfar extracts, twice a week for 8 weeks. SLIT efficacy was assessed by whole body plethysmography, lung histology and broncho-alveolar lavages cell counts. Specific T cell and antibody responses to major and minor HDM allergens were monitored in tissues and serum/saliva, respectively. RESULTS: Mice sensitized to Dpte and Dfar allergens exhibited strong airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and lung inflammatory infiltrates including eosinophils. Sensitized animals mounted Th2-biased cellular and humoral responses specific for group 1 and 2 major allergens, as well as group 5, 7 and 10 minor allergens. This phenotype was sustained for at least 2 months, allowing the evaluation of immunotherapeutic protocols with HDM extracts-based vaccines. In this model, SLIT decreased AHR and Th2 responses and induced HDM-specific IgAs in saliva. The Dpte/Dfar mix proved the most efficacious when compared to Dpte or Dfar extracts alone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The efficacy of a sublingual vaccine based on a Dpte/Dfar allergen extract mix was demonstrated in a well standardized murine model of chronic allergic airway inflammation based on clinically relevant mite allergens. The latter will be used as a benchmark for evaluation of future vaccines, including recombinant allergens. This HDM allergic airway inflammation animal model is a useful tool to design and select candidate vaccines to be tested in humans.