Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel as a first add-on therapy with different anti-seizure drugs.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) when administered as a first add-on therapy to patients with focal epilepsy or idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) taking one other antiseizure drug (ASD). METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, one-year observational study collected data from patients (≥12 years) who initiated treatment with PER as first add-on therapy. Patients had to be experiencing inadequate seizure control on ASD monotherapy and tried ≤3 ASD monotherapies before initiating PER. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for the number and type of previous seizures, duration and aetiology of epilepsy. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients included in the study (mean age 41 years; 54.4 % male), 118 (79.2 %) were still receiving PER as first add-on treatment after 12 months. Mean PER dose was 6.2 mg/day. At 12 months, 45.6 % were seizure-free and 84.6 % responders. A significant difference in seizure freedom rate was found between patients with IGE and patients with focal epilepsy, but not in responders. Reduced seizure control was observed when PER was administered with strong enzyme-inducing ASDs; conversely, increased seizure control was seen when the same dose of PER was combined with enzyme-inhibiting ASDs. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (15.4 %), irritability (14.1 %) and drowsiness (14.1 %); no differences in tolerance were observed among different combinations. CONCLUSION: PER demonstrated a good efficacy and safety profile when used as a first add-on therapy in patients who did not respond to monotherapy. PER dose adjustments may optimize seizure control when combined with strong enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting ASDs.

Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure-free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1-57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2-10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log-rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3-26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure-free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow-up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1-8.33, P = .046). SIGNIFICANCE: PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS.

Clinical outcomes of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for focal-onset seizures: A multicenter audit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients older than 16 years treated with ESL as first-line monotherapy or converted to ESL monotherapy from polytherapy or other monotherapy. Outcomes included 1-year retention rate, seizure-free rates after 6 and 12 months of monotherapy treatment, and safety/tolerability issues. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were included (106 first-line and 150 conversion to monotherapy; 56 patients aged >65 years). Overall, the 1-year retention rate was 79% (72.7% in the ≥65 years subgroup) and seizure-free rates at 6 and 12 months were 59.3% and 55.3% (72.2% and 67.3% in the ≥65 years subgroup), without significant differences when comparing first-line vs conversion-to-ESL monotherapy groups (P = .979). However, the conversion group was heterogeneous and included 43 (29.1%) patients that were seizure free the year prior ESL introduction. A substantially higher proportion of patients remained seizure free for the entire follow-up among those who initiated ESL due to tolerability problems compared with those treated due to inadequate seizure control (71.4% vs 37.3%). Overall, 62 of 256 (24.2%) patients reported AEs (39.3% in >65 years subgroup) and led to discontinuation in 20/256 (7.8%) patients (12.5% in >65 years subgroup). Commonly reported AEs were somnolence (6.6%), dizziness (6.3%), and headache (4.3%). Hyponatremia was recorded in five patients, the majority (4/5) of whom were older than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Eslicarbazepine acetate was effective and well-tolerated as first-line or conversion to monotherapy in a clinical setting in adult and elderly patients with focal-onset seizures.

Perampanel in routine clinical use in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: The 12-month GENERAL study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel across different seizure types in routine clinical care of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, 1-year observational study collected data from patient records at 21 specialist epilepsy units in Spain. All patients who were aged ≥12 years, prescribed perampanel before December 2016, and had a confirmed diagnosis of IGE were included. RESULTS: The population comprised 149 patients with IGE (60 with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 51 generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS] only, 21 juvenile absence epilepsy, 10 childhood absence epilepsy, 6 adulthood absence epilepsy, and one Jeavons syndrome). Mean age was 36 years. The retention rate at 12 months was 83% (124/149), and 4 mg was the most common dose. At 12 months, the seizure-free rate was 59% for all seizures (88/149); 63% for GTCS (72/115), 65% for myoclonic seizures (31/48), and 51% for absence seizures (24/47). Seizure frequency was reduced significantly at 12 months relative to baseline for GTCS (78%), myoclonic (65%), and absence seizures (48%). Increase from baseline seizure frequency was seen in 5.2% of patients with GTCS seizures, 6.3% with myoclonic, and 4.3% with absence seizures. Perampanel was effective regardless of epilepsy syndrome, concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and prior AEDs, but retention and seizure freedom were significantly higher when used as early add-on (after ≤2 prior AEDs) than late (≥3 prior AEDs). Adverse events were reported in 50% of patients over 12 months, mostly mild or moderate, and irritability (23%), somnolence (15%), and dizziness (14%) were most frequent. SIGNIFICANCE: In routine clinical care of patients with IGE, perampanel improved seizure outcomes for GTCS, myoclonic seizures, and absence seizures, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. This is the first real-world evidence with perampanel across different seizure types in IGE.

Effect of lacosamide on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with focal refractory epilepsy: A prospective multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is the main psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy with an estimated prevalence between 20% and 55% and one of the main determinants of quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lacosamide (LCM) on mood and anxiety symptoms in patients with focal onset seizures (FOS). The secondary objective was to evaluate if the potential modifications in variables were related to seizure control or to the intrinsic effect of LCM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study in 8 tertiary epilepsy centers in adults with FOS in which LCM was initiated as add-on therapy. Patients' mood and quality of life were evaluated through questionnaires and scales such as the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/T), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 (QOLIE-10). Initiation of psychotropic medication was not allowed during the observation period. Patients with diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder were excluded. Evaluations were scheduled before LCM treatment, at 3 and 6months. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included (51% female) with an average age of 39.5years (range 18-65). At the start of treatment with LCM, 65.3% of the patients were on treatment with one antiepileptic drug (AED). Based on BDI-II, 38.8% of patients had depressive symptoms and 46.9% according to HADS Depression (HADS-D), 63.3% of patients presented pathological levels of anxiety (STAI-S/T), and 44.9% according to HADS Anxiety (HADS-A). Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 showed that 57.1% of patients had a relevant reduction in their quality of life. After LCM, the score on the BDI-II depression scale decreased significantly (p<0.001). Based on the STAI and HADS-anxiety scales, patients who had a pathological anxiety at baseline, significantly improved. The QOLIE-10 improved significantly over the observation period (p<0.001). At 6months, 28.3% of patients were seizure-free (67.4% were responders). The improvements on depression and anxiety scores were not statistically related to seizure control. CONCLUSION: Lacosamide seems to have a positive effect on depressive and anxiety symptoms. Although the efficacy of LCM in seizure control was demonstrated, the antidepressant and anxiolytic effect on mood and anxiety seems to be an independent factor.

The prevalence of narcolepsy in Catalunya (Spain).

Previous studies have estimated an overall prevalence for narcolepsy between 15 and 70 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of narcolepsy in Catalunya (Catalonia), a north-east region of Spain (7 424 754 inhabitants), on 31 December 2014 by identifying all living subjects diagnosed with narcolepsy. First, we identified patients diagnosed by one of the 13 sleep, paediatric or neurological departments that perform tests regularly to diagnose narcolepsy. In a second phase, we searched for additional patients with narcolepsy in a clinical database of the primary health-care system. Clinical files were reviewed and narcolepsy diagnosis validated according to the Brighton Collaboration case definitions. Three hundred and twenty-five patients had a validated diagnosis of narcolepsy in the specialized centres (mean age: 44.6 years, range: 6-89; male: 60.3%; 85% with narcolepsy type 1), including 17.8% cases in Brighton, definition level 1, 62.5% in level 2, 15.4% in level 3 and 4.3% in level 4a. The overall prevalence for narcolepsy was 4.4; 3.7 for narcolepsy type 1 and 0.7 cases per 100 000 inhabitants for narcolepsy type 2. Fifty-six additional narcoleptic patients were identified in the primary health-care system, increasing the overall prevalence to 5.2 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. Prevalence rates for narcolepsy type 1 increased from childhood to adulthood, but in subjects aged more than 50 years there was a substantial drop in prevalence rates, suggesting the presence of a significant pool of undiagnosed cases in this population. Narcolepsy can be considered a rare neurological disorder in Catalunya.

Early add-on lacosamide in a real-life setting: results of the REALLY study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with epilepsy are treated with antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy. Several factors influence the choice of early add-on therapy, and deciding on the most appropriate drug can be difficult. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide as early add-on therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures. METHODS: REALLY (REtrospective study of lAcosamide as earLy add-on aLong one Year) was a multicenter, retrospective, 1-year, real-life study. Patients included were aged older than 16 years, had partial-onset seizures, and were treated with lacosamide as add-on therapy after one or two prior AEDs. Data were collected retrospectively from clinical records. The primary study objective was to assess the efficacy of lacosamide over 12 months (seizure-free and responder rates), and the secondary objective was to assess the tolerability of lacosamide at 3, 6, and 12 months [adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation]. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study; 89 patients (44.7 %) had tried one AED and 110 patients (55.3 %) had tried two AEDs before lacosamide. At 12 months, the proportion of patients who were seizure free was 44.9 %, and 76 % of patients were responders. The seizure-free rate at 12 months for patients who had previously received one or two AEDs was 58 and 34.3 %, and the responder rate at 12 months was 83.0 and 70.4 %, respectively. The AE rate was 21.5 % at 3 months, 27.1 % at 6 months, and 31.2 % at 12 months, with 7.0 % of patients discontinuing treatment because of an AE. The most common AE reported was dizziness (11.6 %). Cryptogenic epilepsy, a higher number of prior AEDs, and the use of a sodium channel blocker at onset were associated with a worse outcome. The number of concomitant AEDs decreased over 1 year (Z = 5.89; p < 0.001). Twenty-two patients were converted to lacosamide monotherapy with at least one evaluation ≥6 months from the beginning of monotherapy conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Lacosamide was effective and well tolerated as early add-on treatment in patients who had received one or two previous AEDs.

Pilomotor seizures: an autonomic semiology of limbic encephalitis?

PURPOSE: Ictal piloerection is an infrequent seizure semiology that is commonly overlooked as an ictal epileptic manifestation. Piloerection is considered to be principally caused by temporal lobe activity although frontal and hypothalamic seizure origins have been reported. The described etiology has shown a wide variety of structural causes such as mesial temporal sclerosis, tumors, posttraumatic, cavernomas and cryptogenic epilepsies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of ictal piloerection in the clinical records of patients who underwent video-EEG monitoring (VEEGM) between 2007 and 2013 in a multicenter cooperative study. All patients presented refractory epilepsies and were evaluated with a protocol that included brain MRI, neuropsychology and VEEGM. RESULTS: A total of 766 patients were evaluated in four tertiary centers in Spain. Five patients showed piloerection as principal seizure semiology (prevalence 0.65%). The mean age at seizure onset was 39.6 years and the average epilepsy duration was 5.2 years (range 2-14) before diagnosis. Four patients were additionally examined with FDG-PET and/or SPECT-SISCOM. All presented temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), three right-sided and two left-sided. A typical unilateral hippocampal sclerosis was described in 3 cases. The etiology detected in all cases was limbic encephalitis. Three had LGI1, one anti-Hu, and another Ma2 antibodies. CONCLUSION: Our series describes a so far not well-recognized autoimmune association of pilomotor seizures to limbic encephalitis. This etiology should be ruled out through a comprehensive diagnostic work-up even in cases of long-lasting TLE with typical hippocampal atrophy on MRI.

Control of seizures in different stages of partial epilepsy: LACO-EXP, a Spanish retrospective study of lacosamide.

Lacosamide is approved as adjunctive therapy for focal epilepsies. The number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried is associated with prognosis. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study (LACO-EXP) in Spain in 500 adult patients with focal epilepsies examined the efficacy and tolerability of add-on lacosamide. Factors associated with better efficacy/tolerability were analyzed. After 12months, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) was 57.1%, and the seizure-free rate was 14.9%. Efficacy was better when lacosamide was the first or second add-on AED, although there was a small chance to be seizure-free even for patients who had received ≤10 prior AEDs. The mechanism of action of concomitant AEDs is important in all the stages, but differences are smaller in the early stages. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated. A slower dosage-titration schedule was associated with a lower adverse event rate. Further investigation of the timing of initiation of lacosamide add-on therapy and ideal combinations of AEDs is required.

Drug use in patients with dementia: a register-based study in the health region of Girona (Catalonia/Spain).

PURPOSE: To describe the pattern of drug consumption among patients with dementia in a geographically defined general population in Catalonia (Spain), and to determine its association with age, gender, type of dementia and severity indicators. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included 1,894 cases of dementia registered by the Registry of Dementias of Girona from 2007 to 2009. Prescribed drugs were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. A descriptive analysis of drug consumption was stratified according to age, gender, dementia subtypes and dementia severity. Binary logistic regression models were adjusted to detect the association of these variables with drug consumption according to the ATC groups. RESULTS: The most commonly prescribed drugs were for the central nervous system (CNS) (96.4 %), cardiovascular system (79.4 %) and digestive and metabolic system categories (77.7 %). No significant differences were found between the use of nervous system drugs and age, gender, dementia subtypes or dementia severity. The use of alimentary tract and metabolism related drugs, as well as cardiovascular and blood system drugs, were positively correlated with age and secondary dementia. The prevalence of use of cardiovascular and musculoskeletal drugs was higher in women than in men (OR: 1.34; OR: 1.26 respectively). A negative association was found between the severity of dementia and the use of musculoskeletal drugs (OR: 0.71), while its use was significantly higher in the youngest patients (OR: 1.71). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients with dementia received a CNS drug, being at risk of inappropriate treatment. Treatment for comorbidities in patients with dementia should not be withheld on the basis of age or dementia severity, but rather on the benefit/risk ratio of its prescription. Further studies are needed to evaluate potentially inappropriate drug use and possible untreated conditions in this population.

Efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam as an add-on treatment in status epilepticus: a multicentric observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of status epilepticus (SE) has not changed in the last few decades, benzodiazepines plus phenytoin being the most common first line treatment. Intravenous levetiracetam (ivLEV) is a new antiepileptic drug with interesting properties for SE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Efficacy and effectiveness of ivLEV in SE were assessed in an observational, multicentric and retrospective study. Efficacy was defined as cessation of seizures in the 24h subsequent to starting ivLEV, with no need of any further antiepileptic drug. All patients were treated following the standard protocol (benzodiazepines plus phenytoin or valproate). ivLEV was used as add-on therapy, except in those cases with contraindication for the standard protocol, when it was administered earlier. RESULTS: 40 patients were included, 57% men, with a mean age of 63 years. The most common type of SE was partial convulsive (90%). ivLEV was effective in approximately half of the patients (57.5%), in a mean time of 14.4h. ivLEV was used as add-on treatment in 26 patients (after benzodiazepines plus phenytoin, valproate or both) with an efficacy of 46.1%, and as early treatment (pretreatment with benzodiazepines or nothing) in 14 patients with an efficacy of 78.5% (p 0.048). Adverse events were observed in 15% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: ivLEV was an effective antiepileptic drug for SE, but its efficacy depends on the timing of its administration, being more effective when used as early treatment, and less effective as add-on treatment.

Changes in seizure severity and quality of life in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

This 6-month observational, prospective, multicenter study assessed the influence of changes in seizure severity on quality of life in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Patients (N = 262) diagnosed with partial epilepsy and receiving two antiepileptic drugs as determined by usual clinical practice were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was the mean seizure severity score obtained from the Seizure Severity Questionnaire. Reductions in seizure severity were detected from baseline to months 3 and 6 (P<0.0001). Improvements compared with baseline were found for several secondary measures: Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales (P<0.0001), most Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep subscales (P<0.05), and seven subscales of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31; P<0.0005). Seizure severity correlated directly with anxiety (P<0.0001) and inversely with QOLIE-31 measures (P<0.0001). In conclusion, reducing seizure severity with appropriate medication may lead to improvement in the overall quality of life of patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide in idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide (ZNS) for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs). METHODS: Thirteen patients with different types of IGEs who were treated with ZNS between the years 2006 and 2008 were identified. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed at months 6 and 12 post-treatment. Response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. RESULTS: Twelve patients (92.3%) continued with ZNS at month 6, and 11 (84.6%) at month 12. Mean daily dose was 319 mg (range 100-500 mg/d). Response was achieved at month 6 in eight of the 12 patients that continued with ZNS (66.6%), of which 7 were seizure-free (58.3%). At month 12, eight of the 11 patients that continued with ZNS were responders (72.7%) and 6 were seizure-free (63.6%). For different types of seizures, better responses were observed for absences and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Four out of 13 patients (30.7%) experienced adverse events and in two (15.3%), these led to withdrawal. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, ZNS showed efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of different types of IGEs. Limitations include a small sample size and a relatively short period of follow-up. Our results are promising and justify the need for prospective controlled trials in IGE.

Risks and benefits of generic antiepileptic drugs.

INTRODUCTION: In most therapeutic areas, prescribing generic drugs seems to lower costs without sacrificing efficacy. The use of generic drugs for treating epilepsy may, however, be more controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on generic antiepileptic drugs has been carried out based primarily on a bibliographical search in the Medline database. RESULTS: Published studies are usually of a descriptive nature and are sometimes based on generic drugs that were approved in times when regulatory agency requirements were not as strict as they are now. Experts claim that a change in pharmaceutical formulations could cause seizure recurrence in cases that had been successfully controlled in the past, with severe effects on patients. Meanwhile, several health organizations have provided inconsistent recommendations on the use of generic antiepileptic drugs. CONCLUSION: In order to obtain scientific evidence on the potential risks and benefits of interchanging branded and generic antiepileptic drugs, high methodological comparative studies are necessary. These studies could bring consensus about the role of generic drugs for treating epilepsy.

Pregabalin as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in every day clinical practice.

We retrospectively reviewed our clinical experience with PGB when used as add-on therapy in 101 patients (56 women and 45 men) with refractory partial epilepsy, who have been followed up for at least 1 year. Mean age was 40 years (16-64); mean number of concomitant AEDs was 2.8. Most patients (43) had temporal lobe epilepsy. Median number of seizures per month was 16 (3-240). Mean PGB dose used was 412.5 mg. Responder rate (percentage of patients with >or=50% seizure reduction) at 6 and 12 months was 52% and 39.6%, respectively. Seizure freedom for at least 6 and 12 months has been achieved by 12 patients (11.8%) and 6 patients (5.9%) respectively. At 1 year, 61 patients (60.4%) are still taking PGB. Forty patients have discontinued PGB, because of inefficacy (16 patients, 15.8%), adverse effects (15 patients, 14.8%) or both (9 patients, 8.9%). Sixty per cent of patients reported adverse events, being weight gain (>10% body weight) the most frequent, seen in 26 patients (25.7%). Dizziness/ataxia was seen in 20 (19.8%). Adverse effects were generally mild to moderate.

Status epilepticus: evidence and controversy.

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a potential and relatively common complication of epileptic seizures. Traditionally, SE was defined as 30 minutes of continuous seizure activity or a series of seizures without return to full consciousness between the seizures. As a practical rule, it is admitted that all patients arriving at the emergency room suffering from epileptic seizures could have SE and should be treated accordingly. It is well known that the longer an attack has lasted, the more difficult it is to control in the next 5 to 10 minutes. On the other hand, once an attack has lasted for over 5 to 10 minutes, it is unlikely to cease spontaneously. Ambulatory intervention should focus on this "therapeutic interval" in acute attacks with the use of first-line drugs such as the intramuscular, rectal, oral, and/or intranasal application of benzodiazepines (BZD). Treatment of SE is a medical emergency, which should include 3 priority objectives: (1) to stop the seizures; (2) to maintain internal homeostasis; and (3) to treat possible complications. Current consensus is that a BZD, notably lorazepam or diazepam, is the initial class of drug for the treatment of SE. Phenytoin, fosphenytoin, or valproate generally is agreed upon as the next drugs to be administered. Failure to respond to optimal BZD and phenytoin loading operationally defines refractory SE.