Pretransplant donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies despite a negative complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch: Is it wise to desensitize before kidney transplant?

The significance of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) despite negative complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) would be useful for clinical decision-making. Hence, we aimed to determine the impact of pretransplant DSA despite negative crossmatch on the outcome of kidney transplantation. One hundred and eleven kidney recipients were prospectively enrolled in this study after being transplanted at Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center of Kuwait between January 2011 and December 2013. Of them, 50 recipients with positive DSA at the time of transplant were subjected to desensitization (Group 1). Three local protocols were utilized; first included plasma exchange, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab; second included immunoadsorption plus RTX, and the third included high-dose IVIG and rituximab. The second group included 61 recipients with negative DSA. All recipients had negative CDC-XM and flow cytometry crossmatch at the time of transplant. Panel-reactive antibody (±DSA) levels with mean fluorescence intensity and graft function were monitored along the first 24 months for all patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding early posttransplant graft function, patient and graft survivals. Pretransplant DSA with negative CXM carries a minimal clinical risk with optimized immunosuppression.

Early Versus Late Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection Among Renal Transplant Recipients in Terms of Response to Rituximab Therapy: A Single Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: There are no comparable trials concerning the use of rituximab among renal transplant recipients with acute antibody-mediated rejection. Here, we compared early and late acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients in terms of response to rituximab therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1230 kidney transplants performed at Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center (Kuwait) over the past 10 years, 103 recipients developed acute antibody-mediated rejections and were subcategorized into 4 groups according to the onset of rejection and rituximab treatment. All patients received the standard treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection according to our protocol (plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin). We added rituximab to the treatment regimen in 2 groups of patients: 27 patients with early rejection (group 1) and 38 patients with late rejection (group 2). Groups 3 and 4 represented nonrituximab groups, with 20 patients with early (group 3) and 18 patients with late rejection (group 4). We compared the 4 groups regarding graft and patient outcomes. RESULTS: All patients were comparable regarding patient age, sex, pretransplant type of dialysis, viral profile, type of induction, donor criteria, and pretransplant comorbidities. We observed that delayed and slow graft function were significantly higher in groups 1 and 3 (P = .016); however, we found no significant differences in the 4 groups regarding new-onset diabetes after transplant, BK viral infection, and malignancy. Graft outcomes were significantly better in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4 (P = .028). However, patient outcomes were comparable in the 4 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Early acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients had significantly better outcomes when rituximab was added to the standard treatment regimen.