Previous arthroscopy does not decrease survivorship or functional outcomes for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic procedures for osteoarthritis (OA), in particular arthroscopic meniscectomy, have poorer long-term clinical outcomes compared to those managed non-operatively. In addition, previous arthroscopy is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however there is limited data on the impact on subsequent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) outcomes. The aim of the study is to investigate whether patients who had arthroscopy prior to UKA have differences in survivorship or functional outcomes compared to those with no prior arthroscopy. METHODS: All patients who received either a primary medial or lateral UKA at four large tertiary hospitals were included (n = 2,272). Patient data (age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status and surgical data) was recorded following systematic review of all clinical notes and radiographs. Differences between survival curves were analysed using log-rank curves. Differences between categorical data was compared using Fisher's exact or Chi-squared tests, and differences between continuous variables were compared using t-tests. RESULTS: There was no difference between the survival curves for UKA patients with previous arthroscopy compared to those with no previous arthroscopy (10 years: 91% UKA with previous arthroscopy vs. 92% no previous arthroscopy; 15 years: 78% previous arthroscopy vs. 86% no previous arthroscopy; p = 0.50). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was comparable between patients who had previous arthroscopy and those who had no previous arthroscopy at 6 months (38.8 vs. 39.3, p = 0.45), 5 years (42.0 vs. 40.4, p = 0.11) and 10 years (40.8 vs. 40.2, p = 0.71). DISCUSSION: In this large patient cohort with comprehensive review of clinical data and outcomes, we found that prior arthroscopy did not affect survivorship or functional outcomes of UKA patients.

Change in cup orientation from supine to standing posture: a prospective cohort study of 419 total hip arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arthroplasty surgeons traditionally assess cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on supine radiographs. Contemporary hip-spine analyses provide information on standing, functional cup orientation. This study aims to (i) characterize cup orientations when supine and standing; (ii) determine orientation differences between postures; and (iii) identify factors associated with magnitude of orientation differences. METHODS: This is a 2-center, multi-surgeon, prospective, consecutive cohort study. 419 primary THAs were included (57% women; mean age: 64 years, standard deviation [SD] 11). All patients underwent supine and standing antero-posterior pelvic and lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Cup orientation and spinopelvic parameters were measured. Target cup orientation was defined as inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° ± 10°. A change in orientation (Δinclination/Δanteversion) between postures > 5° was defined as clinically significant. Variability was defined as 2 x SD. RESULTS: Inclination increased from 40° (supine) to 42° (standing) corresponding to a Δinclination of 2° (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-3). Anteversion increased from 25° (supine) to 30° (standing) corresponding to a Δanteversion of 5° (CI 5-6). When supine, 69% (CI 65-74) of THAs were within target, but only 44% (CI 39-49) were within target when standing, resulting in a further 26% (CI 21-30) being out of target when standing. From supine to standing, a clinically significant change in anteversion (> 5°) was seen in 47% (CI 42-52) of cases. Δanteversion was higher in women than in men (6°, CI 5-7 vs 5°, CI 4-5) corresponding to a difference of 1° (CI 1-2), which was dependent on tilt change, standing cup anteversion, age, and standing pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: Cup inclination and version increase upon standing but significant variability exists due to patient factors.

Robotic Assessment of Patella Tracking in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Robotic-tools have been developed to improve planning, accuracy and outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to describe and illustrate a novel technique for assessing the patellofemoral (PFJ) in TKA using an imageless robotic platform. METHODS: A consecutive series of 30 R-TKA were undertaken by a single-surgeon utilising the described technique. A technique to dynamically assess the PFJ intra-operatively, pre and post implantation was developed. A full set of data from 9 cases was then collected and reviewed for analysis. A series of dynamic PFJ tracks collected intra-operatively pre and post implantation are presented. Furthermore, a full assessment of PFJ over and under-stuffing through a 90° arc of flexion is illustrated. Finally, a pre and post centre of rotation for the PFJ was defined and measured. RESULTS: The described technique was defined over a series of 30 R-TKA using the described robotic platform. Nine cases were analysed to determine what data could be measured using the robotic platform. Intra-operative real-time data allowed a visual assessment of PFJ tracking through a range of motion of 0° to 90° flexion pre and post-implantation. PFJ over and under-stuffing was also assessed intra-operatively through a range of motion of 0° to 90° flexion. Post operative analysis allowed a more detailed study to be performed, including defining a pre and post implantation centre of rotation (COR) for the patella. Defining the COR allowed the definition of a patella plane. Furthermore, patella mediolateral shift in full extension, and end flexion could be measured. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative assessment of the PFJ in TKA is challenging. Robotic tools have been developed to improve measurement, accuracy of delivery and outcomes in TKA. These tools can be adapted in novel ways to assess the PFJ, which may lead to further refinements in TKA techniques.

Accuracy and completeness of registry-reported unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision.

INTRODUCTION: The key outcome of joint registries is revision events, which inform clinical practice and identify poor-performing implants. Registries record revision events and reasons, but accuracy may be limited by a lack of standardized definitions of revision. Our study aims to assess the accuracy and completeness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision and indications reported to the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) with independent clinical review. METHODS: Case record review of 2272 patients undergoing primary UKA at four large tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2017 was performed, identifying 158 patients who underwent revision. Detailed review of clinical findings, radiographs and operative data was performed to identify revision cases and the reasons for revision using a standardized protocol. These were compared to NZJR data using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The NZJR recorded 150 (95%) of all UKA revisions. Osteoarthritis progression was the most common reason on the systematic clinical review (35%), however, this was underreported to the registry (8%, P < 0.001). A larger proportion of revisions reported to the registry were for 'pain' (30% of cases vs. 5% on clinical review, P < 0.001). A reason for revision was not reported to the registry for 10% of cases. CONCLUSION: The NZJR had good capture of UKA revisions, but had significant differences in registry-reported revision reasons compared to our independent systematic clinical review. These included over-reporting of 'pain', under-reporting of osteoarthritis progression, and failing to identify a revision reason. Efforts to improve registry capture of revision reasons for UKA could be addressed through more standardized definitions of revision and tailored revision options for UKA on registry forms.

Reduction in re-rupture rates following implementation of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in 313 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the mid-term effectiveness of a return to sport (RTS) test in relation to preventing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-rupture and contralateral ACL injury following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Furthermore, this study aimed to assess the timing of passing a, RTS-test after surgery, and the effect age has on RTS outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing ACLR between August 2014 and December 2018 took an RTS-test following rehabilitation. The RTS-test consisted of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury Scale, a single-leg hop, a single-leg triple hop, a single-leg triple cross-over hop, a box-drop vertical jump down, a single-leg 4-rep max-incline leg press, and a modified agility T test. RTS-passing criteria were ≥90% limb symmetry index in addition to defined takeoff and landing parameters. Mid-term review assessed sporting level, ACL re-injury, and contralateral ACL injury. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients underwent RTS-testing, following ACLR with 313 (89%) contactable at follow-up, a mean of 50 months (standard deviation: 11.41, range: 28-76) after surgery. The re-rupture rate was 6.6% after passing the RTS-test and 10.3% following failure (p â€‹= â€‹0.24), representing a 36% reduction. Contralateral ACL injury rate after surgery was 6% and was 19% lower in those passing the RTS test. The mean age of patients passing their first RTS-test was significantly higher than that of those who failed (p â€‹= â€‹0.0027). Re-ruptures in those who passed the RTS test first time occurred late (>34 months), compared to those who failed first time, which all occurred early (<33 months) (p â€‹= â€‹0.0015). The mean age of re-rupture was significantly less than those who did not sustain a re-rupture (p â€‹= â€‹0.025). CONCLUSION: Passing a RTS-test following ACLR reduces ACL re-rupture by 36.21% and contralateral ACL injury by 19.15% at mid-term follow-up. Younger patients are more likely to fail a RTS-test and are at higher risk of contralateral ACL rupture.

Phenotype and energy metabolism differ between osteoarthritic chondrocytes from male compared to female patients: Implications for sexual dimorphism in osteoarthritis development?

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) are greater in females than males. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an underlying difference in the biology of OA chondrocytes between males and females. METHODS: Chondrocytes were obtained following knee arthroplasty from male and female patients with primary OA. Phenotype marker expression, glucose and fat consumption, and rates of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation were compared between females and males. RNAi was used to determine the consequences of differential expression of Sry-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) and PGC1α between males and females. RESULTS: OA chondrocytes from male donors showed elevated ribonucleic acid (RNA) and protein levels of SOX9, elevated COL2A1 protein synthesis, higher glucose consumption, and higher usage of glycolysis compared to females. OA chondrocytes from females had higher PGC1α protein levels, higher fat consumption, and higher oxidative energy metabolism than males. Knockdown of SOX9 reduced expression of COL2A1 to a greater extent in male OA chondrocytes than females whereas knockdown of PGC1α reduced COL2A1 expression in females but not males. Expression of ACAN and the glycolytic enzyme PGK1 was also reduced in males but not females following SOX9 knockdown. CONCLUSIONS: OA chondrocyte phenotype and energy metabolism differ between males and females. Our results indicate transcriptional control of COL2A1 differs between the two. Differences in chondrocyte biology between males and females imply the underlying mechanisms involved in OA may also differ, highlighting the need to consider sex and gender when investigating pathogenesis and potential treatments for OA.

Better post-operative outcomes at 1-year follow-up are associated with lower levels of pre-operative synovitis and higher levels of IL-6 and VEGFA in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with inflammation, and residual inflammation may influence outcomes following knee arthroplasty. This may be more relevant for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to larger remaining areas of native tissue. This study aimed to: (1) characterise inflammatory profiles for medial UKA patients and (2) investigate whether inflammation markers are associated with post-operative outcomes. METHODS: This prospective, observational study has national ethics approval. Bloods, synovial fluid, tibial plateaus and synovium were collected from medial UKA patients in between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations in serum and synovial fluid (SF) were measured with multiplexed assays. Disease severity of cartilage and synovium was assessed using validated histological scores. Post-operative outcomes were measured with Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and pain scores. RESULTS: The study included 35 patients. SF VEGFA was negatively correlated with pre-operative pain at rest (r - 0.5, p = 0.007), and FJS-12 at six-week (r 0.44, p = 0.02), six-month (r 0.61, p < 0.01) and one-year follow-up (r 0.63, p = 0.03). Serum and SF IL-6 were positively correlated with OKS at early follow-up (serum 6 weeks, r 0.39, p = 0.03; 6 months, r 0.48, p < 0.01; SF 6 weeks, r 0.35, p = 0.04). At six weeks, increased synovitis was negatively correlated with improvements in pain at rest (r - 0.41, p = 0.03) and with mobilisation (r - 0.37, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Lower levels of synovitis and higher levels of IL-6 and VEGFA were associated with better post-operative outcomes after UKA, which could be helpful for identifying UKA patients in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV case series.

REST, RCOR1 and RCOR2 expression is reduced in osteoarthritic chondrocytes and contributes to increasing MMP13 and ADAMTS5 expression through upregulating HES1.

Expression of key transcriptional regulators is altered in chondrocytes in osteoarthritis (OA). This contributes to an increase in production of cartilage-catabolizing enzymes such as MMP13 and ADAMTS5. RCOR1 and RCOR2, binding partners for the transcriptional repressor REST, have previously been found to be downregulated in OA chondrocytes although their function in chondrocytes is unclear. HES1 is a known REST/RCOR1 target gene and HES1 has been shown to promote MMP13 and ADAMTS5 expression in murine OA chondrocytes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reduced REST/RCOR levels leads to increased HES1 expression in human OA chondrocytes and whether HES1 also promotes ADAMTS5 and MMP13 expression in these cells. Chondrocytes were isolated from osteoarthritic and adjacent macroscopically normal cartilage obtained from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. RNA and protein levels of REST, RCOR1 and RCOR2 were lower, but levels of HES1 higher, in chondrocytes isolated from osteoarthritic compared to macroscopically normal cartilage. Over-expression of either REST, RCOR1 or RCOR2 resulted in reduced HES1 levels in OA chondrocytes whereas knockdown of REST, RCOR1 or RCOR2 led to increased HES1 expression in chondrocytes from macroscopically normal cartilage. In OA chondrocytes, ADAMTS5 and MMP13 expression were reduced following HES1 knockdown, but further enhanced following HES1 over-expression. Levels of phosphorylated CaMKII were higher in chondrocytes from OA cartilage consistent with previous findings that HES1 only promotes gene transcription in the presence of active CaMKII. These findings identify the REST/RCOR/HES1 pathway as a contributing factor leading to increased ADAMTS5 and MMP13 expression in OA chondrocytes.

Combined Growth Factor Hydrogel Enhances Rotator Cuff Enthesis Healing in Rat But Not Sheep Model.

We hypothesized that a combined growth factor hydrogel would improve chronic rotator cuff tear healing in a rat and sheep model. Insulin-like growth factor 1, transforming growth factor ß1, and parathyroid hormone were combined into a tyraminated poly-vinyl-alcohol (PVA-Tyr) hydrogel and applied directly at the enthesis. In total, 30 Sprague-Dawley rats and 16 Romney ewes underwent unilateral rotator cuff tenotomy and then delayed repairs were performed after 3-4 weeks. The animals were divided into a control group (repair alone) and treatment group. The rotator cuffs were harvested at 12 weeks after surgery for biomechanical and histological analyses of the repair site. In the rat model, the stress at failure and Young's modulus were higher in the treatment group in comparison with the control group (73% improvement, p = 0.010 and 56% improvement, p = 0.028, respectively). Histologically, the repaired entheses in the treatment group demonstrated improved healing with higher semi-quantitative scores (10.1 vs. 6.55 of 15, p = 0.032). In the large animal model, there was no observable treatment effect. This PVA-Tyr bound growth factor system holds promise for improving rotator cuff healing. However, our approach was not scalable from a small to a large animal model. Further tailoring of this growth factor delivery system is still required. Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics and Histology; Animal Model Impact Statement Previous studies using single-growth factor treatment to improve enthesis healing after rotator cuff repair have reported promising, but inconsistent results. A novel approach is to combine multiple growth factors using controlled-release hydrogels that mimic the normal healing process. In this study, we report that a combined growth factor hydrogel can improve the histological quality and strength of rotator cuff repair in a rat chronic tear model. This novel hydrogel growth factor treatment has the potential to be used in human clinical applications to improve healing after rotator cuff repair.

Concentration-dependent effects of leptin on osteoarthritis-associated changes in phenotype of human chondrocytes.

Metabolic syndrome is a risk factor for osteoarthritis. Elevated leptin levels have been implicated as a potential cause of this association. Previous studies have shown that supra-physiological leptin concentrations can induce osteoarthritis-like changes in chondrocyte phenotype. Here, we tested the effects of leptin in the concentration range found in synovial fluid on chondrocyte phenotype. Chondrocytes isolated from macroscopically normal regions of cartilage within osteoarthritic joints from patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, all with body mass index >30 kg/m2 were treated with 2-40 ng/ml leptin for 24 h. Chondrocyte phenotype marker expression was measured by RT-qPCR and western blot. The role of HES1 in mediating the effects of leptin was determined by gene knockdown using RNAi and over-expression using adenoviral-mediated gene delivery. Treatment of chondrocytes with 20 or 40 ng/ml leptin resulted in decreased SOX9 levels and decreased levels of the SOX9-target genes COL2A1 and ACAN. Levels of HES1 were lower and ADAMTS5 higher in chondrocytes treated with 20 or 40 ng/ml leptin. HES1 knockdown resulted in increased ADAMTS5 expression whereas over-expression of HES1 prevented the leptin-induced increase in ADAMTS5. An increase in MMP13 expression was only evident in chondrocytes treated with 40 ng/ml leptin and was not mediated by HES1 activity. High concentrations of leptin can cause changes in chondrocyte phenotype consistent with those seen in osteoarthritis. Synovial fluid leptin concentrations of this level are typically observed in patients with metabolic syndrome and/or women, suggesting elevated leptin levels may form part of the multifactorial network that leads to osteoarthritis development in these patients.

Differential Effects of Hypoxia versus Hyperoxia or Physoxia on Phenotype and Energy Metabolism in Human Chondrocytes from Osteoarthritic Compared to Macroscopically Normal Cartilage.

Chondrocyte phenotype and energy metabolism are altered in osteoarthritis (OA). However, most studies characterising the change in human chondrocyte behaviour in OA have been conducted in supraphysiological oxygen concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare phenotype and energy metabolism in chondrocytes from macroscopically normal (MN) and OA cartilage maintained in 18.9% (standard tissue culture), 6% (equivalent to superficial zone of cartilage in vivo) or 1% oxygen (equivalent to deep zone of cartilage in vivo). MMP13 production was higher in chondrocytes from OA compared to MN cartilage in hyperoxia and physoxia but not hypoxia. Hypoxia promoted SOX9, COL2A1 and ACAN protein expression in chondrocytes from MN but not OA cartilage. OA chondrocytes used higher levels of glycolysis regardless of oxygen availability. These results show that differences in phenotype and energy metabolism between chondrocytes from OA and MN cartilage differ depending on oxygen availability. OA chondrocytes show elevated synthesis of cartilage-catabolising enzymes and chondrocytes from MN cartilage show reduced cartilage anabolism in oxygenated conditions. This is relevant as a recent study has shown that oxygen levels are elevated in OA cartilage in vivo. Our findings may indicate that this elevated cartilage oxygenation may promote cartilage loss in OA.

The Strongest Oxford Knee Score Predictors of Subsequent Revision are "Overall Pain," "Limping When Walking," and "Knee Giving Way".

BACKGROUND: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is used to measure knee arthroplasty outcomes; however, it is unclear which questions are more relevant. Our aims were to (1) identify which OKS question(s) were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision and (2) compare the predictive ability of the "pain" and "function" domains. METHODS: All primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with an OKS at 6 months (TKA n = 27,708; UKA n = 8,415), 5 years (TKA n = 11,519; UKA n = 3,365) or 10 years (TKA n = 6,311; UKA n = 1,744) were included. Prediction models were assessed using logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: A reduced model with 3 questions ("overall pain," "limping when walking," "knee giving way") showed better diagnostic ability than full OKS for predicting UKA revision at 6 months (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80 versus 0.78; P < .01) and 5 years (0.81 versus 0.77; P = .02), and comparable diagnostic ability for predicting TKA revision at all time points (6 months, 0.77 versus 0.76; 5 years, 0.78 versus 0.75; 10 years, 0.76 versus 0.73; all not significant), and UKA revision at 10 years (0.80 versus 0.77; not significant). The pain domain had better diagnostic ability for predicting subsequent revision for both procedures at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSION: Questions on "overall pain", "limping when walking", and "knee giving way" were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision. Attention to low scores from these questions during follow-up may allow for prompt identification of patients most at risk of revision.

Similar Survivorship but Different Revision Reasons for Uncemented Mobile-Bearing and Cemented Fixed-Bearing Medial UKA: A Long-Term Population-Based Cohort Study of 2,015 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survivorship and accurate characterization of revision reasons in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are limited by a lack of long-term data and standardized definitions of revision. The aim of this study was to identify survivorship, risk factors, and reasons for revision in a large cohort of medial UKAs with long-term follow-up (up to 20 years). METHODS: Patient, implant, and revision details for 2,015 primary medial UKAs (mean follow-up, 8 years) were recorded following systematic clinical and radiographic review. Survivorship and risk of revision were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. Reasons for revision were analyzed using competing-risk analysis. RESULTS: Implant survivorship at 15 years was 92% for cemented fixed-bearing (cemFB), 91% for uncemented mobile-bearing (uncemMB), and 80% for cemented mobile-bearing (cemMB) UKAs (p = 0.02). When compared with cemFB, the risk of revision was higher for cemMB implants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 3.2; p = 0.03). At 15 years, cemented implants had a higher cumulative frequency of revision due to aseptic loosening (3% to 4%, versus 0.4% for uncemented; p < 0.01), cemMB implants had a higher cumulative frequency of revision due to osteoarthritis progression (9% versus 2% to 3% for cemFB/uncemMB; p < 0.05), and uncemMB implants had a higher cumulative frequency of revision due to bearing dislocation (4% versus 2% for cemMB; p = 0.02). Compared with the oldest patients (≥70 years), younger patients had a higher risk of revision (<60 years: HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.2 to 3.0; 60 to 69 years: HR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.4; p < 0.05 for both). At 15 years, there was a higher cumulative frequency of revision for aseptic loosening in these younger groups (3.2% and 3.5% versus 2.7% for ≥70 years; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implant design and patient age were risk factors for revision of medial UKA. The findings from this study suggest that surgeons should consider using cemFB or uncemMB designs because of their superior long-term implant survivorship compared with cemMB designs. Additionally, for younger patients (<70 years), uncemMB designs had a lower risk of aseptic loosening than cemFB designs at the expense of a risk of bearing dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A comparison of clinical thresholds for revision following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As revision of UKA may be less technically demanding than revision TKA, UKA patients with poor functional outcomes may be more likely to be offered revision than TKA patients with similar outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical thresholds for revisions between TKA and UKA using revision incidence and patient-reported outcomes, in a large, matched cohort at early, mid-, and late-term follow-up. Analyses were performed on propensity score-matched patient cohorts of TKAs and UKAs (2:1) registered in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 with an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) response at six months (n, TKA: 16,774; UKA: 8,387), five years (TKA: 6,718; UKA: 3,359), or ten years (TKA: 3,486; UKA: 1,743). Associations between OKS and revision within two years following the score were examined. Thresholds were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Reasons for aseptic revision were compared using cumulative incidence with competing risk. Fewer TKA patients with 'poor' outcomes (≤ 25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs 19.6%; p < 0.001), five years (4.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.001), and ten years (6.4% vs 15.0%; p = 0.024). Compared with TKA, the relative risk for UKA was 2.5-times higher for 'unknown' reasons, bearing dislocations, and disease progression. Compared with TKA, more UKA patients with poor outcomes underwent revision from early to long-term follow-up, and were more likely to undergo revision for 'unknown' reasons, which suggest a lower clinical threshold for UKA. For UKA, revision risk was higher for bearing dislocations and disease progression. There is supporting evidence that the higher revision UKA rates are associated with lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of failure.

Associations of the Oxford Knee Score and knee arthroplasty revision at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported outcome measures are increasingly being collected for healthcare evaluation therefore it is prudent to understand their associations with patient outcomes. Our aims were to investigate: (1) if Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is associated with impending revision at long-term (5 and 10 years) follow-up, and (2) if decreased OKS at subsequent follow-ups is associated with higher risk of revision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All total knee (TKAs) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) between 1999 and 2019 in the New Zealand Joint Registry with an OKS at 6 months (TKA n = 27 708, UKA n = 8415), 5 years (TKA n = 11 519, UKA n = 3365) or 10 years (TKA n = 6311, UKA n = 1744) were included. Logistic regression determined associations of the OKS with revision within 2 years of each score. Change in OKS between timepoints were compared with revision risk. RESULTS: For every one-unit increase in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at 6 months, 10% and 12% at 5 years and 9% and 5% at 10 years. For both procedures a decrease of seven or more OKS points from previous follow-up was associated with higher risk of revision (5 years: TKA 4.7% versus 0.5%, UKA 8.7% versus 0.9%; 10 years: TKA 4.4% versus 0.7%, UKA 11.3% versus 1.5%; all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The OKS had a strong negative association with risk of impending TKA and UKA revision from early to long-term (10+ years) follow-up. A decrease of seven or more points when compared with the previous follow-up was also associated with higher revision risk.

Ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of traumatic rotator cuff injuries in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Traumatic rotator cuff injuries can be a leading cause of prolonged shoulder pain and disability and contribute to significant morbidity and health care costs. Previous studies have shown evidence of sociodemographic disparities with these injuries. The purpose of this nationwide study was to better understand these disparities based on ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status, in order to inform future health care strategies. METHODS: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) is a no-fault comprehensive compensation scheme encompassing all of Aotearoa/New Zealand (population in 2018, 4.7 million). Using the ACC database, traumatic rotator cuff injuries were identified between January 2010 and December 2018. Injuries were categorized by sex, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic deprivation index of the claimant. RESULTS: During the 9-year study period, there were 351,554 claims accepted for traumatic rotator cuff injury, which totaled more than NZ$960 million. The greatest proportion of costs was spent on vocational support (49.8%), then surgery (26.3%), rehabilitation (13.1%), radiology (8.1%), general practitioner (1.6%), and "Other" (1.1%). Asian, Maori (indigenous New Zealanders), and Pacific peoples were under-represented in the age-standardized proportion of total claims and had lower rates of surgery than Europeans. Maori had higher proportion of costs spent on vocational support and lower proportions spent on radiology, rehabilitation, and surgery than Europeans. Males had higher number and costs of claims and were more likely to have surgery than females. There were considerably fewer claims from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This large nationwide study demonstrates the important and growing economic burden of rotator cuff injuries. Indirect costs, such as vocational supports, are a major contributor to the cost, suggesting improving treatment and rehabilitation protocols would have the greatest economic impact. This study has also identified sociodemographic disparities that need to be addressed in order to achieve equity in health outcomes.

What are the perceived benefits and barriers to the use of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty? A survey of members of the European Knee Society.

PURPOSE: Members of the European Knee Society (EKS) recently took part in an online questionnaire on robot-assisted TKA. The purpose of this study was to report and analyse the questionnaire results on the demographics of users versus non-users, the drivers for users of the technology, and the barriers or limitations that hinder the uptake of robot-assisted TKA. METHODS: The questionnaire was composed of 16 questions covering surgeon demographics and drivers for or barriers to the use of robotics. Responses on four- or five-point Likert scales were trichotomised depending on the type of question ("not important" - "moderately important" - "important/very important" or "fully disagree/disagree" - "neutral" - "agree/fully agree"). Consensus on a statement was defined as at least 75% agreement. RESULTS: There was a 67% response rate. Forty-five surgeons performed conventional TKA, of which 78% aimed for systematic alignment, while 22 performed robot-assisted TKA, of which 82% aimed for individualised alignment, and 16 performed technology-assisted TKA, of which 56% aimed for systematic alignment. Respondents agreed that robotics significantly impact accuracy of bone cuts (51/62, 82%), intra-operative feedback on ligament balancing (56/62, 90%) as well as bone cut orientation and implant positioning (57/ 62, 92%), and assistance to customise alignment (56/62, 90%). Respondents agreed that associated costs (14/18, 78%) are an important aspect for not using or to stop using robotics. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents still perform conventional TKA (54%), while only a small portion perform robot-assisted TKA (27%) or other technology-assisted TKA (19%). Most robot users aim for individualised lower limb alignment, whereas most other surgeons aimed for systematic lower limb alignment. There is consensus that robotic assistance has a positive impact on accuracy of bone cuts and alignment, but no consensus on its impact on other peri- or post-operative outcomes. Finally, the associated cost of robot-assisted TKA remains the main barrier to its uptake. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Integrating wearables and modelling for monitoring rehabilitation following total knee joint replacement.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Wearable inertial devices integrated with modelling and cloud computing have been widely adopted in the sports sector, however, their use in the health and medical field has yet to be fully realised. To date, there have been no reported studies concerning the use of wearables as a surrogate tool to monitor knee joint loading during recovery following a total knee joint replacement. The objective of this study is to firstly evaluate if peak tibial acceleration from wearables during gait is a good surrogate metric for computer modelling predicted functional knee loading; and secondly evaluate if traditional clinical patient related outcomes measures are consistent with wearable predictions. METHODS: Following ethical approval, four healthy participants were used to establish the relationship between computer modelling predicted knee joint loading and wearable measured tibial acceleration. Following this, ten patients who had total knee joint replacements were then followed during their 6-week rehabilitation. Gait analysis, wearable acceleration, computer models of knee joint loading, and patient related outcomes measures including the Oxford knee score and range of motion were recorded. RESULTS: A linear correlation (R2 of 0.7-0.97) was observed between peak tibial acceleration (from wearables) and musculoskeletal model predicted knee joint loading during gait in healthy participants first. Whilst patient related outcome measures (Oxford knee score and patient range of motion) were observed to improve consistently during rehabilitation, this was not consistent with all patient's tibial acceleration. Only those patients that exhibited increasing peak tibial acceleration over 6-weeks rehabilitation were positively correlated with the Oxford knee score (R2 of 0.51 to 0.97). Wearable predicted tibial acceleration revealed three patients with a consistent knee loading, five patients with improving knee loading, and two patients with declining knee loading during recovery. Hence, 20% of patients did not present with satisfactory joint loading following total knee joint replacement and this was not detected with current patient related outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inertial measurement units or wearables in this study provided additional insight into patients who were not exhibiting functional improvements in joint loading, and offers clinicians an 'off-site' early warning metric to identify potential complications during recovery and provide the opportunity for early intervention. This study has important implications for improving patient outcomes, equity, and for those who live in rural regions.

Introduction of ROSA robotic-arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time.

PURPOSE: The introduction of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) into the operating theatre is often associated with a learning curve and is potentially associated with additional complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve of robotic-assisted (RA) TKA within a multi-surgeon team. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 83 consecutive conventional jig-based TKAs compared with 53 RA TKAs using the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) for knee osteoarthritis performed by three high-volume (> 100 TKA per year) orthopaedic surgeons. Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, sex and pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence graded and Hip-Knee-Ankle Axis were well-matched between the conventional and RA TKA groups. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess learning curves for operative times for each surgeon. Peri-operative and delayed complications (infection, periprosthetic fracture, thromboembolism, and compromised wound healing) and revisions were reviewed. RESULTS: The CUSUM analysis for operative time demonstrated an inflexion point after 5, 6 and 15 cases for each of the three surgeons, or 8.7 cases on average. There were no significant differences (p = 0.53) in operative times between the RA TKA learning (before inflexion point) and proficiency (after inflexion point) phases. Similarly, the operative times of the RA TKA group did not differ significantly (p = 0.92) from the conventional TKA group. There was no discernible learning curve for the accuracy of component planning using the RA TKA system. The average length of post-operative follow-up was 21.3 ± 9.0 months. There was one revision for instability in the conventional TKA group and none in the RA TKA group. There were no significant difference (p > 0.99) in post-operative complication rates between the conventional TKA and RA TKA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the RA TKA system was associated with a learning curve for operative time of 8.7 cases. Operative times between the RA TKA and conventional TKA group were similar. The short learning curve implies this RA TKA system can be adopted relatively quickly into a surgical team with minimal risks to patients.

Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

IMPORTANCE: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a surgical option for patients with isolated lateral osteoarthritis however, the procedure has higher revision rates than medial UKA. The reason for this remains unclear; therefore, a better understanding of the indications for lateral UKA revision is needed. AIM: The primary aim of this systematic review was to identify revision indications for lateral UKA. Secondary aims were to further investigate if revision indications were influenced by implant design and time from surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Search was performed in January 2022 in MedLine, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library using the keywords "knee arthroplasty", "unicompartmental", "reoperation", synonyms and abbreviations. Articles published in 2000-2021 that were at least level III retrospective cohort studies with at least 10 lateral UKAs and reported all failure modes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Revision indications, patient characteristics, study design, implant types and time to failure were extracted from the selected studies. Collated data were tabulated and differences were tested using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. FINDINGS: A total of 29 cohort and 4 registry studies that included 7,668 UKAs met the inclusion criteria. Studies were judged as having moderate or severe risk of bias; this was associated with the retrospective nature of studies required to investigate long-term outcomes of knee arthroplasty. The main indications for lateral UKA revision were OA progression (35%), aseptic loosening (17%) and bearing dislocation (14%). The incidence of revision was similar for mobile-bearing implants (7.6%) and fixed-bearing (6.4%). For mobile-bearing implants, there was introduction of bearing dislocations as an additional mode of failure (24% cf. 0%, p < 0.001). For fixed-bearing implants, the incidence of revision was higher for all-poly-ethylene (13.9%) than metal-backed (1.8%) tibial components. Early lateral UKA failures were associated with bearing dislocations (sequential decrease from 69% under 6 months to 0% 10+ years, p < 0.001), whereas late failures were associated with OA progression (sequential increase from 0% under 6 months to 100% > 10+ years, p < 0.01). Compared with medial UKA, OA progression (41% cf. 30%, p = 0.004), malalignment (2.7% cf. 0.8%, p = 0.02), instability (4% cf. 1%, p = 0.02) and bearing dislocations (20% cf. 10%, p < 0.001) were more common for lateral UKA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: OA progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocation were the three main revision indications for lateral UKA. Compared to medial UKA, OA progression, malalignment, instability and bearing dislocations were more common revision indications for lateral UKA. Higher survivorship of metal-backed fixed-bearing implants was found. The findings suggest that the outcomes of lateral UKA may be improved with more optimal alignment, gap balancing and patient selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III systematic review.