Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 6(2): 415-21, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10690518

ABSTRACT

Emerging evidence suggests that apoptosis is an important mechanism of tumor cell death from antineoplastic therapy. 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) is a novel protein kinase inhibitor that increases chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in vitro and is in early phases of clinical development. In this report, we present a 68-year-old patient with chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma treated with UCN-01 and chemotherapy. He had a stage IV plasmacytoid lymphoma that failed to enter remission with high-dose EPOCH II (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) chemotherapy. Due to disease progression and transformation to large cell lymphoma in the liver and bone marrow, he received UCN-01. Four weeks later, he received "standard-dose" EPOCH because of progression, developed severe neutropenia for 9 days, and expired from Candida sepsis on day 23. At autopsy, there was no histological evidence of residual lymphoma, although PCR for immunoglobulin gene rearrangement analysis revealed a faint clonal band in two of six nodes but none in the liver. Significantly, no B cells were detected by immunohistochemistry in lymph nodes, and a polyclonal ladder pattern associated with the presence of normal B cells was not seen in the immunoglobulin gene rearrangement PCR assay. Profound peripheral lymphopenia (50 cells/microliter) was also observed. Pharmacokinetics showed UCN-01 salivary concentrations, a surrogate for free drug concentrations, to be within an effective range in vitro (45 nmol/L) as a modulator of DNA-damaging agent cytotoxicity. In vitro, UCN-01 is synergistic with multiple cytotoxic agents and increases fludarabine-induced apoptosis in a human breast cell line. These results suggest that UCN-01 sensitized the lymphoma to the cytotoxic effects of EPOCH, possibly by modulating the "threshold" for apoptosis, and may illustrate a new paradigm for reversal of drug resistance.


Subject(s)
Alkaloids/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Protein Kinase C/antagonists & inhibitors , Aged , Alkaloids/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , B-Lymphocytes/drug effects , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphoma, B-Cell/immunology , Lymphoma, B-Cell/pathology , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Staurosporine/analogs & derivatives , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tissue Distribution
3.
J Virol ; 73(12): 10514-8, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10559370

ABSTRACT

Using real-time fluorescence PCR, we quantitated the numbers of copies of latent varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and type 2 (HSV-2) genomes in 15 human trigeminal ganglia. Eight (53%) and 1 (7%) of 15 ganglia were PCR positive for HSV-1 or -2 glycoprotein G genes, with means of 2,902 +/- 1,082 (standard error of the mean) or 109 genomes/10(5) cells, respectively. Eleven of 14 (79%) to 13 of 15 (87%) of the ganglia were PCR positive for VZV gene 29, 31, or 62. Pooling of the results for the three VZV genes yielded a mean of 258 +/- 38 genomes/10(5) ganglion cells. These levels of latent viral genome loads have implications for virus distribution in and reactivation from human sensory ganglia.


Subject(s)
Genome, Viral , Herpesvirus 1, Human/isolation & purification , Herpesvirus 2, Human/isolation & purification , Herpesvirus 3, Human/isolation & purification , Trigeminal Ganglion/virology , Virus Latency , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chickenpox/pathology , Chickenpox/virology , DNA, Viral , Female , Herpes Genitalis/pathology , Herpes Genitalis/virology , Herpes Simplex/pathology , Herpes Simplex/virology , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Herpesvirus 2, Human/genetics , Herpesvirus 3, Human/genetics , Humans , Immediate-Early Proteins/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Trans-Activators/genetics , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Viral Load
4.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 87(17): 1316-22, 1995 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7544834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical benefit that may be associated with reduction of tumor volume, chemotherapy may produce physical or psychological distress that could compromise a patient's quality of life. Although palliation may be as relevant as tumor response in patients with metastatic breast cancer, quality of life is not commonly evaluated in phase II clinical trials of new therapeutic agents. PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of quality-of-life assessment in two phase II clinical trials of patients receiving paclitaxel (Taxol) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A battery of instruments (i.e., Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale [MSAS], Functional Living Index-Cancer [FLIC], Rand Mental Health Inventory [MHI], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], and Memorial Pain Assessment Card [MPAC]) designed to capture information about social, psychological, and functional aspects of quality of life, as well as symptom prevalence and distress, was completed prior to treatment; serial assessments were obtained at regular intervals during the treatment period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed evaluating base-line quality-of-life parameters and standard prognostic factors in relation to outcome measures of survival, tumor response, and toxicity. For 30 consecutive patients with extensive prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, longitudinal data were analyzed associating tumor response to changes in quality-of-life scores throughout the course of treatment with paclitaxel. RESULTS: Base-line scores of two validated quality-of-life instruments, the MSAS and the FLIC, independently predicted the overall survival (P < .01 for each). In this model, however, neither standard prognostic factors nor quality of life instruments predicted the likelihood of tumor response or the probability of encountering grade 3 or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. With serial assessments of quality of life, the majority of patients who achieved partial tumor response or stable disease reported improved or unchanged quality-of-life scores, while those patients with progressive disease experienced rapid deterioration in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Base-line quality-of-life assessment may provide prognostic information distinct from that obtained through standard prognostic indicators alone. The combination of two factors--extent of disease and a base-line quality-of-life assessment--predicted survival more accurately than either used separately. Evaluation of quality-of-life outcomes in relation to tumor response may illuminate previously unmeasured palliative effects of chemotherapy, such as pain relief, as well as the burdens it imposes. IMPLICATIONS: Information obtained from quality-of-life assessment in conjunction with phase II testing of new chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic breast cancer can guide quality-of-life evaluation planned in large, randomized future studies.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL